Hunter Biden to be charged with lying to obtain a gun , and income tax evasion?

[888theGreat]

He will be found guilty and not pardoned by his dad

He will be found guilty and his crooked father will pardon him

He will be found innocent because his dad is President

Updates

+1 y

I can't wait until the argument is that they can't prosecute him because his computer will put National Security and top secrets in jeopardy , when his pappy said his son had nothing to do with Government. So that would be impeachable right there. No doubt one way or the other Biden will be impeached and the witch Harris will pardon him the next day.

[exitseven]

He will be charged but the hand picked AG will not indict him. Or else if it happens after the Republicans take over congress he will turn up in a hotel stone cold dead with the spike sticking out of his arm before he could take a deal.

[joeldalton]

Nope. The corrupt FBI will never investigate one of its own.

[UCrayCray]

Hunter Biden is an FBI agent?

[joeldalton]

@UCrayCray a member of the deep state

[UCrayCray]

[joeldalton]

@UCrayCray you’re right. Absolutely everything is legit about a crackhead son of a lifelong politician/Vice President being a board member on an energy company in one of the most corrupt countries in the world who moonlights as an artist whose artwork sells for hundreds of thousands of dollars. Silly me.

[UCrayCray]

“Silly me”
Ahh well…. admitting it is the first step. 👍

[joeldalton]

@UCrayCray yup, you know the truth. Let me guess, you still think the laptop is fake news.

[UCrayCray]

@joeldalton
I don’t know. Neither do you. The difference is, I don’t fill in the gaps with leaps of faith and fanciful thinking.
I wasn’t talking about that anyway. Judge Judy was unimpressed with your “deep state” reference.
I just don’t believe in a world-wide coordinated effort to “get Trump,” or turn us into a completely socialist country. Or to turn your sons into daughters. Or whatever the conspiracy is today. 🤷‍♀️

[joeldalton]

@UCrayCray ok, You don't believe there was a conspiracy to get trump. I get it. There wasn't an admission from Jeff Zuckerburg that the FBI pressured him to hide stories about Hunter's laptop on FB. That's totally wildly made up. Twitter never banned people fro posting the NEW YORK POST'S article about hunter's laptop. That's complete silliness. There wasn't an article in Time Magazine that stated that media and tech worked together to keep Trump out of office. Never happened. Google's never admitted that they have proven they can sway voters by hiding and curating what's in your search results. That's just pure wild speculation. All completely crazy stuff, right?

[UCrayCray]

“You don't believe there was a conspiracy to get trump.” I think there were many people who knew what he was really like, and knew he was incapable of holding Presidential power. They weren’t wrong, but that’s another debate.
I think the media was correct in not reporting, what appeared to be, the Republicans October surprise. That’s their fault for holding onto it until a time they thought it would make the biggest splash. They were hoping that it would have the same effect that Comey’s bullshit announcement had against Hillary days before the 2016 election. No time to vet the information, which was by design of course, so they didn’t report it. Honestly, I wish that was standard in the media. This “I heard from a guy, who heard from a guy” brand of reporting is a strong contributor to the societal division we see today.
If not reporting it is the media’s attempt to keep Trump out if office, would that mean reporting it would be an attempt to keep Trump in office? 🤔
Because either one would sway voters.

[joeldalton]

@UCrayCray Oh, so now it WAS a conspiracy, but ok because it got "your guy" elected. Got it.

[UCrayCray]

Comprehension isn’t your strong suit, is it?

[joeldalton]

@UCrayCray lol, you admitted that you're fine with a violation of the 1st amendment to keep Trump out of office. You lost any high ground at that point.

[UCrayCray]

So your position is that the media should report everything ever said because to do otherwise is a violation of the first amendment? (Refer to Judge Judy gif.) How is not reporting something questionable and unverified a conspiracy? Do you have any idea how stupid that is? Yeah, you probably don’t. If it doesn’t work in favor of the right, it’s a conspiracy.
You are free to say whatever you want to say. Not being provided a platform isn’t a violation of your free speech. Sorry
My friend, you can’t even see the high ground.

[joeldalton]

@UCrayCray wait a minute. The media - in this case, the New York Post, the 2nd oldest newspaper in America - published the story of Hunter's laptop. Then the tech companies banned people who posted the NYP link based on pressure from the FBI. That, my dear, is a conspiracy. The reporting was already done. The violation of the first amendment is the government coercing tech companies to prevent me from speaking about a news story.

Once again, everything I typed that you dismiss as a "conspiracy theory" is 100% true and verified. You just are ok with it because orange man bad.

[888theGreat]

@UCrayCray I do , I saw what was on it. HE BROKE THE LAW and the evidence is all there in video format because the crack head video taped himself using drugs , buying drugs and had sex with prostitutes. He is nude and pro made him cum by using her feet.

[UCrayCray]

@joeldalton
“You just are ok with it because orange man bad.” This is your starting point for anybody and everybody who disagrees with you.
“You hate Trump, you big Trump hater,” then you build everything else from there. 🤷‍♀️
Tell me something. Do you believe everybody should have a right to the platforms of others to spread anything they want? Regardless of truthfulness, accuracy, or fact?
Is shouting fire in a theatre free speech to you?

[UCrayCray]

@888thegreat
You saw what 888? The contents of the laptop? Or a copy of the hard drive that was in
Giuliani‘s hands for a while before anybody saw it? How likely is it that you would believe they found the ever elusive Trump pee tape, if you found out it was in Nancy Pelosi’s possession for a while before its release? You’d jump all over it and believe it true?
Of course you wouldn’t. You would dismiss it the moment the words hit your ears.
Only accepting facts that confirm your preconceived notions isn’t really a reliable way to determine facts. At 53, how do you not know that?

[888theGreat]

@UCrayCray It was natural unedited Biden . There are no tapes of Trump. Democrats lies were that just lies. There has never been proof of anything about Trump. We are told there is but Democrats never show anything. Just talk by a bunch of Socialists

[UCrayCray]

“It was natural unedited Biden” Did you examine the actual laptop when you came to that conclusion? Or did you only access the copy of the hard drive?
“There are no tapes of Trump.”
But what if one materialized? What if it materialized and it turned out it was Pelosi who had it? Would you believe it?
Not a chance.
“There has never been proof of anything about Trump” I know. His claims are mostly bullshit.

[888theGreat]

@UCrayCray Again , there is no tapes of Trump or important files. That was , lies like all the rest. Now FBI says there are more. There were none there and there are none anywhere else.

[UCrayCray]

Lmao. See. You prove my point. If it were to come out that a video did exist, you have already dismissed it. That’s exactly what Im talking about.
I bet you’d believe a video of Joe Biden and the apparent assault of Tara Reade if someone told it existed.
Hell, you’d be posting about it before even seeing the proof of it’s existence for yourself, you’d be so excited.
You know it, and I know it.

[joeldalton]

@UCrayCray do you think a major newspaper should have been censored on Twitter and Facebook? Simple question.

[Surely]

They can not convict him. Because the money will probably lead back to daddy!
He will plead guilty to a stupid lesser charge and still have taxpayers footing the bill for his security detail. But then prison would be the best security for him!

[Guy13]

“What Computer 💻 “. these hateful Republicans and their fantasies 🤷🏻‍♂️…..

[Sabretooth]

how long do they intend to behave like horses?

[Guy13]

@Sabretooth Jackasses and their followers are not known for thinking reasoning and being able to move outside of a path when it is obvious there is Trouble... when the government runs out of money and the economy and Nation crashes.

[Sabretooth]

seems like they would rather this country burn than their dominance.

[TroyDT2]

Doubtful. The Establishment lets its own slide. If he were an outsider, either D or R, he would already be behind bars.

[anylolone]

Investigations will be blocked by the DOJ because of his crooked dad handlers.

[Summeroflove]

He smoke crack til his teef fell out

[msc545]

Maybe and maybe not. Wait and see.

[Fuentes]

Yeah he won't be messed with I think

[Sabretooth]

Looking at either B or C.