Maybe now people will learn to not be so gullible.
No, they probably won't
@Agape93 they did bann a vaccine
"FDA bans vaccines"
"the FDA banns the covid 19 in the US, yet they would not let anyone go anywhere inside without it. But today they just banned it? So what was the point. What do you think about this? "
You're inconsistent and misleading. They just stopped using one because they had a new version. There were no plural vaccine bans as you stated, they just discontinued it and no longer allow its use. Do you claim the FDA bans vaccines every time a new vaccine comes out? No, because you're just here to shitpost.
@Agape93 they still banned it.
@Agape93 so then we agree they still banned one? Yes?
No, I've never seen those pictures and I have no idea what they're pictures of. I haven't had t. v. or a newspaper for 2.5 years and I wouldn't trust them even if I did have them. The only bits I'd read in the paper is the obits and the comics and the only things I'd watch on t. v. are re-runs from the `60's and maybe a game show or two.
@In_Trance Are those nurses twerking? I don't understand. What's going on there?
They did no such thing. Please stop spreading rumors.
twitter.com/.../1648315663939715072
Proof is in the pudding ^
Asker, it is the original vaccine that is not authorized because they have a new version. This has been in the news all over the world. You are spreading misinformation. Even your own link states:
"BIVALENT vaccines are authorized" which is the new version that protects agains more variants.
www.fda.gov/.../coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-authorizes-changes-simplify-use-bivalent-mrna-covid-19-vaccines
You're right. Proof is in the pudding. What I said is true. Either you didn't read the article, or you didn't understand it.
It got eerily quiet when the asker outed himself as spreading lies with his own link.
@PrettyPriya
Nothing new here. People have vast resources available on the Internet but don't spend two minutes using it to verify things.
Look at all the people answering this question as if it's true. That's pretty much the norm around here. I guess being gullible is easy. Not being gullible requires a few minutes of time, which apparently is too much to ask.
@PrettyPriya they banned a vaccine regardless
Yes, but you present your post in a way that is meant to mislead people. Why did you not include the image of the tweet you just linked here?
Why did you also not give the information that it is because they were replaced by a better Covid-19 vaccine? Why did you not include a link to the FDA where it says why they no longer are authorizing that particular vaccine.
Oh, right. Because that doesn't fit your narrative. I bet you cannot answer a single question I just asked with a shred of truth.
@SaoirseS unauthorized In the US means banned
@PrettyPriya I did include the image, not my fault your screen doesn't work.
See, I knew you couldn't tell the truth. That image has been cropped. You didn't include the rest of it until you linked the tweet where it blew a giant hole in you lie.
@PrettyPriya you said their wasn't an image but there is an image. I could not put the full thing on here so I gave the link to the full image. Like let's use logic here. Why would I give you a link if I wanted to present my own opinion only. Let's think logically here.
@SaoirseS I think you should look up verbs of the word "unauthorized" then come back to me & tell me I pulled it out of my "anus"
You don't read so well, do you? Here is what I said:
"Why did you not include the image of the tweet you just linked here?"
Nowhere have I suggested you did not include and image. I asked why you couldn't use the image YOU LINKED ON THIS OPINION TO TWITTER and not the cropped one you took to mislead people?
@PrettyPriya You're the one who can't read I clearly said why I could not & for some reason English isn't reaching you. So provide me with a language and I would be happy to accommodate you.
So I answered your first question.
"you said their wasn't an image but there is an image. I could not put the full thing on here so I gave the link to the full image."
And I answered your second question
"Why would I give you a link if I wanted to present my own opinion only. Let's think logically here"
Like I said if you are having a hard time, let me know first language and I would happy to oblige thank God for technology in 2023. I can speak in various languages, just to communicate with others all around the world
@SaoirseS your blocked from my post now, since your upset they banned a vaccine.
@SaoirseS
@SaoirseS I am asking you to stop spamming & harassing me, warning number two.
Asker, you know darn well what you meant with this question. Now you are trying to pretend that you said something different than you really said. You just want to play games with words.
Vaccine A
Vaccine A+B
Requiring B to be administered along with A is not a ban on A.
"None of you provided me links with a counter just your own opinions "
Because I expect people to spend two minutes looking it up, which is what I did before posting. It wasn't just my opinion.
I admit that I can be stubborn and intentionally not post links. But your question should have raised a major red flag for anyone reading it. It should immediately trigger verification. People need to take responsibility for understanding the world around them, without someone else holding their hand the entire time.
@WindAtMyBack Well said.
@SaoirseS no your name calling & spamming me which is harassment in the TOS. Just because you don't agree with something doesn't mean you can spam and harass on here. You might wanna read up on the TOS and see you're breaking rules here.
Also no unauthorized is another word for banned. If you don't beleive me Google it. Verb, Synonyms And Antonyms. It is a thing, and you can't harass me for it.
That's your opinion to tell me what I "darn well meant" a vaccine was still banned.
u You’re violating the TOS by trolling. @WindAtMyBack clearly explained the difference.
@Agape93 she is calling me names
@SaoirseS you can't give me an opinion you have and accuse me of "trolling" and call me names because you don't agree with me or my thought process. That's abuse
@Agape93 she called me a troll - that is a name call and then she spammed me multiple times you will not control ny GaG experiance. Just because you have a "M" in your profile. You're not above breaking rules and harassing users. I can remove any post I feel is harassment and spamming to me. Theirs nothing in GaG's tos that says I can not do that to protect myself from abuse.
That's not name calling, its what you are because that's what you are doing.
Also, she is not spamming you nor harassing you. But whilst you can remove comments, doing so excessively also falls under trolling, which is NOT allowed. I told you to stop trolling, and you will stop or you will face the consequences of breaking the rules.
No one is abusing you. It is a debate, which is the point of the site. By removing and censoring one person simply because their opinion is not what you want to hear is considered trolling.
Now, before you say that is not trolling and does not violate TOS, just know that 'trolling' is not defined in the rules. However, as a moderator, I will take action if someone is removing opinions or replies in a volume that shows they cannot have a civil discussion. Fair?
@PrettyPriya debates end when you call names and start spamming - is in the TOS that isn't allowed. Turning around and calling me a troll in what you call a "debate" doesn't make sense because hiw can we debate if you're calling me a troll. Let's use logic here. So you admit she was calling me names and @Agape93 says I'm a troll too but you're telling g me it's a debate that is abuse and that isn't a civil discussion and you know it.
Do not call others names. You all think because you have alphabetical letters in your names you can call names and then call it a debate. So If I feel harassed by @saoirses I can and will block her, I also will remove any harassing & spam comments made by that user.
Nowhere in this thread has anyone called you a name (troll). Users have said that they believe you are trolling or 'People who troll usually get called out for trolling', which is also not calling anyone a name but rather stating that they believe you are in violation of trolling.
Now, if someone called you a troll and you removed it, that shows you right there what a bad idea removing peoples opinions and replies are because now I cannot see that. So, to me, you would be in violation of trolling for removing an excessive amount of opinions or replies that had no reason being removed or part of a debate.
Don't lecture me on the rules. I am quite clear on what they are.
@PrettyPriya she called me a troll but I screenshotted it and removed and reported her opinions of each time she called me a troll. So there is that and I will be sending it into GaG and clearly you need to be reminded of the rules because you think you tell me to allow others users to harass me and think the under case letters in your name means your above them. But you're not above the rules because you're a volunteer. So yes I can lecture you and give you a reminder to please follow them and respect others users. Although you didn't do the name calling doesn't mean those you're here with did not.
@PrettyPriya i reserve all rights to remove all nasty and harassing and spamming opinions. It's in the TOS and if GaG takes a look each comment removed was name calling and nasty and non sense.
No, I do not need to be reminded, nor lectured. My account is also monitored by admins. Also, as I just stated, there is your problem with removing posts. I simply cannot see them now and therefore have only what is here to go on.
You have basically just admitted to sabotaging yourself. If I would have seen comments that violated, I might have a different view. However, removing them from moderators to see is exactly what you have done so I am only left on the visible evidence that I have.
I am no longer going to respond to this thread as it is a pointless debate. I will do what I am asked to do as a site moderator if I see it.
@PrettyPriya no because you're not the admins I refuse to use you for help because @saoirses is your friend and that shows pure bias. Therefore all reports will be going to GaG directly and not through you. I am allowed to message GaG with any mishaps with the mod team. I do not at any time have to speak with you first about it. Others will see this & agree.
Interesting, because Saoirse isn't my friend, but you didn't come to me either. So what bias would I have had?
Sure you're entitled to go to them if you wish, but with thousands of reports daily, do you really think they'll care someone called you out for trolling behavior? No, they'll focus more on your trolling behavior. And yes, they can see it and every post you remove.
@Agape93 calling me names spamming and now gaslighting me telling me "do u think GaG will care" nice one just nice also screenshotted. For telling me to take harassment and accept it and go ahead and report it cause GaG won't cae and you can do anything you want unchecked because you think someone you disagree with or may not be smarter then you is a troll so you have the rights to abuse them. That's bad behaviour.
@Agape93 that's your opinion and your opinion doesn't beat facts that I have screenshotted and will be sent in directly to GaG.
Nobody called you a name and nobody spammed you. Saying you're breaking the rule of trolling is not name calling, spamming or gaslighting.
Go ahead, that's fine, admin can see this anyways. But like I said, you are entitled to send them whatever you wish, but I did warn that it might not go how you want. That's not a threat, that's a reality of how things go on here.
Yeah we disagreed, cool, but thats not why I'm here right now. I'm here addressing your conduct and rule breaking.
@Agape93 yeah you don't make up the TOS so i suggest you go read them and touch up on them because you're doing is gas lighting at this point. I will remove and delete any nasty & harassing comments and you will not tell me I can not do so. Like I said screenshotted and reported and sent Into GaG directly it is my right. And you can't stop that at all.
@SaoirseS yeah? So in your eyes I must tell you I am not trolling even though I said you're name calling for you to not call. me names any further? Yeah that makes perfect sense & is. just abusive behaviour.
@Agape93 yeah I will delete any abusive comment, go ahead and name call me and harass me and watch it get deleted. I think I have enough screenshot if this abusive mod power trip and I will be sending it in. We're done here but if you wanna personally name call and harass and spam me, expect me to go ahead and remove the comment. Be my guest.
@Agape93 they did and it was removed do it again and I will remove any name calling and abusive and derogatory words made agaisnt me.
@Agape93 like I said I am done, but if you wanna be my guest and continue to have your mod friend insult me. I will remove it like I did before.
u Asker there was no denial, directly or indirectly, or even comment from you was there? Now you’re gaslighting and prolonging this discussion needlessly, and pointlessly. I have reported you for trolling. I have also sent @WindAtMyBack an apology for prolonging this thread and blowing up his notifications, and he has been a gentleman about it. I am done with this thread.
@GirlsAskGuys allows mod hits now? points out all their troll accounts. nathan. grow the fuck up petty mob.
None of you are trolling. (At least you weren't in the beginning.) Stop being petty. Can't we just have an adult conversation? Why does it have to devolve into "I'm telling Mommy!"?
Opinion
13Opinion
u You are propagating fake news. Here is the actual FDA announcement:
Just because they can't sell it to our citizens anymore doesn't mean they can't sell it to other people's citizens. Or that OSHA would lift their rules on Covid.
Please note that the U. S Food & Drug Administration has not (BANNED) it however they did (Amend) & (Authorized) instead.
They didn't "ban" COVID-19 vaccines.
They stop authorizing the use of the OLD vaccines but have authorized the use of new ones for the newer variants.
news.yahoo.com/...-vaccine-guidance-203218022.html
Please learn to do due diligence.
The ended the emergency use for the monovalent shots. the bivalent ones are the only ones approved. None of this takes away from the fact that it's inhumane to mandate a shot that doesn't prevent the spread of disease and causes health problems. But a point of clarity is needed.
still waiting for the big sorry from all the karens who called people like me "conspiracy theorists" or "covidiots". man being right sucks ass sometimes.
"Monovalent" just means the vaccine works against only one strain. Bivalent COVID-19 vaccines are still authorized. If you read the entire thread you can see what is really being said.
Umm even your link comes with a statement saying it is inaccurate, and states it is being used differently now, but not banned
I don't know. Follow the money and you will figure out what is really going on.
Its not authorized because the virus has mutated & the original versions are ineffective.
You have heard of reverse image search right? Fakest shit I’ve seen today.
Haven’t heard that, they talking about a newer version on the news yesterday
If only they would.
They did - twitter.com/.../1648315663939715072
The FDA website says, "... This action includes authorizing the current bivalent vaccines (original and omicron BA.4/BA.5 strains) to be used for all doses administered to individuals 6 months of age and older..." Ores not banned.
*It's not banned
Unauthorized in the US = banned
So a vaccine was banned.
"A" vaccine?
Regardless A vaccine was banned.
Many drugs have been banned. You specified the covid 19 vaccines in your v question. I only wish they were banned, but according to the FDA government webpage, they are still being authorized (even for babies).
It says one of them are no longer authorized
It's still authorized, but the Emergency Authorization was removed.
It was rushed and pushed.
LUCKY!!
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
Most Helpful Opinions