Do you agree or disagree with zoos that cage animals for entertainment?

[CAPTAIN-OBVIOUS]

Agree

Disagree

[Alexandrubaschet08]

As long the animals have food, toys, medicine, space and the workers ar take care to clean thous spaces and the animal mabey.

Then i'm more then happy, because Zoo can save some animals if they are taking care of the animal.

My zoo from my home town succed to confort 2 tigers and they made a baby tiger, whitch is rare and hard in captivity. For this kinde of situation i'm moust of the time in favor of Zoo.

In London had been created the first zoo in the world and evolv in a completly diferent way from the beggining till now.

[LiamJHayden]

Depends. Sometimes I think they are cruel in caging free creatures. But older or injured, or taken from an owner and too domesticated to survive in the wild, especially if it is an endangered species, I have no issue with.

[jennifer_bloom]

It depends whether they are well cared for or whether they are being abused. The zoo is preferable to other forms of stimulation like wrestling or sports which injure human beings and not animals.

I think animals are beautiful but I would rather hurt an animal than a human because and that is what people do when they by pay for a wrestling match or acrobatic show.

[Anonymous]

I think the people that agree with this should be locked in a cage and see how long they last.

[CAPTAIN-OBVIOUS]

Yeah I know

[ShesRad80]

its a two sided answer for me in one respect I dont agree with it, but in another way if the animals were injured and rehabilitated and clearly cannot live in the wild anymore its ok. though, if they are well treated and taken care of its a good place to be in the end. a lot of the workers literally animals are their life and it shows with the love and care they provide daily for these animals

[OfMiceandMen]

I disagree with taking a healthy wild animal from its habitat to put on display. If something is unhealthy but otherwise okay and/or it was raised in a zoo from a hatchling, then I am okay with it.

[Iron_Man]

Well somebody in this world has to see live exotic animals not everybody can fly out to Africa but if they have plenty of room in the zoo and they’re not really caged like at zoo Miami, then it’s not bad

[exitseven]

Any zoo I ever went to had nice living facilities for the animals and they appeared to be well fed and well cared for. I bet they are happy to be there instead of living in the jungle where they will be eaten by a bigger animal.

[mb120101]

Cruel in terms of caged zoos but I've been to a sanctuary in Honduras that lets people tour and the monkeys had lots of freedom and space having the time of their lives.

[Rosexøxø]

I think there are better ways to go about this- having people see exotic life and exotic life having longer life-expectancy. I say I disagree with the current methods: caging and poor quality.

[Rosexøxø]

voted disagree

[Molly1997]

If it’s a good zoo and the animals are happy, and they are animals that may not survive in the wild , I don’t see why not.

[WanderingLoveWizard]

I love your brain. It's so sexy

[TomMarks]

I think as long as they are treated well, animals in a zoo are protected from a lot of the dangers they would see in the wild. For example, they cannot be hunted in a zoo.

[Clarkkk]

Zoos don’t cage animals for entertainment purposes. They do so for educational purposes, so people don’t end up wiping out every animal on the planet.

[kevypatyy7]

I disagree because I feel animals have the right to freedom

[Cubus]

Zoos are the reason many animals that were extinct in the wild were reborn, such as żubr. Thanks to the animals that were kept in captive.

[Jackblue]

Yes, it is only unfortunate that we don't have them fight anymore.

[Anonymous]

Yes I do and that's why I hate Zoos.

[SandyKandy]

Agree.