Are you kidding me? Save the cows and take out the politicians, they spew all kinds of garbage into the air via their mouth (worse than cow emissions).
Why don't we sacrifice all the politicians instead? Don't they produce even more methane and other gases than cows, seeing as they're constantly full of shit?
Sscrificing agriculture and food resources for an ideal that will never be achieved is foolish. There is still india, china, us and others that are polluting like hell and this sacrifice will mean nothing. Europe overall is already "green" compared to rest of the pack and further limiting their emissions drastically through replacing vehicles, planning to ban short domestic flights, banning coal mining. Killing cows and destroying agriculture is madness.
It's just a way to ruin food production and replace it by something else. By a strange "coincidence" there is a lot of promotion for insects based food these days.
Nothing good comes from listening to wokes. There should be deeper studies about the sources of pollution in that country, run by non-politically biased people, but objective scientists.
The problem with that is your last few words. There aren't many objective scientists because that isn't how science is funded. Governments expect to get something for their investments of other people's money into science, as do universities.
As long as the food does not go to waste then yes. I don't know why so many people are saying no cows only exist to provide humans with a food and drink source. They are going to get killed anyway so we can enjoy beef.
Have you noticed how it's always the little people having to give up something they can't afford to part with rather than the rich having to give up another luxury? I suppose Macron expects starving commoners to eat cake if they have no bread too. That worked out great for the last person who said that in France.
@Sixgunsound Yes, it's always the same, it's completely ridiculous. He does risk getting his ass beat if he continue doing shit in France is really not a good things..
Unless you can get the 3-4 countries who are the biggest polluters of the environment on board what the rest of us do or don't do won't make a bit of difference.
Better to ask if Brazil should. 200,000 cows per ranch out there, AND Argentina. We usually equate 'food' (waste) mountains to Soviet Russia, but it's clearly a problem for ourselves in the West.
Pay attention to all the food factories catching fire and livestock around the world disappearing. If they cared so much about the climate they'd downsize their own lives first and lead by example. Someone wants to control the food sources
This sounds like a fake story. Normally I'd do my "due diligence" and fact checking but since it's from the Telegraph I'm just going to assume it's a completely made up story.
LoL bullshit Ireland what damage to the environment really US china Russia India all those countries do something might have some chance not bloody Ireland.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
50Opinion
Are you kidding me? Save the cows and take out the politicians, they spew all kinds of garbage into the air via their mouth (worse than cow emissions).
Why don't we sacrifice all the politicians instead? Don't they produce even more methane and other gases than cows, seeing as they're constantly full of shit?
Sscrificing agriculture and food resources for an ideal that will never be achieved is foolish.
There is still india, china, us and others that are polluting like hell and this sacrifice will mean nothing.
Europe overall is already "green" compared to rest of the pack and further limiting their emissions drastically through replacing vehicles, planning to ban short domestic flights, banning coal mining.
Killing cows and destroying agriculture is madness.
Is this one of those greenpeace terrorism types?
Farmers and regular people would suffer the most if it will happen.
I just double checked about that.
Greenpeace in Germany tries to do the opposite of that. Although it's German.
https://act.greenpeace.de/rinder-an-die-luft
Still I call terrorism on these plans (not the German greenpeace trying to get the cows out of "gulag" type barns).
It's just a way to ruin food production and replace it by something else. By a strange "coincidence" there is a lot of promotion for insects based food these days.
Nothing good comes from listening to wokes. There should be deeper studies about the sources of pollution in that country, run by non-politically biased people, but objective scientists.
The problem with that is your last few words. There aren't many objective scientists because that isn't how science is funded. Governments expect to get something for their investments of other people's money into science, as do universities.
where are we going to get milk? from monkeys?
I sense a clandestine market waiting to make a few dairy smugglers rich.
It's all about the money.
And other dairy products
As long as the food does not go to waste then yes. I don't know why so many people are saying no cows only exist to provide humans with a food and drink source. They are going to get killed anyway so we can enjoy beef.
Sorry i forgot to mention the other dairy products we get from them, in fact it might not be such a good idea if we lose a food source.
They want to do the same in France guess it's an European laws and I'm against it, they should forbidden private plane instead of killing cows
Have you noticed how it's always the little people having to give up something they can't afford to part with rather than the rich having to give up another luxury? I suppose Macron expects starving commoners to eat cake if they have no bread too. That worked out great for the last person who said that in France.
@Sixgunsound Yes, it's always the same, it's completely ridiculous. He does risk getting his ass beat if he continue doing shit in France is really not a good things..
I used to fly private aircraft and I realize their utility. "Banning" cows is beyond absurd.
@Sixgunsound True, that is the "golden rule", those with the gold make the rules.
But those with the numbers win long term. Louis XIV and Nicholas II were unavailable for comment.
Unless you can get the 3-4 countries who are the biggest polluters of the environment on board what the rest of us do or don't do won't make a bit of difference.
Better to ask if Brazil should. 200,000 cows per ranch out there, AND Argentina. We usually equate 'food' (waste) mountains to Soviet Russia, but it's clearly a problem for ourselves in the West.
Pay attention to all the food factories catching fire and livestock around the world disappearing. If they cared so much about the climate they'd downsize their own lives first and lead by example. Someone wants to control the food sources
This sounds like a fake story. Normally I'd do my "due diligence" and fact checking but since it's from the Telegraph I'm just going to assume it's a completely made up story.
If it is in the Telegraph then it is bound to be bullshit
They had better kill themselves not the cows.
That so bad for this world. People's are starving and they do that shit
As opposed to just eating them as planned?
Are you really this retarded?
They also for other food sources which they need to be alive to provide.
I'm okay with this as long as hungy humans get to eat them.
LoL bullshit Ireland what damage to the environment really US china Russia India all those countries do something might have some chance not bloody Ireland.
no!! there are clearly better solutions to climate change.
Man made climate change is bull shit. Government is just trying to fuck farmers out of thier land to build cheap housing.