HWhat do you think of Hitler?
- 7.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 ykinda a cute baby? I never read his book but would like to see the cliff notes version. Honestly, very loud and frightening speaker, did not like how he spoke. He was always mad... which mean's he's really sad inside. Don't trust such people...
Traumatized child living out of hate and fear from early life and world war I.
He sure despised Jewish people and blamed them for all his problems... which appear to be, banking related. Oddly, didn't blame German's... even when their tanks were crapola and in front of his eyes, Jessie Owens crushed his best. Thus, he was really pig headed and stuck in his ways... stupid. He demonstrated that stupidity more than once which lead to his quick demise.
If he had gone slowly like China, probably have lots little Hitlers running around.
03 Reply- +1 y
Ever wonder why you don't see English translations of Adolf's speeches? It's because the words he's speaking are animated - no doubt - but are meant to be inspiring for his audience, not angry. It sounds angry because that's just how German sounds.
Also, Jesse Owens said that Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists treated him kindly and congratulated him on his performance but he was snubbed by President Roosevelt and his own American peers back home. Of course, even though Americans despised him, that didn't stop American propagandists from using Owens to spread the idea that he crushed the German National Socialist ideal.
Hitler was by no means perfect, nobody is, but much of what we're told about him these days is just lies and propaganda. - +1 y
Interesting… he did hiwever have a bunch if germans murdered and consolidate power and such. He was nice and hinest with churchill… until he turned amd attacked. Not someone id put on a pedestal and value. But id enjoy a true study in the character from an emotional and psychological and possibly… biological and genetic viewpoint.
- +1 y
That's true that he had some political opponents killed, but that's politics for you. I can't think of a single world leader - good or bad - who doesn't have blood on his hands, especially during a time of revolution.
Churchill was hardly a sympathetic figure. Churchill was an alcoholic who threw his own people into a meat grinder to start an unnecessary war on behalf of international finance. That's ultimately what WW2 came down to. International finance and preserving the new world order vs. Germany's nationalism and protectionism. International finance won and now the world is super gay but at least we aren't speaking German.
Most Helpful Opinions
- 527 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yHe was a brave man and very passionate about his Germany along with its citizens to a nationalistic degree. Also, he was intelligent and charming. I would've liked to have met the guy before WW2 due to how people described meeting him.
However, he was also impulsive/reckless, manipulative, callous, arrogant, spiteful, and he had a lot of problems with addiction (drugs and sexual stuff.) The dude was so fucked up from WW1 and the stress of Russia invading that he was taking a ton of drugs for his anxiety. Plus, I think he made a lot of stupid decisions due to likely being rushed and gradually losing his mental stability.
Of course, I don't know if this is all 100% true, as I never knew the guy or was there even. This is just my POV based on what I've read/watched.00 Reply
- 6.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yNot the nicest guy was he? Probably the type who would join gag and constantly ask moustache questions and scream woke at anyone who disagreed with his politics.
43 Reply- +1 y
Yepp - his type is still around :)
- +1 y
@andreasderjuengere Oh, hell, yes.
324 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. what kind of question is this 😭😭 obviously he was a fucking awful nazi blight on humanity
36 Reply
Asker+1 yWhere are you from 😂
Asker+1 yAlright..
- +1 y
He did good things for Germany too though
- +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill jesus christ
- +1 y
Read about him some more. Its true
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
27Opinion
- 10.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yone compliments: charismatic
otherwise he was basically the devil incarnate
10 Reply
+1 yI'm surprised this is a question. Hitler was by any standards among the worst humans to have ever lived. He was responsible for the genocide of millions and a war of aggression that killed tens of millions. Within his country there was a regime of terror and secret police.
He committed those horrors - and LOST. Despite being willing to do "whatever it took", to lead is race of ubermen to world domination, he and his Nazi party utterly failed.
Julius Cesar forged an empire that lasted centuries. So did Qin Shi Huang. Even Genghis Khan's empire lasted a while. At least there gain for the evils that they did. Hitler and Germany accomplished nothing.
I remember decades ago going to a military air show in Berlin. I remember the people - children and grand children of the WW2 Germans, cheering as American warplanes flew overhead. Made me smile.
20 Reply- 5.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yTo quote my favorite hidden camera show, "Hitler was a bad dude, but not all of his ideas were bad."
I think it's a bit stupid that Slavs didn't fall under his "master race" theory. However, I do like that he wanted to bring back extinct wildlife and plants, and restore the ecosystem to how it was in the past. And sort of return Europeans to their old roots. And of course he built the autobahn and instituted a lot of social and welfare programs.
His vision was poorly executed, to say the least, and he was a hypocrite in many aspects.
00 Reply 1.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. He was a lunatic, that took his country to war, and got the male population of Germany decimated in the process, murdered millions of innocents, caused billions of dollars damages to London, and turned most of the free world against Germany. Sad the lunatic was ever given life.
23 Reply
Asker+1 yI still don't understand how he got enough army to rule so much place..
- +1 y
As a born German I object: it wasn't ''his'' country. Austrians only share the language (partly, that is). Historically, they had been a different nation before and after.
- +1 y
If you ever watch some of the 'History Chanel, they sometimes have film showing how Hitler had his youth movement and was 'recruiting' young men that were probably younger than high school, and he had bullshitted them into becoming supporters for his "world domination' viewpoint. I guess he got support for the war with that kind of ploy toward young Germans.
- 541 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yGreat artist. I support His anti-smoking views, Volkswagen, Sir Charlie Chaplin moustache, vegetarianism, against Capitalism view, and such. I am against His idea of holocausting Blacks, Roma, dis-abled, several nationalities, Jews, &c and His vengeful ideas of wanting to fight the world because Austria lost the ‘War to End All Wars.’
160 Reply- +1 y
“and His vengeful ideas of wanting to fight the world”.
But it makes perfect sense though. The policies of reperations imposed on Germany after the war contributed to its dire economic situation.
How can you blame them for wanting vengeance? - +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill That would be justifiable, how about the Holocaust? Innocent people killed for their religion.
- +1 y
- +1 y
- +1 y
@Naughtygurl66: Yep, there still are Nazis, including on GAG
- +1 y
@Naughtygurl66 I didn’t say that
- +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill Bullshit, and it wasn't just bankers they scapegoated and murdered.
The fact that you think that the murder of millions of innocent people is something you can separate from other things Hitler did is monstrous. - +1 y
- +1 y
- +1 y
Assess*
- +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill Of course you're a bloody Nazi, you're justifying genocide based on lies about an entire religious group.
- +1 y
- +1 y
I don’t think genocide was the appropriate response, but regardless you’d be a fool to think they played no part in the dire economic situation
- +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill You're totally justifying his actions: "they weren’t really “innocent people” after all" you said, because you're a Nazi. You were talking about millions of people who were killed. Normal people, working normal jobs, keeping homes, going to SCHOOL, and some not even that old, you monstrous asshole.
- +1 y
- +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill You weren't, Nazi. You responded with:
" @goaded Except they weren’t really “innocent people” after all is the thing though. Were they?
You’d be naive to believe so "
to my:
" @WhiteBoyChill Bullshit, and it wasn't just bankers they scapegoated and murdered.
The fact that you think that the murder of millions of innocent people is something you can separate from other things Hitler did is monstrous. "
You were talking about millions of people who were killed. Normal people, working normal jobs, keeping homes, going to SCHOOL, and some not even that old, you monstrous asshole.
MAYBE you misread what I said, but if you had, you'd be apologising for it, not doubling down. - +1 y
@goaded Again, just because Hitler did some bad things doesn’t mean he wasn’t a good leader for Germany at the time.
Can you imagine how much worse off things would’ve gotten if they just continued with the status quo? Hitler was the only one willing to challenge it. Paul Hinderberg refused to do anything. He just sat there and let millions of other ordinary Germans suffer through the Depression - +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill "some bad things"? You were talking about millions of people who were killed. Normal people, working normal jobs, keeping homes, going to SCHOOL, and some not even that old, some not even born. This is why I will continue to point out that you're a Nazi. You're beyond the point of apologies or excuses being able to absolve you.
Hitler also invaded other countries, leading to a war that decimated the German people. That's also not the action of a "good leader". - +1 y
@goaded Well yes. I oppose Nazi racial ideology on the lense that I myself am not considered racially pure enough under Hitler’s own definition. I have East Slavic heritage, and so I would have eventually been on his chopping block as well.
It is good that the allies were able to stop him when they did, but regardless most jews at the time did support the corrupt politicians and charge, and they also disproportionately represented government at the time and fought for not the national interest of the German people, but their own personal interests.
So it is incorrect to call me a Nazi, as I do not believe in racial purity and Nazi ideology itself. I am merely just an anti-semite - +1 y
@goaded Also you fail to realize that the German war effort restored respect abroad for the German state. Nations realized that they could no longer just walk all over Germany without expecting retaliation.
Thankfully largely up until this point, the nations of Europe have largely been peaceable amongst eachother, with exceptions like the Yugoslav wars and the current Ukraine conflict. - +1 y
"I am merely just an anti-semite" Well fuck you, then. You couldn't get a cigarette paper between you and a Nazi.
You say "most jews at the time did support the corrupt politicians and [in?] charge" as if that's a reason to kill all Jews or all people who support your political opponents, based on lies about them.
In democracies you vote people out, you don't kill people who disagree with you. Nazi. - +1 y
- +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill So you're pretending you're only concerned by the severity (murder) of the punishment for being Jewish or disagreeing with the fascist government, based on the lie that ALL Jews were somehow responsible for something that never even happened, not that it happened. Lying Nazi.
- +1 y
- +1 y
Your government hides the truth. Ever heard of the Allied control council? Your entire history was rewritten to be more favorable to the allies. That was a condition of Germany’s independence after the war.
If they were to reverse the conditions set upon them, there would be a sharp response from the rest of Europe.
Germany is not allowed to speak the truth. And it has also lost the political will to do so.
Its a shame that the coup attempt was unfolded all those months ago.
Your country needs a Fourth Reich sir - +1 y
Your country has been overwhelmed by Islamic immigration and if it keeps course, your European identity will all but be lost under the guise of multiculturalism.
It doesn’t take a Nazi to understand that. It takes a patriot to understand that the identity and culture of a nation’s people must be preserved at all costs - +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill Why do you keep answering with two posts? To hide the worse first one, Nazi?
"they were responsible tho."
Define "they", Nazi. You mean all Jews, ignoring the fact that bankers were a tiny fraction of them and the Nazis were lying about them.
"Your country needs a Fourth Reich sir " NAZI. - +1 y
- +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill You are lying. You proudly claim to be an anti-Semite, don't care than millions of innocent people of all ages, including babies, were slaughtered in the Holocaust, and suggest that they were all guilty of crimes that the Nazi regime lied about Jewish bankers. You're a Nazi. No doubt.
"they were responsible tho."
Define "they", Nazi. You mean all Jews, ignoring the fact that bankers were a tiny fraction of them and the Nazis were lying about them. - +1 y
- +1 y
- +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill There were Jewish Nazis, British Nazis, Black Nazis. You're an admitted anti-Semite who has said that millions of Jews "weren’t really “innocent people”". You're a Nazi, and a disgusting monster, but I repeat myself.
Asker+1 y@WhiteBoyChill "What do you mean when you say your country is suffocating with Islamic immigration?
- +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill Oh, look, you replied twice again, with the ever so slightly less obnoxious post second.
"Jews did extensively support the corruption present in Germany at the time."
In a democracy, which it was, why do you think that was a problem, even if you're telling the truth about corruption, which you're probably not?
You don't get to exterminate the opposition party or their supporters. - +1 y
- +1 y
- +1 y
Also I am curious about those black Nazis you mention. That does really interest me.
How do you explain that?
Well, unless you’re referring to Idi Amin in Africa who admired Hitler’s strongman like image - +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill I'm not interesting into discussing anything with a Nazi, I'll just point out the facts.
You proudly claim to be an anti-Semite, don't care than millions of innocent people of all ages, including babies, were slaughtered in the Holocaust, and suggest that they were all guilty of crimes that the Nazi regime lied about Jewish bankers. You're a Nazi. No doubt.
"they were responsible tho."
You refuse to define "they". You obviously mean all Jews, ignoring the fact that bankers were a tiny fraction of them and the Nazis were lying about them.
Asker+1 y@WhiteBoyChill what do you mean when you say that your country is drowning in islamic immigration?
Asker+1 y@goaded What did he mean when he said that your country is drowning in Islamic immigration?
- +1 y
The fact that Germany accepted millions of refugees from Syria over the years of Angela Merkle. Which unsurprisingly lead to a sharp rise in crime.
Also, why the f*ck do you care? - +1 y
- +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill I'm not the one brainwashed, Nazi. I'll just point out the facts.
You proudly claim to be an anti-Semite, don't care than millions of innocent people of all ages, including babies, were slaughtered in the Holocaust, and suggest that they were all guilty of crimes that the Nazi regime lied about Jewish bankers. You're a Nazi. No doubt.
"they were responsible tho."
You refuse to define "they". You obviously mean all Jews, ignoring the fact that bankers were a tiny fraction of them and the Nazis were lying about them. - +1 y
- +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill Nope, you're as wrong on that as you are about everything else. You're a Nazi because you're an anti-Semite (you said so yourself), and you think the Jews were "not innocent", ditto. You deserve to die in a fire, you monstrous asshole.
Reminder: You proudly claim to be an anti-Semite, don't care than millions of innocent people of all ages, including babies, were slaughtered in the Holocaust, and suggest that they were all guilty of crimes that the Nazi regime lied about Jewish bankers. You're a Nazi. No doubt.
"they were responsible tho."
You refuse to define "they". You obviously mean all Jews, ignoring the fact that bankers were a tiny fraction of them and the Nazis were lying about them. - +1 y
Asker+1 y@WhiteBoyChill You told me why do you care?
- +1 y
I was talking to the other guy. He’s trying to make me feel bad about being a “Nazi” even though I am not one
Asker+1 y@WhiteBoyChill When are you planning to answer my question?
- +1 y
I already did
Asker+1 y@WhiteBoyChill You didn't, why did you say that your country is drowning in Islamic immigration, can you explain it to me? What do you say about Europe?
- +1 y
Read above
- +1 y
If you can’t find what I wrote, then you’ve got an issue. But I’m done taking questions from you
Asker+1 y@WhiteBoyChill You have tons of articles, can you please write now or are you talking nonsense?
- +1 y
For some reason, he's blocked me for Why wouldn't you call someone who glorifies Hitler and says he was right to blame all the Jews a Nazi? ↗
- +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill a man for a man would make the human race extinct. We’re lucky to have many peaceniks around!
- +1 y
- +1 y
The whole thing was a farce: claim the "Jewish bankers" are the problem, then kill every person of Jewish descent, even if they owe money to the same banks. All to make the in-group feel good about themselves and support him. It feels familiar (they can't go for gay people any more, so they've picked another group, but the Jews are still in the cross-hairs).
- 789 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yI'm gonna say it: despite the many atrocities, like the labour camps, genocide and war, they had some pretty good organizations and they were great city planners. In school we were shown a masterplan of how Germany would have been reformed, with a much better public transit, a perfect street network, public facilities etc
01 Reply - 1.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yI read the Yelp reviews and I didn't believe them at first, but that guy is every bit the Negative Nancy they say he is.
2/10; do not recommend.
20 Reply - 6.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yHis example still makes me suspicious whenever I meet an Austrian.
In his ''Mein Kampf'' he announced early and visibly how he's going to fool Germany;
but finally he fooled himself, too.
10 Reply
+1 yi dont, thinking gives him more than he deserves
20 Reply870 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. he was an evil dude who tried to genocide jews, romanis, polish people, etc
20 Reply- 963 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yThe worst tyrant at least in modern times, probably of all time, with his hatred of minorities and those he perceived to be weaker, with his genocide against Jews, disabled and Romanies.
20 Reply 18.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Great guy with a bad 12 year patch. I wish everyone would look at his good sides for once.
(Thinking…)
He was vegetarian. Though it made him fart constantly. So much he had teams of doctors following him around. So much for master Aryans. Lol10 Reply
Anonymous(25-29)+1 yA madman who has thankfully been dead for a long time.
30 Reply
+1 yWhoever is downvoting all of these replies is a racist piece of garbage.
10 Reply- 1.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 ySome good, and some bad about him.
The good: Founded Volkswagen, Built highways, ended the depression, made Germany Great Again.
The bad: started a needless and pointless war which he ultimately lost. Persecuted Christians.
026 Reply
Asker+1 yyou are right
- +1 y
Yessir. And controversial take here but the Holocaust is exaggerated and not really that big a deal.
Its more so just the commitment to state atheism that turns me off - +1 y
- +1 y
- +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill Yes it is such a exaggeration and not a big deal, dozens of millions were needlessly executed just for the crime of being who they were. You will note the sarcasm, you seriously need to get a grip and a education mate
- +1 y
- +1 y
- +1 y
- +1 y
Asker+1 yOK, don't argue anymore.
- +1 y
Why I might call someone a Nazi. ↗ (any responses here, not there, it's years old).
- +1 y
- +1 y
@goaded Regardless, as I’ve said before, the Nazi grievances were legitimate, however I do not share their racial ideology, or believe in Hitler’s “Final solution”. As I said before, I think the Holocaust was a step too far.
Regardless people do not usually take into account that many prisoners died of starvation and diseases because of rampant food shortages and overcrowding.
Camps operated at an individual level. I’ve read the autobiographies of some former Nazis who read the camps.
They explained that in a lot of the cases, they saw the exterminations as an act of mercy for the poor living conditions. - +1 y
*Camps also*
- +1 y
@goaded You have been to feel ashamed of your own history. But the truth is German military and economic might during WW2 was a mighty impressive feat, given that Germany was just recovering from a Depression ten short years earlier.
Germans out to feel proud of their WW2 history. They restored respect for the German state abroad and proved to the world that you cannot f*ck with Germans and expect to walk all over them, without justifiable retaliation.
Now onto the topic of WW1.
Do you think it was fair that Germany was made to pay ALL reparations for WW1, and was the sole country blamed for the conflict? - +1 y
*made to feel*
*ought* - +1 y
A lot of SS officers didn’t even want to kill people, but they were too afraid to refuse orders.
- +1 y
Germany was treated badly at the end of WW1. I won't argue against stating another war because of that - in that part of history, wars were common.
But where does the murder of millions of German citizens fit in, then after invading other countries carrying out ethnic based murder on a vast scale. What possible justification is there for that?
- +1 y
My point is explained in detail in Why I might call someone a Nazi. ↗ You say you're not a Nazi, presumably because you don't want to call yourself that, but you believe and propagate the same lies about Jewish people, think there's nothing wrong with blaming all Jews for the supposed actions of a necessarily tiny fraction of them, nothing wrong with putting them all, including women, children and infants, in death camps where they would die "of starvation and diseases because of rampant food shortages and overcrowding" even if the (hero) soldier guards (who you insist were only following orders) hadn't killed them.
I'm not interested in discussing your supposed excuses for the tens of millions of deaths directly caused by Hitler's actions, just your behaviour in the here and now. - +1 y
- +1 y
You also said that you're an anti-Semite, that the millions of men, women, children, infants and babies killed by the Nazis for nothing other than being Jewish "weren't really "innocent people"", and you've tried to minimise the actions of the people who did it. Not to mention calling Hitler whose actions and orders led to all those deaths and tens of millions of others worldwide (including one in eight of the German population) "a good leader for Germany".
I do read the crap you write, and there's only one conclusion that can possibly be drawn from it.
27.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. He was a bad man. I hope he is roasting on rhe end of a pitchfork
20 Reply
Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 yHe was a monsterous cunt obviously but here is an uncomfortable truth for you; he did more to combat global warming than anyone alive today (probably, certainly more than most).
00 Reply5.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Never met him, and unlikely we would've agreed on much.
00 Reply- 8.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yI think he was just a little confused and misunderstood and just needed some love.
14 Reply- +1 y
- +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill He's a nazi.
- +1 y
Well yes, he’s a leftie that believes in censorship
- +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill I rest my case!
Anonymous(18-24)+1 yGreat painter, amazing at holding speaches.
Had minus human level and is most likely burning in hell..
10 Reply
Anonymous(25-29)+1 yA man whose is rightfully hated by the overwhelming majority of people but a small but powerful minority tends to use his methods of tyranny to make sure people like him never come back, thus defeating the entire point of such an effort.
05 Reply
Asker+1 yThe truth is that Hitler was a genius but they succumbed to their ambitions so they lost
- +1 y
A LOT of people would've supported putting anti-maskers and anti-covid vaxxers into camps. So are Hitlers methods of brainwashing the masses to turn against one another really that obsolete?
Opinion Owner+1 yNo he wasn't. His way of running Germany was not sustainable at all.
He is a moron if he thinks he can run a country where all of his dissidents were slaughtered.
Opinion Owner+1 y@asker
Opinion Owner+1 y@JoeMichael67 Either they don't realize this was his method or know it and don't care.
- 1.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yI don't think he'll bother us again. What do you think of Viktor Orban?
10 Reply
+1 yI personally think he was uncool, I'd also go as far as to say he was awful.
00 Reply
+1 yOne of the evilest human being ever
40 Reply
Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 yHe had really bad PR. But then he and his crew were a bit naughty.
00 Reply- 1.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yWhy is this a question? Obviously one of the worst humans who ever lived.
00 Reply 11.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Just some dead Austrian tyrant
20 Reply- 3.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yI think he is dead
20 Reply 2.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I want to piss on his grave
21 Reply- +1 y
And take a dump to
He's my favorite Austrian painter.
00 Reply12.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. He was a Fascist/Socialist radial.
00 ReplyNot exactly a gentleman
111 Reply- +1 y
He was. Everything he did, he fought for the German national interest. You can question some of his actions, but his intentions were always good.
- +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill I'm curious, if genociding millions of people, and starting wars that killed tens of millions can be done with "good intentions", what do you consider and example of bad intentions.
- +1 y
@richardcory What Joseph Stalin did. Collectivizing farmland under state ownership. It was not intended to “boost production” that was a blatant lie because production vastly dropped
- +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill I'm sure not going to defend Stalin, he killing millions in the Gulags and created an internal reign of terror. OTOH, in contrast to Hitler the USSR did continue to exist for decades after him, rather than being utterly destroyed. Stalin didn't launch a self-destructive war.
Hitler's policies resulted in a brief burst in German productivity, but withing a decade in its total destruction. That result was completely predictable when he declared war on the rest of the world, while committing the sort of atrocities against his own people and against conquered areas that would drive away almost all potential allies.
The Nazis fashioned themselves on ancient Rome (look their banners) but they were nothing like Rome. Rome conquered - but then integrated conquered areas to be part of Rome. Rome was tolerant of other cultures and religions as long as they obeyed Roman authority (until very late as rome was starting to fail when they started persecuting Christians).
Its easy to be fooled by the image of the Nazi supermen, but they not only committed horrendous crimes, they failed. The lost the industrial race, and lost the technological race. All that remains now are people who use Nazi symbols as a fashion statement to get attention.
- +1 y
@richardcory Yes but you have to realize also, it did take the entire world several years to defeat them. While they did have Italy and Romania as allies, they were still responsible for probably 90% of the Axis war effort.
Had some things been done differently, I do believe it is possible Hitler could have won the war and ushered in on world domination - +1 y
@WhiteBoyChill I don't think so. German just didn't have the necessary industrial base. They could probably have held some of western Europe, but the combination of the US and USSR could tremendously outproduce them.
The problem was that their behavior drove most of the world to be their enemies, and a competent leader would have recognized that and limited his grasp to what he could hold.
The US involvement in Europe was somewhat delayed by Japan. That was also a miscalculation, attacking Hawaii was just stupid. But once the US defeated Japan, they would have turned their full might toward Germany and there just was no chance.
Even if they had a military victory, how would the domination win? With their insistence on a "master race" there would have been a tiny number of Germans trying to control the vast population of the world. Their ideology doomed them to failure - +1 y
@goaded Did I suggest that I didn't above? If so, I didn't intend to. Sure someone who glorifies Hitler is at least a Nazi sympathizer.
Still, I'm interested in talking to them. I also know someone who idolizes Stalin. Haven't found a Mao supporter yet but I'm sure they are out there. I find it interesting to see how people who believe these things think
+1 ySlang term for penis.
10 Reply- 899 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yA Legend in my book
00 Reply 4.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Demon possessed megalomaniac
00 Reply
+1 yUhhh, 'tf
10 Reply
What do you think about Hitler?
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News