Are his attorneys stupid like him or they choose to be that stupid and clueless?

[legalboxers]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/eddy-grant-explained-song-electric-015729749.html
Eddy Grant explained his song 'Electric Avenue' to Donald Trump's lawyers in a deposition. It did not go well.

Donald Trump's lawyers asked Eddy Grant to "explain" his 1980s dance hit, "Electric Avenue," a bizarre, newly public deposition transcript shows.

It didn't go well.

The singer-songwriter bristled when asked about the disco-reggae song's meaning, according to the transcript, filed Friday as part of his $300,000 federal copyright lawsuit over the song's use in a 2020 Trump campaign tweet.

"Do I have to?" Grant answered when asked: "So can you please explain what the song is about?"

"We can stay here all day," Grant told two lawyers for Trump, "And I can go round and round with this," Grant continued.

"But the bottom line of it is that — sorry. The bottom line of the song is that it is a protest against social conditions, and then I can pick out the words to — I mean, obviously you've got those words there, I suppose," he told the former president's lawyers.

At this point in the transcript, Grant recites his lyrics: "Now in the street there is violence, and there's lots of work to be done."

Then he interrupted himself, the transcript shows.

"Well," he said. "You know, I could go a long — you know, I mean, do we have to?"

"I don't see the relevance," the artist responded, reasonably enough, when Trump attorney Darren Saunders asked, "Are you knowledgeable on the meaning of the lyrics and title of the composition?"

Grant noted that "Electric Avenue," a common street name worldwide, is also the name of a street in the south London district.

[rigmarole]

They're obviously way smarter than you. They are drawing attention to how socialists exploit the grievances of blacks for revolutionary objectives without regard for their welfare. They instigate race riots and use blacks as cannon fodder. They are showing the patterns of color revolutions across countries so that people that are watching pay attention to patterns in history and those who are causing that chaos. The song is about the 1981 Brixton Riots which can be easily compared to the 2020 George Floyd riots... If you had any worldliness and the smallest amount of education you'd pick up on that.

[rigmarole]

For the slow kids in the class (that would be you legalboxers)... In its most general sense, a fair use is any copying of copyrighted material done for a limited and transformative purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize, or "parody" a copyrighted work. Such uses can be done without permission from the copyright owner. In other words, fair use is a defense against a claim of copyright infringement. If your use qualifies as a fair use, then it would not be considered an infringement.

If you watched the advertisement, the "Biden Train" was playing the electric avenue song. What did Biden do? He exploited the Blacks in a race riot to conduct a color revolution... Ta-da case won... Sleepy Joe's campaign is an imitation and comment on the subject and the video is mocking the communists subject. I know you're working with limited brain cells, but this is all pretty common sense.

[rigmarole]

But we could go deeper with its meaning... Who funded the 2020 George Floyd riots? George Soros... Who funded the 1981 Brixton Riots? Was it again George Soros as part of his plot to break the Bank oif England in 1992? Plans take time to execute... Some of us have read this story before...

[legalboxers]

@rigmarole Tell me how did your 1/6 stunt go? Who paid for the wall? and who got locked up?

Your specal education bus is waiting for you

[GoodGuyBreakingBad]

Trump, doesn't know whether he's coming or going.

[GoodGuyBreakingBad]

Thanks for MHO :)