Should alleged rapists be able to sue their accusers for defamation?

No. Malicious prosecution should be a criminal matter. If they can prove the accuser made it up beyond a reasonable doubt, then the accuser should go to prison. But proving it based only on a preponderance of the evidence when the standard for proving the rape actually happened is beyond a reasonable doubt is a sadistic double standard, especially as the failure to prove beyond a reasonable doubt could be used as part of the preponderance of evidence.
Not guilty is not the same thing as innocent..
@normalice I agree with most of what you said except your excluding civil action. Where there is criminal liability there is usually also civil liability.
If civil culpability is contingent on criminal culpability, sure, but there isn't a lot of damages one can pay for while in prison or with a criminal record. But again that should go both ways, as well. Rape and knowingly false accusations of rape should face equal punishment. Same with all crimes, in my opinion. Especially pedophilia!
If the conditions of defamation are met, I don't see what the rape part has to do with it.
These are some of the conditions of defamation:
1) A defamatory statement was made.
2) The statement made was published in some fashion, meaning it was told to others either verbally or in writing.
3) The statement was not true, and the person who published the statement knew that it was not true.
4) The statement caused the victim harm or injury, emotionally or financially.
5) The statement did not fall under the privileged category.
Once #1 & #2 occur, #3 and #4 become critical. In the case of an alleged rape, it's easy to see how #4 will occur, and if so, the one being accused somehow has to prove that the conditions of #3 become fact.
Opinion
11Opinion
I think proven false accusers should be a crime in it of itself but since we do not do that, this is the only option for a man who has been falsely accused, found innocent but still has his life ruined because the accusation alone is that damning.
they should be able to do more than sue their accusers for defamation
accusers who are found guilty of lying need to face the same punishment should the accused have been found guilty
They do, as it comes under making a false police report, perjury, and wasting court time among other crimes.
to deter false accusations. i can only accuse if i can prove it.
@normalice An expensive lawyer is not a guarantee that one will prevail.
@normalice The difference does exist, true, but to the degree that men would feel free to rape? I doubt that...
@msc545 not a single rapist stopped what they were doing because they thought they werent free to rape. That's how they became a rapist. And with powerful attorneys I'd imagine that feeling increases rather than decreases. Even if only slightly, even I only 0.01% by whatever metric, how many additional raped women does that add up to that wouldn't have been raped otherwise?
@normalice on balance, in my opinion, possibly saving one woman from rape is not as important as saving men from ruined live due to false accusations.
@normalice If you make it impossible for men to use the only tool they have (defamation lawsuits), that actually will encourage women to make more false accusations.
That clearly makes these things dependent.
@normalice That has nothing at all to do with what we are discussing.
@msc545 I understand redpill rage causes brain damage but please try to at least retain the content of your own recent posts. And failing even that, just scroll up to see what I was replying to. I'll spell it out for you this once, though. You said "... men are still going to get prosecuted if they rape a woman." I was pointing out 94% don't even get prosecuted now.. z 60% Don even get reported. Put the ingredients in place for a narrative that women will go to prison if they can't prove they were raped, and that 60% could easily jump to 100%
Absolutely - a false accusation can ruin a man's life.
California is retarted. Why shouldn’t a guy falsely accussed be able to?
As long as they didn't actually rape anybody.
This isn't about being innocent until proven guilty, it's about disqualifying credible accusations. So I must respectfully demur.
Yes, they should.
If there is no conviction, yes.
Typical American
Be the first girl to share an opinion
and earn 3 more Xper points!
Superb Opinion