How would it be in future if jury is AI?

Question

ClaircognizantEmpath · Accepted Answer

hey, then it would be entirely fact based.. whereas if its a jury its still emotional based to some degree... i was once ordered for jury service at a crown court, so fairly serious, i didn't want to do it, i had anxiety bad at that time, i also couldnt afford it having to pay travel upfront, i had no childcare, and i would of lost wages.. all you get is expenses... i would of left around 7am got home around 6pm with two primary aged children... and none of that counted... at all... so if i was a juror then, how do we think all of those things would of affected me during that trial? luckily i cared for a disabled lady 3 times a week so she wrote in to say it would be harmful to her welfare... so on that count perhaps a. i would of been a better option... omg youve just made me think for the first time ever a. i running prisons... makes sense... but what would ai do now here in the uk there are no prison spaces... i suppose if someone was seriously dangerous they would have to be contained, but just recently a known crime leader criminal past charges of violence, assault etc stabbed an old man on a mobility scooter for no apparent reason... but there was footage of him just before walking across a road, then just after holding the knife, wiping the blood off casually,,, in front of him was a woman pushing a buggy not 15 feet... he made no moves toward her at all... despite then claiming mental health issues... the police accepted this and he was given a hospital sentence where the judge said it would not be in anyones interest to ever... ever!!! put him in a normal prison... now i watched a video of that mother fucker being arrested and he was well aware of the situation... so another guy, immigrant let loose here in the uk, killed a well loved school caretaker, two weeks from retirement and two beautiful fresh talented students in our streets... again.. mental health... diagnosed... but out in public and a condition if meds are not taken highly dangerous... unyet from his arrest until a few days later he never saw a mental health professional? but when it goes to court they are all of unsound mind... ai could take lie detection tests, brain scans, body scans etc and take actual law then find the correct course of action... it would illiminate jurors being hacked, dodgy judges?

Altheavas · Accepted Answer

Disaster!

abc3643 · Accepted Answer

That won't happen because it would be unconstitutional violation of the Sixth Amendment.

This is the Sixth Amendment:
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence."

As described in the SCOTUS opinion of the case Thiel v. Southern Pacific,
"Trial by jury presupposes a jury drawn from a pool broadly representative of the community as well as impartial in a specific case."

Since any artificial intelligence system is not a "representative of the community", it would not be capable of being in a jury pool, let alone being a juror.

Reminds me of this scene in Star Trek:

BCA6010 · Accepted Answer

Unconstitutional in the US under the 6th amendment.

Assuming that weren't a factor however, it would be a disaster because AI does not weigh social or civil issues objectively because the people who control and program them are not objective. Any verdict that was ever to be decided by AI would be easily appealed.

AI is a tool, not a person or a god.

OlderAndWiser · Answer

It would be unconstitutional in the US.

Bricealan · Answer

It would certainly be better than humans... free of human bias, based on facts, and how the law is applied to whatever the person is accused of.

I have been the Foreman, on a criminal trial, and have seen first hand how some, people, (usually men) that tried to bull doze or intimidate other jurors, into seeing things 'their way" AI would be my choice to avoid that.

Juxtapose · Answer

Disaster. A. I is not our peers, they are more alien to us than organic aliens. They will surpass us.

RetroReviews · Answer

I could see that happening, they would say emotions and prejudice wouldn't factor in the verdict handed down... er coumputed

Lynx122 · Answer

People would just try and manipulate it. I don't think it would work.

IslaTheWitch · Answer

it wouldn't work... simply because pure logic doesn't work when we talk about human emotions

LaurenM1997 · Answer

That would be one of the biggest disasters of the world

FreyaRed · Answer

Maybe we will see less arbitrariness in courts. Currently a child murderer gets 7 years like someone who dared to slap an arrogant cop.

Danny_dan92 · Answer

Somewhat unpredictable. It could end up being very biased due to AI building upon itself

OfMiceandMen · Answer

Might not be a bad thing, perhaps they can take the emotion out of the trial. It should would change the lawyer's cross examination approach.

AviatorTom · Answer

In the US, the defendant is entitled to a jury of their peers. Unless an AI is being charged, an AI jury would be illegal.

FunkyMonkee · Answer

Depends on how they're programed and, because of that, alone, I kinda seriously doubt it'll EVER come to that!

Caroline91 · Answer

First confirm it is true then slip away with no forwarding address, metaphorically speaking.

ApplePie409 · Answer

It would make more sense than what we have now.

kuffs · Answer

Skynet and the Matrix come to mind. AI is never good. Eventually it thinks humans don’t matter.

normalice · Answer

It would be more reasonable to have an a. i. judge.

turnpost · Answer

Judge is the most UN AI able job, There job is to literally find out what to sentance someone when the law isn't fully working. So there jobs are safe.

msc545 · Answer

This is a very bad idea for a multitude of reasons.

JacobJordan · Answer

Would be a lot faster to come up with a verdict

Anonymous · Answer

if anything AI would be useful for recreating an exact holographic scene of the crime that took place

MicahRaine · Answer

An ai jury would defeat the purpose of having a jury.

Surely · Answer

Hopefully AI would be programmed with the original Constitution. Not the leftist one!

MacDaddyRico · Answer

Never happen; unconstitutional. Besides, AI can be programmed for anything, even evil.

AngryCarl · Answer

A jury is 12 people. Are you going to have 12 different AIs?

dinojames22 · Answer

Legally not possible. "Jury of your peers" is the main requirement and last time I checked... I am ktk a cyborg (yet)

Razp_Sorbet · Answer

Probably more reliable than the current system

Anonymous · Answer

It would’ve taken even less time to convict Trump.

dustybiker2 · Answer

Step further. Implanted chips just rat you out.

Anonymous · Answer

It depends upon the AI

Charliefretz329 · Answer

More rigged than it is now

CubaPirate · Answer

Watch the Terminator

Awantika03 · Answer

Hanging out 😎

Nice222 · Answer

It would be manipulated I’m sure.

eagle1951 · Answer

oh shet

How would it be in future if jury is AI?

Most Helpful Opinions

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

How would it be in future if jury is AI?

Most Helpful Opinions

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

We're glad to see you liked this post.