Are your a feminist?

[White_Swan_]

[RingOfFire]

The problem with any discussion like this is defining what "equality" means.

Does it mean equality of opportunity or does it mean equality of outcome? There is a very significant difference between the two.

In America, women already have equality of opportunity under the law. As a matter of fact in many cases they have more opportunity than men because there are so many programs that are only for women and men are excluded (No one complains about these because men are just presumed to be the oppressors and therefore not entitled to extra benefits. Women are just presumed to be oppressed and therefore no one questions when they get benefits that men are not entitled to.).

So women already have equality of opportunity.

So what then is the complaint?

It seems to be that in some areas there isn't equality of outcome. In other words if a male and a female have the same type of job and the male earns more, that is automatically considered to be discrimination.

But there are studies that show that such discrepancies are often explained by things like the fact that women have a higher absentee rate from their jobs than men.

Should someone with a higher absentee rate be paid the same amount just because they're a woman? Should a customer have to pay more for the product because women built it and employers had to subsidize the cost of their absenteeism and charge more for their products? Should a company that is forced to charge more than its products because it employees more women than it's competitors be forced out of business because it cannot compete at a price that allows it to succeed in the marketplace?

All else equal an employer might rationally prefer to hire a man instead of a woman for a certain job knowing that she is more likely to have a higher absentee rate.

Women are also far more likely to leave their jobs after they have a child than men. Again given a man and a woman who both have equal qualifications, would an employer be wrong to choose the man rather than invest in the cost of training an employee who is more likely to leave? Should those costs also be built into everything that people buy?

So there is already equality of opportunity for women. The debate that needs to be had is whether or not there should be equality of outcome for both men and women regardless of whether or not it benefits a society or infringes on freedom of choice for others in the decisions they make.

[Anonymous]

No, because women really don’t want equality. Many of them want the good parts of being a man w out having the responsibility of men. Like selective services. There are no laws on the books that say women can’t do the same things men can’t. But the laws are certainly stacked against men especially in the court system when it comes to divorce, child support and alimony. Feminist aren’t protesting to get into a lot of the manual labor fields. A majority of women aren’t willing to step up to be the bread winner of their household if she’s making more than the man. She usually wants someone who makes as much as her or more. A majority of women aren’t going to wake up in the middle of the night to go see what that noise was. Women still get the benefit of being freed first in hostage situations along w the kids while the men are expected to suck it up. Men are still expected to plan dates, pay for the date, make the first move, etc. These are just some examples of how women want equality but still expect men to treat them as princesses. That’s not equality.

[White_Swan_]

I disagree. Feminism is egalitarian. If a woman wants superiority, not equality, she is not a feminist.

[Opinion Owner]

That seems to be what a majority of women want, superiority but disguise it as feminism.

[DishLady]

I do consider myself one, but before you start heating the tar and collecting the feathers to torture me over this declaration, I have a philosophical disclaimer...

I don't believe in the extreme 21st-century feminism, which has completely derailed and disrespected the original intention of feminism (instigated by wonderfully classy and feminine ladies like Simone De Beauvoir). I believe a woman can be a true lady and stand up to herself without any negative assumptions about "ALL MEN" being a certain way... Every human being is different... there's no single reductive formula to understanding all "Category X" of the human race. We're all designed to be equal and we all deserve the basic respect that so many individuals and countries have fought for since the dawn of civilization, that's all.

So... feminist? Yes... misandrist? Not by a long shot.

[White_Swan_]

What is the difference between old feminism and 21st century feminism? Feminism has been advocating equality since day one.

[DishLady]

Look it up. I left all the details above.

[White_Swan_]

I don't think there is a difference. Just because some people are hostile to men under the name of feminism does not mean that feminism has changed. Because this is not the real feminism.

[ManOnFire]

@White_Swan_ As she said the ORIGINAL concept of feminism back then was fine and good, especially in an age where women literally were not allowed to speak or do anything outside of the house. But the so-called "feminism" that took off in the 1960s to today is nothing but ridiculous militant garbage meant to assert women above men, to put men down, and as an excuse for women to be sexually loose "because if men can, why can't we?"

[DishLady]

@ManOnFire thanks for twisting my words and becoming part of the problem. It’s things like this that CAUSED feminism to be derailed.

@White_Swan, please read up on Simone de Beauvoir and learn about what an authentic woman who can manage to feel feminine and dignified looks like. Her work is very beautiful. She was way, way ahead of her time.

She’s probably turning in her grave knowing how many boneheaded creatures exist today who have twisted and mangled her words and ideas too….

[ManOnFire]

@DishLady "I don't believe in the extreme 21st-century feminism, which has completely derailed and disrespected the original intention of feminism"
- Did I not agree with that?

[DishLady]

@ManOnFire Yes, you did, but the manner of your agreement left something to be desired. :/

[White_Swan_]

@ManOnFire I know that there are those who try to change the meaning of feminism, and that some women think they are feminists by being anti-men, but this is not real feminism. I `m talking about this. Everyone should be a feminist without changing the meaning of feminism. "If men can do it, why can't we?" I am aware that there are people who say this, but I do not agree that this has anything to do with man-hatred. Because this is not about victimizing men. We must be feminists to protect our current rights. What is the subject of the book you mentioned? Does he advocate that women be both passive and equal to men?

[DishLady]

Well said.

[ManOnFire]

@White_Swan_ No one needs to be a feminist. It is not required for anyone to support women having rights and human decency. Unless you like clubs and groups.

Wanting to do what men do is not hating men, that is correct. Hating men is going on and on about "patriarchy" and thousands of years of oppression blah blah blah, and wanting to use stats of male violence and male suicide as a reason for why people shouldn't have to regard men as human beings also deserving of respect. That is what modern day feminism is about. These same groups of women are also the ones who didn't think that women of color should have any rights, but it only mattered if you were a white woman. These feminists are not noble in my eyes and do not garner my respect whatsoever.

[White_Swan_]

@ManOnFire no, it is necessary. Without feminists, we as women would not have the rights we have now. Why doesn't anyone need to be a feminist? If one does not become a feminist, male superiority will continue. Talking about patriarchy means hating patriarchy, not men. A true feminist defends all women without any distinction between black and white. Feminism is for all women, not just white women. If you don't like the new feminism, you can defend the old feminism. You obviously want to have less rights than men.

[ManOnFire]

@White_Swan_ Feminism is SUPPOSED to be for all women, but it hasn't worked that way. Male superiority is non-existent today because most men are weak and bow down to women because they fear making them upset, and because men want to give favor to women they are attracted to.

I am not a woman. Unless you were being cheeky. But anyway, do what you feel is best.

[White_Swan_]

@ManOnFire Today, feminism is for all women. “There is no male superiority today.” It's a very ignorant thing to say. Only in 6 countries are men and women fully equal. In all other countries, men are superior. Moreover, even though we are legally equal, we are not equal socially and culturally. Men have been leaders for years. Men never submitted to women and were never afraid of upsetting women. If you look at history you will see.

[4ngelic]

would say i'm an equalitarian (so like i'm for women's rights and stuff, equality, etc) but not a feminist. mainly cause the louder strands of modern feminism often focus on trivial dumb shit that isn't real like manspreading. also they're trying to promote this narrative that nothing has changed since the middle ages and all men are evil psychopathic child fucking serial rapists. they also tend to promote all the other very far left leaning stuff that has nothing to do with women's right, and they try to make it an innate part of the movement. they also have greatly helped fuelling actual misogyny and reactionary beliefs in the last decade that are starting to hurt women

[mandyfire98]

I'm for society treating men and women as equals and giving both equal opportunities. I'm against supremacy in any form.

[White_Swan_]

Then you are a feminist.

[PA19062024]

No, she said that she is "against supremacy in any form", so that makes her either non-committed, or opposed to feminism.

[LaureenVO]

@PA19062024 No? Feminism is not about supremacy. It's about equality. So she is a feminist

[Sabretooth]

@LaureenVO feminIST supremIST.

[LaureenVO]

@Sabretooth That doesn't make any sense. hegemonist, progressionist, instrumentalist, experimentalist, documentalist, therapist, humanist, perfectionist, and many more words. Just because both words have an "IST" in them, doesn't mean at all that they are related or the same. You're logic doesn't make sense. Ist in Latin means "one who performs an action; believer". There are many believes and many "ists"

[Sabretooth]

@LaureenVO but it roles off the same way. this article talks about it: fiamengofile.substack.com/.../when-feminism-is-child-abuse and this is an account about a lost feminist with a son: jourms.org/.../ a boy will either be a simp or a misogynist because of feminism.

[LaureenVO]

@Sabretooth That article has nothing to do with this. Mothers that act like that are not real feminists. they are abusers that hide behind excuses.

[Sabretooth]

@LaureenVO and yet, are drawn to feminism and are the face of feminism. Theses are not fringe pieces.

[LaureenVO]

@Sabretooth it still doesn't make it feminism. It's as simple as that

[Sabretooth]

@LaureenVO for one in denial, perhaps.

[LaureenVO]

@Sabretooth "the belief that women should be allowed the same rights, power, and opportunities as men and be treated in the same way, or the set of activities intended to achieve this state:
" the cambridge dictionary doesn't agree with you. It's not denial, you just don't want to realize that maybe all those toxic females aren't real feminists.

[Sabretooth]

@LaureenVO or, maybe it's you that doesn't want to realize. any rational person would stop and think. we gravitate to what aligns with our values. again, those pieces are not the fringe.

[Sabretooth]

@LaureenVO that's a nice platitude and you can any former cultist that. if we can put feminism aside for a moment, do you remember those commercials about the Church of Latter-day Saints?

[mandyfire98]

I'm for any group that agrees that men aren't overall better than women in society. I'm for any group that agrees that women can be just as successful as men. That a woman's goal in life isn't to just be beneath men and only support men. I'm for any group that doesn't view women as second class. I'm for any group that fights misogyny.

Whatever you want to call that. That's what I am. It's definitely somebody that doesn't think one group of people is better or has more power or importance than the other.

[White_Swan_]

Great! So thinking like that means you're a feminist.

[Sabretooth]

@LaureenVO that's a nice platitude... of course, cults do, too and you can any former cultist that. if we can put feminism aside for a moment, do you remember those commercials about the Church of Latter-day Saints? they made my skin crawl. eventually, an episode of Dateline confirmed my suspensions.

Reply

[PA19062024]

@LaureenVO "Not real feminists", is the "no true Scotsman" fallacy, isn't it?

[Sabretooth]

@LaureenVO suspicions

[RebelinSteel]

In any country on the planet, people should have the same freedoms, irrespective if a girl a guy, gay, bisexual or lesbian, colour of skin. People should be able (within common decency) be free to wear normal clothing without discrimination, condemnation etc. A job should have the same pay irrespective who is doing the job, based on the person being suitable for the role. Life should be about equality across the board, with the same equal opportunities. Is that Feminism, fuck knows, just seems to be sensible

[V_Injector]

Anti-feminist. My understanding isn't what's in a dictionary of feminism. I'm a shit lord on the internet that has been exposed to the worst of the worst of these fagatron so-called feminists. Kill all men they say... men are just dumb they say... and then they do bullshit like only suck their ability to live out of men's dicks and bank accounts.

I didn't start out with this bias... feminists drilled this shit into my head.

I love women, but women and feminism are two different animals.

Firmly anti-feminist.

[V_Injector]

https://youtu.be/J6oTIjvw_-8?si=8Idx5Dio_udnby_t

[Danzigdawson]

What happens when the trolling no longer works?

[ManOnFire]

Nope. You don't need to be a feminist to support human decency or rights for women. Feminism as we know it is a bunch of ridiculous ideology that was created by privileged and insecure caucasian women and has poisoned our societies.

[LaureenVO]

That is not real feminism. Real feminism is simply about the eqaulity of both genders haha

[ManOnFire]

@LaureenVO Feminism is about women having power. It's not about equality for "both genders." People have been saying that for like the last 20 years and it's old now. If it's about equality for both then it shouldn't be called feminism.

[Anonymous]

I've read through all the comments here, and your responses to them, and YOU are the problem with modern feminism because you enable all the bad behavior that has rightly given feminism such a bad reputation. You basically think any bad behavior by a feminist means she is not a "real feminist", thereby relieving feminism from any responsibility. How convenient for you. Imagine the absurdity of Incels saying Elliot Rodger was not a real Incel because he did bad things. Think about it.

Feminists like you are a joke. Take some ownership for the bullshit FEMINISTS do and try to do something about it instead of just denying any responsibility for it. All you're doing is pushing the reputation of feminism further down the toilet.

[HelpfulWoman]

yes. everyone should be.

while i hate the "fem" part, its for equality. only weird dumbasses don't want equality

[PA19062024]

If it's "for equality", then why do feminists never demand "equal representation" in fields like coal mining, garbage collection or in the army as front-line soldiers?

[HelpfulWoman]

@PA19062024 because the CHOICE which is what they would strive for... is already there. Women can join the army if they want to. Same as men can IF THEY WANT TO.
hence, equality has been met. It being male dominated isn't a failure of equality...

[MisterWack]

“Are your a feminist?”

Me have empathy for women’s struggles.
Me respect women. Women good. 🤣

Seriously: I don’t categorize as a ‘feminist’ though I do categorize as a being of empathy & wanting women to get the respect and recognition they deserve.

If you are a woman reading this: You look good today and you are a talented, lovely, and warm person that all have the honor to behold. Keep doing what you are doing, don’t let anyone stop you, and I pray for you.

[LaureenVO]

Yes. Feminism simply stands for equality for both genders. "But women want to overpower men and they hate men", that is not real feminism! Real feminism is just about equality. Nothing more and nothing less.

[Anonymous]

I am not. I think that the premise that we live in a patriarchy is not only incorrect but is "us vs them" by nature so it makes sense why the man-haters have taken over the institutions and has raised us to believe that there is something inherently wrong with masculinity by making up a strawman version of it called "toxic masculinity" used to explain their hatred while trying to make it sound like it isn't.

They were somehow able to justify giving masculinity all of the negative aspects (you can't have negative aspects of a positive trait otherwise it will cease to be a positive trait but ok) one could possibly have while saying that the good aspects in masculinity aren't exclusive to it and femininity can have it too.

[BCRanger10]

No, I am not. Don't get me wrong, I'm not exactly a red-piller either (or whatever the male equivalent is), but I am proudly and happily anti-feminist.

[White_Swan_]

Why?

[Amandanator]

I’m for equality between men and woman. Definitely not the radical kind.

[White_Swan_]

Feminism already advocates equality between men and women. Then you are a feminist.

[Amandanator]

Yeah I understand that. There are definitely countries that need it more than the US. Saudi Arabia as an example where women can’t even drive a car.

[White_Swan_]

Yes.

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

Yep, very much a feminist as much as an egalitarian

[Iosis]

Get real. Women are only needed to birth children and raise them. Men are needed to build the world and provide.

The only reason why elites have brought women up is so they can control society. All western societies are f*cked. They’re going to collapse because of brainwashed idiots like you.

Feminism then Covid and now lgbtq. It’s going to get darker and darker……
If you’re from the UK, we might have to do compulsory military service now. They want us die to for lgbtq and other degeneracy.

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

You can always die on your own time as a form of protest

[llorando]

No, I'm an egalitarian. At least in the US, feminism has out lived its purpose and has transformed into a movement making woman (issues more important) superior, at the expense degrading men. Can't remember the name of the university, but a group of students organized an event to bringing awareness to men's suicide, a group of feminist put up a big fuss, and the university shut the down the event before it took, place, so yea, so much for equal rights.

[dustybiker2]

An original? From the peaceful movement? Or the one they warped to try and look obnoxious? There is a huge difference.

[White_Swan_]

Original and peaceful movement of course

[dustybiker2]

Then, yes. I suppose I am. Most people were.

[Anonymous]

Sorry, but unlike you, I do not buy into the "feminism is good, therefore anything bad is not feminism" nonsense. Today's feminism is dishonest, toxic, divisive and harmful, just like red pill, MGTOW and all that other men's rights bs. By supporting feminism, you are supporting all of that.

[JonCobretti]

Nope

Feminism by definition is for equal rights for men and women

Currently there is NO right that a man has that a woman doesn't.. Except the right to go topless

So what's the point of feminism?

[White_Swan_]

Just because women and men are equal under the law does not mean that feminism does not advocate equality.

[JonCobretti]

Yeah I was talking about USA, I'm sure feminism is required in Taliban but...

[sawno]

No, I am not for partisan movements and I think modern feminism is very destructive to what its claiming to defend.

[Apple1996]

Nah I don't believe in the whole equality thing. Men and women are different and have different roles in life

[White_Swan_]

There is no need for women to be passive

[White_Swan_]

Just because a woman is different from a man does not mean that she has less rights than men.

[Summeroflove]

No…. I think the people who have taken over feminism are mostly toxic women. Who hate men…. And hate other women for that matter because they all stab one another in the back.

[normalice]

I think women should be given equal opportunity and equal pay for equal work. Some people call that feminism. I just call it common sense.

[White_Swan_]

This feminism

[PA19062024]

That's not feminism though. Feminists want special treatment, they want MORE than what men have.

[normalice]

I haven't met any feminist like that but if I do I will happily tell them they fit the manosphere's caricature of feminism and are doing it no favors.

[White_Swan_]

@PA19062024 No, they don't want such a thing. Feminists have been asking for equality since feminism was founded.

[LaureenVO]

@PA19062024 That is not real feminism. Real feminism is simply about the eqaulity of both genders haha

[HawkPerception]

Being a feminist nowadays is like being a firefighter in the middle of the ocean.

It's pointless and delusional.

[DarkLegacy]

I am not because that is the worst thing you could be. Feminism is anti men and as a guy with Autism we have faced the most discrimination thanks to feminism.

[White_Swan_]

Feminism is not anti-men. If a feminist says she is hostile to men, she is not a feminist. hostility towards men is misanthropy.

[DarkLegacy]

Whatever you say

[sirderpsalot123]

I would call myself an equalist or egalitarian. There are a lot of definitions of what "feminist" means, and I don't care for most of them. I just want everyone treated like individuals.

[AliceGregory]

I'd consider myself one #girlpower

[msmissydc]

Yes, and I think everyone should be.

[White_Swan_]

Absolutely.

[PA19062024]

"Should" be? What if I just don't want to be?

[Anonymous]

HELL NO!

Feminists Are NutCases !

https://www.youtube.com/embed/rrZxNh0uck4

[Opinion Owner]

@white_swan_

[White_Swan_]

🤣🤣🤣

[Anonymous]

nope. anti-feminist

feminism continues to hide behind false definitions to mask their true intentions and most of western society is still unaware they are complying with their long term agenda

[BetaBucks]

I'm an egalitarian. Which feminists consider to be misogynistic, so I don't think they would count me as a feminist.

[blueonblack22]

Why didn’t you make it a poll? You probably didn’t want to see the ugly results eh? B

[bolverk]

No I'm not a 'feminist' but that does not mean that I have not given women around me (AKA family and friends) the support to be the best they can be, and in turn they have helped me.

[DrPepper12]

Qualified yes. Whats YOUR definition? Cuz dickheads dont get it.

[DishLady]

👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

[LadyKitty]

I am an Egalitarian.

[White_Swan_]

That means you're a feminist.

[LadyKitty]

No it does not because that label has never applied to me. I don't necessarily agree with feminism today. I think feminism is needed in countries where women lack basic rights though. I do recognize there is rights and social issues for men too and I don't see feminism aiming at men's issues at all in any shape or form. If I had the label of feminist it would be more old school.

[White_Swan_]

Everyone who is egalitarian is a feminist. Feminism is an ideology that emerged against discrimination against women, so it does not defend men, but this does not mean that it is anti-men. Just because some women say they are feminists but are anti-men does not mean that feminism is anti-male. True feminism is not anti-men. Women and men are fully equal in only 6 countries, and socially and culturally women are everywhere behind men.

[LadyKitty]

While I recognize the critical role of feminism in addressing historical and ongoing gender discrimination against women, I view feminism as a vital part of a broader egalitarian framework. Egalitarianism seeks comprehensive equality for all people, irrespective of gender, race, or social status. For instance, the legal requirement for men to register for the draft, disparities in family court custody decisions, sentencing differences, and higher rates of homelessness and suicide among men highlight significant issues that need attention. True egalitarianism addresses these issues alongside women's rights, ensuring a balanced and inclusive approach to equality. Therefore, while feminism is a crucial movement for gender equality, it falls under the wider umbrella of egalitarianism, which aims to achieve equality for all. The word Egalitarian is older than the word Feminism. So therefor Feminism is just one part of Egalitarianism. I hold the belief that everyone should have equal rights and opportunity regardless of gender. So while I hold traditional feminist believes its just one part of my egalitarian beliefs.

[Danny_dan92]

I want equal rights and opportunities for everyone. That’s the definition of a free society. It is the core of the values of my country.

[dolemite58]

Yes I think women should work hard and pay for their own stuff

[bobby_bush_eater]

Nope. Not with this modem feminist shit.

I actually respect merits and kindness, not entitlement.

[nudeNhorny]

Yes I am, however unlike a lot of people I do understand what the word feminism truly means.

[Sabretooth]

no! it's bullshit. wanting to help better girls and promote stronger girls is one thing... but, that ain't what. it's about mindless and aimless destruction and chaos.

[Sabretooth]

no! it's bullshit. wanting to help better girls and promote stronger girls is one thing... but, that ain't what this is about. it's about mindless and aimless destruction and chaos.

[Anonymous]

Everyone should be. The problem is when women expect a man to be in his traditional role while they themselves are not. And expect equality with a man who is better than them.

[PA19062024]

God no. I despise extreme political ideologies.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

I believe treating women with social equality but I don't identify as the word feminist.

[White_Swan_]

Why? If you believe so, you are a feminist.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

That term has become a confusing term and I just don't want to be associated as a feminist as that term sounds womanly.

[White_Swan_]

You don't have to be a woman to be a feminist, so there is nothing feminine about the word feminist.😊

[White_Swan_]

So when you call yourself a feminist you are not being feminine.

[Pohjolan]

Nope. Plenty of feminists don't even think that men can be feminists.

However they think that a man can be a woman, curious.

[OfDeath]

Well it is true that one moves “into” the future. If you feel my bulge.

[Jason2469]

Lol. Fuck no. I was raised by women, work with all women, haven't even talked to a man in 7 years. Women are the cause of all of the worlds problems.

[Anonymous]

I will never support such a manipulative, destructive, hateful ideology such as feminism.

[Anonymous]

Of course I'm not a feminist. A man being a feminist is like a Jew being a Nazi. It takes an incredible degree of dishonesty to say otherwise.

[Anonymous]

Probably not, but maybe. I'm a classical liberal. A lot of what passes for feminism today strikes me as not terribly liberal.

[postaldudePL123]

[Qqerw]

No cause I’m not a retard. If I was on a date and a girl told me she was a feminist I’d walk out. Even if she’s stunning

[bobalife]

Yes, I’m for rights and equality.

[BaronReagan]

Turkish women succumb to Western modernity

[White_Swan_]

Yes, and that's very good.

[BaronReagan]

It's true. What I hate is that in our country military service is still compulsory.

To avoid military service, I pretended to be a transgender woman. The authorities asked me to take the necessary steps to prove that it was true.

I had only two options left: either I confessed my lie, and you know our country, they would have sent me to prison for lying.

Or I could say nothing and become a woman. And today I've been on hormones for several months.

Honestly, if our country didn't have compulsory military service, I wouldn't have had to become a woman.

[White_Swan_]

Where are you from? Conscription is not a bad thing. On the contrary, it glorifies men, because military service is a sacred duty.

[BaronReagan]

Turkey

[White_Swan_]

Ben de.

[BaronReagan]

It's great, there are lots of Turks here. But don't write in Turkish here, they'll delete the message .

So you think I deserve what's happening to me?

[White_Swan_]

Why are they deleting it? I don't think he deserves it, I'm just saying that compulsory military service for men is not a disadvantage for them.

[BaronReagan]

Because they delete when messages are not in English.

I see. Unfortunately for me because of my lie, I am now forced to become a woman.

[AviatorTom]

I'm not even sure what that means anymore.

[White_Swan_]

Feminizm advocates women being equal to men. İt’s always been like this.

[AviatorTom]

@White_Swan_ Not always. There are feminazis who claim to be feminists and want female superiority. And most women who claim to be feminists don't really want equality, they want equal opportunity, and they decide when they should be equal.

[White_Swan_]

They are not real feminists.

[BonzoInBitburg]

Nope. I'm not any "ism"

[pervertedjester]

Better question, Why should I be?

[White_Swan_]

To prevent women from being victimized. Better question: why should women experience victimization?

[pervertedjester]

I think women are empowered enough for that on their own. How does my voice add to that empowerment? Why should "anyone" experience victimization? If you are in that moment where you see something nefarious go down, step in but if you find yourself the constant victim don't wait for others to support you, stand up and fight back. My three sisters, Fight! They've never asked for help from their brothers, they punch back on their own.

[White_Swan_]

I see all women as victims, not myself. There is strength in unity so everyone should be a feminist until men and women are 100% equal.

[pervertedjester]

One would think that automatically viewing all women as "victims" negates your attempt to be feminist. Also 100% equality would mean that you accept the fact that both men and women can be victims and criminals.

[Account]

Yes.

[Danzigdawson]

Yup.

[matchrestore]

Yes.

[Agape93]

Yeap

[ChinaGrove]

They don't exist.

[impalabill77]

No I'm not but I'm dating one, though.

[Nifrayu]

Yes.