Who has more rights to America: Childless or Parents?

[OddBeMe]

“The childless have no interest in the future of this country so should have less votes!”

Parents

Childless

Uhh…they the same dude

[Anonymous]

"Who has more rights to America: Childless or Parents?"

The obvious answer is, they have the same rights, because they objectively do.

Should they? That's another question entirely. Our children are the future of the US, and the decisions we make as a nation today will affect them for decades to come. The parents of those children have more of a vested interest in our country's future than childless adults. Its hard to argue against that, so yeah, Vance makes a good point. It will never fly, of course, but he's not wrong.

[abc3643]

That's false because that presupposes the childless people do not care about the future after they are gone.

I decided to have no children to protect them from the shitstorm I knew was coming since before you were born. But I have a profound interest in the welfare of our species and this planet long after I am gone.

I protected my children by not having them.
Now I can dedicate my efforts toward protecting yours.

[OddBeMe]

@abc3643 and we pay the same taxes even though we have no kids to go to school.

[abc3643]

God, he is such an idiot. No wonder Trump chose him - someone stupider than Trump.

And he looks like a supervillain!

Seriously, can you think of anyone in real life who looks more like a supervillain than J. D. Vance? I can't and I am 61 years old!

[abc3643]

Take a look:


It's like he's pondering his next moves for world domination, but, first, he must eliminate the Fantastic Four and the X-Men.

[abc3643]

He's like a cleaned-up Che Guevara.
¡Viva la revolución!

[purplepoppy]

Does that mean a woman with 12 kids should have 12 times more than one with just one kid.

[OddBeMe]

apparently in Vance's mind.

[Drewtate]

Those 12 kids have rights but can't legally make adult decisions so the woman has her rights plus the rights of those 12 kids.

[OddBeMe]

@Drewtate That doesn’t make her rights any more powerful. And were she to do something that experts deem is unfit, those children’s rights are transferred to fosters.

[Drewtate]

They aren't her rights, they are the collective rights of her children

[OddBeMe]

@Drewtate so have them vote. I’m honestly not against child voting.

[Drewtate]

Give the mother 5 more votes

[OddBeMe]

@Drewtate Ironic you are going against Reynolds V Sims SCOTUS ruling of “one man, one vote” in 1964.

[avery58]

Every law abiding citizen has the same rights to vote and have their voices heard

[OddBeMe]

law abiding... well that excludes all of wall street deary! can't we just say "non-convicted"... no that'll exclude trump...

[DrPepper12]

he's WEIRD!! He has some really strange views on women, family, education, religion, the role of the state, the causes and solutions for rural poverty and on top of that he is a complete opportunist hypocrite.

[Drewtate]

Probably parents because when they have children those children have rights and being responsible for those kids they have both their rights and their children's rights.

[NathanDavis]

if it didn't work... he would not be saying it, lol...

[MoroccanPrincess]

I don't live in America but I believe both have rights in my opinion

[exitseven]

is JD Vance supposed to have said that?