Is violence against health care executives and companies justified sometimes?

I am not a fan of violence, but health care executives that deny care and medicines to people they insure in order to enrich themselves are doing violence to their policy holders.

Violence is very disturbing and morally wrong, but people are not required to simply lie down and die in response to the sort of selfish tactics that healthcare companies promote as "good business".

We are entitled to self -defense, and if the legal system can't or won't defend us, then self defense is the only alternative. If that self-defense involves serious injury or deaths, it is no more than what insurance companies do to us. Perhaps a few of these incidents will make the officials of these companies decide that the cost to them may exceed their monetary profits and perhaps they will mend their ways.

Updates
1 y
CEO's encouraging their companies to withhold lifesaving care from their enrollees to put more $$ in their own and their shareholders' pockets, thereby killing a good number of those enrollees, is what lead to the murder of Thompson. Sadly, none of the mainstream media or the politicians want to talk about those deaths because they were just average Joes and Janes, so deemed not worth enough to care about.
Is violence against health care executives and companies justified sometimes?
Post Opinion