Why does the World Economic Forum want women to wait until middle age to have children?

[AngryCarl3]

World Economic Forum: Your shadowy overlords

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

You know the birth rate in the US is the lowest it’s been in a long time? It’s because we have a record low rate of birth for women between the ages of 15 to 40. A lot of single women are just choosing not to have kids. Maybe these economic nerds recognize that they’re not doing that because they can’t afford to have kids until their mid-40’s and are just going with it.

[AngryCarl3]

Not just the US, but every Western country.

[Anonymous]

More taxes and lower wages.

[Zack-Bann]

Doubled workforce without doubling the mouths to feed.


They woke up one day and realized that the economy is unsustainable if only men worked especially if every man had to provide for himself and his wife therefore 2 for 1.


Increasing population won’t solve the problem fast enough because more workers will require more food.


But getting women to work is a valid solution.
They already exist and consume food as it is. So by working they’re balancing out their personal contributions to the world’s profit margin


And most women who procreate young typically end up with reduced careers which turns them once again into liability

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Women don't need men to tell them when we should get pregnant. That includes the World Economic Forum or just your random guy off the street saying we need to have them in our 20s or, for those that are sick in the head, saying it should be even younger.

We will get pregnant and have children mostly when we are ready. Men don't really get a say in that matter.

[AngryCarl3]

Your body, your choice. Too bad that we can't support our ageing population.

[DryGermanGuy]

The World Economic Forum wants no such thing. They also don’t want to make your showerheads smaller or take your gas stove away. Most important of all, they are no shadowy organization. They are simply an open forum for experts and politicians to meet and discuss ideas and solutions how billions of people can live peacefully together. Everything is published on their website. But I guess the people so paranoid of a neutral Swiss organization lost their reading abilities long ago. 🙄🤦‍♂️

[AngryCarl3]

With all due respect, no organisation is neutral. Much less than one controlled by the global elite.

[Maybe_Maybe_not]

Can't be neutral indeed, it's a think tank

[DryGermanGuy]

A Swiss-based organization with members and guests from all around the world is neutral enough. If you’re waiting for the proverbial squaring of the circle, you will wait forever.

[RandomGirl42]

They've got a much longer wait than that if they're waiting on me! 🤣

[AngryCarl3]

You're exercising your veto?

[RandomGirl42]

Yes, I am. If they want children they can go have their own. 🤣

[exitseven]

They have been trying to reduce population.

[AngryCarl3]

Certainly looks that way.

[MichaelTrump]

WORLD e f... bijatchh pleeeeese lmao. Bunch of nobodies with a bit of $ cirklejerking

[Maybe_Maybe_not]

What's the speech in question?

[AngryCarl3]

Speech? Who listens to these people?

[Maybe_Maybe_not]

There has to be some, otherwise there wouldn't be journalistic reports brought to your attention lol

[AngryCarl3]

There's no such thing as journalism. Just a bunch of hacks repeating state propaganda.

[Maybe_Maybe_not]

No private sector news sources in the UK? It's hard to believe...

[AngryCarl3]

I know, right? What's the news like in Antarctica?

[Maybe_Maybe_not]

It's rather... minimal

[RavVid]

So they don't have to fund schools. Big saving.

[Anonymous]

Because they don't want anyone having children