2.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. If all the men in a tribe died except for one 14 yo boy, the tribe would be back to full strength in 20 years.
if all the women in a tribe died except for a 14 yo girl, it would be many years before the tribe was back to full strength with the number of females only doubling every 20 years. If all goes well it would take 120 years.
It is not so much women's souls that are important but their reproductive organs.
Of course today it would be conservative women and children first with the liberal women going down with the ship alongside the men.34 Reply- 1 mo
Of course ,, when it is Nowah boat ,, we should then save women.. so yea.. every ship sinks is that boat
- 1 mo
Yea , Now we are talking
Most Helpful Opinions
2.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It's a jolly good question, I say.
Maybe it's based on the idea that women are the fairer sex?
But judging on the basis of the woman in my office, fuck that shit, I'm having the lifeboat.
13 Reply- 1 mo
They don't deserve to be prioritized over men.. no sane mane would die for a woman he doesn't know and what even remember he did.. only an idiot
- 1 mo
Lol, yes i think so..
- 631 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
u 2 moThat's just male chivalry on display. Children absolutely should be first though. I think men just believe it's more noble to sacrifice themselves for those they deem "weaker". Then again it's other men who have never sacrificed themselves at all in their lives like those men did, who make a big deal about how women "take advantage" of it.
Besides, I think I heard in the real titanic disaster, men on one side of the boat did get to go on lifeboats too112 Reply- 2 mo
The same thing happened in Italy and the men were fighting women for the boats. I think it's just an English thing.
- 2 mo
Returning to our subject miss Bri, this is one of the reasons too that women were treated better even by the past societies 😄
Let the women first, if it was done in the opposite way, the feminazis would have roared that they were being treated as second class citizens but since they have earned the first place, to hell with all these men that are going to freeze and die 🤣🤣 - 2 mo
Treated even better? We weren't allowed education and a career of our own for the most part. We were reduced to baby factories, maids and child carers.
- 2 mo
That's true, in the past women were oppressed and yes they shouldn't be treated like this, even i personally support the role of a loving devoted housewife and appreciates such women a lot but yet other women are free to choose what they want to do in their lives...
I can never see any person to be lesser than me and i don't accept it...
I believe in the traditional gender roles but without forcing it on anyone...
I respect a hard working woman too...
I support the rights of a woman where it says that she shall be treated like a man and not like a half person and i support the rights for a woman where it says that she can work and that she can more than a housewife only, because what if a woman do not like to become a housewife or have babies, shall i hate her and force her? Nope, i respect her decisions because men are allowed not to get married or have babies, why wouldn't a woman be allowed the same 🤷🏻♂️
As long as she's not harming anyone and not doing anything bad towards her society than she's free... - 2 mo
And that's how it should be. Every woman making their own choice for themselves about what they want to be in life. If we want a career, great! If we want to be a stay at home mom, great! If we want to drink wine all day and have 30 cats, great!
Men should be able to do the same. That's equality at work and all that I hope for. - 2 mo
@Ez-Bri-Z_v2 , i'm glad whenever we have a convo together, because even though you and me don't agree on everything but we always maintain a nice debate, that's what i like about you, unlike others who goes balistic, their minds starts malfunctioning and they resort to insults and throwing bad words which ends up blocked by me or me blocked by them 🙂
Thanks! - 2 mo
- 2 mo
I try to stay civil especially when the person im debating against is the same way, I dont need agreement on everything and just like hearing others points of views. Im not always right (but mostly I am 🤣... jk), and I don't want to live in an echo chamber. I do enjoy speaking with you too and am glad when we do find common ground! Thank you for that
- 2 mo
You're welcome 👍🏻
2 moTrue it was nonsense
30 Reply
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
14Opinion
1 moWomen and children first” was not because women’s lives or souls were considered more valuable than men’s. It came from older ideas that men should protect the more vulnerable during emergencies. Children were prioritized because they were defenseless, and women were often viewed as needing protection. Today, many people believe every life has equal value regardless of gender.
01 Reply- 1 mo
And yet on a crisis event like war or a sinking ship they still prioritize them..
6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. There is a thing called chivalry and honor. Men who don't possess those qualities are pussies.
Men will run into burning buildings and perform courageous acts to rescue others at their own risk because that's how real men react. They will defend the weak and innocent for the same reason.
Men also have a better chance of survival than women and children in dangerous situations.06 Reply- 2 mo
That just makes them reckless and stupid, not real men.
- 2 mo
Why should weak people live and strong people die? Makes 0 sense
- 1 mo
- 1 mo
@Light_beam. Girly men can stand there and do nothing while real men take action. Not that it's wise to face certain injury or death when confronting an attacker.
But what you're saying is that people should do nothing. - 1 mo
No people should fight equally for their lives.. they asked for equality.. so let them have it.. No one should be forced to die for a woman to live.. again it is fine if he chooses it..
- 5.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 moyeah. women are more valuable than men in society. that's why they historically weren't the ones expected to work. and they still somehow managed to make themself the "victims" through feminism. like no feminist ever fought for a womans equal right to die in war or in these instances you mentioned xD
113 Reply- 1 mo
@alice55 I highly doubt that's a mainstream feminist thing. Maybe it's a broader social policy decision there. But that's not the things feminists are interested in. Feminists only fight for better outcomes for women. It's in the name. They aren't calling themselves egalitarianists for a reason.
- 1 mo
I have no idea if that’s feminist pushing for it or just capitalist or something else but that’s something that talked a lot about on French tv by journalist and such it’s on tv they push for it as for the feminist I don’t know i don’t follow them I just know I Heard it a lot on the news and journalist these kind of stuff about ousving women on men job and pushing men into women job
- 1 mo
- 1 mo
@genericname85 Yea, the fight for equality when it is in their favor.. but in situations of crises they will act as poor helpless females who needs protection ,, they they have it both ways and never pay the price of what they get
- 1 mo
they*
- 1 mo
Yeah the victim complex works. Never take accountability for everything and always shift the blame away from you. That's a really powerful tool for all sorts of groups of people. kind of a dictatorship by minorities.
- 1 mo
True..
- 1 mo
Here there's hundred and hundred of article like that pushing women to go into men work and even difficult and hard one :
an article talking about how good is it to push women to work in construction :
www.preventionbtp.fr/.../femmes-dans-le-btp-un-necessaire-changement-de-paradigme_XEWYfmSigBs4u6ydoJvgcE
article psuhing and encouraging women to work into construction by telling them it's a good things and it have changed : www.je-change-de-metier.com/reconversion-dans-le-btp-pour-femme
You know nothing of what you talk about dude especially not when it come to France. - 1 mo
bigmedia.bpifrance.fr/.../5-femmes-qui-ont-entrepris-dans-le-btp
In France women are encouraged to work in construction as well as going to the army you sure you have your degree? it don't seem like you do - 1 mo
- 1.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 moSome kind of survival trait. As far as nature is concerned a woman is just a walking bioreactor. So, you put all the bioreactors in the lifeboats. That way they can breed twice the number of humans that drown in the ship wreck. A woman's value is she's got a uterus. A man's value is he's got muscel and he can work and fight. Society follows jungle law at a basic level. It gets dressed up in various ways but it's really just crude mechanics.
00 Reply
2 moWomen’s bodies are more valuable. They have a limited time to produce eggs and incubate babies, meanwhile men can impregnate women by the hundreds in the same span of time.
16 Reply- 1 mo
Are you kidding me !!! Is t Nowah boat?
- 1 mo
No, because Noah’s ark didn’t follow those rules either
- 1 mo
Yes, but it was meant to REPOPULATE earth again
- 1 mo
Yeah, are you not aware of how humanity once survived with a rate of 17 women to 1 man? Men are incredibly disposable
- 1 mo
Wow, that is what equality is, thanks for teaching me about it
- 1 mo
That happened like 8000 years ago. For unknown social reasons. All men now belong to one of 17 genetic groups as a result
- 4.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 moin theory saving ladies means more pregnancy at same time than less lady. but only when polygamy was allowed. but at time of titanic it was a stupid idea and unfair to men.
01 Reply- 1 mo
yea..
4.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. One man can ilpregnate 30 women but 1 women can only get impregzjtzd by one man so women are more valued for the population
13 Reply- 1 mo
Yea sure.. that is because the population number is so damn small nowadays.. I am not talking about the past by the way.. and what is this word " impregzjtzd" ?
- 1 mo
You know technically the population of old people is too high and the population of young people is too small so it does make sense, there's too many people that are old in the worlds and not working (sick or disabled) and there's not enough young healthy people to make the worlds run normally (after in the USA it's a bit different because there's lot of immigration but in most of the worlds there's a problem of too much old people and not enough young people so the government push people to make babies they even said anyone over the age of 29 a message telling them to make babies for the country XD).
impregnation (sorry I was on my phone it mess up my words I'm more used to writing on my computer).
And that is the reason that was years ago and too you talked about titanic? not modern worlds. In modern worlds I don't think they still work this ways? also that was a chivalry things men were designed as protector and it was shameful of them if they did not let their place for women.
- 1 mo
So I checked and there''s not official law that say women and children should go before no law at all so men can go and be safe before the women and thechilren the difference is that if there's women killed on the sinking then once they comeback they 're shamed for it becuase they did not help saving women (as women as seen as needing protection since they're more vulnerable ) but that was years ago (like in the 19 century or in the early 20 century).
Some men also did not let other men go to save themselves if women and children were still on the boat and needed help since it was their duty to protect women and children.
There's no official law and it never existed it's more a cultural stuff that a real true law and that was based on chivalry and duty to protect the less fortunate one.
Today there's no laws and men go save themselves at the same time as women after obviously the captain of the boat is the chief so he can kind of decide and give order to what he prefer personally.
This is what I found while making research.
- 7.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 moYou need one woman to pass on humanity. But if all the men survive on an island and no women, then that's the end. Men are always the sacrafice in nature...
00 Reply - 918 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
2 moStatistically women and children are least likely to survive. However ships nowadays have enough space on life rafts for every passenger.
09 Reply- 1 mo
That is not true, on a sinking ship it is the boat or die.. and women who can swim can survive better than men who can't swim.. so no reason..
- 1 mo
"Statistically "
- 1 mo
so men should die because of that?
- 1 mo
Did i say that?
- 1 mo
Yea, that is what one can get from what you said.. Statistically the have the same probability to survive
- 1 mo
There's been studies on ship wrecks over the last three centuries. Women were less likely to survive, captain and crew most likely.
- 1 mo
Studies you made?
- 1 mo
"crew members have the highest survival rate, followed by captains and male passengers, whereas the lowest survival rates are observed for women and children. "
Anonymous(25-29)1 moBecause there was no gender equality. It was men's duty to do so because they ultimately took on that duty for themselves.
02 Reply- 1 mo
It is still the rule nowadays too
Opinion Owner1 moI dont believe it is.
2 moNo, but from a purely species survival standpoint, only one man is needed to repopulate.
11 Reply- 1 mo
Good.. Cause if the women on one ship died.. the species will extinct
1.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It's not a question of "souls." It's a question of re-population afterwards. The women and children are the future of any group.
11 Reply- 1 mo
Yea sure because it was the NOWAH boat
11.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Misplaced chivalry. Let all those strong, independent women who don't need men save themselves, just like men have to.
11 Reply- 1 mo
Aw, They forget all that strong feminists stuff when it comes to their lives.. in a sec they will go back to cave men mentality when women are pussies and weak and needs men' protection.. We men are idiots to let them have that
2 moThat was the mediocre ideology back then!
I believe that we must save as much as we can save because all souls are equal!02 Reply- 1 mo
It is still the same nowadays.. Women first
- 1 mo
Not for me actually 😏
5.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Not putting women and especially children first is disgraceful.
05 Reply- 1 mo
@Levin Please elucidate. Are you perhaps suggesting that my not being OK with your desire to blame every immigrant for the actions of a few is not putting women and children first? You know, about half of those immigrants you'd have shipped back to live under the Taliban and probably killed by them.
- 1 mo
@Levin More lies. www.visaverge.com/.../
"UK Asylum Claims: No Evidence Taliban Sell £40 Fake Death Threats
As of October 2025, there is no verified evidence or Home Office alert showing the Taliban sells £40 fake death-threat letters to support UK asylum claims. Standard credibility checks continue, and legal advisers warn against buying documents. Applicants should give honest accounts and supply alternative corroboration where formal records are unavailable."
Because we’re expected to die like men. Look death in the eye and show courage.
01 Reply- 1 mo
yea die like a man not like an idiot.. You can CHOOSE to die for a woman you love.. but chivalry being forced on you without having any choice to die for women you don't know? that is just being an idiot
- 5.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 moThey'd have thrown us black men overboard first !!!
01 Reply- 1 mo
Ahhh damn , black sarcasm ,, but yea true
Anonymous(36-45)1 mothey should have stood at the boats and asked each woman if she'd choose the bear or a man. Those that answered bear, should have gone down with the ship. 😁
00 Reply- 6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 moIt's because women can make more babies.
02 Reply- 1 mo
Yes, because the survivors of Titanic were meant to repopulate the earth? i am not about the PAST
- 1 mo
It has nothing to do with the Titanic per se. It is believed to originate from the Birkenhead drill in 1852. It's really more of a Hollywood style perpetuation of an unwritten sea code designed to promote a Victorian era sense of chivalry. My comment is one of those satirical ones that could have a lot of truth in it.
I have no idea what your comment "I'm not about the past" means in this context. when the actual post IS specifically ABOUT the past. :)
Are women's lives worth more than men's lives?
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
Most Helpful Opinions