Imagine that most humans have extinct in the future, and the Earth was populated by artificially created lifeforms: Androids, Replicants, Cyborgs, Mutants, tactile Holograms and sentient Robots, what if they started a war, who would win?
A.) Android - Artificial being designed to resemble a human, made from a flesh-like synthetic material. Usually built to be stronger, faster and more intelligent than humans. B.) Replicant or Augment - Bio-engineered being, virtually identical to humans but genetically enhanced, they have superior strength, speed, agility, resilience, and intelligence. C.) Cyborg - Cybernetic organism, a being with both organic and mechanical body parts. D.) Robot - Autonomous or semi-autonomous machine, can be designed in a human-like or non-humanoid form, capable of performing various tasks with no regard to their appearance. E.) Mutant - An organism or a new genetic character arising or resulting from an instance of mutation, by alteration of the DNA sequence, or by unpredictable factors such as bio-pollution, chemical contamination, or nuclear radiation. F.) Hologram - Three-dimensional computer projection that can sometimes be tactile through the use of force fields. H.) Humans resistance army - Leftovers of human civilization trying to regain control of Earth.
Androids
Replicants / Augments
Cyborgs
Mutants
Holograms
Robots
Humans would succeed in regaining the control of Earth
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Who would win a war between Androids, Replicants, Cyborgs, Mutants, tactile Holograms and sentient Robots? Could humans stop them in the future?
I think robots will take over because they come in different shapes and sizes so you can attach anything to a robot without regarding about their shapes and appearance. It's a limitless potential. There can be robot tanks, robot planes, robot bombs and robot ships and more. Androids and cyborgs are just the same. While mutants are bio, they can feel pain and can cripple them. Robots can come up with viruses/nanobots that can destroy any living organism and they're immune to it.
Holograms may seem invincible for anyone but they have weak points. Holograms needs their holographic devices for them to operate and if they can phase through anyone, so can anyone phase through them and destroy their main sources. Anyone can sniper it.
T-800 model 101 (terminator), no chance Legion (also from the terminator series), no fckn chance
But I think mutants could be beatable, dependingon how advanced their mutations are... I think on the infamous series on ps3
Most stuff would be the end of mankind, probably
Most dangerous stuff are tec based things because simply, right now there is so much stuff to buy out there you wouldn't believe, then ridiculous rich people got even way more advanced shit... with an ai taking over those tec, good night mankind
Probably cyborgs, they will be further along faster than AI/incorporated with it from the get go. We are a wire into the head away from our cell phones making us cyborgs already.
We need electricity too, for powering our machines. We can starve to death, they can't, even if some of them run out of power, others can find them, switch them on the power charger, and they are ready to fight again. Humans can't do that, if we run out of food, we are finished. Oh right, and we can easily die when we get wounded, while they can just repair themselves, their wounds can't get infected.
Cooking ages humans and causes disease? LOL, different sorts of bacteria, viruses, fungi, protozoa, and other microbes is what causes disease, check on biology books. Unless you'd rather believe some new age mumbo jumbo or raw-foodists ideology.
Masai live up to 45 years old, wow, that's very commendable. Inuits, before they had Canadian healthcare, they lived up to 40 years old, but modern Inuits have accepted civilized way of living, they started cooking food, and now they live up to 68 year old (that's still lower than average Canadian life-span). Raw food often contains parasites, such as tapeworms, liver flukes, ringworms, trichinella and other dangerous organisms, don't eat that.
There are thousands of viruses and bacteria in your intestines. The immune system actually relies on them, and is not as simple as you think*
As for studies we just get paid to write whatever the grant finder tells us to write.
No way of finding out exactly if the study is actually being completely honest and hasn't got a agenda.
Humans are only people who cook their food. It's actually relatively new that we have completely started to do this. In fact there is e. coli and bacteria in salads and fruit etc. On a continuous basis we eat that raw.
I know there are thousands of bacteria in human immune system, but not viruses, unless you're infected. Lots of bacteria can help the immune system, but viruses don't help, they are usually harmful. Immune system never relies on viruses, I guess you should have studied more thoroughly.
If cooking allegedly releases AGEs, then how come people live longer in civilized countries, while people in tribal communities that prefer raw food live about 40 years. Of course you get paid to write whatever the grant funder tells you to write, that's called propaganda, the funder has certain interest, financial or other.
"Humans are only people who cook their food" - And what other people exist on planet earth besides humans? Humans started cooking in the stone age, it probably started as an accident (food dropped in the fire, cave men liked the smell, they tasted it, and decided that cooked food tastes much better).
"In fact there is e. coli and bacteria in salads and fruit etc" - In fact, e. coli is a species of bacteria, no need to separate it with "and" ;) Yes, fruit can contain it, but not always, and if it does have e. coli, it can infect you. We can eat some type of food raw, usually fruit, and some vegetables, even some mushrooms, but in most cases, it's safer to cook them. Fruits and vegetables should be washed before you eating, because they may contain parasites, or their eggs, and check your books, parasites also never help your immune system, some of them can actually kill humans (e. g Trichinella).
The human body is simply getting weaker, the more tools we use, the more we cook, the more we don't allow our body to work, simply we will loose that function.
Civilised societies have more colds, flus, allergies on general that uncivilised societies do not have.
If you look at hunter gatherers, nomadic people's, their bones and teeth show that civilisation and it's practices age, cause disease and in fact reduce life span.
It's true more children in wilder lifestyles die attributing to to a median of higher mortality. But are we factoring this in?
The skin is the largest organ, I am sure millions of viruses are sitting on it right now. Junk DNA used to be disregarded, but suddenly it's seen as important. Just like that what viruses do to the human body, their importance can be more understood.
We can also see from our pets that civilised lifestyle causes them diseases and reduces their fertility.
Cooking food is simply not needed. As a animal we should be able to eat food without cooking it. Makes no sense why nature would design us any other way.
The denaturing of proteins whilst cooking, the heat of the food will damage the body.
We don't allow our body to work? But cooking is working, some people are professional cooks. Yes, human body can loose some functions if we use too much tools, but we can always make up for it in the gym. It's true that civilized societies have more colds, flus, allergies etc, but that's because people in civilized countries are less exposed to natural influences. Still, they live quite longer than people in tribal communities. If you haven't noticed, modern people have much longer life span than hunter gatherers and nomadic people's. How are we factoring their mortality? Their lifestyle is backward and too risky. Even if there were millions on our skin, they are most likely dormant, otherwise, they would kill us, that's what active viruses do. There are millions of bacteria on our skin, but they are not as harmful as viruses, and some of them can be useful for humans.
DNA can be genetically modified, maybe someday scientists will find a way to make us immune to most viruses. Our pets can eat cooked food, and their fertility is usually reduced by veterinarians, otherwise, we would have a house full of animals. Civilized way of life also developed cures for our pets if they get sick.
True, animals eat food without cooking it, but that's because they haven't evolved enough, they have no civilization, nor they have hands to build tools, unlike us humans. There are different ways of cooking, not all of them are "unhealthy". Humans invented roasting, boiling, frying, baking, steaming, stewing etc, some of these techniques are healthier, some are less healthy. Besides that, would you be able to eat warm apple crumble without baking? I don't think so ;)
You need to research a little more, many civilisations still eat raw food.
Also you need to factor in almost all junk food is fortified with raw meat vitamins. Without this most people will drop dead. There is no way to meet your RDAs if the government stops fortification.
I did research more, yes, most civilizations eat raw fruits and some vegetables (as a salad), but that's it. Even a salad needs to be seasoned with a vinegar, not just because of the taste, but also in order to destroy potential parasites.
I agree that junk food is fortified is not healthy. Humans don't need fortified food, most of the natural vitamins and minerals are in vegetables, fruits and grains, they don't need to fortify them. Humans also eat eggs and dairy products, they also contain vitamins and minerals. And how would you make a raw apple pie? :D
I know about Steak tartar, Mr Bean didn't like it for a very good reason :D Most types of cheese are raw, you don't need to cook it, it's curdled and fermented, that's how its protected from spoiling. Raw milk - Naturally, we are mammals. Hollandaise - Lemon juice in it protects the sauce from microorganisms. Mayonnaise - Also containes either vinegar or lemon juice. Ice cream - Contains lots of sugar to preserve it, and freezing also protects it from certain microbes. Blue steak - As I said, Eskimos eat raw meat, and they don't live very long. But they gradually accepted civilization. Raw sushi - People who eat it often get sick in the stomach. Raw oysters - Clams in general are filter feeders, they can contain lots of pathogens, or even chemical from polluted sea. Raw octopus - Disgusting. Raw egg yolks - Sure, but you need to watch out for Salmonella. Maunka honey - Honey is honey, no need to separate it. Don't you know that honey kills various microbes?
I know, some primitive cultures eat disgusting things that look like something zombies would like to eat.
Not all the food is fortified with vitamins, especially not with "raw meat vitamins", because vegetables, grains and fruit naturally have more vitamins than meat. Furthermore, some people don't eat meat at all, not just vegetarians and vegans, but also fruitarians. Some people don't eat meat out of religious reasons (e. g Hindus), some don't eat it out of ethical or health reasons. For most fortified food, they use synthesized vitamins, or extracted from plants, such as algae, even from some sorts of mushrooms.
I've never heard of any religion promoting veganism. Some governments promote vegetarianism, but not veganism. Right, haha, only neo-liberal media promotes veganism. I don't support veganism, but I know that meat is not healthy either.
Yeah, you do, and I understand, if I were you, I would probably also do it for the money.
I did read all religions, Buddhism, Hinduism and some denominations of Wicca promote vegetarianism, not veganism, as for the other religions, none of them support veganism. Muslims and Judaists don't eat pork, but they eat other meat (if the meat is kosher/halal). My government definitely don't promote veganism, and they don't need to pay the actors. If you mean some Hollywood celebrities, they are not paid to promote veganism, most of them are vegans because they think it's "trendy".
LOL, and who paid me to say that humans are weak? Aliens? Robots? Demons? I'm just being realistic and logical, unlike you. By the way, liver is disgusting, it's a food for hyenas, vultures and other scavengers.
Right, we are incredibly strong, that's why it's so much easier for humans to get killed - compared to e. g Androids, Holograms, Mutants and others in the poll.
It's possible, but replicants are resourceful too.
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Home > Technology & Internet > Polls > Who would win a war between Androids, Replicants, Cyborgs, Mutants, tactile Holograms and sentient Robots? Could humans stop them in the future?
Most Helpful Opinions