Accuweather does it again? Why are they so desperate to fool people about global warming?

[strateguy632]

Today i compared accuweather, with a name pretending to be "accurate" but misused the prediction part of forecast, where they won't get caught lying because it is a prediction , not measured at the time, just to fool people about increased heat!

While the local weather in a place OUT of u. s. where they LACK the agenda to fool people about global warming, they forecast for this afternoon, 12p 28 c. with COOLING to 27 c. =81f at 1p, 81 degrees Fahrenheit, in pic

somewhere out of u. s. local forecast

but #accuweather instead of copying local weather, misused its prediction to fool people warmer! We CAN lie since it is a prediction? Nobody can catch us, because not measured at the time?

So we must lie HOTTER for the agenda so they did... in picture

everything bad "poor air" and "extreme" ultraviolet to cause fear

for same place 29 c. that is 85 f. FOUR degrees HOTTER than local forecast, instead of just copying local forecast, so why is global warming so IMPORTANT that they try to fool people 4 degrees HOTTER instead of copying local forecast?

[msmissydc]

Local forecasts will always be more accurate because the big stations often use an aggregate of the nearest of their own stations. They can't just use the local once without their agreemeant. Even if they can they dont go into as much specific areas as local stations will go. Also forecasts are ju t that forecast, A try to be as precise with your limited knowledge as possible. They never claim it will be accurate. There will also be areas where the local forecast will on average be higher, so does the global warming scare then turn into a try to keep climate change hidden from the public?

About what you refer to as the climate change scare, it's important to recognize that the UV index is a legitimate and scientifically backed measurement. You do know that, right? The UV index provides a fair warning based on their forecasts, indicating the potential for harm from unprotected sun exposure. Without the "extreme" warning, people might mistakenly believe that the scale runs from 0 to 100, with a level of 11 being considered low. This misunderstanding could be far more misleading than a missed weather forecast.

Additionally, some weather forecasts also include pollen warnings, which are designed to inform individuals who suffer from allergies about the levels of pollen in the air. However, you seem to suggest that this is just a hoax, claiming that allergies related to nature do not exist. This perspective overlooks the substantial body of research that demonstrates the reality of seasonal allergies and their impact on many people's lives. It's crucial to approach these topics with an open mind and consider the evidence presented by experts in the field.

[exitseven]

Joe Sobol is one of these guys that goes on the Today Show and MSNBC. He is carrying water for the democrats

[exitseven]

Thanks for the MHO😎