I think it especially bears mentioning how the audience loudly approves when the father of the girl tells her ex (?) boyfriend he would have killed him if he had found him.
Of course he's biased, his audience is mostly women. More than that, the field of psychology is just naturally more apologetic towards women's feelings. I think it's because women tend to experience their feelings a little more strongly than men.
Yes. Remember the target audience is women.
If you just look how he give femal sex offenders a platform to defend and justify their actions. Disgusting really.
Teachers having sex with students is sickening and wrong no matter if what gender the teacher and student are. Teachers are trusted to protect the students and clearly, they violated that trust. If these situations had been a male teacher with a female student, it would have been making the audience hate the teacher the entire show. (If it even made a show like this)
I thought it was just me that thought so, glad I'm not the only one.
Probably. He's on television, so he has to behave how he's told to not upset important people such as advertisers. Even if he doesn't agree with what he's saying, he's a tv personality so he has to put forward a certain personality to keep advertisers happy.
Dr. Phil is garbage anyways. His show has become a launching pad for spoiled brats social media personalities, like Daniel Brogelli and whoever that spoiled kid was whose mom bought her a Mercedes "G Wagon". Both of them have huge social media followings now. He's being used by spoiled young girls to start their youtube careers and doesn't even acknowledge that fact.
He'z doing it for the money because it's a female audience. Just like judges give pussy passes to get more money. It's all about money and politics.
Most psychologists are. Not necessarily intentionally, but their science is based almost exclusively on the assumption that female emotive response is the norm, in essence dismissing normal male emotive responses.
Yes I do.
Glad you got a laugh out of it.
Dude, man. . . you guys and youtube. I will be glad when it becomes more mainstream and advertisers force this sick garbage off. Then you dudes will have to go to some deep internet site to find this crap.
? I always have something of value to say. Do you have you have anything to value to post?
Freedom of expression? Dude, you come from Hungary. Is there freedom of expression in Hungary? Freedom of speech? Guaranteed civil and individual rights?
I think not. And dude, that's perfectly fine. It is your country, do with it what you like. But one thing you have to understand youngster, is whatever you decide for you and yours, it is only for you and yours.
The rest of us make different choices. We ain't Hungarian. We don't aspire to have Hungarian nationalism. If you don't like feminism or women's rights or whatever. Then do you.
If you don't like our "ways", then don't live in our nations and we won't live in yours.
Just don't be jealous.
Because we certainly are not jealous of you.
Always? Talk about being conceited.
My country'a political turmoils don't reflect my opinion on free speech. And for the record, on paper free speech is protectes by out constitution. Practice is a different deal.
You built your whole argument around this ad hominem, didn't you? Pathetic.
by the way "our way" look at the comments. Most people agree with me. There is no you as a collective. Feminism has finally destroyed itself with it's own obnoxiousness.
Yes. I am conceited. Does that anger you?
And you are talking about the Constitution? What in the world?
Why are you talking about the Constitution of the United States? You are Hungarian. You live in Hungary. You guys don't like feminism.
Don't have it.
In my nation, it is legal.
And you are going to use the population of GaG against me? Haha!!! That is hilarious. GaG is reflective of only a portion of those in my country. And the folks here know it. Hence, all the whining.
So you admit being a shitty person. OK.
Believe it or not, Hungary also has a constitution. I know, crazy. Almost like other countries work very similarly to yours. What a shock!
"And you are going to use the population of GaG against me? Haha!!! That is hilarious. GaG is reflective of only a portion of those in my country."
So you just assumed that no matter how many people disagree with you, they MUST BE a minority? Talk about a cognitive bias.
Yes, I am a proud "shitty" person. Does that upset you? You mad. . . bro? You triggered?
"So you just assumed that no matter how many people disagree with you, they MUST BE a minority? Talk about a cognitive bias."
No son. I have values. I have a code. I don't subscribe to what the majority think. I am not a groupthink kind of guy. What I believe, I believe because of my own ability to reason and think for myself.
So if you want use what you think the majority here think against me, do it.
I stand on what I think is right. I don't give a damn what the majority here think. I am not lemming. And I cannot stand folks who are.
Let me make it plain;
"Yes, I am a proud "shitty" person. Does that upset you?"
No, I am actually happy, as this makes you that much less credible.
I'm not your son. If I was, I would have killed myself, just to not be associated with a worldly idiot like yourself.
"I have values. I have a code. I don't subscribe to what the majority think."
You still act like you have some objective moral standard, and as if everyone not agreeing with you would be misguided and dumb. And you are still wrong about that.
Also, if it doesn't matter to you how the majority thinks, why did you argue that "GaG is reflective of only a portion of those in my country", as if what others in your country think would be somehow relevant? You said it yourself - " I don't subscribe to what the majority think" - so why even bring it up?
"So if you want use what you think the majority here think against me, do it."
I don't have to try hard. You already made yourself look like a fool with your unnecessary aggression and trolling.
"I stand on what I think is right. I don't give a damn what the majority here think. I am not lemming."
He said while being an NPC bobblehead himself. Just the usual leftie troll wallowing in cognitive bias.
But you know what? Let's hear it! You have a moral code. You said it. how does it go against recognizing that the show host in the videos above gave preferential treatment to his female guests? What moral prevents you from acknowledging this fact?
"No, I am actually happy, as this makes you that much less credible. "
Little one, you don't sound happy. Lighten up. Live a little.
"I'm not your son. If I was, I would have killed myself, just to not be associated with a worldly idiot like yourself."
You would have killed yourself? Haha! Son, calm down. Stop being so angry. Breathe a little. Drink some koolaid.
Yeah, I don't give any fucks about you or a lot of folks here at GaG disagreeing with me. I mean, if you were a person I respected, that would be different. But you already posted a bullcrap thread about women not giving you sex after you were nice to them. So that already proves you have no code. You have motivations. You are motivated like a pet animal. If people approve of you, treat you nice, agree with you or if women give you sex, that motivates you to act in a certain way or to claim certain beliefs.
"He said while being an NPC bobblehead himself. Just the usual leftie troll wallowing in cognitive bias."
He? Dude, are you talking to yourself?
If so, I will leave you alone.
Most of his audience women by the way. It probably just seem like dr phil is biased because you rarely see woman getting doubted anywhere compared to men actually dr phil is logical. He just don't have that women are wonderful effect in him.
It's a television show, not a therapy session. Women are far more likely to watch this sort of programming, thus, men are more likely to be made out as the bad guys.
He just plays to his audience which is mostly female.
A bit. But really, he's just an all-around idiot whose only purpose is to try (and fail) to make good television.
"Doctor" Phil is a hack. Him being biased or objective is completely beside the point.
I don't even give these celebrity doctors credit
@Desconhecida I agree with you there.
That guy was so attractive
He was too cute for her
Cherry-picked. They chose the two that best illustrated their points, not an analysis of them all...
You don't actually have to examine all cases to show there was some bias that should be explained. This doesn't imply there is a rule, but it does show that at least in two cases he was dismissive with men, and empathetic with women.
Tell me, what do you have to gain from defending this person with such fervour?
There is no "fervor". I'm just against poor methodology. And I've seen a LOT of such biased videos...
phil is a satanist
Most Helpful Opinions
It sure seems like it. I guess it shouldn’t be surprising that several of his male guests end up “revolting” against him.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=15fXhJG7JdM
However, I don’t think it’s his personal bias. I think he feels pressure to be biased, especially since most of his fans are women.