We live in a time when people feel very entightled to any and everything. I think this is just an opportunity to get famous and get some money without putting in much work.
Well, it looks like it worked out for him better than it did for Kurt Cobain.
2
0 Reply
Anonymous
(45 Plus)
+1 y
Stupid on the surface but we know how Holly weird things can be and I could see people stalking him harassing him because of an image of him or about him this is where lawsuits coming to play
The baby shown is now grown up and he has already made money from this in the past. Now I think that it is a CANCEL CULTURE rearing its ugly head again. But this is my opinion.
That's not how photography has EVER worked. The photographer, not the subject, is the owner of a photograph. And the model release - which any professional photographer will get signed before they use a picture of a person - will have certainly state that the photographer owns the picture and that there are no ongoing royalties - that's standard boilerplate text on a model release.
Only VERY famous people can negotiate partial ownership of photographs normally, and that has to be done in writing and added to the release. I'm not aware of any case of such being added retroactively.
disgraceful album cover and should never have been made. Maybe if he was wearing shorts it would not have been so bad. Or maybe a painting wearing shorts.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
61Opinion
If the judge doesn't immediately throw this case out, then I don't want to live on this planet any more.
I thought that kid was laughing about it... I guess he changed his mind?
I feel like his parents made the wrong decision for easy money.
Not exploited but they should have explained what happens to a guy’s private’s in water. (Shrinkage)
We live in a time when people feel very entightled to any and everything. I think this is just an opportunity to get famous and get some money without putting in much work.
Well, it looks like it worked out for him better than it did for Kurt Cobain.
Stupid on the surface but we know how Holly weird things can be and I could see people stalking him harassing him because of an image of him or about him this is where lawsuits coming to play
He's made bank on being that baby for years. It's completely ridiculous.
This is absolutely fucking stupid and ridiculous 🙄😒
He should be more upset about being badly circumcised than seen as a naked baby.
The baby shown is now grown up and he has already made money from this in the past. Now I think that it is a CANCEL CULTURE rearing its ugly head again. But this is my opinion.
Please tell me who is being canceled here
pedos almost certainly sexualized this, but pedos will sexualize anything related to kids.
Was that the objective? Go ask the people responsible.
Doesn’t he have a tattoo of this album cover on himself?
I think he should at least be entitled to a percentage of the royalties. He wasn't in the band but he provided an iconic album cover.
That's not how photography has EVER worked. The photographer, not the subject, is the owner of a photograph. And the model release - which any professional photographer will get signed before they use a picture of a person - will have certainly state that the photographer owns the picture and that there are no ongoing royalties - that's standard boilerplate text on a model release.
Only VERY famous people can negotiate partial ownership of photographs normally, and that has to be done in writing and added to the release. I'm not aware of any case of such being added retroactively.
I am going to guess it's bigger now. So what is the big deal?
If he was like 8 years old sure I would understand. He was a baby!
Not sure. I think it's a legitimate question to be asking, though.
But he should be sueing his parents, not Nirvana.
More stupid shit... Women and their fucking cancel culture.
He was exploited by Nirvana and now its time for them to pay the boi
hey can i get your opinion on a topic in your dm?
@JohnyBoy133 ok
Its beyond ridiculous. That poor dude is just out of money and is abusing the justice system to fill his wallet
disgraceful album cover and should never have been made. Maybe if he was wearing shorts it would not have been so bad. Or maybe a painting wearing shorts.