old masters could perfectly paint female nudity, but the paintings are good because of their nonchalant beauty, not because they can turn somebody on. It is art, portrayal of human's perfection. These illust have nothing to do with it. The nudity makes it more interesting for some people, but there is an extremely thin line between a kitsch and art
no I think it makes art even prettier
Female nudity does not bother me at all if it is not sexual which the type of art I think you are asking about is not usually sexual in my opinion. Like if I visited somebody's house and they had a nude female statuette or painting on display it would not bother me at all. When I say "not sexual" I guess that falls into the category of knowing it when you see it and people may see it different ways, that to me is the only risk w it. JMO!
I don't find it offensive at all. I'm an artist and I like doing female nudes. I've done a couple of nude self-portraits too...
Nudity in general isn't a big deal for me. Then again, I'm European. ^_^
I voted No.
www.utoopics.com/.../Kawasaki-murmur_lj.jpg
Audrey Kawasaki, one of many artists I like.
Almost all great artistes have painted nude women. Their work is great, I like it. If only voluptuous paintings are there, it is no art.
s No, it doesn't offend me. It's art, nothing more or less than that. It's not sexual (at least in my perspective), so I see no reasons to be offended.
Not so fond of it but it doesn't get to the point where it offends me either
I have posed fully bare for art's sake.
So, clearly, it doesn't offend me.
I like it and have many nude painting in my home.
I've never found it offensive
no, it represents vulnerability
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions