Girls what do you wear under leggings?

[Anonymous]

I never wear underwear under my leggings because Iv noticed on other girls you can see them! what do you do?

[crissyita]

I normally don't wear leggins... I'd rather to wear skirts... because of I like the air between my legs, since had some issues like lbl, I had little leakage at times... so a skirt let my panties to dry itself up with the air, otherwise leggings stay wet.
that's the truth!!!
independently if it is fashionable or not

[orphan]

little leakage never hurt no one...

lol

[crissyita]

@orphan no... I guess... but unconfortable though!

[Anonymous]

When I work out, I wear a thong under yoga pants or shorts. If I'm wearing skinny pants that are not see-through leggings, I might wear a thong or that no seam pantie. I usually wear a shirt long enough to cover my butt, so you can't see anything anyways.

[Mybeachlife88]

If your man dared you to wear the see through kind without panties... would you take him up on his dare? Say you were on vacation somewhere, etc.

[Opinion Owner]

@Mybeachlife88 Maybe in private, but not in public.

[Mybeachlife88]

Hmmm

[Daniel961]

WTF? I always wear underwear. And as someone already said, leggings AREN'T pants, you shouldn't care less about the outline of the underwear cause they meant to be worn like this...
4.bp.blogspot.com/.../60035740e.jpg

[gtrain]

more like NO YES

[Mister_No]

@gtrain cameltoe is never a "yes"..

[RJGraveyTrain]

I wear seamless underwear or a good old fashioned thong. The idea of my cooch getting all over my leggings is a bit unappealing.

[SleepingSnorlax]

You can deffinantly see the undo outlines
Not that i ever look of course...
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[Anonymous]

I would at least wear some underwear under them. Wear black underwear

[Asker]

You can see the outline of what you're wearing. I only wear some of I'm wearing a cardigan that's going to cover my ass

[Opinion Owner]

And leggings rock! Don't listen to @ThatJarHead

[Opinion Owner]

Yeah the outlines are sexy. Doesn't matter

[fauchelevent]

I just wear my usual underwear. If you're really concerned with it, either wear a thong or just continue to wear none.

[Shaft50]

Hahaha... so, don't wear underwear because underwear is visible under leggings... what do you think would be visible if you don't wear underwear?

[LaJackie]

Depends on the colour of the leggings.
However, i think it feels better wearing underwear.

[RainbowFanGirl]

I wear either a thong or boy shorts under mine. You should get opaque leggings so that you can't see the undies. It's kind of gross to wear them with nothing. :/

[kittykatbrat]

Me = A g-string (ie: My compression pants are see through up close)

[chintita]

what kind of leggings do you wear? most of them are not see through

[Anonymous]

I wear underware and don't wear the leggings unless I'm wearing a shirt long enough to cover my privates

[Dantheman101]

Spoil sport

[ThatJarHead]

LEGGINGS ARE NOT PANTS GOD DAMN IT!!!

[Asker]

What are they then?

[ThatJarHead]

If they are pants they'd be called pants! Leggings are just a heavier version of tights. Leggings are leggings. Pants are pants.

[ThatJarHead]

And I'm not saying leggings are bad. Just that they aren't pants.

[Daniel961]

Finally a reasonable person.

[ThatJarHead]

@Daniel961 right?

[Jane1]

Actually, leggings are a type of pants/trousers, just like jeans are type of pants, as you can see here:

dictionary.cambridge.org/.../leggings

www.oxforddictionaries.com/.../leggings

www.macmillandictionary.com/.../leggings

Here are some differences between leggings and tights:

www.diffen.com/difference/Leggings_vs_Tights

www.wisegeek.org/...etween-tights-and-leggings.htm

shellstyling.com/2013/01/30/tights-vs-leggings/

[ThatJarHead]

@Jane1 yes but when was the term "Leggings" officially endoctrinated into the English language to mean "tight stretchy pants"? Just because it's in the dictionary now doesn't mean it's factual. For gods sake the word "mansplain" is in the dictionary and is now endoctrinated into the English language (thanks feminism. Language regression... Never would've thought...)

[Jane1]

They are pants, you are ignorant just like those people who think that fish is "not meat" (well, fish are most certainly not vegetables) ;)

[ThatJarHead]

@Jane1 fish is meat. When people can prove to me that legging can 100% cover a human beings lower half the way pants are intended to and protect your lower half from environment you can work in them they're durable then I will consider them pants. Otherwise I disagree.

[ThatJarHead]

@Jane1 and I may be ignorant but at least I have the balls to defend my beliefs so you can never call me u spoken.

[Jane1]

But leggings do cover human beings lower half, see the picture: media.tumblr.com/.../...line_mnofn31tBV1qz4rgp.jpg

Besides, short shorts don't cover legs completely - but they are considered as pants.

[ThatJarHead]

@Jane1 they aren't pants. They're shorts. They cover the lower half yes. But can you see skin through them? If so they do not cover the lower half.

[Jane1]

You can't see skin through leggings, only through tights, see the differences.

[ThatJarHead]

@Jane1 you still have yet to prove me wrong. You prove 1 point when I made several. Just no defence for the others or?

[RJGraveyTrain]

Neither are shorts, and skirts, and dresses. Those are also not pants. Point being?

[OrangeBoy]

Duuuude, don't thell them that :' D... they can stop using it...

[Jane1]

You have no point... what kind of argument do you expect, I have explained everything.
Leggings cover your legs completely - just like pants.
Leggings are not tights, you can't see skin through them.
Leggings are footless - unlike tights, stockings, fishnets etc.

Therefore, they are pants, and you're most certainly not qualified more than experts from Oxford, Cambridge and MacMillan dictionary.

[orphan]

the shit people debate about nowadays.

[ThatJarHead]

@orphan Right? I'm judging causing havoc to see how many people put up a stink about a simple statement that leggings aren't pants. Because they aren't! Leggings are leggings. Just like sweats are sweats and jeans are jeans. If people actually got the point of my reply they'd get much less offended :P

[Jane1]

Sweatpants (obviously) and jeans are all types of pants/trousers... is that so hard to comprehend dude?

[ThatJarHead]

@Jane1 You're an idiot. It's called Satire. Or being sarcastic. Or being facetious. They all work. Buy yourself a thesaurus.

[Jane1]

You're the only idiot here mr JarHead (the name suits you) :P

[ThatJarHead]

@Jane1 Why do you think I picked it?

[GhostOnToast]

That's what thongs were made for

[Errui]

Just wear a thong. 😂😂

[Dantheman101]

😱😱😱

[FrenchyRomain]

that is completely un-hygenic... gross actually

[CHARismatic110]

I always wear underwear no matter what I wear.

[Jane1]

Usually nothing, leggings are enough for me.

[Hannahcakes]

Nothing. But if I did maybe a thong

[Hollywood-Glam]

I wear regular underwear.

[Dantheman101]

What's regular

[Hollywood-Glam]

@Dantheman101 Underwear like cheekies, boyshorts, and bikini.

[Dantheman101]

Bikini 👍👍👍👍👍😉

[chloe93]

wear seamless panties, no underwear lines!

[james_mark]

I mean it's nice both ways if you wear or not :p

[Anonymous]

I wear thongs under leggings.

[BarbieDollT]

Wear thongs underneath

[Anonymous]

Going without underwear is skanky.