So he has to give her 200k a month in child support despite Kim kardashian being a billionaire and coming from a wealthy family. Anyone find this to be fair?
I think that it must be 50/50 but if the mother is doing everything than the father must pay morr and for sure taking into consideration his financial status, both the mother and father should always be related to the kids unless one of them decided not to be a parent anymore and lose all his/her parental rights towards their children...
In the end, the parents must try their best to stay together married, especially if they have kids, divorce should be the last thing they think of, just like that suicide pill where a fighter knows that he lost by all means and ni chance in hell he have to survive anymore...
These days, people get married and file for a divorce from the 1st opsticule they bumped to...
No one is really caring about the needs of the child, and although both of them have a significant amount of money that can be used to raise the kid, I think it is about the thought and custody of the child. Even though Kim makes more than Kanye, Kanye still owes something to his kid, if that is even the acknowledgment of unneeded money rolling in every month I think it is in every case necessary to charge Kanye. Kim is taking time to raise that child. Time is money, Kanye doesn't have full custody, but he must make a full effort (even in money) to make a mark in this child's life. Kim's deserves every right to that money, because everyone knows Kanye will live just fine without that 200k. So will Kim, but her well time is being spent on that child every waking moment. Why should there be an exception just because they're both rich? Rich people come with problems too. Problems have cause and effect. Child support, in Kanye's case, is EFFECT.
Kanye West is the father of his children. He is assessed child support payments that are in line with HIS income. He has a financial responsibility toward his children, no matter what Kim Kardashian makes or how rich her family of origin is. Otherwise he is a deadbeat dad.
The reason he's assessed child support is that Kardashian has full custody. He's not taking care of those kids because he's as loony as a toon most of the time. If they had shared custody and he was mentally stable, his child support payments would be cut in half because he would be sharing the responsibilities of parenting. But he isn't.
And because he's acting crazy and not taking medication, he's not being a father to those children, period, and is depriving his children of a co-parenting situation that would help normalize their upbringing as much as possible despite divorce.
The people saying yes on here are blowing minds. He wNts to spend as much time with his kids as possible.
Kim shouldn't be able to just be like "oh, I'm leaving you, taking the kids and you have to pay me 200 thousand dollars a month and you have no say over what I do with that money.
How the fuck is she going to spend 200 thousand dollars on those kids every month? She's one of the richest women on the planet. What are you talking about the law doesn't just magically go away. It's not supposed to be used like this.
Child support is for someone bailing out on a relationship and trying to put the burden of the kids on someone else.
All that said. I'm pretty sure Kim k doesn't actually take the money. I thought I read that somewhere.
Opinion
43Opinion
Yeah, I think it is misuse of judicial powers and common sense but he should utilize visitation and fatherhood...
u Would you find it ridiculous if Kanye was not required to pay anything towards the support of his own child even though he is a billionaire?
Your poll is poorly worded.
You cannot trust your results.
Your thread title is: "Do you find it ridiculous that Kanye still has to pay child support..."
Then over your yes/no button options you ask: "Anyone find this to be fair?"
Those are opposite to each other and people have the option to answer your headline... YES they find it ridiculous OR they could answer your question YES it is fair.
Do you want a YES answer to mean we find it ridiculous or do you want our YES answer to mean we find that it is fair?
Different posters will mean different things when they give their answers and no one can draw any conclusions from the results because you asked the question 2 different times in your thread and the questions are opposite of each other instead of agreeing totally mixing up the yes/no answers.
Yeah, only cause the whole point of child support is that the mother most times made less money than the father and so was the way for the father to still financially help with the child since the mother most times got sole custody.. In this case Kim is the one making more money.. I get that Kanye should still be responsible for his child, but there's many other ways he can support his daughter.. Like being there and simply taking good of her when Kim or the family is around.. Or at least if he pays child support a ridiculous amount like 200k shouldn't have been in the equation..
The concept of child support is ridiculous to begin with. It shouldn't exist under any situation. Parents should have joint custody so long as neither is abusive to the child. When the kid is with you, you take care of them how you want to according to your own parenting principles.
Ain’t ridiculous, its the law. That’s what happens when you come up w/ and sign a bogus prenuptial agreement, shit comes back to bite your ass hard. Love is overrated, where there is money, marriage is just another financial investment, she won a lottery.
Two hundred grand a month? Do their kids have some rare disorder where they can only eat gold-plated Harvard diplomas?
You know, if there was some mandate that the money had to be spent ON or FOR the children, I could almost see it being justified, but sheesh...
So just because Kim can afford to provide for the kids on her own it means Kanye is not their father anymore and therefore has no financial responsibility? Especially after he has talked so much shit about his kids online like how badly he wanted them and loves them such stuff in the past, he literally has no right to say having to provide for his children is unfair on him.
200k may sound too much but they are celebs and the kids definitely aren't living like the average children. Even keeping aside things like their food, clothes, toys and gadgets are pricier than ours, things like providing them security/bodyguards, sending them to schools meant for celeb kids, nannies because let's be real Kim is a busy woman and trained nannies are expensive to hire, their transporation... it's not bad.
Of course it's ridiculous. What do they say the average cost of bringing up a kid is until 18 years age? 100,000 is what they say. And that is so bullshit. 17,000 per year? Get the fuck out. With that mind set, it takes north of $300,000 for an average American to raise a child? If people have 3 kids what is that? None the less, who cares? 200k per month? Wow. That is pure California aids.
It's ridiculous. Children don't cost that fucking much unless they need a new car every 2 weeks.
Legally speaking though her lawyers probably made the argument that she will lose money from not being on TV or something... which is bullshit because childcare doesn't cost that.
I mean, just because he’s a celebrity doesn’t mean the laws magically go away. He is a parent and has to pay child support until all his kids are 18. Unless he wants to go to jail, then by all means, he’s more than welcome to skip paying child support. Either that or give up his parental rights.
Yes, I do find it to be fair that a father be required to pay for his children. Taking care of your kids is a pretty big part of being a parent. Some would argue the whole thing, in fact. What kind of limp dick loser doesn't provide for their kids? So what if she's also rich? Put their money together and buy the kids a small nation. Who cares? You want to give them the best possible life and two billion can buy more than one billion.
Usually I am all for paying the child support. However, in this case, because she is a billionaire l, I can't imagine how she would spend 200k/mo on the kids. What would she buy for them?
I think if she out the child support in an annuity or something similar, then they could just let it pile up until they are 18 añd give it to them then, or just continue to save it.
it's a shame there are so many forces at play designed to destroy the nuclear family unit
on one hand, there is social media, pop culture and propaganda used to discourage women from motherhood
on the other hand, you have family court laws and societal expectations to discourage men from fatherhood
The government should only enforce contracts between the parties, not rewrite or void contracts. However, since in effect we are slaves, voting changes nothing, we are powerless to do anything about the criminals that own the government and rule over us. All we can do is make the best of it. Especially, that is what females should do when we can benefit at the expense of males.
Women don’t take accountability. I’m disgusted by women today. Acting slutty even in her 40s, cheating, bashing men for everything. Women in this world live a pretend life but I know when world war 3 hits, it will scare the living shit out of them. If a woman has money, make her cheap ass pay for child support to. I’m not scared of feminists and especially third wave feminism. Guys and men have to stand up now. Eventually Gods words will prevail and that will piss off a lot of girls with the second coming of Jesus Christ back on the earth because those OnlyFans girls can no longer live a life of sin and make money off their body. Women tell guys to value them and treat them like equal, enough of the lies. Modern day women are utterly lost souls, living life vicariously with only 3 things in mind — 1) herself, 2) money, 3) her friends. Well my rebuttal is — money can be gone with a snap of a finger. Friends come and go in life all the time.
I don’t think it cost 200k to raise a child. Child support does a percentage of your income? I think their should be a cap to that. Like if you make a 3 million a year you shouldn’t need to pay 14% of that since it doesn’t cost that much to raise a child.
Sure but what's more ridiculous is that women get all/most child custody by default & the man is assumed to be wrong/less deserving. A lot of these women are horrible mothers.
of course. doesn't matter a wife is billionaire or not. He's a father of his children, he's responsible for the child support.
It's the court's job to consider both him and her financial situations and set the right amount for the both parties.
The amount could be $1, $1B. and it doesn't matter how rich/poor the wife is,
he has to pay for child support and it's really upto the court to set the ideal amount that is fair/workable for him considering both parties life styles/income/$ the kids need.
No child support is about the father doin his share.
I do think 200k is ridiculous. Always found it bad that being rich means they have to over do the amount.
Superb Opinion