@hi_it_is_me123 Body hair is a masculine trait, although men naturally generally have more of it than women, women still do have body hair luckily it's much less. If a woman leaves it to the point it's visible it becomes repulsive because it's masculine so liking it on a woman would be gay not the other way around.. Removing body hair is the feminine act while leaving it be is the masculine act. Why you say? Because the hormonal balance is what decides the amount of body hair a human have, the hormonal balance of a male makes them have it much more than females that's why it's common for men to have body hair, same as muscles, I wouldn't like a girl with big muscles, she would look more like a man and liking her for her muscles would be make me part gay in fact.. Nothing wrong with an athletic woman with a toned physic but after a certain limit she becomes more masculine than feminine thus not attractive to a hetrosexual male, because a hetrosexual masculine man is naturally attracted to femininity and feminine traits like smooth skin, soft voice, and delicate body..
Funny how feminism has made women question the basic human biology of genders smh..
@Smashingdoozy no it's biology in the first place.. The amount of body hair on a man is much more than a woman, and when I say body hair I'm not talking about pubic hair. Body hair is a primary trait in a man probably because of testosterone which men produce more of than women..
And it's a matter of attraction in the first place a female leg with hair on it is just not physically attractive to a heterosexual male, and I explained why.
It's just psychological in a man to get repulsed by masculine traits and get attracted to delicate feminine traits.. Why is that so difficult to understand? It's the same as a man with rounded physical features is less attractive to women than a man with squared physical features, because roundness and curves is feminine while square features are masculine.. Physical flexibility on women is attractive as it's feminine, physical strength on men is attractive cuz it's masculine..
And it's not black and white, men have femininity in them and women have masculinity in them, that's completely normal.. But attraction is usually to the opposite sex
Body hair isn't inheriantly masculine or feminine. Every ADULT has body hair (with the exception of those who do not grow it) what you are calling biology is western societal norms.
Attraction isn't entirely biological it has influence from society. For example in Western society breasts are sexual. In others they think we are fucking weird for sexualizing babies food sources.
A lot of non western influenced societies have women WHO DO NOT GET RID OF BODY HAIR.
Every single thing you are talking about is told to you by society NOT biology.
You see everybody, the fact that you need to insult me to get your point across only proves how mentally ill you're, that I don't hae to listen to anything you say..
The bottom line is I find visible body hair manly thus repulsive.. And I wouldn't find my woman's legs sexy if it's full of hair.. I know it's normal but I'd like hair to remove it consistently because I love her smooth skin more.. Waxing would be preferable because it stays smooth for 2 whole weeks after waxing..
That's my opinion that I answered on the question and I have the right to it, so everybody just mind your own business.
Exactly it's a preference not biology. Just say you have a preference for shaved/waxed women and move on. Don't try justify your reasoning with fake facts
@Smashingdoozy listen these are not fake facts.. it's a true biological fact that men have thicker longer body-hair, that's why it's a masculine train and it's because of the male hormones that man have, women have the same hormones too but less that's why they have less body hair all over their body. The less male hormones in a woman the less masculine she is thus the more physically appealing to men she is and most men like feminine women. That's all am saying and it's true.
Fact, the more a woman's leg looked like a man's leg the more repulsed most men would be from it. Whether the reasoning for that is biological or social it doesn't make much of a difference. Now I explained why I believe it's biological (Male and female hormones) and if you don't see the logic in my argument that's not my problem.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
58Opinion
Clean shaven looks much better and it feels better too.
lol if i love the girl her legs doesn't matter for me
I'm from Texas, so I prefer smooth legs. But if she's not about the shaving, maybe go with some thigh high stockings? I like that stuff too.
Id prefer clean shaved but overall don't really care either way
Even if shaven legs weren't a standard. We would still love women all the same. Makes no difference.
Wax and laser. So u will never get hair on your legs. This looks nasty and just as bad as hairy legs
As a man I personally prefer to have my own legs cleanly shaved.
Gross, even shaving isn't great.. Gotta be waxed!
@hi_it_is_me123
Body hair is a masculine trait, although men naturally generally have more of it than women, women still do have body hair luckily it's much less. If a woman leaves it to the point it's visible it becomes repulsive because it's masculine so liking it on a woman would be gay not the other way around..
Removing body hair is the feminine act while leaving it be is the masculine act. Why you say?
Because the hormonal balance is what decides the amount of body hair a human have, the hormonal balance of a male makes them have it much more than females that's why it's common for men to have body hair, same as muscles, I wouldn't like a girl with big muscles, she would look more like a man and liking her for her muscles would be make me part gay in fact.. Nothing wrong with an athletic woman with a toned physic but after a certain limit she becomes more masculine than feminine thus not attractive to a hetrosexual male, because a hetrosexual masculine man is naturally attracted to femininity and feminine traits like smooth skin, soft voice, and delicate body..
Funny how feminism has made women question the basic human biology of genders smh..
💀 "basic human biology" *only talks about societal norms*
@Smashingdoozy no it's biology in the first place..
The amount of body hair on a man is much more than a woman, and when I say body hair I'm not talking about pubic hair. Body hair is a primary trait in a man probably because of testosterone which men produce more of than women..
And it's a matter of attraction in the first place a female leg with hair on it is just not physically attractive to a heterosexual male, and I explained why.
It's just psychological in a man to get repulsed by masculine traits and get attracted to delicate feminine traits.. Why is that so difficult to understand? It's the same as a man with rounded physical features is less attractive to women than a man with squared physical features, because roundness and curves is feminine while square features are masculine..
Physical flexibility on women is attractive as it's feminine, physical strength on men is attractive cuz it's masculine..
And it's not black and white, men have femininity in them and women have masculinity in them, that's completely normal.. But attraction is usually to the opposite sex
You sound dumb lol
Body hair isn't inheriantly masculine or feminine. Every ADULT has body hair (with the exception of those who do not grow it) what you are calling biology is western societal norms.
Attraction isn't entirely biological it has influence from society. For example in Western society breasts are sexual. In others they think we are fucking weird for sexualizing babies food sources.
A lot of non western influenced societies have women WHO DO NOT GET RID OF BODY HAIR.
Every single thing you are talking about is told to you by society NOT biology.
It's what YOU are attracted to because SOCIETY TOLD YOU TO.
@Blackcupcake he sounds idiotic, and resounds stupidly
@NathanDavis LITERALLY!!
You see everybody, the fact that you need to insult me to get your point across only proves how mentally ill you're, that I don't hae to listen to anything you say..
The bottom line is I find visible body hair manly thus repulsive.. And I wouldn't find my woman's legs sexy if it's full of hair.. I know it's normal but I'd like hair to remove it consistently because I love her smooth skin more.. Waxing would be preferable because it stays smooth for 2 whole weeks after waxing..
That's my opinion that I answered on the question and I have the right to it, so everybody just mind your own business.
@Aassem insulting maybe, but it was no slander
also, the level of your stupidity was the insulting thing in the first place, off the charts
@NathanDavis
Again buddy, get a life, don't force your opinions on others, I don't care what you think, so get lost
Exactly it's a preference not biology. Just say you have a preference for shaved/waxed women and move on. Don't try justify your reasoning with fake facts
@Aassem I'll get lost so I don't flood others' notifications, lol.
@Smashingdoozy listen these are not fake facts..
it's a true biological fact that men have thicker longer body-hair, that's why it's a masculine train and it's because of the male hormones that man have, women have the same hormones too but less that's why they have less body hair all over their body. The less male hormones in a woman the less masculine she is thus the more physically appealing to men she is and most men like feminine women. That's all am saying and it's true.
Fact, the more a woman's leg looked like a man's leg the more repulsed most men would be from it.
Whether the reasoning for that is biological or social it doesn't make much of a difference. Now I explained why I believe it's biological (Male and female hormones) and if you don't see the logic in my argument that's not my problem.
I'm done with you all.
Yes it's true that men are usually more hairy but the whole appealing part is not biological.
Men in western societies* would be repulsed.
I don't care about such a thing at all.
Not really the greatest of looks.
I prefer she not shave at all.
I couldn't care less.
You should try waxing those legs, it lasts longer.
That's more like a banana leg
U mean a rotten banana?
Spotted banana
Suboptimal.
Not big deal.
Grosss
How is it gross? You're acting like a 12 year old boy or an annoying pick me girl who want the guys to be on her side. weirdo
Feminists disliking my comment.. If you already have to dislike negative opinion why do you even ask such questions
I'm not a feminist hun, far from it. I'm just not an idiot.
It’s not gross it’s normal it happens to women and you can’t stop it:/ how can you say that about body of your own genders
When legs are spread nothing matters
Frankly, men find women attractive..🙄😂
Clean shaven is much better
It's not attractive. At most it's passable.