+1 yI've found in study and life that ladies are intuitive thinkers while men are lateral thinkers.
So while a guy thinks through each option and evaluates each one's applicability, a lady will likely compile the ideas together and pick en-mass of information.
Hence why women prefer medical careers and men STEM. Engineering, science, and machining are all step by step processed without room for diviation, it simply doesn't satisfy the brain chemistry of women to work in such a slow boring step by step process. I also think this is where people get the notion of mansplaining. Just because the female mind can compile the idea the man needs to walk through doesn't mean it's offensive.
My reasoning for why women prefer medical is because they are natural prognosis givers. Women can look at someone andall of their symptoms then compile the most likely answer from it.
In a way guys are typically more logical because their minds think in the style that logic is actuated, step by step with each step relying off of previous ones.
But women are far more intuitive, socially evolved, and brainy when it comes to a lot of things. It's also why women are the natural nurturer, she has the brain for raising young people that men can't aptly mimic.
Guys use intuition yes, but its not the default of thinking for us, hence why women don't always make sense.34 Reply
Asker+1 yThat’s so interesting! Thank you for sharing 😊
Asker+1 yKnowing this could actually be really helpful.
- +1 y
Right? When I learned about all this I started thinking about its applicability to gender roles in relationships. Like how men tend to be the decision makers is based in the reasoning that men's brains are tuned to step by step decision making. And women are there to slap them in the head when they are going in the wrong direction lmao
Every captian needs a navigator after all.
Asker+1 yHaha yeah! Exactly. It would be a good balance with the right people.
Most Helpful Opinions
+1 yThere are four main points I'd like to make.
1. In talking to a LOT of people about dating and their experiences, I have found if anything, the opposite is true at the beginning. Guys may try to hide it, but I'm referring to whether they're actually emotional underneath it all. We get attached more easily at first than women, hence our difficulty actually starting a relationship. Guys make the first move and keep things rolling - that's why women aren't as attached at first. We have already thought about the person we're pursuing and have taken action to achieve that relationship. We're already attached at least a little bit.
2. Actual measure of emotions is a tricky subject, but it is my belief that neither gender actually has more than the other. They simply show it differently. Men do put up fronts to seem less emotional, however, we can sometimes be more emotional than a woman in a given circumstance.
3. In general, all people have a level of maturity, and that is really the key factor in how we see someone's emotional level. If someone is mature, they don't feel as much like they have to hide it. They also have probably seen enough life to have knowledge and patience enough to know when and how to express themselves.
4. Personality type matters a lot here, not gender as much. For example, I'm an ENFJ (Extroverted, Intuitive, Feeling, Judging). I am an emotional person, but I also know how to manage it and know how to be logical as well. An INTJ (Introverted, Intuitive, Thinking, Judging) is going to be much less naturally emotional.10 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yI feel like for myself anyways, I would say I am but only because it actually genuine with my logic. I'm emotionally more mature than the guys I've encountered because I've been through shit. So it forces me to take my time and be logical. Because a lot of men are still trying to figure their emotions out. Its like waiting for someone to finish a lesson you already took honestly. 😅😅
So by default, I act logically when it comes to dating because I know what it takes to uphold whatever relationship you have with a person. Whether that be Friends With benefits, Fuck Buddies, boyfriend/girlfriend, and etc. Therefore, a lot of guys find me "unique" or weird because I act like similar to males with my approach to dating them.
I have options and I let that be known. Communication is something I'm great at, and I'm honest about everything from the beginning. I know what I want and what I don't. What I will and won't put up with. I can have sex and not get attached from it but I'm also choosey with that. I put energy and effort into who putting that back into me. I trust actions not words. Not with all the drama so I definitely cut people off if I'm not feeling them. I play my position, stay in my lane, and I enjoy being picky and single. 🤷🏽♀️
In conclusion, I feel like I'm actually cautious and logical because I've been there. While guys are like that because that's how they actually think, but their control on their actual feelings are lacking. So they get caught up on dumb shit a lot. So that makes me one step ahead of them by default.10 Reply
963 opinions shared on Dating topic. Yes, and this might be one of the main reasons why couples usually have little fights. She thinks he doesn't care
She thinks he doesn't love her
She thinks he just doesn't appreciate it and so on
But as a matter of fact they do, they might not come and shower us with billion comments and dedicate love quotes for us daily, but they do all of this their own way, as long as we're able to tolerate and still understand that MEN are build differntly when it comes to their mindset and expressing feelings and emotions, then a couple can actually grow pretty strong together.
Been there done that, and it's not that tragic
-D-00 Reply
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
67Opinion
2.1K opinions shared on Dating topic. Inexperienced guys (I'm talking dating/relationship experience here, not sexual experience) can be just as, if not more emotional - those feelings of attraction can be very powerful. But more experienced guys are generally more logical and less emotional, yes.
With obvious exceptions, of course.21 Reply- +1 y
Yes. And there’s totally nothing wrong with that. It fits perfectly and what makes couples bond more.
+1 yThere are outliers, but I do believe women solve problems or at least solve problems as you show in an emotional manner, men judge more, and typically think in a more logical way. If your bestfriend's dog went missing, logically a man would dedicate his help to finding the dog in question and thinking of possible ways it could have gotten out/taken. A woman would console their bestfriend and give them emotional support, they would probably help too, but not in the same manner as the men.
In a matter of judging, women tend to be emotionally driven, while men view things in an objective manner. Say a person (ungendered) is being charged with murder, a story (conjecture and unproven) is given that is very graphic but does not do a good job of linking the suspect to the crime, the woman would probably be very emotionally driven by this story and feel hate towards the suspect. The man would view it in an objective manner, he may too feel hate towards the suspect if they do feel the suspect is guilty, but they typically tend to hold a neutral position, or use facts and logical statements to instill guilt.
Of course there are many outliers, speaking purely on hormonal levels, testosterone suppresses strong emotions in men, making them less likely to cry and whatnot. Women are simply more emotionally sensitive since they lack testosterone, low testosterone men typically exhibit more emotional behaviors such as crying/depression.
In short, testosterone makes men less emotionally invested, it is easier for them to shrug off emotional attacks or maintain an unbiased view, women on the other hand do not have testosterone, or have extremely miniscule concentrations. They have estrogen, I know for sure in an argument about a relationship, I would view things objectively and try to use factual statements to argue a point, women may use subjective statements that can be interpreted or viewed differently.10 Reply- 681 opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yPersonally, I've found myself more logical and less emotional than each of my male partners. I've found myself to be also generally more logical and rational than about 75% of men I've worked with in an corporate setting (strangely, retail employees are more logical and rational I've found...).
But I also had a bit of an odd upbringing. I had to be logical and rational from an early age (as in elementary) to survive my mother's narcissism and my dad's enabling attitude.
Logic and reason are shields for me and I practically hide behind them in many settings. I've gotten better, but when I was younger I used to just bottle up emotion.20 Reply I think so, and that is because men see things or are normally trained to see them in a certain perspective, more objective while women are allowed to have a different one. But as you mentioned, there are some exceptions.
EG: Men should focus on the facts, in a more objective and realistic point of view so they can take more logical and accurate results, while women are trained to be more empathic and understanding to others' pain, feelings and woes, like good mothers, nurses, lovers, etc., so they can know how to cheer up and give the others what they really need emotionally.10 Reply
+1 yI think boys are taught earlier on that they have to approach the world in a more logical-manner in order to be taken seriously. The pressure simply isn't there for women in this regard. As young girls, if we go by our gut or use more emotion, this is expected of us and permitted by society. The same is not accepted in boys. Thus, when girls grow into women and the consequences of not being as logical in our youth crop up, we're at a disadvantage. Boys simply had more time and pressure to adjust to it.
And, of course, there's the male ego which comes into play. Men are usually far more confident in their abilities, often to the point of overconfidence. Women who are in all intents and purposes equal to their male colleagues in any given situation lack that necessary ego. I see no reason why this wouldn't apply to the tired old notion of logic/emotion as well.10 Reply
+1 yWell, we'd need studies. Random people's opinion on this here doesn't do anything. Women being more emotional than men is probably highly overrated. I know at least that men are much more narcissistic than women. Lots of men like to think they are "rational", but often they just rationalize their emotions. They don't want to accept that they are also emotional creatures. Heck, just look at domestic violence. Clearly the guys doing that are not being rational...
As for me, yes! I'll admit it without shame, I am an emotional creature! I really don't always do the rational thing, and not just with relationships. I don't think there is anything wrong with that, what is wrong is pretending otherwise when you are.10 Reply
+1 yNo (kind of)
I think internally its basically the same, however men generally are taught to think more logically and so will focus on the practical aspects of a relationship more; with the inverse being true of women.
The needs for both are their in both tho, its more a question of who focusses on what14 Reply- +1 y
Some of it is taught but not all. When researchers went to the jungle and tossed human toys in front of young apes: the female apes picked out all the stuffed animal toys & hugged them.. trying to nurture and comfort the dolls. The male apes picked out the toy cars and tried to figure out how the wheels worked. No Joke.
- +1 y
- +1 y
There's been lots of studies.. Stuff like
www.livescience.com/...-dolls-boys-toy-trucks.html
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2583786/ - +1 y
Related... how they use sticks...
"The frequency of stick-carrying peaked among juveniles and was higher in females than males (Figure 1). This sex difference could not be explained by a general propensity for females to use objects more than males [6], because several types of object use were in fact male-biased, including weapon use by adolescents and adults... We suggest instead that sex differences in stick-carrying are related to a greater female interest in infant care, with stick-carrying being a form of play-mothering (i. e. carrying sticks like mother chimpanzees carrying infants). Several lines of evidence support this hypothesis. First, in the few instances when we observed adult females carrying sticks (five females, six events), the behavior always occurred prior to the female's first birth. Thus, unlike probing and other object use, stick-carrying ceased with motherhood."
www.sciencedirect.com/.../S0960982210014491
+1 yNot in a significant way, no. The statistics on that, that people (men) love to throw around as "evidence" are being grossly misinterpreted. Yes, there are certain gender specific tendencies that can be found. But it's so much more complex and complicated than that. There are many many factors that contribute to how skilled someone is at logical thinking, and gender is not even close to being a significant one. Another thing is that this dichotomy of "logic/reason vs. emotions" is complete nonsense. It's just not how human psychology works.
And even all that aside, the idea that men tend to be less emotional is beyond delusional. Most of the bad shit that's happening in the world is because of men not being able to control their emotions of anger, jealousy, frustration, hurt pride, and so on. So can we (men) please stop bullshitting ourselves and women with this ridiculous "we're so rational" nonsense? We're not.00 ReplyI think so because when my last relationship wasn't working out my boyfriend wanted to break up and all I wanted was to be with him despite knowing it wouldn't work out in the end. So either they're more logical or he doesn't like me as much as I did.
10 Reply- 6.3K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yThis is the standard for everything.
A man's brain runs on facts and logic.
A woman's on feelings and emotion.
This isn't to say either gender doesn't have some of what the other has, but these are very basic differences that feminism tries to deny - the giant lie.
Women connect emotionally.
Guys connect physically.
The basic dynamics are very different between the two genders. And why you cannot simply and arbitrarily decide which gender you are.15 Reply- +1 y
Then why do many guys experience emotional pain after a breakup if it’s just a physical thing. They can easily replace one woman by another if it was just physical..
- +1 y
@littlejazzy - You clearly misunderstood. Oh well. And it is also clear you're beyond confused. Sorry, I can't fix that.
- +1 y
No I think you just can’t explain you’re idea lol. You said guys connect physically and women emotionally which is a misleading statement.
- +1 y
@littlejazzy Don't be a fukkin moron. There's nothing misleading about it. Did you come here to learn something? Or just argue about semantics?
You know guys really hate that, right? You'll alienate every damn one of them with that bullshit. - +1 y
Lolll first I’m not here to learn something, at least not from you. Nor do I care about ‘alienating’ old men. Considering you are 64 your comprehension and concept of relationships is zero. So are your manners calling a random person a moron. I’m just assuming your a pathetic angry and stupid person. lol
Wouldn’t even bother to reply to stupid people like you but this was fun.
2.4K opinions shared on Dating topic. Well I think it depends on the guy if the guy is 100% into the relationship and he makes everything all about you then he is more logical and more emotional and if you knows how to fill with energy even more emotional to be honest I think it depends on both people and what type of relationship they really h a v e e
10 Reply
+1 yBoth are just as illogical, just men usually try to word their arguments in a way that sounds more focused and to the point (regardless of whether the point makes any sense), whereas women can be a lot more all over the place or don't care to try and justify how they feel, instead getting more caught up on whatever illicited an emotional response
10 ReplyI think anyone can be logical in a relationship regardless of gender and the same goes for emotional. That's a big part of the Latin culture for relationships is showing emotion regardless of your gender and since I'm Latin I personally get emotional in a relationship.
00 ReplyWhat about trans men? I feel like they're more emotional just because they've experienced the crazy hormone fluctuations and periods, and are typically more caring in general. (I know from friends I have.)
Cis men are pretty concrete. Relationships are typically built on trust and respect with them, not always pure emotional bonding.00 ReplyI think so. I've noticed this in therapists too. Male therapists don't coddle you, they tell you things straightforward and rationally. Female therapists tend to try to comfort you and then work on the issues later. I prefer male therapists.
25 Reply
Asker+1 yThis is exactly what I was thinking when I was looking for a therapist yesterday. I’ve been to only female therapists and now I’m looking for a man. I was gonna ask on here if it’s weird for a girl to seek an older male therapist but I really feel like he’d give me more insight to what I need therapy for over
Asker+1 yover a female just because I want directness and logic and the truth to how I’m thinking and behaving, and I feel like a female may just tell me I’m doing great since were similar in thinking
1.2K opinions shared on Dating topic. Highly doubt it.
To much culture that says it is that and that we have to act a certain way to fitt in. majority tries to fit in due to the survival strategy they have chosen at early age. ( belong to a group and fitt in instead of walking your own way )20 ReplyNo. Both are emotional in different ways, which makes both emotionally vulnerable in different ways. Women, from a femenine construct, men's from a masculine construct.
Wile most women's relye on intuition (which is an unconcious analysis relying on previous experiences), mens tend to relye on concious analysis of concrete aspects of a person.10 Reply2.3K opinions shared on Dating topic. Yes. Unless the guy was raised by a single mom with zero good male role models around. Then he will act just like a woman.
20 Reply- 3.2K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yYes. I feel like everyone knows this but then of course there are feminists. *facepalm*
31 Reply
Asker+1 yHahah
+1 yI don’t know man all I know is that I cry a lot when I miss him when I’m hurt or upset or feel unloved and he has never cried in front of me he almost cried one time because he was so happy and the other time over a sad show but I don’t think I’ve ever seen him cry more than one tear
00 ReplyThat’s not true. Not all women are emotional and can’t take decisions based on being logical instead of emotions. Also I know guys that have no logic in their lives and they’re also doing okay. We shouldn’t follow old myths and ignore reality.
10 Reply
+1 yYes, I think so in an overly general way. Men are logical or emotional (one thing at a time). Women are both at the same time.
10 ReplyIt doesn't matter. There are ways to approach relationships that can be learned and applied in a logical sense which can improve any relationship.
Just because people are ignorant does not mean they could not act in a different way.00 Reply
Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 yI don't think when it comes to relationships specifically, I think just in general period (with anything) that's often the case. But exceptions to that for sure.
21 Reply
Opinion Owner+1 yJust look at the way we talk..."I feel like..." has become a normal way of talking lol. Especially with women. Key word "feel", I don't think that's a coincidence at all lol.
2.1K opinions shared on Dating topic. No.
There is no such thing as "more logical". Usually they mean "more of an asshole" or "more frank" when they say "logical" as human conversations are rarely "logical"00 Reply- 2.7K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yNo, typically most of the population is very illogical, and logical people are exceptionally rare in both genders.
40 Reply Being introverted I think everything through too much rather than taking a leap. Takes me time to find a connection/ trust people to share emotions with.
Lack of relationship experience (like mroracle says) is something that I realised I have recently after jumping at a millions miles an hour with someone I like recently.00 Reply
+1 yNo. Just men put on more a front. Men are emotional too but emotions aren’t always displayed stereotypically aka crying etc. being emotional can be in many different forms.
00 Reply16.6K opinions shared on Dating topic. When it comes to love and relationships, I would say no (as opposed to life in general). You see this when they make obvious mistakes in getting involved with a particular person.
00 Reply6K opinions shared on Dating topic. Yup and that's typically the case with everything not just dating.
10 Reply- 8.9K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yyes. i think that's true in general. not just in terms of love and relationships.
20 Reply That's the rumor, isn't it? I imagine guys might be calmer, but that doesn't necessarily mean we're more logical. Perhaps, more women want to be confrontational, where as guys don't? I actually prefer confrontation.
10 Reply
Anonymous(25-29)+1 yYounger women tend to more emotional but since some guys only want young women they dont consider older women's opinions and think all women are like that
10 Reply- 870 opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yYes, and that’s typically the case with everything, not just dating.
10 Reply - 583 opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yWell it use to be that way. But I'm not sure that's the case anymore with how much men and women have changed.
01 Reply - 3.3K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yYeah but asking the guy with zero emotions that question as good as feeding it into a computer
10 Reply
+1 yMost of the times until a woman gets logical with them then they want to turn emotional
20 Reply
+1 yNah. 'on average' Guys are stupid and girls are mean
34 Reply- +1 y
I'm going to count you as one of them also because you've never met most guys in the world yet you consider it "on average"
- +1 y
@Aiko_E_Lara Well, most of the guys in my world are stupid
- +1 y
Unfortunately for you were not asking about your world and neither we are living in your world
- +1 y
A world full of delusions i mean
+1 yNo, we all have feelings and emotions. Men just don't want to share that because women are mean and manipulate.
10 ReplyNope, guys are super emotional. At least the ones I’ve been with lol
119 Reply- +1 y
The ones you have been with doesn't really make up the majority of the population and they are just called anecdotes for your information
- +1 y
Well now that clears things up saying "it's my opinion" This is exactly why I'd like to point out that your anecdotes don't prove your claims. No one can also accurately say your statement is just your opinion or you're just being delusional.
- +1 y
You're still assuming im mad over a simple response and not realizing how mad assuming makes you sound? All im doing is making things clear other wise you either actually making an opinion or just being delusional. It's more like you just like to get mad and not learn anything. Really easy to assume
- +1 y
What do you call people who always assumes you're triggered? ↗ I gotta love these comments describing you so much
- +1 y
@Aiko_E_Lara Why do you feel the need to start off a conversation with her in a hostile way? That makes it seem like you have a preexisting trauma with something related to this. Either that or you just like to start trouble. Nobody deserves to have their opinion attacked like that for no reason. Her experience I'd anecdotal, but that doesn't mean it doesn't matter. Go troll someone else.
- +1 y
@ChristianMan21 Hostile? That was just a response. If you think that was hostile then ironically, people who think that way have some sort of a trauma. Like seriously, a simple response = hostile according to you. Now do you realize how you sound? Where on earth in my first response is actually name calling her? And also where was i even assuming she's mad? She did it first so why look at me?
- +1 y
@ChristianMan21 If you think a correction means trouble or if you think someone making things clear is trouble, that's your problem. Really, if a reply is such a big deal, no one is forcing anyone to make comment in the first place.
- +1 y
@Aiko_E_Lara Yes, it was hostile. I looked back and saw that it was more the second comment, but the first was definitely indicating that you thought her opinion was invalid or unimportant. No, I have no such trauma, but I am aware of social tact. What you said simply wasn't polite. Your second comment reads,
"Well now that clears things up saying "it's my opinion" This is exactly why I'd like to point out that your anecdotes don't prove your claims. No one can also accurately say your statement is just your opinion or you're just being delusional."
Let me ask you this... Why are you saying that her anecdotes don't prove her claim? That's assuming she was making some sort of claim over something else. She simply said according to her own experience, so she is 100% correct. Why do you feel the need to try to "fix" others' opinions? That's a very toxic trait. Second, you didn't do it directly, but if anything, what you did was sort of worse. You make the comment that she might be delusional. She said nothing that asks for an insult like that. Suggesting such a negative possibility to someone about themselves is a very manipulative firm of insult. Don't do that. You also tried to do that with me by turning what I said around saying I might have trauma because I commented on your rude behavior. Simply put, that's a pathetic way to try to hurt someone so you can feel some empty, false sense of "winning an argument". Just don't insult people, okay? Be nice and polite. - +1 y
For you it is hostile because objectively it is just a reply. And again there is no name-calling and ad hominem used in here unless you just want to start feeling things like what people with chroma do and ironically or denying that one. And by the way do you think making hasty assumptions based on anecdotes is actually a polite thing to do? So yes by giving a hasty anecdote as her claim, she just basically give an argument. Also the one in her original comment is also a hasty generalization basing on her experience so do you think that also a polite thing to do? Therefore i give for an argument she asked otherwise she wouldn't exactly give any hasty generalizations like that. As he simply said it is on her own experience, she also said "guys are super emotional" which is a generalizing statement. And yeah i also did nothing to insult her so what's your problem? I'm just "simply" giving her a benefit of a doubt if you just say she just "simply" give an "opinion" really it's not different if i say girls are stupid. But in my experience. And do you think nobody would actually reply to me if i say something like that? How about you learn to judge things properly because i'm beginning to think this is just one of those double standards and you're just being a white knight
- +1 y
This is the last comment I'll make since it does appear you just want an argument. You used backhanded insults like suggesting she is delusional. So yes, you did insult her. Why do you think she got upset? And I'm stating the fact that how you are interacting with people is objectively and obviously hostile. You have probably probably into plenty of people who get defensive when you make a comment, yes? That's why. And she just said that in her experience, guys are super emotional... What's wrong with that? Being emotional isn't a bad thing, so your example is not a good one. It isn't the same as calling someone stupid. You jumped to a conclusion because you thought she was actually claiming the whole population was like that. I am judging things according to the usual code of manners that everyone should know. If you aren't aware of how manners work, then I feel sorry for you as I'm sure that will create a lot of unfortunate situations for you. It isn't a double standard. Just a general standard. It applies to everyone, lol. And if you call a person who defends someone being attacked or insulted a white knight, then yeah, sure. I'm a white knight. Nothing wrong with standing with someone who is under attack.
- +1 y
Another one of those assumptions actually. "It does appear" yeah right. Of course you would only look what you want to see and call it someone who appears to just want to argue. Delusional part i said, i said no one can tell if she is being delusional or she is just giving an opinion. I never said she is delusional so can you read again instead of misconstruing what i said to give yourself an excuse to actually take offense? I mean of course coming from someone who is emotional you don't see anything wrong with. And of course you can be an example of an emotional man who just likes to get triggered with everything and call it an "insult" if you say i thought that she is claiming the whole population was like that then you know i can also say you have been jumping to conclusions because you thought i'm just being angry or being disrespectful here so yeah with your logic though, how about you except yourself first? So yes i call it a double standards and your hypocrisy. Also you're mistaking gentlemen to a white night and i'm talking about white knights here like you.
- +1 y
If you want to assume i just want an argument and i can also assume the same thing, she just want an argument. You see how easy your logic gets backfired?
- +1 y
Also talked about manners here, how about your differentiate someone actually giving bad manners to someone just giving an opinion to an opinion? I can also give a strawman argument like you that everyone knows that. And again this is what i'm talking about your logic getting backfired and that what you get for being too emotional. We don't live in your fancy tea party world where everything is full of sugar and lies.
- +1 y
Then that was just a reply. it's not that deep
- +1 y
So what if it's a paragraph? is also not that deep. And by the way i was responding to a deep comment not yours
+1 yI thought that was pretty obvious all along. No matter how irrational a man can be there's always a woman who will outdo him. Hence why relationships are so emotionally taxing on men. Generally speaking.
00 ReplyMen are just equally as emotional but they just know how to curb it more. When women get emotional, they let it run everything.
10 Reply
+1 yNot really. Lots of guys are fucking idiots and lots of women are extremely logical. It depends on the individual
30 Reply- 939 opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yI don't know I was more logical than the guys I was around.
00 Reply
+1 yGuys typically lie less. Girls call that 'being emotional' - but in fact it is 'I expect more than you do so I lie and cheat to get it' (and then when found out they cry, though men also do when hurt)
11 Reply- +1 y
Also, girls imagine that ing pregnant with 'the most ejaculating dick' and then bluntly asking (or convincing) someone else to raise the bastard - makes that idiot a gorgeous man.
I'd criminalise it, and quite possibly to death sentence level for the mother (the child could live, why not).
Doesn't apply to me lol. I'm more of an emotional guy. Being so helps me understand how everyone's feeling better. :) Can switch to the logical mode instantly when I sense something fishy aha. :P :P
00 Reply775 opinions shared on Dating topic. Well, my wife of 23 years and I are like what you describe in everyday life.
10 Reply- 948 opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yYes. Making decisions based on emotions is, well, illogical and will endup fucking it up for you.
10 Reply
+1 yhonestly in my opinion, I think it could go either way in a relationship, i think some of it has to do with they're background and past experiences, it could probably go either way honestly
00 Reply- 1.9K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yGuys just conceal their emotional sides as women hid behind burkhas and stuff
00 Reply
+1 yIt all depends on the individual. You can't generalize things like this about men or women.
01 Reply- 510 opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yDating in 2021
10 Reply
+1 y
Logical or emotional doesn't really matter. Being correct is what matters.00 ReplyI've seen a guy getting mental counselling after a breakup
00 Reply
+1 yYes guys are more rational and women are more emotional.
00 Reply- 322 opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yMen are logical about everything; women are emotional about everything. So I guess yes.
00 Reply
+1 ythe question is very general why post it anonymously
00 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yYes and its the biggest reason that they shouldn't have been allowed to vote. They are easier to manipulate with lies from the mass media
00 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yGenerally speaking yes. However the majority of people are morons and don’t know how to conduct a healthy relationship
00 Reply
+1 yYes women only think with their clits, men are the the leaders and the thinkers of human society.
01 Reply- Show More (34)
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News