Is it red flags if a man agrees with Andrew Tate even if it is selectively agreeing?

[Anonymous]

Would you find it to be a red flag if a man agrees with some of the things Andrew Tate has been putting out into the public domain?

[HiveBee]

Tate is the most beta beta male. All that fighting and money for what? So he can tell all men they have to be like him in order to find dates, sex, love?

It's bullshit. Guys a loser.

I think him and men who praise him are whiney cry babies. And women see right through it.

That's right. Women SEE THROUGH THE ACT.

It's all an act. You're PLAYING "real man."

That's what I think.

[jamartheg]

How can he be a loser when he’s achieved all the most important things in life

[NathanDavis]

it's a red flag SO red... that China would want to buy it from you at all cost, billions even

only a true scumbag would agree with anything he has to say

as for those who would agree "selectively" even worse, because they would not even bother to discern bias from perspective, when they would have the chance to do so, lmao...

[anon1903]

That's like saying "I don't stan Amber Heard... But..."

[DarkWinterNights]

It’s actually logic like this that draws more people to him. Reality is more than black and white and absolutist arguments hinder debate and free thought. We used to debate people we disagreed with and beat them with facts and sound arguments. Now we silence people. Which is antithetical to freedom of speech and democracy. Basically we’re saving democracy by destroying it.

[NathanDavis]

@DarkWinterNights they are not silencing people...

they are "silencing" plain stupidity

now, that douchebag does not debate and disagree with people, no

he puts on a show, in which he brings paid panelists so he is free to say all the stupid things he wants to say to make money out of it and out of all the idiots who are too stupid to know the difference between an actual "debate" and the money making exploit of a show he would put up on wherever he was banned from

so no, freedom of speech does not cover profit out of bullshit nonsense

[Subarugirl]

"If you dont like a Rule... Just Follow it.. Reach on the Top.. and Change the Rule"

Adolf Hitler said that...

“The art of reading, as of learning, is this: … to retain the essential, to forget the nonessential.”

and that...

Just you might agree with some of it doesn't mean you should be vocal about it.

[anon1903]

Yes I think so. Huge reg flag in my book. Even for the sake humour, women should not be degraded.

[ShadezMcgee]

I don't know anything about this guy, just that he has been circling the website in conversation. All I know is that he has pretty much been banned from media platforms for misogynist views.

All I will say it that views are subjective and no one will agree or see things eye to eye. So personally if your guy agrees with things Andrew Tate has said, I guess this number is the question. How many things does he agree with, how many things can he truly believe or agree with before you decide to no longer be affiliated with him?

You didn't specifically say what it was he agreed with, much less give an idea of how much you would truly tolerate. So what is YOUR boundary on this? Is it ok of he agrees with some things Tate has said or if he agrees to anything Tate said that makes you have immediate doubts?

[Hanrej]

No. If the mans reputation makes all his points or argument invalid then you subscribe to ideas like:

1. Women shouldn't be protected.

2. Women should at all times manage themselves and never ask a man for help.

3. Men shouldn't have to work hard, achieve or rise above themselves.

4. Men shouldn't control their emotions ever. (meaning anger and violence is close at hand as well)

I think we live in a world where too many disqualifies what they hear based on who says it. It's intellectually lazy and keeps you unaware of what is truly happening around you. Want to pretend like you're woke? Challange your own preconceptions a few times and reevaluate what you really think.

[Asker]

I don’t disagree with the points you mentioned but I don’t like Tate’s lifestyle of sleeping around and men who like him seem to be perverts who act like 16-year-old boys with raging hormones and no control of their sexual desires and Tate seems to want women to put up with these cheating scumbag men and not say anything.

[Hanrej]

If you don't disagree than you agree with Tate on some things, like it or not. The man reputation or quality as a human being has no impact on facts or arguments.

[MountAverage]

That's a DARK RED flag that should make you run far away from him. Andrew Tate is an extreme misogynist, complete psychopath, and a scammer on top of that. Any guy who agrees with him will treat women like shit. Dating someone like that will be nothing but txoci and abusive. He will try to control you and treat you like his property.

[jamartheg]

You sound like a pick me lmao

[MountAverage]

@jamartheg You sound like an incel LMAO

[Tyrael]

I don't see the issue. You can see good points being made by all sorts of people, but that doesn't mean you embody everything they are. Some books contain awful material but you can still find nuggets of great information in them. You shouldn't just disregard the whole thing just because you disagree with a part of it.

[chicosuave]

It's sure has a lot of attention including yours. When he speaks to women he attracts these women like magnets cuz they are always trying to qualify themselves to Andrew tate. He brings a variety of emotions to women that attract them. Women respond by there emotions and not by there logic so he understands that. It's crazy but he is a great example of a Chad who doesn't care what others think and what women love.

[Pot8o]

People's behavior matters more than their publicly expressed opinions. I'm sure there are lots of outraged soy boys condemning Tate who aren't much better beneath the surface.

[Googlemyahoo]

They fucked up banning him. It made him a martyr. The best thing you can do with people like that is let them talk. Eventually they’ll shoot themselves in the foot.

[rebeliouse]

your question is a bit confusing take for example that andrew says women should be protected by a man. if you agree with this statement made by andrew then why should a man also agreeing with this be seen as a red flag? would u want the man not to agree with andrew and think that women shouldn't be protected by a man just for a man not to have a red flag attached to him?

[MementoMori_]

What I think is that there is too much censorship of thought.

And it all comes from the left.

[NurseMel4]

Yes - although some people, especially older people, never like to fully disown soemtning cause usually everyone has at least one good point

[Anonymous]

I would be sad that I know a man that is that stupid.

[Rockstarrrrr]

I think only beta males listen to that bald headed softie

[Jamie05rhs]

Just because someone is partially wrong doesn't mean they're completely wrong.

I judge ideas, not people.

[roy_ricky09]

What do you even know about Andrew?
Girls hate him because he says the right things openly

[Asker]

I think he encourages promiscuity in men and sleeping around and expects women to out up with men’s promiscuity.

[roy_ricky09]

You just think! That's the point but actually know nothing

[Part2603]

Pretty sure women encourage promiscuity in men when they refuse to date virgins, lol.

[Asker]

@Part2603 I only want a virgin ugh

[Anonymous]

If they agree with the things he says that are correct and disagree with the things he says that are incorrect I don't see how that would be a problem. Isn't that what you'd WANT in a man?

[TonyMetal___86]

I agree with a lot of things that he says, can i have my red flag now? 🤣

[LimitedBenefits101]

He makes feminist rattle, legend in my book✍️

[TallAnon]

I don't know anything about him, but even a broken clock is right twice a day.

[Anonymous]

If you're gonna judge an idea based on who said it, then yes.

[Part2603]

Bitch, Andrew Tate is Nostradamus.