True or false - women who dont act like they want commitment are more likely to get commitment?

Women who don’t act like wifey material will have a much harder time finding men (the men they want — not simps) who will wife them up.
If a women is really into hook up culture for example, that’s going to automatically disqualify them from most men who are looking for something serious.
Most men will put women in a ‘just for fun’ box if they don’t appear to be wifey material but may be nice to have in the bedroom.
If a woman*
It’s one thing to be flirtatious, and it’s another thing to be putting out all the time.
What I hear from a lot of guys is that girls that put out way too easily are usually not someone they want to have a serious long term relationship with.
And I would be the same. If girl were to put out before barely knowing me, that would make me question a lot of things about her.
@MyOwnMan2 Casually dating is one thing. But, the question was about commitment though. As in serious relationships, right?
When it comes to commitment, wouldn’t someone rather marry someone whose’s committed to them rather than non-committal?
I mean, that’s why so many men are afraid to marry. They fear disloyalty and lack of commitment from women.
@MyOwnMan2 Then in the context of casual dating, commitment is irrelevant.
Attraction is one thing and commitment is another.
A woman who is promiscuous can cause many men to be attracted to her.
But, a woman who is promiscuous will have trouble getting men to commit to her for life in marriage and split 50% of all his assets with her.
Yup. A man shouldn’t judge promiscuous women if he’s just as promiscuous.
A woman that doesn’t sleep around deserves a man that doesn’t sleep around.
You can act like you want it but still allow him to see that you have other options if he isn't into it... he will feel a bit threatened and hurry to lock it down.
Before we were exclusive, my boyfriend knew that I was dating while celibate and was still receiving offers for dates from many other people. He had the marriage discussion on the third date because he wanted me to know that his intention was to date for marriage, and I respect that.
Yes that’s true. Men like challenges and the constant rejection because in their head you are interested in them but you are playing hard to get. (I don’t understand why they like making things hard for themselves🤷🏾♀️).
Main reason why men go for the ‘free spirit’ and not the ‘pick me’ lol.
They are feeding off of the ‘free spirit’.
Long turm Relationship are risky in terms of time and resources. Nobody with any sence is going to make that bet with some how is not serious. Admittedly there are peaple that dont have sence thought and it will probably cost them.
Opinion
2Opinion
Very true - I’ve had better luck once I stopped caring , took care of myself person
Yes and no. The problem is the women that are generally complaining about lack of commitment are the same ones that 1. choose men incapable of commitment. And 2. Do nothing whatsoever to foster wanting to commit in a man.
It's not surprising therefore that the women that get men to commit never have to bring it up.
Those sleeping around with a lot of people usually end up not being able to pair bond. It sends a message that they will mist likely want to outsource the sex if we got together and to me that is highly disrespectful, unloving, uncaring etc. If a man has to go through a figurative obstacle course to get with with someone why would he want that person? We perfer someone that has an aura that causes us to want to be the best version of ourselves when around them.
True in my case. I never wanted to settle down but it happened 🤷♀️
In what context? This is a very open ended question.
True
Superb Opinion