Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
Men love much harder and more deeply than women ever will. Women will bounce the moment her man shows weakness, loses his job, is seriously ill, or otherwise has a major negative life event.
Most men would rather die in their saddle than to be seen to fail by their women. Men know exactly what happens to their relationship when they have a weakness.
Harsh but true
Women love money, protection and status, not man. Most love virtue signalling, are self-righteous, woke, bi-sexual, egoistic, feminazis whishing to exterminate men or enslave them. They are NOT even attracted physically to men and are NOT 100% straight. Most of them are extreamly beautiful, but evil beings who treat men like trash.
You reminded me of this scene
https://youtu.be/suCm5oW0bv0?si=_WVEr6xtlKywCxeo
No, men think women love money. This is what men love and think women love that also. Materialistic women love money. That is a type of woman. Women crave emotional safety and consistency. A man has to be secure and confident to give this and since men rope all their worth into how much money they make, they are horrendous assholes when they don't feel they have reached where they want to be in terms of their money. So women seek the men who are settled in their worldly goals so they don't have to deal with broken assholes who use them as emotional band aids then throw them away when they've drained all the good out of her.
Opinion
8Opinion
How can you say this?
Maybe you were too busy writing questions or opinions on here, or I don't know, talking to other women or men. I DONT KNOW alright, but
have you ever noticed how many OLD MARRIED men on here said in one post they were HAPPILY married, (where it fit), but in another post they would flirt with some account- be it old or new? Maybe her pfp was provocative or she was an old user simply making flirty comments.
Am I to believe that was just a joke?
And how could this happen (I seen one man say he used to be spied on by his wife showering, but he left the door open). Why would he have shared such specific information on here with strangers, when his wife may not even know, and he and she should both keep their relationship cultivated, tended to, cared for, and private?
Is that a genuine love? Well is it?
So far, this small example of men on here, and their interactions with other women or how they and some talk about women on certain questions- is that genuine love?
Well is it?
And just recently some other guy asked a question about why he loved women “so much” and I get he had an attraction. Anyone can see that in his posts and such. So I said maybe it was a love, like a ‘favorite thing,’ not a love of caring for them. And then I added maybe it was more of a lust than a love.
Before I was committed to and taken by anyone, I used to get flirtatious and really sexual DMs from MARRIED men.
In good number… is that really LOVE?
Is that the love Nat King Cole Sings about?
L is for the way you look at me.
O
IS FOR THE ONLY ONE I SEE..
Is this the love the religious Jesus talked about? Seeing no evil? Is selfless? And all?
Is it really?
I get everyone gets hurt, but to even question this means (for me) you’re already on a path of your own, and if you or anyone else thinks or proclaims women don’t love genuinely- I simply have to disagree. Simply!
Anyways, I can’t be included in that statement. I’ll gladly be “the exception.” Cause I have the proof, but it’s not needed to prove to anyone here. It’s private and it should be kept that way- special- between my partner and myself.
What- is this to also try to get women to keep them “in-check?” They try prove their loyalty or devotion, while some men still remain unloyal? Inconsistent? Luckily, I have a loyal partner. A consistent one. And I’m a 100% sure to it.
It's a question. Not my opinion. Calm down there 😂
Apologies for offense. But I took offense by seeing this question.
I made a real observational conclusion just now thanks to this. That’s the only plus.
The demographics of men specifically on this site can be broken down into
A bunch of independent categories, but it’s almost always negative towards women.
Either in HOW they talk of them, how they treat their married wives or girlfriends, while they flirt with other a holes in here who are desperate for attention.
And everyone should be dating irl or trying positive stuff on other platforms not just spewing opinions and pains on here and expecting to find true love. It’s not going to come from here.
The women aren’t excluded from this toxicity,
But so far I’ve realized the men tak bad of women, or disrespect them by talking to multiple women at once, and talking to a woman other guys talk to, and then the ones who never had a woman or good one, will make ill questions painting women as bad. You’ve done it, coach has done it, and Unit one has done it.
THE ONLY GOOD MARRIED MAN EXAMPLE IS @OlderAndWiser
(Sorry for tagging you and you may very well disagree and truthfully I don't know him at all) but he never (from what I seen) flirted with any woman on here and stays true to saying he is devoted to a woman irl.
I admire that. He HAS to genuinely love her.
You and all the other examples don’t love women. You break out the protests out of the cookie jar and throw them like frisbees at everyone. Injustice! Betrayal!
But the sexual chaos on the other side is just as crazy.
Is there any good women on here? Tbh I don’t even know. I really don’t think so maybe just Snow
And some I’ve followed. That aren’t even active much anymore.
But do men love genuinely?
And women love conditionally?
Why the difference. No one is a saint, and I’ve seen many crossed lines on here. No one here is exception. Not even me. I made my mistake in the past.
But to say one is truly better than the other?
Idc if you’re gay or lesbian. Look around. Lots of people are toxic.
Stop blaming a gender just to justify your new gender. If you wish to be gay or feel you need that right. Okay go and be that, but question the quality of a gender and collectively include them all in an accusatory manner of a question….
It really just baffles me.
Maybe this is the new day of toxicity. Where both genders will point fingers and commit sexual acts with the same sex as a revenge or as a coping mechanism. Who knows. I just think both are wrong, or right. And not all women are bad or incapable of love. “ “
Well to plainly answer the question I choose: disagree.
- I was just confused as to why one seemed to be painted as good, and the other painted as bad.
And besides we see many throw out conditions right? Calling it standards. So I think there’s a possibility both genders could love conditionally but it still be genuine.
There’s some who love genuinely and have almost no conditions.
Maybe conditions they have but are not judgmental.
I wanted to address that you mentioned "I seen one man say he used to be spied on by his wife showering, but he left the door open. Why would he have shared such specific information on here with strangers, when his wife may not even know, and he and she should both keep their relationship cultivated, tended to, cared for, and private? Is that a genuine love? Well is it?"
Do you know the man's name? Do you know where he lives? Do you know the wife's name? Do you know anything about their lives other than that story he shared?
No you do not. It's an anonymous site. You don't need to post anonymously to be anonymous. Most people (not including myself) don't even use a picture of themselves for their profiles.
GaG is an outlet and way to pass the time for many people.
The fact that you're offended by the way I phrased the question makes me laugh.
And for the record, you're clearly clueless about my own opinion. I believe there ARE women that love sincerely and there ARE men that NOT love sincerely. I just think that those types are more rare than vice-versa.
men that do not***
Valid points, but he knows what he said. Is sexual conduct with his wife which he enjoyed really in need of any outlet to share? That’s my question in response.
We may not know who he is, or his wife. You’re right. But he knows, and he told other random strangers all about it. Why? What do you think could be the reason?
Maybe he’s a blooming voyeur and wants us to question more about it? Maybe it’s not enough for his wife to “spy” but he would go on to want others to see the whole thing.
What I’m saying isn’t uncommon.
If you think otherwise than your question implies. I don't know why you wouldn’t phrase it differently. People have gotten uncomfortable with the way people have phrased things in the past and I’m just one example of many who have done so and will do so. If you believe otherwise. That gives some peace of mind, but the question clearly implies women as bad and men as good and you’re a man. The world will need more men like you to say there are good traits about women more than just their physical assets.
As does the world need more women talking about the good qualities about men. Especially now because everyone only seems to highlight the bad. And personally it bothers me. I’m only human to be bothered by it. I’m not yet calloused by this stuff.
Apologies for my harsh statements against you, but I honestly had something click when I read your question and instantaneously recalled a lot of what I observed from men on here throughout my times on this site. And it seemed mostly negative towards women. I have no idea why that exactly has happened, but it’s a sad sight for myself.
I just hope things are slightly different and more optimistic around the world, but I’m not TOO confident in that. A lot of the people you see online talking of such things are the same ones walking around outside.
What they say is what they believe. I just hope they don’t believe the inaccuracies, and I also hope people don’t live up to what they believe in either.
Rude wording which makes me question your authenticity, but I AM clueless on your opinion on this matter. I just used context clues, of briefly recalling your previous questions in the past and then seeing how your question was
***PHRASED.****
Maybe you tried to hide your true opinion to prevent bias, but it’s a 50/50 thing and the question seemed to favor guys over women. 🤷♀️ The correlation is you’re also supposedly a guy and have asked similar questions in the past.
I don’t think by any of that, that I guessed wrong. Especially when a lot of the stuff again shared on here is negative towards women. 🤷♀️
As much as I apologize for my claims and it possibly offending. I actually can’t and refuse to apologize for my passion and the legit points made. I don’t go around like this all the time speaking against users’ behavior. This would be a first. Because- it seems plenty have painted females in a negative light and it’s really no help that a good handful of females on here aren’t a great example. It’s not all but a good handful that I had seen.
I purposely phrase my questions to trigger responses from people. It is a more argumentative tone, which tends to get people such as yourself riled up. I find that "agree or disagree" tends to make the question clear and people can only respond with one or the other.
You taking offense to how the question is phrased is not my problem. However, it does imply that you're one of those entitled, progressive, liberal women out there.
Okay so let’s get more specific- it was to trigger women cause it implied women as bad and I’m a woman who took offense and so I got riled “ “ up as you said and you got to name calling even though it was expected and you expected this so it was a targeted question and then you tried to summarize my beliefs.
Are you a man who genuinely cares for the female gender?
Or you were trying to paint things make a game of it cause it was all expected then you respond how you expected to and was aiming to (since you were prepared) and intentional in this question.
All of this behavior^^ me summarizing and using what you yourself claimed here-
Does any of this resemble care for the female gender or viewing them in a positive light?
You already said the good women and such are RARE.
so you think a large portion don’t love genuinely?
This all seems as though you have something against women. Or you feel need to correct. It doesn’t seem genuine.
The question was meant to trigger it wasn’t genuine curiosity. 🤷♀️
You don’t seem like a genuinely GOOD person “” MALE* yourself.
Tbh- you don’t know much about me except for what I shared here which was saying more need to mention the good in others. BOTH genders.
I hardly think what I PERSONALLY said was wrong. I even promoted confidentiality between a couple and my ACTUAL observations of the REAL behavior of guys on here.
So just because it’s virtual or “anonymous” the behavior is OKAY?
is that anything close to integrity?
Is their anonymous behavior helping their GENUINE love offline to their wives or girlfriends?
Neither gender loves with it condition. You can agree or disagree to that and leave it at that. I don’t need some person telling me who I am or aren’t.
I’m in a successful relationship with my partner and I’m genuine with him and vice versa.
You seem to have some troubles with the female gender at large and ready to categorize and make claims. What they believe. This that.
I don't know what you hope to accomplish in that or in this question.
What do you accomplish in riling up and then trying to guess or label what that person is?
So you think you understand who I am essentially.
Then what?
Wasted question. Provoking people for fun. Moreso women. Instead of men. Or both.
There’s inconsistencies in your words your previous questions. You don’t seem to have good intentions. You can block me and I’ll unfollow.
I stick by my every word.
They need to see the good in both genders.
And I stick by my answer:
There are some good women in the world.
And NO MAN and NO WOMAN is a total saint.
All love IS conditional.
The genuine part is what should be considered. I’m genuine. Especially when I had takes of things I was passionate about.
Were you genuine?
I suppose people won’t know, but I sense otherwise and I’ll take that to the grave. 👍
Is there any such love as the one we call ‘Unconditional’ ? ↗
Ai Brad confirmed it.
HUMANS (he’s an ai lol)
Have conditional love due to tangible/ human-like and living species frailties. Period.
You want to promote one over the other or simply imply that and go on name calling?
Massively applause. You accomplished what you wanted on an ***Anonymous site.**
I vote no based on personal experience. My mom have also stuck with my dad through thick and thin. He lost his job and we were broke, mom stepped up to support the family while still being supportive and encouraging of my dad. He took a major hit in his ego/masculinity when he lost his job - he felt like he lost his status as the provider of the family but my mom still stuck by his side no matter what. I learned all that from my mom.
My ex went broke, I took him in and supported him until he could finally find a job. Didn’t love him any less. We broke up bcs the long distance wasn’t working anymore. Now with my current partner I act the same way. During covid he lost his job and had to shut down his business. I’m still here. I don’t see him for his money. As long as he still loves and cares about me then I will return that love tenfold.
There are few women like you and your mom in the world left. Y'all are gems to cherish.
Note: A golddigger is someone who brings almost nothing but looks (often youthfulness) and agreeableness/submission to the relationship in exchange for status and money that is not within their expected reach or sphere (i. e. a barmaid with basic education marrying a highly educated billionaire).
A golddigger is not a female microbiologist preferring to date engineers over mechanics, or a yoga instructor preferring to date a physical therapist over a entry-level fast food employee.
Hawk, you know what's going to happen when you post something like that! C'mon. :D
Obviously, I think that's a bit of a generalization and not exactly accurate. But I'm going to make a few generalizations myself. Then y'all can fight it out and I'll get some popcorn... :D
The video, from an evolutionary biology standpoint, is somewhat flawed in its comparison. Men are theoretically motivated to have sex with as many viable females as possible. Women are theoretically motivated to select the most eligible and dominant partner possible to ensure the survival of offspring. Therefore, a man being fine with a bottom income worker is more to be expected than a woman being fine with it. Raising a family on only a fast food worker's wages would be fairly unrealistic for a woman, in the traditional sense. That's the way I look at it, anyway.
As for myself, I know that my love for the man I married was not conditional. He was not a wealthy or influential man, but he was one I respected and loved. If I could have given my life in exchange for his, I'd have done it without a second thought. He was committed, he was genuine, and he was kind. All the money in the world can't buy the security that those qualities bring in a relationship. Just my perspective...
Well said as always Ms. Potts. You always bring a refreshing perspective paired with eloquent wording.
Don't worry, I didn't mention gold digger anywhere on this post to my knowledge. I do have to address that while you're correct that gold digger does not apply to women that make a significant income and can provide a high standard of living for themselves... would you not say that if they're not willing to date someone that makes under their level of income, that can be seen as shallow? It doesn't matter if I'm a millionaire or billionaire. The income level of a woman does not affect my judgment of her. I'd prefer that she's simply doing something she's passionate about and makes her happy.
And yeah... I get ya. But I deliberately phrased my question in this way to trigger people and get some passionate responses. I still have more fun posting questions that trigger people and responding to the anger than receiving the "matter-of-fact" manner in which people usually post in on normal questions.
I'll also add that you have a very lucky husband 😁👍🏼
@HawkPerception I had to tease a little after reading some of the impassioned responses, LOL. You definitely succeeded in triggering, I think. :)
Thanks for the compliment! I was responding more generally to the video where the guy calls the girls golddiggers for not dating a bum, and a few of the opinions, so I added that note.
I think it could definitely be considered shallow to only date in a certain sphere, similar to guys only dating twenty-somethings. But I don't know if I'd consider it golddigging (i. e. marrying someone for money). It could potentially be an intelligence thing, too. I. e., an entry level person who hasn't practiced higher order thinking? I don't know; just processing it a bit. I think the trouble lies in entirely ruling a category out, perhaps.
I think for me, the work ethic and drive is more important than the status. I mean, if a guy is working three low-status jobs to make ends meet, that says a lot about his character, vs. a highly educated trust fund dude who is the CEO of his daddy's company. You know?
I think to a degree, we all love conditionally. Faithfulness is usually a condition. Beauty can be a condition, potentially. Weight can be a condition. Effort can even be a condition. I guess it makes me think, what would unconditional love actually look like? What do we consider conditional vs. necessary for the success and health of the relationship? Now I'm just thinking out loud...
It's been three years since he died, actually. I probably wouldn't be hanging out on here if I were married, unless I was doing it with my hubs! :D I guess I never did post my status. But yes, we had a good marriage and we almost made it a decade before cancer happened.
I am truly truly sorry to hear that. Cancer takes away our loved ones from us too soon. My mom also had it and luckily survived it and I had a scare of my own with it a long time ago.
I am jealous you've found a deep love like that at least once in your life though.
I don't think you were implying it's wrong to be on this app while in a relationship, so don't take what I'm about to say to as me being defensive...
I don't think there's anything wrong with being on GaG while in a relationship. I personally use it as an outlet and way to pass the time. When I was in a relationship in the past, I'd be on this app with my partner's full awareness and even sometimes send screenshots of an opinion I made or debate I had with someone else to get their opinion on it.
The nature of your question isn’t to seek answers, it’s to seek validation for your perspective. I’ve dated women who love conditionally and women who love unconditionally. Part of the dating experience is meeting and clicking with someone who supports you through both the good and bad times. Painting a broad brush generalizes all women into one category. This mentality only serves to validate yourself and pit an “in group” against an “out group”.. It’s immature. If you’re having difficulty attracting women, maybe start there….
Regarding your update, will a woman stick through for a guy who was broke? I don’t know…. Is that guy actively improving himself? Is that guy accepting accountability and taking ownership of his challenges? Is that guy patient with his partner (and children) while enduring hard times? You make it sound like being broke is a test of her character; in my experience, life challenges are a test of MY character. And I learned pointing fingers and blame is a quick way to isolate anyone, not just my partner.
You are entirely incorrect in your assumption. It's not my perspective. I believe there are women out there who love unconditionally and men that do not love sincerely. I phrased the question in a specific way to trigger and generate more opinions.
And I'm not talking about being a deadbeat guy that is not trying to improve, lives in his mom's basement and games all day. I'm obviously talking about a guy who's broke from maybe making some poor decisions in life, but still trying to improve his standard of life. Like come on man... no one should want to provide for a bum.
I encourage you to get off your high horse and stop trying to act like a smartass. You're clearly not.
I agree with men loving sincerely. But I wouldn’t say women love ‘conditionally’. Some definitely will, but that’s not love in my opinion
Would I stay with my husband if he was broke? Yes, and we would figure out our finances together. It’s not the most important thing in the world (or in a relationship).
If he would leave me, I’d be heartbroken and I would miss him so bad. Him, not his bank account. Financial status is not something all women care about. At least I don’t. I respect your opinion, but maybe you’ve had some different experiences?
I phrased my question in a way to make it clear to people and to trigger some to respond... not to reflect my own opinion.
I definitely believe there are women out there that lovely sincerely and there are men out there that do not love sincerely. However, I would say that they are in the minority.
Your husband has a gem.
Disagree. Love is a deeply personal and individual experience, and generalizing it based on gender oversimplifies complex human emotions and relationships. Both men and women are capable of loving sincerely and conditionally, depending on their individual personalities, experiences, and the dynamics of their relationships. Sincerity and conditions in love are influenced by factors such as personal values, past experiences, emotional maturity, and communication skills. It's more accurate to say that how someone loves varies widely among individuals rather than being determined by gender. Healthy relationships thrive on mutual respect, understanding, and commitment, regardless of whether the partners are men or women. read
https://www.youtube.com/embed/KtA4D-fgCjUYes. It seems like so.
You know what girls love sincerely? The AI girls!
I think either answer fits some in both men and women
It's not that simple; I know a helluva lot of men who only love conditionally.
I would go with no because the majority of women aren't like that. Sure there are more conditional women than conditional men. But still, the majority of women aren't conditional. So...
Have to disagree with that. I think this is one area where men and women are about equally likely to be guilty.
Depends on the individual, but in a broad sense, yes.
i think they are just the samw
It depends on who brings more to the table.
Precisely.
Do you think men and women are just not good to each other or themselves? Is this the transition over where people just get their sexual pleasure but never do anything noble for the ones they have a sexual experience with?
Like does the good deed STOP at sex or sexuality for people? And what they do for others? Or is this just a case when it comes to individuals online? I’m curious.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions