Yes the title may seem boring but please give it a read...
A-C-T. To an American high schooler, those 3 words may seem pretty daunting. In fact, they are. American College Testing, as it stands for, is a standardized test taken by many high schoolers in order to prove their readiness for college.
The fact is, this test really doesn't prove college readiness. On the reading section, students must read 4 500 word passages and answer 40 questions on these in 35 minutes. Thats 2000 words excluding the questions. Not even a literature professor or someone highly skilled in the English language would be able to do this task and answer all questions perfectly. So if this task can't prove proficiency in the English language, then what does it prove?
The only thing this proves is how fast students are capable of reading. But when will people ever need to use speed reading in the real world? For test cramming in college, it may be useful. But does test cramming really get you that far in the end? Not really...
Take me for example. I have a 3.82 GPA, take honours and AP classes, have a part time job, varsity athlete, many volunteer hours, on honour roll...everything a college wants in a student, right? Well not until they see my ACT score...
I ended up scoring above average but not enough to get me into my 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, or even 5th choices for universities. My GPA and other credentials are exceed what those schools ask but my ACT score doesn't. Many other students are in the same situation as well.
Some background on me: I live in America but was born in Germany. Even though I speak English at home, German was what I spoke until I was 7 and was the language I learned to read in. Transitioning to reading in English was a hard shift and I still am a slow reader today. This showed on the ACT, as I got a 23 on the reading portion.
Other sections of the test also involve the speed at which students can work. Speed doesn't correlate with intelligence. I personally prefer to work slowly, write out all my work and go over it thoroughly before turning it in. Other students may function like that and others not. With that said, the ACT and other standardized tests seem to favor those who work faster which results in a misrepresentation of many student's academic capabilities.
Another issue is that many schools don't teach English grammar and punctuation, including mine. They do tend to focus on other aspects such as vocabulary and literary skills. This also shows on standardized tests as students that haven't learnt the proper mechanics of English typically scored lower on that section. Should a small as well as many times uncontrolable factor have such a large indirect impact on college admissions? I think not.
Perhaps the most disturbing issue can be wealth inequality. And yes, that does impact test scores. Wealthier kids tend to have the TI-84's (the mother of all calculators), private tutors, test prep class, and other important resources that help them score higher. Many lower income parents can't afford these, which results in a score different between wealthier and lower income students. Not to mention taking these tests isn't cheap so wealthier students can afford to take them more if they are unsatisfied with their scores. As said before, is this something that should affect our test scores indirectly?
So back to the title...Due to the fact that every student has their own individual strengths, weaknesses, learning styles, backgrounds, and other variables, standardized tests shouldn't be used as a measuring stick to determine how ready one is for college. It is unfair to those that don't conform to the test, doesn't give accurate readings, and doesn't test a student's true academically capabilities.
Standardized tests are like making a single type of T-shirt for the entire population. Only a small portion of people will fit it but due to varying body types and other factors, most won't.
This is my first myTake so feedback will be appreciated. Also tips and resources for the ACT, as I am retaking it in February. I'd also like to know what you guys think of this. Thanks! =)
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
3Opinion
basically the whole education system is shit. personal weakness and strength is completely ignored. it´s tough in way that is the least likely to actually teach kids plus it´s only about tricking the system to get good grades instead of actually learning stuff. meaning that pupils just memorize stuff instead of actually understanding.
grades in higher education are supposed to depend on usage of the acuired knowledge and using it to solve new problems to bypass that problem... but everybody knows that even in university you can be good by just memorizing shit.
it´s not enough to only complain about standartdised tests, which are just the cherry on top of a huge pile of shit.
Thats true. But standardized tests are the biggest of all the issues. I feel that once that is solved, then we can tackle the other ones.
I've felt really passionate about it because despite being a good student, I can't show it on standardized tests because they don't work for my learning style.
tests don´t work anyway. they don´t show the potential of a student. you can have a bad day or something and it´s just stupid to test the learned stuff of a year or so in a 1 hour test.
Yeah, I know. Thats for understanding!
The ACT takes 4 hours with writing.
yeah 4 hours, 10 hours whatever still it´s not at all capable of testing a students potential. using knowledge in an appropriate moment where it is actually needed is more human then just having to spew out all the theoretical knowledge you have at once. our brains don´t work like that.
Yes, I fully agree with that! Another reason I hate standardized tests.
If tests become specified to the individual then lesser individuals will end up getting jobs they can't handle. I mean, do you really want this kid as your future surgeon?
https://www.belch.com/img/hittedit.jpg
I wouldn't want that kid to be a surgeon. What I mean by more individualized tests is having them conform to the student's needs, not academic ability. The score will demonstrate what it is supposed to but having more individualized tests would allow for students to demonstrate what they are capable of.
You can't just make a certain type of shoe and size then expect the entire global population to fit into it. You make different styles and sizes so everybody has a shoe to match their needs. It's just a matter of who can run the fastest. By giving people shoes that conform to their foot type, as giving tests that conform to someone's learning style, people will be able to perform at their best but there will still be winners and losers, whether it be determined by speed or academic skills.
If you had been a native English speaker you would've got a 30 or more and you wouldn't be complaining or writing this.
Hell, I got a 32 composite without studying at all, but I got a 3.0 GPA.
Propose a better alternative to standardized testing?
My English is better than my German currently. I started reading in German first and I'm just not a fast reader...
We need to take into account that not everyone is a fast reader and we all learn differently. If I were a native English speaker, I would still complain because of the many other negatives that come with standardized testing.
That is probably because you just fit into the small minority of people that are good at taking these types of test. I have a 3.85ish GPA but am a slow reader and suck at taking these types of tests. Because of the standardization, many other students and I are unable to prove ourselves to colleges since our learning styles don't conform to the exams.
I propose something like the Finland's educational system. It has proven to be effective, doesn't have standardized tests, and is much better than the broken mess we have here.
en.wikipedia.org/.../Education_in_Finland
So, testing based on what you wanna major in/get a job in?
Yes, that would be my ideal. What about you?
I'm not sure. Lots of people don't know what field they want to work in at that age.
I've been interested in geoscience since I was 8 or so and still am.