Reminder: Irrational Numbers are abstractions. What do you think?

[Wade12345]

The number "PI" does not exist in nature. It only exists as an abstraction.

The Universe is finite, therefore you cannot have an infinite number of decimal places in a number, therefore irrational numbers do not exist in nature.

This also means "Excluded middle" and "Mid-point theorem" are not guaranteed to work in the real world, because it is not safe to assume an infinite number of decimal places for ANY number, nevermind doing so for two or three numbers being compared to one another.

Real World Example:

Even a Proton is not a perfect Sphere or Circle. It's actually triangular. It's made of two Quarks of one type and one Quark of another type, so it's not possible for that to add up to a Sphere.

[Tyrael]

We don't know if the universe is finite or not, so all of this was unnecessary.

[Wade12345]

Big Bang theory proves the Universe is both past-Finite and finite in size, and started as a single point.

"No space-time continuum can ever be infinite nor self-eternal." (Guth et al 2008). They won an award in math and physics for their proof in 2014.

Edgar Allen Poe proved the Universe was Finite with a simple thought experiment.

1) If the Universe was infinite and there were an infinite number of stars in the Universe, then the night sky should be entirely lighted.

2) The Night Sky is almost entirely dark.

3) therefore the Universe is not infinite.

[Wade12345]

The Big Bang theory is actually so close to the "Philosopher's Truth" about the Universe's origins, so that it correctly described the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation and its temperature several decades before the CMB was actually discovered.

[Wade12345]

It should be noted that Alan Guth (et al) their theory allows Inflation, but does NOT allow "eternal inflation". In fact it proves the theory of "eternal inflation" wrong.

I personally do not believe General Relativity allows Inflation at all, although the CURRENT version of the Big BAng theory includes Inflation. I think the Speed of Light Postulate prohibits Inflation exceeding the Speed of Light from one side of the Universe to the Other.

Thus I believe the Universe is 96 Billion years old, not the 13.8 billion years proposed by mainstream physicists.

I can show that the Sun is a First Generation Star and is 48 billion years old, and has a Main Sequence lifespan of a little over 96 Billion years. If it burned at a continuous rate, it would survive for about 110 Billion years, but in reality it will accelerate throughout the Yellow Dwarf phase, so it won't last quite that long as a Yellow Dwarf. Once it finally becomes a Red Giant, it will only burn for a few million years as a Red Giant before it runs out of Helium, because Helium burns many times faster for several reasons, most importantly the Carbon Core that forms causes a deeper Gravitational Gradient which means you need to burn fuel thousands of times faster to maintain equal pressure.

Anyway, the Sun as evidence, being a First Generation Star, shows the Universe is several times older than the Scientists think.