
If higher education was free, how many uneducated people would take advantage?

This question is a huge one as it is encompassing bigger and complicated questions we can't solve easily. Here are the implicit questions, overlapping, deriving from this one:
Too many. We already have too many going to college. If it was completely free to the student, the problem would get even worse. You'd have all those college grads feinting when they get the bill from the plumber who charges $200 to show up at their door, and another $150 per hour for the work. Then they'll wonder why they wasted four years in college instead of becoming a plumber.
All of them. I would jump right back into school, get another degree or two, be able to qualify for better jobs.
Except you wouldn't, because if everybody has it it stops being a differentiating factor. Associates degrees used to count for something. Little, but a tie-breaker at least between highly improbable otherwise equal candidates. Now a BA is practically the same thing. Plus too many people would get worthless degrees and ultimately not be able to pay the taxes to support it. There is no way to make education truly free. K-12 isn't free. It's free to the student, but a good deal of our property tax and special use tax go to fund it. If you make it so college students don't pay any longer, those university professors still need to get paid. They aren't going to teach for free. That money has to come from the taxpayer, which eventually most of these college students will (hopefully) become.
I think the assumption is the education becomes free through taxes
I like the way they do it in Hong Kong. College is free, but you don't get to decide your major.
that is very beatrice prior
It's challenging to predict exact numbers, but if higher education were free, many more individuals would likely take advantage of the opportunity. Factors like accessibility, societal encouragement, and personal motivation would play significant roles. Historically, reducing financial barriers increases enrollment and diversity in higher education. This would enable individuals who were previously constrained by cost to pursue academic and professional growth, potentially raising overall education levels in society.
Opinion
14Opinion
The GOP can't have that! Their voters would leave the party and the GOP would be as relevant as the Rent Is Too Damn High Party.
In Europe where it's free, it's not as easy to get in. They dual-track their secondary students. Unlike the US, they don't try to cram everyone onto a college-prep track whether or not they have the apptitude or desire to go to a four-year university.
We have a first year free policy for tertiary education and enrollments went up by 30k
it's a shame it's not free
Many would and a more educated workforce would lead to increased productivity and economic growth, but of course, this kind of logic is not big with those that control the education systems.
In the state where I live they are offering Community College for free to people who do not already have a college degree. I heard today their enrollments are up 18% which is a lot.
I don’t think it would jump up a lot. Probably more so for women, a little for men. But a lot of men don’t like school. I never did. W that said yes I had to take some schooling to get into the field I’m in. I think if a lot of trade schools were free a lot of men would do it. But as far as college, whether 2 or 4 years or longer, I don’t think they’re really geared toward men.
Free is just another word for worthless.
If it's worth something:
- no one would hand it out for free
- people will pay to attain it.
you do realize education is free for foreigners? housing, bills too
sugar plum with joni mitchell thank you for coming out!
If they were being educated under today's Randy Weingarten teachers the uneducated would come out dumber than ever. They would know WOKE but nothing else!!!
If higher education were completely taxpayer funded (the real meaning of "free") lots of uneducated would take advantage. Just how many of those would follow useful career paths might be another matter altogether.
if those tax dollars were exclusively for americans i'd have no problem with that
If it was free there would be certain academic requirements to meet to attend that most students today don't meet.
there are people way smarter than me. i don't meet them often and i acknowledge their distinct fields of knowledge. i was a shit student until i woke up.
You miss the point. At one time getting into college depending on academic ability and achievement
i don't even think i made 1000 points on the SAT. so i was not eligible for a scholarship. i had to pay.
When something is free it becomes worthless. People do not value or pursue worthless things. Would you marry a worthless person?
no. but i would use her for free
Probably not many if any at all. Education is not about getting in to or staying out of debt. It is about learning and preparing for the job market.
if a kid knew he liked doing certain things and wanted to learn more but couldn't because he couldn't afford the education... that's the type of kid that makes it worth it. it's many scenarios that can arise. education and knowledge used to be passed down. now intelligence is a business and has been for 50 years+
A ton. who wouldn't want 4-6 years of fucking off at a sexual buffet paid for by someone else?
How many free tuition grants and loans are being left unobtained? Quite a few.
that's not free buddy
Some but nowhere nearly enough because anti-intellectualism is rife in America. (And far from uncommon amongst Canadian lasses and lads).
Quite a few I think.
Definitely.
Too many.
I wouldn’t.