
Does the chart indicate that for the last 60 years, public schools and colleges have increasingly become a hostile environment for boys and young men?


Opinion
10Opinion
Not at all.
You need to learn the difference between causation and correlation.
For instance, if you looked at a graph of shark attacks and ice cream sales, you'd notice that they have similar time-trends; shark attacks and ice cream sales go up in the summer. This would easily be seen on a chart over several years - say, 60 years.
So, I have to ask a question just like yours:
"Does the chart indicate that for the last 60 years, ice cream sales have increasingly become a cause for shark attacks?"
Of course not! The reason for the ice cream sales increasing is the warm weather. The reason for the increase in shark attacks is more people at the beach... due to the warm weather.
So, shark attacks and ice cream sales are correlated, but they do not cause each other.
The situation with your chart is similar.
And the answer is simple: More women have been going to college compared to the past. That's what happens as society changes with the advances made from feminism in the past 60 years.
Now, I must admit that there are other issues with men in today's society but public schools and colleges "increasingly becom[ing] a hostile environment for boys and young men" isn't it because they aren't making their environments more hostile to boys and young men.
Part of the problem is militant feminism or, for lack of a better word, "reactionaryism" in which there's a jump to blame men (White men, in particular) and "The Patriarchy" by default. Many young males are feeling a target on their back and/or a lack of support from society in general. I think that's true to a degree, but it's also partly their fault due to growing up in a world with technology that is both helpful and harmful and not having the maturity (due to shitting parenting) to keep their shit together mentally and emotionally so they can weed out the bullshit online, but also how to spend their lives more productively than playing the latest version of Grand Theft Auto at the age of 25. Today's world is filled with people with a low attention span and low maturity.
I know the difference. Every year before it snows, the leaves turn brown and fall off the trees. I know that doesn't cause it to snow.
However, even Yeonmi Park when describing her experience of attending Columbia University with Jorden Peterson stated, "to graduate so every every class had an element of being a politically correct and shaping you how you think and I learned how to censor myself"
THIS:
Jorden Peterson stated, "to graduate so every every class had an element of being a politically correct and shaping you how you think and I learned how to censor myself"
Yes. That's right. That's how the real world has worked since the dawn of time.
This is why God gave you an inhibition center in the frontal cortex of your brain - to keep you from saying or doing shit that is going to cause you harm. So, apparently, Jorden is an immature, whiny kid who doesn't understand how the real world works. That's one of the reasons for college - for taking you from the incubator of childhood near your home and helping you transition into becoming a functioning adult in the real world - not just by the classes that are taught, but by the experiences of having to interact with other people of other backgrounds than the one that you were incubated in growing up.
And "political correctness" has always existed - it just changes over time. In fact, it was sort of intuitive, so we didn't have a term for it. Whiny, immature people needed a term for why "others are to blame" (and not themselves) for when those other people get upset with the whiny, immature people like Jorden Peterson.
Read it again. That was a quote from Yeonmi Park; not Jorden Peterson. However, if you wish to say, you posted correctly because I omitted two commas, I will not disagree.
I am doing fine at SMU. However, I kind of wish that instead of liberal arts, I had selected a college offering a degree in Chinese studies, such as Davidson, assuming I would be accepted or perhaps, Hendrix if I wasn't. I would have enjoyed two study abroad semesters in China, Taiwin, or Hong Kong.
Hong Kong Baptist University (HKBU) and Southern Methodist University (SMU) maintain a student exchange partnership. For 2025, students can choose between a full academic semester or a short-term summer program. [1, 2, 3]
Summer Program 2025
Dates: July 2 – July 31, 2025.
Structure: A month-long program featuring credit-bearing courses in disciplines like film, business, social innovation, and languages (Mandarin/Cantonese).
Activities: Includes a day tour to Macau, visits to UNESCO World Heritage sites, and theme park adventures.
Estimated Cost: Approximately $1,520 USD (covering on-campus accommodation in a new student hostel, activities, and visa fees). Airfare, meals, and personal spending are additional.
Application Deadline: Students typically need to be nominated by their home university by late March (e. g., March 21). [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
(more)
Semester Exchange (Fall 2025 / Spring 2026)
Semester 1 (Fall): Starts September 1, 2025, and ends November 29, 2025.
Semester 2 (Spring): Starts January 12, 2026, and ends April 25, 2026.
Course Load: Exchange students are typically expected to register for a minimum of 12 credits per semester.
Financials: Under standard exchange agreements, students pay their regular tuition to their home university (SMU) and only pay administrative or housing fees to HKBU. [1, 11, 12]
Academic & Credit Transfer
Approval: Before applying, students should consult their academic advisor and the SMU Abroad Office to ensure credits will transfer to their specific degree requirements.
Grades: For SMU (Dallas) students, grades earned abroad on approved programs generally post to the SMU transcript and factor into the cumulative GPA. [13, 14]
AI responses may include mistakes.
LINKS (Part 1 of 2):
[1] intl.hkbu.edu.hk/.../important-dates
[2] geo.smu.edu.sg/smu-student-exchange-partner-universities
[3] https://www.instagram.com/p/DGEAB9RiukZ/
[4] studio.smu.ca/.../summer-program-hkbu-summer-programme-2023
[5] studio.smu.ca/global-opportunities/tag/Summer
[6] www.instagram.com/csusm.studyabroad/p/DGgbrHyyIdn/
[7] studio.smu.ca/.../hong-kong-baptist-university-summer-2025-exchange
[8] studio.smu.ca/.../hong-kong-baptist-university-summer-2025-exchange
[9] intl.hkbu.edu.hk/.../important-dates
(more)
Yes, I could, but it would take at least another year to graduate. To learn Mandarin, Chinese Studies requires two semesters abroad for deep language immersion and authentic cultural understanding, something difficult to achieve in a classroom setting alone, allowing students to reach professional fluency, grasp subtle cultural nuances (like humor, social cues, history), and experience daily life firsthand, which is crucial for a comprehensive degree in a complex language like Mandarin.
You could always spend time in Chinatown in Manhattan. And the food is spectacular!
For instance, my go-to when in Manhattan is Hop Kee as it was for the late, great Anthony Bourdain.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Uc7x-GY1qlo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_S2UuNmn2c
HOWEVER, consider following this guy or reaching out to him. He likely would have insight for you that I cannot provide.
https://www.youtube.com/@xiaomanyc
You have yet to go to Chinatown... English is not the primary language there. There are quite a few places in the United States where English is not the primary language.
I would love if you went to China - or anywhere else. You would then exhibit what Mark Twain said:
“Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the earth all one's lifetime.”—"Innocents Abroad," 1869
Whike I forget the exact date there was a rather sweeping, near global, reform in schools to save young girls who were seen as performing worse.
The reforms worked. That is more or less what we are seeing here. Of course societal shifts contribute. Today schools are more marched with how girls learn than how boys do it.
I don't think we need to undo it exactly. I do think we need to look at educatiok and figure out how to make it more boy-friendly again. This time without screwing anyone else over.
Really, we are suffering from success. This was the goal. It just was meant as 50/50 and went a bit above it. We employ very little of our understanding of psychologt to the academical world and teaching process. All a change needs is a public or political demand for one.
To me, one of the fundamental drawbacks for men, in a classroom environment is evolutionarily based. What I mean by that is that guys often tend be more production driven, whereas women are often more procedure bound. 'Yeah, okay, so your term paper may be factually correct, but you didn't dot this 'I' or cross that 'T', so you get a 'D', etc. Guys are seeing their efforts thrown out on a technicality.
I'll give you an example of how this can happen: I work part time at a sandwich shop, and the cooler/display table that holds the lettuce, tomatoes and etc, which is about 50 years old, often gets too cold, and ruins our vegetables for the sandwiches. I was able to solve the problem by covering the air vents next to those items, preventing the cooler from freezing them. However, when I told the owner we needed more duct tape, she instead scheduled 3-4 service calls for a tech to come out and look at it, because in her mind, that was the 'right' way to handle it.
And of those 60% females with college degrees, I'd bet <20% actually have a career in their field of study. Frankly, it's kind of a waste.
Men don't graduate with degrees because on the job training and apprenticeships are a much better path to success. College is just not as valued as much. But, of the 39% of college educated men, I'd suspect the majority of them are actually utilizing their degrees.
No, it just means the societal powers of the old days vanished to the point it allowed women to break free from the kitchen.
Yes. We've "girl powered" society to the detriment of males.
Not enough data. There are endless explanations.
Okay, the short answer here is yes. That is exactly what it indicates and that is exactly what has happened. Nobody cares. Men aren't important unless you need something.
I guess, but do you think us black lads have EVER had it easy in school or anywhere?
Yes it does
You can also add your opinion below!
AI Opinion
The perception that public schools and colleges have become increasingly hostile environments for boys and young men can be complex and multifaceted. Over the years, societal changes have influenced educational approaches, discipline, and expectations. Some argue that teaching methods have evolved in ways that might not align with traditional learning styles often associated with boys. However, many schools are increasingly aware of these challenges and are actively working towards more inclusive and supportive environments for all students. It's essential to consider multiple perspectives and data points to understand this issue fully.