I feel great about that! I want my kids to know that they always have a choice and no matter what they choose they will be accepted. That's the kind of future I wish for my children and grandchildren.
340 opinions shared on Entertainment & Arts topic.
😂😂😂 I don't know. It doesn't seem right. I mean i don't really care but Where's the moderation? If homo sexuals are all we'll see then Kids will take idols one way or another.
The kids are best taught to avoid the media completely.
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(18-24)
+1 y
I'm fine with some characters being gay cuz that's a thing and children need to be aware gays exist. But I don't think every single show needs to have gay relationships and such. Kids shouldn't focus on sexuality that early on. I think gays should be mentioned, just like other relationships are, but they shouldn't be the main focus
It's so it'll be too condition these kids to be around a group of Harvey Weinstein looking mfer so their ass can fiddle with the kids like a light switch.
Such characters are created to groom children for sexual abuse by paedophiles, who will convert an otherwise normal child to a life of sexual perversion and misery.
If your going to add for example a gay character to a show why not make a new character that is gay, instead of changing an already established character that prior episodes risk contradicting the changes, also if its aimed at way younger and purely educational I don't want any sexuality stuff in it period gay straight or otherwise
I didn't know Ratburn was gay! It's hilarious how most dudes on here think there's a hidden agenda to make kids gay for _______ reason. Lol what a bunch of fools. Turn off the TV if your closed minded brain can't handle people being gay on TV.
373 opinions shared on Entertainment & Arts topic.
Filth to muck up children's minds; hardly fit to be called entertainment; suited rather for the gutter and the cesspit than for any kind of mainstream media; proof of the decay and degeneracy accompanying modern living.
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(36-45)
+1 y
These producers are not including these characters just because they feel like it’s the right thing to do. No. They are doing this for media coverage and money.
@BrotherFrost Anything that exists is normal. Otherwise it wouldn't exist. Hiding it won't make it disappear, it will only feed it and direct it into to the wrong path. Hasn't history thought as enough already? It's a damn time to bring all into public and try to direct it into the right path. We can't "cure" it, but we can give proper support as fellow human beings. Afterall we are humans we should be more supportive of each other, because it could've been you (or your children or anyone you care about). Any behavior that you see in anybody just proves that we as humans are capable of it, any of it. You are human too, so it doesn't exclude you. You think those people choose to be like that? You think they like it? Just try to imagine what it's like having those kinds of desires and not being able to turn it off, while the whole freaking society hates you and calls you a monster. Suicide rates are highest in these cases (in LGBTQ communities as well). It is no secret that humans are complicated beings, not everything is black or white. And it's been like that ever since the beginning of time; gays, zoophiles, necrophiles, pedophiles and all kinds of something-philes that are not that known, existed long, long before.
My point is, if it does not involve crime, why do we have to judge it? What does it have to do with us? Look how many sex toys there are today, for the love of god I have a rotating vibrator that feels great! Does that make me a monster? Am I some kind of roto-phile because of that? I am well aware that penis cannot rotate but I it'd be great if it could. Same goes for all that people, the only difference is that they cannot enjoy anything else other then what they are attracted to. So why don't we give proper help and think of solutions for those people, instead of throwing hate, neglecting them and sending them to graves? We could make toys for them too, for example. Our sexuality doesn't define us. A person can be a pedophile and still be good person, good friend, a genius, a hard worker, etc. etc.
@BrotherFrost Yes, exactly, because future depends on those kids. We screwed it up but maybe they'll do better. And the only way to make that happen is to make them aware of it from the very young age, because otherwise they will end up just like us.
@little_bird1 The point is all other deviations are illegal. Why should one deviation be legal, and others not? There is no logical explanation. People with physical mutations also exist. But they are not normal, as they do not confirm to a norm. Same goes for homosexuality and other deviations. Children who do not understand this will get screwed up if they are exposed to it. Many adults are unaware, so that's why lots of westerners are screwed up.
@BrotherFrost@BrotherFrost So you would say people with physical disabilities are also not normal? If that's your point, then people who wear glasses because of bad vision are also physically disabled and, by your logic, they also not normal? Hmm, so that would mean that anyone who lacks something (even as something as trivial as, let's say, not having as many hair on eyelashes as someone you define as being normal by the norm) is not normal? That would mean that 99% of human population is not normal, lol. Cmon, you are not a kid, you do realize how stupid it sounds what you just wrote? You should know that every human is different, both physically and mentally, no? We all have different faces, there is not a single human who is identical to another. Not physically not mentally, it is impossible and stupid to pick a one human being and compare all the others to it. Because that's what you're doing. You just picked one VERY SMALL (compare to all the others) group of people and called them "normal" because that small group was the only group accepted by society your ancestors built centuries ago (because they were in that group). They believed that their little group was the only legitimate and rightful group to call themselves humans and walk this earth. So they rapidly reproduced, were bigger in numbers and thus they created this society (their society), made some rules and completely neglected the existence of others, calling them "deviant". In fact, the only reason they hated these other humans is because they did not have the tools or knowledge to explain evolution and basic human anatomy. They were actually just afraid of others that did not look or behave like them. I did not made this up, google it it's all in history and evolution books. But it is inevitable to evolve, and that's why things are changing now, you like it or not.
@little_bird1 Don't play dumb. The majority sets the rules, simply because it can enforce them. Claiming that anything other than that is behind it is silly. Norms on the other hand can be objectively judged. It's not a matter of opinion and enforcing that opinion. A lion is a lion if it looks and behaves as all others like him. If you see a lion who does not look like a lion or does not behave as lions do, at best you will say that that is one odd lion. Humans are exactly the same way. If one has abnormaly large feet, he will be called big foot. Some deformations you can see, others you can not. But that does not change a thing, unless functions of part of or the entire specimen are altered in any meaningful way. How big of an impact is if you have one less eyelashes? What about five? And how big of an impact is it if you have the need to hump a lion? As for your glasses idea, your compereson makes no sense. Humans can see. Some see further than others. It's not a third eye on your forehead.
@BrotherFrost Yeah an odd lion, but still a lion. As the matter of fact, it doesn't mean how it looks or behaves, the point is that it exists same as you and me. It didn't choose to exist, but it does. Same with humans, there are different kinds everywhere. And you want to hide them and restrict them of all rights just because the majority finds them... odd? Because watching two guys kiss is disgusting to watch? You are not losing anything by supporting them, but they are losing EVERYTHING if you don't. Forbidding it or hiding it or even inventing a law to kill LGBTQ people wouldn't change anything, new ones would be born.
@little_bird1 Nobody questions the species of the deviants. But i will not have anyone lie that they are normal and get away with it. They get the same rights as everyone else. They however can not ask for "special" rights to be created for them. I am not going to enable deviant behaviour, no matter their subtype. Tolerating their exsistance is the most they can ask. But that does not make their behaviour normal nor acceptable, which is promoted by showing it on TV.
@Juxtapose You are right, further discussion is pointless, he will never understand he is brainwashed beyond limits. He is one of those people who thinks a kid can become gay if influenced by media, and that a kid can be prevented to become if not influenced. It's so sad, such a small brain...
@little_bird1 It's rimarcable how handicapped you westerners are. You do not even realize that you are the ones who are brainwashed, as you are unable to see simple connections between arguments. You know how i know? You keep paroting learned sentences and keep pretending you know where the discussion is going ti go. In fact, i am not even saying that kids will catch the gay if they see it. That's how i know i am the one who is not being brainwashed: my answers aren't predictable. And that's probably why you, a brainwashed human specimen, can't even comprehend what i am saying. If you actually read what i wrote you would see exactly what my concern is. On top of that, you are a hypocrite. You pretend that you care for all people, while if you trully did you would die of depression as every minute someone on the planet dies. Not to mention that feelings are not even valid arguments.
@BrotherFrost You 100% are incapable of demonstrating how homosexuality hurts you or anyone else.
I am bisexual, and that has never hurt anyone. You are whining about a victimless crime and I'm going to tell it like it is.
You have absolutely nothing except your own disgust over homosexuality. You haven't given us jackshit, not ONE valid way of how homosexuality harms anyone.
As you can not understand how humping a goat is a problem when it is preceived equal to male-female intercourse then sure, you called it. Because in law you need to prove guilt. Good luck putting a goat on the stand.
@BrotherFrost You are contradicting yourself because you can't give us a valid answer as to how homosexuality harms others. Your opinions are based purely on your personal dislike and hatred. You are simply evil. But luckily, the world has started to see what kind of garbage of majority has ruled this world, and it's time to put you down. We win, buddy.
Are you so clueless i have to spell it out to you? In fact, i won't. I will post a series of questions, which should be easy to answer if you have any basic knowledge of the matter. Then, you will either hop around it or spell it out yourself, for yourself.
What is the purpose of sex? What offten happens when a fertile male and a fertile female have sex? What happens when two fertile people of the same sex have sex with each other? Does the society benefit from any one of those two pairings? What is the difference between those two pairings then? Which pairing is hurting the society and how?
Hah, no. I want you to say what i mean by following the step-by-step explanation you get by answering my questions. That way i make sure that you either: A. Show that you don't know what you are talking about. or B. Answer your own question.
If you answer your own question i avoid continuing this ping-pong where you ignore the parts that you don't like. If you show that you don't understand basic biology and sociology, you discredit yourself.
So i am not going to continue the ping-pong match. Either answer my questions and get your answer, or continue arguing with a mirror. By the way you already showed lack of basic knowledge of philosophy.
Muslims believe gayness is evil, just like you believe. So you are the same. I mean if that's what you believe, then that's what you believe. I can't reason with a religious fanatic. :(
But I do not believe in Islam, what is so hard to understand? Because I don't feed into bumlshit pro-gayness propaganda, doesn't make me a Muslim extremist, or a Muslim at all. Christians, actual Christians, oppose this disgusting trend aswell. You're a bad troll.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
76Opinion
I feel great about that! I want my kids to know that they always have a choice and no matter what they choose they will be accepted. That's the kind of future I wish for my children and grandchildren.
Lmao this is why generations are getting dumber and dumber
😂😂😂
I don't know. It doesn't seem right. I mean i don't really care but Where's the moderation? If homo sexuals are all we'll see then Kids will take idols one way or another.
The kids are best taught to avoid the media completely.
I'm fine with some characters being gay cuz that's a thing and children need to be aware gays exist. But I don't think every single show needs to have gay relationships and such. Kids shouldn't focus on sexuality that early on. I think gays should be mentioned, just like other relationships are, but they shouldn't be the main focus
It's so it'll be too condition these kids to be around a group of Harvey Weinstein looking mfer so their ass can fiddle with the kids like a light switch.
Such characters are created to groom children for sexual abuse by paedophiles, who will convert an otherwise normal child to a life of sexual perversion and misery.
Make new/original characters, dont change older characters for it
May I ask what you mean by that?
If your going to add for example a gay character to a show why not make a new character that is gay, instead of changing an already established character that prior episodes risk contradicting the changes, also if its aimed at way younger and purely educational I don't want any sexuality stuff in it period gay straight or otherwise
I don’t think much of it, but it’s good to see more positive representation of different kinds of people.
Only the religious freaks will be triggered by it
I think it is good and not triggered by it
I didn't know Ratburn was gay! It's hilarious how most dudes on here think there's a hidden agenda to make kids gay for _______ reason. Lol what a bunch of fools. Turn off the TV if your closed minded brain can't handle people being gay on TV.
I think it's unfortunate. I'm don't dislike gays or lesbians, but I don't feel that it's appropriate to feed that stuff to our kids.
Le Fou is not openly gay. It can be argued that he is gay, but it's not something the movie ever addressed.
At the wedding he is seen slow dancing with a man
Filth to muck up children's minds; hardly fit to be called entertainment; suited rather for the gutter and the cesspit than for any kind of mainstream media; proof of the decay and degeneracy accompanying modern living.
These producers are not including these characters just because they feel like it’s the right thing to do. No. They are doing this for media coverage and money.
LGBT people exist, so it makes sense for them to appear in fiction once in awhile.
Nobody is complaining about zebras being shown. To me, it's just as inconsequential.
What about zoophiles, necrophiles and pedophiles? They too exist.
@BrotherFrost Anything that exists is normal. Otherwise it wouldn't exist. Hiding it won't make it disappear, it will only feed it and direct it into to the wrong path. Hasn't history thought as enough already? It's a damn time to bring all into public and try to direct it into the right path. We can't "cure" it, but we can give proper support as fellow human beings. Afterall we are humans we should be more supportive of each other, because it could've been you (or your children or anyone you care about). Any behavior that you see in anybody just proves that we as humans are capable of it, any of it. You are human too, so it doesn't exclude you. You think those people choose to be like that? You think they like it? Just try to imagine what it's like having those kinds of desires and not being able to turn it off, while the whole freaking society hates you and calls you a monster. Suicide rates are highest in these cases (in LGBTQ communities as well). It is no secret that humans are complicated beings, not everything is black or white. And it's been like that ever since the beginning of time; gays, zoophiles, necrophiles, pedophiles and all kinds of something-philes that are not that known, existed long, long before.
@little_bird1 We're talking about a kids TV show here.
My point is, if it does not involve crime, why do we have to judge it? What does it have to do with us? Look how many sex toys there are today, for the love of god I have a rotating vibrator that feels great! Does that make me a monster? Am I some kind of roto-phile because of that? I am well aware that penis cannot rotate but I it'd be great if it could. Same goes for all that people, the only difference is that they cannot enjoy anything else other then what they are attracted to. So why don't we give proper help and think of solutions for those people, instead of throwing hate, neglecting them and sending them to graves? We could make toys for them too, for example. Our sexuality doesn't define us. A person can be a pedophile and still be good person, good friend, a genius, a hard worker, etc. etc.
@BrotherFrost Yes, exactly, because future depends on those kids. We screwed it up but maybe they'll do better. And the only way to make that happen is to make them aware of it from the very young age, because otherwise they will end up just like us.
@little_bird1 The point is all other deviations are illegal. Why should one deviation be legal, and others not? There is no logical explanation.
People with physical mutations also exist. But they are not normal, as they do not confirm to a norm. Same goes for homosexuality and other deviations. Children who do not understand this will get screwed up if they are exposed to it. Many adults are unaware, so that's why lots of westerners are screwed up.
@BrotherFrost @BrotherFrost So you would say people with physical disabilities are also not normal? If that's your point, then people who wear glasses because of bad vision are also physically disabled and, by your logic, they also not normal? Hmm, so that would mean that anyone who lacks something (even as something as trivial as, let's say, not having as many hair on eyelashes as someone you define as being normal by the norm) is not normal? That would mean that 99% of human population is not normal, lol. Cmon, you are not a kid, you do realize how stupid it sounds what you just wrote? You should know that every human is different, both physically and mentally, no? We all have different faces, there is not a single human who is identical to another. Not physically not mentally, it is impossible and stupid to pick a one human being and compare all the others to it. Because that's what you're doing. You just picked one VERY SMALL (compare to all the others) group of people and called them "normal" because that small group was the only group accepted by society your ancestors built centuries ago (because they were in that group). They believed that their little group was the only legitimate and rightful group to call themselves humans and walk this earth. So they rapidly reproduced, were bigger in numbers and thus they created this society (their society), made some rules and completely neglected the existence of others, calling them "deviant". In fact, the only reason they hated these other humans is because they did not have the tools or knowledge to explain evolution and basic human anatomy. They were actually just afraid of others that did not look or behave like them. I did not made this up, google it it's all in history and evolution books. But it is inevitable to evolve, and that's why things are changing now, you like it or not.
@little_bird1 Don't play dumb. The majority sets the rules, simply because it can enforce them. Claiming that anything other than that is behind it is silly. Norms on the other hand can be objectively judged. It's not a matter of opinion and enforcing that opinion. A lion is a lion if it looks and behaves as all others like him. If you see a lion who does not look like a lion or does not behave as lions do, at best you will say that that is one odd lion. Humans are exactly the same way. If one has abnormaly large feet, he will be called big foot. Some deformations you can see, others you can not. But that does not change a thing, unless functions of part of or the entire specimen are altered in any meaningful way. How big of an impact is if you have one less eyelashes? What about five? And how big of an impact is it if you have the need to hump a lion?
As for your glasses idea, your compereson makes no sense. Humans can see. Some see further than others. It's not a third eye on your forehead.
@BrotherFrost Those are shown in fiction dude, all of them.
Homosexuality by itself is not harmful, and these kids shows are not showing the characters fucking, so it's completely age appropriate.
@BrotherFrost Yeah an odd lion, but still a lion. As the matter of fact, it doesn't mean how it looks or behaves, the point is that it exists same as you and me. It didn't choose to exist, but it does. Same with humans, there are different kinds everywhere. And you want to hide them and restrict them of all rights just because the majority finds them... odd? Because watching two guys kiss is disgusting to watch? You are not losing anything by supporting them, but they are losing EVERYTHING if you don't. Forbidding it or hiding it or even inventing a law to kill LGBTQ people wouldn't change anything, new ones would be born.
@little_bird1 Nobody questions the species of the deviants. But i will not have anyone lie that they are normal and get away with it. They get the same rights as everyone else. They however can not ask for "special" rights to be created for them.
I am not going to enable deviant behaviour, no matter their subtype. Tolerating their exsistance is the most they can ask. But that does not make their behaviour normal nor acceptable, which is promoted by showing it on TV.
@BrotherFrost Why not? Has does accepting it harm you or anyone in any way?
@little_bird1 It harms the society by implying that their behaviour is equal to the normal behaviour.
@little_bird1 He's never, in a million years, going to give you a rational reason on how homosexuality supposably harms others.
Individualists don't operate with the term 'society', i know.
@Juxtapose You are right, further discussion is pointless, he will never understand he is brainwashed beyond limits. He is one of those people who thinks a kid can become gay if influenced by media, and that a kid can be prevented to become if not influenced. It's so sad, such a small brain...
@little_bird1 It's rimarcable how handicapped you westerners are. You do not even realize that you are the ones who are brainwashed, as you are unable to see simple connections between arguments. You know how i know? You keep paroting learned sentences and keep pretending you know where the discussion is going ti go. In fact, i am not even saying that kids will catch the gay if they see it. That's how i know i am the one who is not being brainwashed: my answers aren't predictable. And that's probably why you, a brainwashed human specimen, can't even comprehend what i am saying. If you actually read what i wrote you would see exactly what my concern is.
On top of that, you are a hypocrite. You pretend that you care for all people, while if you trully did you would die of depression as every minute someone on the planet dies. Not to mention that feelings are not even valid arguments.
@BrotherFrost You 100% are incapable of demonstrating how homosexuality hurts you or anyone else.
I am bisexual, and that has never hurt anyone. You are whining about a victimless crime and I'm going to tell it like it is.
You have absolutely nothing except your own disgust over homosexuality. You haven't given us jackshit, not ONE valid way of how homosexuality harms anyone.
Get the fuck out of here, you're a disgrace!
Ah, so you have a personal horse in the game. No wonder you are fighting tooth and nail to paint the image that you are the one making sense.
@BrotherFrost Still nothing.
Called it.
As you can not understand how humping a goat is a problem when it is preceived equal to male-female intercourse then sure, you called it. Because in law you need to prove guilt. Good luck putting a goat on the stand.
@BrotherFrost You are contradicting yourself because you can't give us a valid answer as to how homosexuality harms others. Your opinions are based purely on your personal dislike and hatred. You are simply evil.
But luckily, the world has started to see what kind of garbage of majority has ruled this world, and it's time to put you down. We win, buddy.
@little_bird1 You are clueless. Which is why the west is in decline.
@BrotherFrost I'm not talking about fucking goats, I'm talking about consensual sex between two adults that happen to be of the same sex.
You are unable to directly answer my question, because you are disingenuous. You can't give me an example of how homosexuality hurts anyone.
He is switching subject, it's so obvious. He got pushed to the corner because he's got no facts, nothing.
1:0 for us.
Are you so clueless i have to spell it out to you? In fact, i won't. I will post a series of questions, which should be easy to answer if you have any basic knowledge of the matter. Then, you will either hop around it or spell it out yourself, for yourself.
What is the purpose of sex? What offten happens when a fertile male and a fertile female have sex? What happens when two fertile people of the same sex have sex with each other? Does the society benefit from any one of those two pairings? What is the difference between those two pairings then? Which pairing is hurting the society and how?
@BrotherFrost you won't answer a very simple question and then you expect me to answer a series of questions.
@little_bird1 He really did dodge the question, lol. You nailed it.
As i wrote. You chose to skip around it. You do not want your questions answered. Now why am i not surprised.
@BrotherFrost If you can't answer a question without asking a question of your own, you are mentally deficient.
Hah, no. I want you to say what i mean by following the step-by-step explanation you get by answering my questions. That way i make sure that you either:
A. Show that you don't know what you are talking about.
or
B. Answer your own question.
If you answer your own question i avoid continuing this ping-pong where you ignore the parts that you don't like.
If you show that you don't understand basic biology and sociology, you discredit yourself.
So i am not going to continue the ping-pong match. Either answer my questions and get your answer, or continue arguing with a mirror. By the way you already showed lack of basic knowledge of philosophy.
@BrotherFrost You are literally too stupid to answer a simple question?
I think it great! But I don’t think it should be forced in a tv show either. If a plot needs an lgbtq+ character then by all means!
It's insanity. Corrupting children's minds from early on.
The world doesn't revolve around your Islamic extremism.
How is common knowledge Islamic extremism? But nice try, SJW.
Muslims believe gayness is evil, just like you believe. So you are the same. I mean if that's what you believe, then that's what you believe. I can't reason with a religious fanatic. :(
But I do not believe in Islam, what is so hard to understand? Because I don't feed into bumlshit pro-gayness propaganda, doesn't make me a Muslim extremist, or a Muslim at all. Christians, actual Christians, oppose this disgusting trend aswell.
You're a bad troll.
I accept lgbt people, but on deep emotional level I dont support lgbt stuff on kids shows.
Only bad ideologies need to be propagated to children in order for there to be any adults who accept it.
Not a fan of sexualization in children's shows period.
It doesn't belong. LGBT is an ideology and it doesn't belong in the culture.