According to me
Man 191-200 cm
Woman 177-181 cm
According to me
Man 191-200 cm
Woman 177-181 cm
Ah! Something I'm an expert in!
According to most other people, the ideal height for a woman is 5'7" or 170 cm, which is neither tall and definitely not short, either. And the ideal height for a man is 6'1", or 185 cm, which is the very start of "tall" for men, but without being too tall.
Now for me... I say the ideal height for homo sapien men is 6'2", or 188 cm. And I say the ideal height for homo sapien women is 5'10", or 178 cm. That is just my opinion. However, women are getting taller every generation (especially Korean women), while men have largely plateaued. Which is kind of scary, if you think about it.
As for me? My ideal height would be 6'5" barefoot, or 195 cm. That is my dream height an the height I was actually supposed to be before crippled by Precocious Puberty. The dream height of my partner would be 6'3" or 190 cm, which is a half inch shorter than what the actual love of my life was. And if this perfect, tall me ever had a daughter, she can be much shorter than us at only 5'11", which is more normal for a girl.
"Man 191-200 cm"
So, 6' 3" to 6' 7".
Good luck with that.
You might need to travel to the jungles of Central Africa to find a lot of men that tall.
Or become a groupie for an NBA team.
www.guinnessworldrecords.com/.../67503-tallest-tribe
TUTSI (ALSO KNOWN AS THE WATUSSI)
The tallest major tribe in the world is the Tutsi (also known as the Watussi) of Rwanda and Burundi, Central Africa whose young adult males average 1.83 m (6 ft).
Doesn't matter to me since im 4'10 and everyone is taller then me so I don't really notice anyone's height. I had a friend that was 7'4 and he often said the same thing but opposite that he just was taller then everyone so he didn't even notice anyones height. Seems like the only people obsessed with height are average heighted people.
You're perfect. HK.
Seriously? Those are both way over the average! But I guess that's just your preference. I think it's meaningless. If I like the person I don't give a damn about height. I don't do casual dating, but I get why someone would seek out a certain type of guy in that case, since it isn't actually about personality when it comes to that.
They're ideal TO YOU.
Anyways I think you misunderstand my comment about them being "above average" I did not mean above average in attractiveness, I meant above average height.
Opinion
33Opinion
Only 4% of men are 191cm.
Less than 2% of women are 180cms
Before posting questions, do people think about the impact of their words? Did you wake up an decide to bring misery to hundreds of people online by making what is already an insecure world, more insecure?
You can have your preference but to put out such toxic energy into the world is only going to come back at you in a myriad of ways. When those in your life begin to turn on you and things go against you, do not be surprised.
Kind regards,
DoctorSex
So just to recap.
You woke up and decided that only 4% of men were entitled to be considered beautiful, And less that 2% of women.
Void of character, history, goals and personality.
You then proceeded to let everyone out there in the world know that only 4% of them should consider themselves beautiful.
That's how you decided to spend your time. Now, with the greatest of respects and I mean this with absolute humility. By every stretch of the imagination, you would be considered average.
I don't think you should place yourself as the judge of what is or is not beautiful my dear
Apologies for my bluntness
Kind regards,
DoctorSex
@marish01 I agree, you're entitled to keep what's beautiful to you to YOURSELF. You don't know what internal demons people out here in the public space are dealing with. Nobody asked you for your divine judgement. Again, you are average at best on any metric. You have some nerve to go around telling the vast majority of humans that they aren't beautiful. Keep that to yourself and have some degree of decency, grace and elegance to how you move through life.
Kind regards,
DoctorSex
@DoctorSex
Dude... No one hates their height/being short on this site more than me, and even *I'm* not offended at this post. It's just an opinion, because no one is ideal. You're implying the subjective "ideal" should be the mediocre. Mediocre is mediocre for a reason. Because it's not ideal.
@MCheetah
"You're implying the subjective "ideal" should be the mediocre. "
I never implied anything of the sort. My issue is with this young ladies brass neck, her audacity to class only 4% of men as beautiful and less than 2% of women. Everyone else lacks beauty in her eyes. It's not enough that she holds this viewpoint, it's important to her that she makes 96% of men and 98% of women understand that they aren't beautiful.
Remember, it was her decision to post this. A person will receive in life the same energy they put out. This is karma coming her way brother, I am only the first stone that will be thrown at her.
Simply put, she should keep her shallow beauty standards to herself or if she is directly asked.
Kind regards,
DoctorSex
@DoctorSex
"her audacity to class only 4% of men as beautiful and less than 2% of women."
Yeah, that's called an opinion. No one can claim what it is "objectively" attractive. You're now implying people aren't allowed to have opinions on things.
Also, she never said "beautiful" and never said "96% of men and 98% of women aren't beautiful." Either way, people are allowed to have opinions, even if you think they're shallow. But I think you're really stretching. Like I said, if anyone were to be offended by this post, it'd be my short-ass.
"Simply put, she should keep her shallow beauty standards to herself"
No. People are allowed to express their opinions, even unpopular ones. You are not the arbiter of censorship. Instead, trying to counter arguments with your own arguments, instead of wanting to censor people or telling them they're not allowed to say things you dislike.
If I were to take your logic, I'd say "keep your rude opinions to yourself." That is your own logic. Of course, I don't abide by it. Do you?
@MCheetah do you remember when you wrote this
"When more and more women have incredibly sh*tty attitudes and inflated egos thanks to the simps and betas of the world, an "unattractive" man will come at an impasse. This man will make one of three decisions.
1) Keep going as he is and delving deeper and deeper into the hole of depression and rejection from women never finding him to be good enough based on genetics.
2) Try EVERYTHING in his power to become as attainable as possible, only to either fail anyway, or possibly succeed, just to realize the women he can now get still don't like him" ?
@MCheetah I mean this with the greatest of respects brother.
Do you know why guys like me are always women's number 1 choice whilst guys like you aren't? It has nothing to do with your height of weight. It's your personality and energy! guys like me are never afraid to check a woman's bad behaviour, where as guys like you simp constantly, wasting your time arguing with a brother who is 6ft, ripped, with a sea of women trying get his eye contact, whilst earning well above average AND who fights for guys like you who simultaneously attacks me. White knighting for a girl who wouldn't look at you twice.
I'm actually disappointed in you and tired of talking to you so god bless.
@DoctorSex
I didn't say it because I was drugged out on surgery at the time. But the reason you're upset here is that you're taking her response as a personal rejection/slight against you, and getting angry at that, when she never mentioned this in context to dating or beauty. You then try to claim I'm "simping" because I didn't read her comment as a personal rejection towards a bruised ego and try to imply *I'm* the sensitive one, here.
Where as you want a woman to say a man has to be mediocre/low tier/garbage in order to be "ideal," while also getting offended you don't fit into these ideals. Where if you are as MGTOW/red pilled as you imply to be, would know this is the standard.
So yeah, that's all I had to say about that. Fuck off with your "simp shit" while you're getting offended a girl doesn't find 5'7" men to be "ideal," as if she just rejected you on Tinder or something. I only recognize this behavior because I *used* to be that way. Like, a long time ago. You apparently still care about this, despite coming off redpilled.
I don't know if im super tall for girls but im in the 173-175cm range , i guess thats kinda tall for a girl? i really dont know , maybe the ideal height for girls is lesser than that.
i guess the ideal height for a guy would be anything over 175 cm.
5'8" is medium-tall for a girl. 5'9" is the bare minimum most Westerns would consider a girl to be tall. You're 5'9"/175 cm, so that's low-tall for a Western woman, with 5'10"/178 cm being legit tall.
And it's ironic that you're somewhat-kinda tall, but then listed short guys as the ideal male height. (I guess you meant "Ideal to date you.") 5'9"-5'11" is really small for a Western adult male, in my opinion. That's still "female height" to me. So you've got me curious.
Gregor Clegane? Scandinavians are your role models? to me a woman 181 cm look too masculine.
I'm 6'3 (about 191 cm). I would consider anything between 6'1" to 6'4" pretty much an ideal male height. That basically puts you in the top 10% of men or so but stops right before you enter the top 1% (where maybe you can start to get more disadvantages of being too tall).
Women: 5'6. Perfect medium height. Not too small or too short. I read articles as well that stated girls usually 5'6 have the most optimal height.
Men: 6'3. Tall enough to be tall, but not too tall. Usually when girls like tall guys, 6'3 would be the perfect tall height.
I believe guys don't care so much, about a woman's height. They usually won't turn a girl down for being too tall, or too short..
Now, in my opinion the ideal height for a woman is 168-175cm (or 5'6-5'9). I think 5'11 is a bit too tall for women. For guys the ideal height 5'11-6'3.6'6/200 cm is way too tall
I'm 5'4''. I like my guys 6'3'' and above. Even 6 feet is not enough for me.
But in my opinion, women look the best at the height of 5'5-5'6''. Women at this height are tall enough to look graceful and elegant but not tall enough to look masculine. They also tend to look better in clothes than shorter women.
Anyone who fits through a standard door.
Which indicates the significance of the horizontal dimension as well.
By the way: nature already provides all of us with an average - which is clearly below your dreams. It can be looked up online.
I see no reason to question evolution and natural selection :D
Height depends greatly on age and race (typical bone structure).
A 12 year old girl couldn't possibly have the same height as a 21 year old girl. The same goes for guys.
Going further an average 21 year old Black guy can not possibly have the same height as an average Chinese guy.
There is no ideal height for a man and a woman. The man-woman couple should feel comfortable with each other, regardless of height.
There's no such a thing as an ideal height, since that depends on the culture and each person's preferences, the only real thing is an ideal weight based on the height.
There's a regular height in every culture, for example, in my country being taller than like 168 as a woman is being tall, and for a man being around 170 is the normal.
Whatever their body can handle.
Why the fuck would you gatekeep height? It's not something you can choose. You think someone goes to school to "learn how to be 6ft 3' "" or something?
I’m 191cm so I suppose myself?
and for women I’m not a fan of short women I love medium, tall women. Not that I won’t date a short woman but still. So I’d say 168cm and up?
sensibly, a height of possibly 158/160- 175 for guys (but tbh, i dont really care as long as he's not above 180). For women, 160-170cm since were doing both genders.
For dudes probably 5'9 or over? But some women want at least 6 feet so who knows. For girls it doesn't matter but I'd rather be taller than them. Not a requirement by any means tho
Im 6"1 I don't know whats that in centimeters
I only date women that are 5"5 to 5"9
below 5"5 feels like i'm walking with kids
it's funny these women aka beasts of nature on this shithole site still have their walking checklists of demands they expect from a guy before even considering him but yet they have NOTHING to offer a guy except for a used up smelly hole between their legs
just amazes me how shallow they are when they can't even bring a fraction of what they demand to the relationship
I don’t care. They could be sitting behind a desk when I met them.
Do they have a sense of humor? Was more my initial interest.
For many women, that height range is a requirement. The bottom end of that is about 98th percentile. This is why Rebecca Lynn Pope said she stopped doing matchmaking for female clients.
As mentioned elsewhere none of this is relevant as nature/evolution will decide. Yet humans being humans HAVE to put people in boxes in order to feel better about themselves. As long as I am taller than the women I date, then I don't care.
You can also add your opinion below!