John Cena dresses in a mini skirt, stockings, heals and makeup for his new movie role. Would you dress as a woman for a certain amount of money?

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

Deuteronomy 22:5 👊

A woman shall not wear anything that pertains to a man, nor shall a man put on a woman’s garment, for all who do so are an abomination to the LORD your God.

[NamerOfStars]

Leviticus 11:12 "Every water creature that lacks fins or scales is loathsome for you.".

Not eating a given water creature- the creatures themselves. The ones that God created. They were supposed to be abominations. That kinda suggests that you're searching for guidance and rules among God's teenage emo poetry.

What proves it comes 48 books later, in acts 10:15: "The voice spoke to him again, a second time, 'What God has made clean, you are not to call profane.'".

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

Why you heathens love talking the Bible when y'all are ignorant as hell about it is beyond me?

The dietary laws of the old testament were for the ancient Hebrews only and those laws are now done away with under the new testament.

In Acts 10: God used a trance he put Peter under to give him a illustration about meats which the Jews didn't eat vs the Gentiles did eat and the purpose of that illustration was that the Gentiles in the whole context of that scripture was they weren't unclean because of the meats they ate as God through Jesus Christ was going to save them as the Jews to those who believe in the gospel.

Peter then went on to preach the gospel to a man named Cornelius who went got saved..

Don't talk what you don't know.

[NamerOfStars]

Right back at you, buddy: Jesus said "Not one letter" would disappear from the Law until all was accomplished; you're just using scripture to justify bias against things that make you uncomfortable. The clothing restrictions only applied to the ancient Hebrews, too.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

Again you fool. Jesus completed all the requirements of the law.

The old testament law with the exception of the moral laws are no longer valid according to the Bible.

So go somewhere with your nonsense.

[NamerOfStars]

If that were the case, then the prohibition on cross-sex clothing would've expired too- you can't have it both ways.

[Stoner710]

fuck 🤯 i was just making him as a mans man. i get a kilt because William Wallus but Cena the ALL American" FACe OF THR WWE!!! and seeing him in prison at NO WAy Out 2008! (history is nalstalgic after a few)

point is yes an a fan and what CENA stood for yes i am disappointed

[Daniela1982]

I don't see what anyone sees in this clown. In my opinion he is not good looking nor can he act. I would not watch any of his movies. I won't even watch commercials that he is in.

[IceCreamSandwich]

I wear that kind of stuff for free. Of course I'd do it for a role to get paid. Unless it was a really bad role, but I doubt John Cena would take a bad role either. Actually I don't know what kind of role he would take, I've never seen him in a movie..

4 verses later it also says "Do not plant two kinds of seed in your vineyard; if you do, not only the crops you plant but also the fruit of the vineyard will be defiled."

Even if I followed the Bible, these types of laws aren't like the 10 commandments. They're specific to the Israelites in that time and place, and a lot are symbolic, to set them apart as a nation, not because the acts themselves are wrong to do. But because God commanded them specifically not to, then disobeying him would be wrong. God obviously didn't mean these types of laws to be universal though, or he wouldn't have explicitly undone some of them later in the new testament.

(If you're Jewish then it's totally reasonable to see yourself as still under some of those types of laws, but not to see everyone else as under them too. Because it is still to set you apart, it wouldn't make sense if everyone had to do it and not just God's people. To my knowledge John Cena isn't a practicing Jew, so he still wouldn't be doing anything wrong. You can't expect people who aren't in your group to follow the rules set specifically for your group.)

[KostasKouvalis]

Absolutely not! They made men dress in drag on The Amazing Race before, and people honestly astonish me. I don't think any amount of money is worth compromising my morals

[OfMiceandMen]

Yup, not a problem and I am not religious in that sense, so it would not bother me.

[Dinosaursandanime65]

I never thought he of all people would take such disrespect and disrespect himself in such 💀🌊

[AviatorTom]

I'll do it for the right price... How much are you offering?

[Texaskid1]

Once again...

by 2040.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

😂😂 Why you keep saying that number?

[Texaskid1]

It is my theory that by 2040 we will all be declared genderless eunuch's by the US government.

Only 17 years left of manhood in the country.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

They might as well kill me then.

[Texaskid1]

LOL.

[Texaskid1]

But I would not be surprised if there is some official declaration by the US government in the next 20 years or so saying that gender is a social construct and how dividing society into men and women is sexist and archaic. The fact that several states are already banning so called "gender affirming care" for minors means the left has a big enough impact that the more conservative states needed to put laws in place or slow it down.

40 years ago I never though that gay marriage would be a thing or that states would OK homosexual couples adopting children.

The country is going down a dangerous and twisted path in the name of "gender equality" In some places in the US saying that there are two genders or stating that there are natural differences in the brain structures between men and women is enough to get you fired ( check out that Google Engineer who got canned because he dared say certain truths about why most women have no interest in engineering).

Even Don Lemon from CNN ( whom I find to be insufferable smug) was suspended because he said that women are in their prime in their 20's ( which is true but you are not allowed to say it out loud you see). Ever wonder why older guys have no problem chasing young women in their early 20's? (i. e. some years ago we had an attractive 24 year old colleague that joined our work team and off the bat there were several married men that chased her. The youngest one was my age and the oldest one was around 60) .

It is what it is.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

One extreme usually follows the opposite in extreme and that is bad as well.

America just needs to get back to basic common sense.

[AngryCarl2]

If it's for a movie it's okay. I mean it's just acting. Right, John?

[Pete671]

I wear a microskirt in the summer, so good luck to him,,,

[Asad1ONE1]

That's a good question.

As for me, I wish money was that easy lol.

[Wade12345]

I agree with deuteronomy. This is pathetic.

[NostalgiaSenpi]

No, I would not.

[Lycirian]

NEVER!!!

[Redstang88]

If it’s for a laugh, sure

[msc545]

Temporarily and in a film or play, yes.