Dear God. Women find men hot. unless your dad renutted in your mom and you where conceived a girl you wouldn't understand. Women find attractive men attractive. But unlike men we won't touch a butteface or find every other average guy gorgeous. Because your programed to get every healthy girl pregnant and we are programmed to get pregnant by attractive men.
That's the thing, women don't find average guys attractive. Also I am starting to think that women only look at guys in the same way us straight guys look at other guys. In other words, some straight guys acknowledge another guys looks but don't feel any kind of attraction towards guys.
Um. No. You keep asking the same questions over and over again. Women and men aren't the same. what your doing is thinking a womans sexuality should be like a mans and since it isn't you think something is wrong with women If someone is attractive to you they will be. You aren't entitled to female attention. Your the minority of men who think women aren't attracted ro men becausr you haven't gotten to know a woman
@TheSpartan @somebodysaycheese It may seem crazy but I can think of a temporary work around to having an ugly face what about things where you go in fancy dress like a mascaraed ball type thing maybe with Venetian masks covering your face. I don't know what most girls or other guys might thing of a situation like that but for something casual where for all I knew I was with a beautiful masked woman id be OK with not knowing that she had an ugly face if I thought she was hot with the mask. In my mind Iv fooled around with a beautiful girl and hopefully we enjoyed our selves a lot i'm happy and so is she. Its a bit like a more extreme unisex version of make up! Id want to see the real her for something permanent so I knew what id be looking at ever day. Then an ugly face would turn me off but to me fake sounds OK for something casual or to role play in an actual relationship!
In my opinion, women are visual and always looking, they just don't get as pre occupied looking like men do. I'm tall and thin, my height makes women notice me, but it's my thinness and lack of big muscles that makes them quickly ignore me and focus on other, built men. When it comes to working though women frequently remember me after coming back and usually ask me for help over other guys, that means something I guess.
I usually wear casual clothing I hate dressing up, usually jeans or shorts and a t shirt. Do women care how you dress or find certain clothing more attractive?
from your bio "m half Japanese half Mexican, I like using my finger exercisers to strengthen my finger strength and dexterity. I am a animal lover. I am very compassionate and respectful, I have a deep voice but I am only 5 feet 4 inches, I am usually serious but I still smile and laugh. I only listen to classical music. I am a straight man (heterosexual). When it comes to dating for me, I have to be physically/visually attracted to the woman (face, body, clothing style) and I have to be emotionally attracted to the woman (she has to be compassionate/nice) for me to consider dating the woman."
try being 5-6" taller prolly even more, strengthen more than ur FUCKIN FINGERS and get well built and good looking, just LOL if u think they dont receive attention. As i said before, women are more visual than men, their standards for that are WAY higher though
I'll admit that I'm a little overweight but I'm working on burning some pounds. It's true though women seem to be attracted to tall guys, height is the equivalent of breasts for males. Do you even consider yourself attractive? T
yeah, i am still banging walls and trying to order KCN but i can't find any sources, so i'll just looksmax soon instead once my exams get over, i am starting, its all planned and everything
tbh, i am an ethnic man myself like you (indian) and unless we are famous, a 9/10 ethnic guy=6/10 white guy and i am a 4/10 ethnic guy so a 1/10 white guy,
Maybe because they are famous, I've seen some social experiments were a a guy acts as if he is a average guy when flirting. The women reject him, however once the guy pretends that he is famous with a fancy car, with paparazzi etc, those same women try to flirt with him. Sure enough he rejects them and let's them know of the social experiment.
It doesn't disappoint me. In fact I do think women are just as visual as men. If women can be visual with other women and notice if they're attractive or sexy or not, they can do the same thing with men, but don't because I think it's about ego: females would rather praise the way other women look before they do it to men because they want to seem like they're above being "shallow" - as they perceive it. In their minds, it seems to be weakness to show physical interest in men.
you are spouting pseudo science. Women, are just as visual as a men. This notion of women not being visual was started by a sexist feminist who wanted to make out men to be nothing but a bunch of horny dogs who are not capable of emotional love. this notion is quite idiotic and sickening and on top of all of that its false. there are many tests on this and the reactive time on females are just as strong as a males. the test that were taken before hand had actually included false variables such as wide age groups, pictures that some men/women will not find attractive etc.. In a more recent study women were provided erotic images that are seen as attractive in society. Before having time for emotional responses caused by a womens thought process the females brain lit up just as quick as a males would. There is no indication of a certain sex being more horny nor more visual. Its time to drop this false study and move on.
Good take. Appearance matters to a woman to a degree, but they know it won't take her anywhere. Looks equal success in guys who are looking for casual sex, but to men looking to be involved in relationships it won't mean a thing because looks do not make a woman stay. If a girl is attracted to you, and wants you for the long haul,, your looks though it may have opened you the first door, you won't make her wet... Unless, you tell her "I will commit to you", then she'll let you fuck her.
Guys on the other hand see a hot girl and he will want to have his way with her, either with one time sex, or date her (which also sex will be automatically taken in consideration).
It's true that women don't get as excited about just a pic of a guy as guys get about women... We don't care that much - unless there's a huge hormonal imbalance (teenager or ovulating)... But maybe not even then.
+ if a guy isn't attractive psychologically, the woman will not want anything else with him - physical or otherwise...
So, basically, yeah, it's true. Women aren't visually driven like men are.
Nope. That's definitely not it. When straight women look at other women it's because they either want something they have or appreciate the beauty of something they have or want that body or hair... and appreciate it.
You do realize that women just don't get caught as easily right? We have wider peripheral vision so we can see without focusing on one area. Not that everyone does it.
Also yes I find random guys attractive physically. Like very attractive.
I'm not sure we're *as* visual as men but I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one who finds men physically attractive even if I don't know them.
Haha loving those classic Abercrombie pics there. Seriously though, I think women ARE pretty visual, at least the women I know and of course myself. I can definitely appreciate a hot guy when he walks into the room, and I definitely will check him out even if it's not obvious that I am. Looks are pretty important to me, and if I'm attracted physically to a guy it's the first step in getting me romantically interested in him. Then comes personality and everything else.
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(36-45)
+1 y
Good take. I think it's nice if people just express themselves.
Well, that's definitely a tough one. Women's sexuality and brain is definitely a mystery. Have you seen the study lead by a female researcher from Ohio? She made women, both hetero and homosexual, watch 3 movies. The first movie was a heterosexual scene, the second one a lesbian scene, and the last one an animal scene. ALL the women reacted exactly the same way: they were all aroused by the scenes, including the animal one... Not to mention there also was a scene where a man was walking half-naked on a beach and that didn't arouse any woman. Even weirder! So in a nutshell, female sexuality doesn't make any sense. We are much more attracted to the general spirit emanating from a man than just the appearance. Of course, to me, appearance is super important but the main reason I dated my boyfriend was because... of his fragrance and voice!
@ADFSDF1996 Of course they do! I'm crazy attracted to my boyfriend. I believe guys are equally attractive as gals. But the difference is that they "might not" feel SEXUALLY attracted to guys in the first place, like guys can be when they see a woman wearing a bikini for instance. It will come later, mixed up with the personality of the guy and just his general way of being.
@ADFSDF1996 Don't worry, women do find men attractive, it just takes a different process for them than it does for guys! So it's difficult really to advise you to take care about your body and shave your face, because some women might hate it but some others might like it!! And you can see it's different for guys: i've never seen any guy being fond of a girl with a moustache.
this lady clearly has no idea what she is talking about. Showing signs of arousal does not correlate with attractiveness. So no, women are not attracted to animals. also, if you showed a man a video of animals having sex he would also show signs of arousal. There was another test that took place, the supposed ''male and female brain'' thing isn't even real. Why? because the majority of us dont fit the supposed models of these categories. Most people, are in between and have variations. all they did was take a test with about 50 out of 7 billion people and assume that females in general are like this. gender studies are pure crap
@Bobbyhill1 Dude, I have a PhD in Gender Studies. I know what I'm talking about. The point here is to say that women aren't attracted to men the same way men are attracted to women. That's not very hard to understand.
Also, what you are saying is incorrect. Men do not show signs of arousal towards animal sex. The study shows "Any expectation that the animal sex would speak to something primitive within the men seemed to be mistaken; neither straights nor gays were stirred by the bonobos." The evidence is right here : https://w ww. nytimes. com/2009/01/25/magazine/25desire-t. html
Sounds like you're the one who has no idea what they're talking about.
the problem is gender studies isn't accurate outside of cultural issues. the majority of male or females dont even fit the supposed gender brain that they are supposed too. Just like a finger print a brain is unique to each person we are all in between and no, a phd won't make me believe in what you are saying. the fact that you studied in this field is even more of a surprise to me because anyone who even took these courses knows how inaccurate they are. Lets say I get 50 females and 50 males, I get certain results and come up with a bold claim knowing that this one group doesn't even make up 0000001% of the population. there is no logic involved in these studies. how are you going to say that men aren't attracted to females like females are attracted to males if every ones brain does not fit the gender model? there is another study by the way, that shows men being aroused by animal sex. When a study contradicts another that means that there are no facts involved
you still have no idea what you are talking about. This is why I laugh in the face of gender studies, and even more at the people who got a phd in it because they take it seriously
If the attraction comes later on for women then perhaps women don't really like men. Why would a woman date a man if she doesn't like how he looks? Is it only for his personality? I still think male modeling is pointless if it doesn't appeal to women.
@Bobbyhill1 Lol you're so funny. It's not cultural, it's scientific, twat. Obviously you're coming on here with no knowledge and you just want to discredit people who actually have some for a reason I ignore. Why do you disagree so much with me, do you have something to reproach yourself? ;) You absolutely have NO scientific evidence to back up what you are saying, contrary to me. Which shows you obviously don't know anything about science and how it's done. Please find me this last study you're talking about. I looked for it and I haven't found it. Check out Meredith Chivers work. Her article was published in the NY Times and was read more than 20 million times, and approved by the most prominent scientists in that matter. You don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Bye.
how about this, i'll calm down a bit and we can have a normal conversation with no insults ok? I never said your claim wasn't used with scientific methods, what I did say was only the cultural aspect of gender studies holds weight. I dont need evidence to state that you are giving me studies that dont even consist of 000000001% of the population therefor, to say one study shows how male and females react visually in general is just illogical. The study would make sense if it consisted of about a billion people or maybe a few hundred millions. I know about science enough to know that evidence does not make something true rather there is a likeability and in this case this study doesn't even support likability due to the fact that not many people took place in the study. at most I would say about 100 males took place in this study, meaning there is still a few billion other men that may function entirely different than what the article claims.
thats like me making a article with 50 people. I can easily find 25 females more visual than men, and people will simply flock to it and believe it. science is not always right, some of the community is pretty dirty in the way they handle things in terms of psychology and gender studies. This is why I stick to concrete things such as physics, biology and anatomy. anyways here is a quote from the study ''doubt you’ve heard the phrase “Men are visual creatures” more often than you can count. But new research suggests that women may be just as visually driven when it comes to sex as men are, says Bergner. One study described in Bergner’s book found that women’s eyes linger on erotic imagery just as much as men’s do,'' you can search his name up, he has a entire book on these topics. besides that here is a fun fact, over 43% of porn accounts are in fact, from females.
just to let you know the reason why I am angry is because I get insulted by these type of articles as should you. The same pseudo science that tells you how females are so different also claim men are better in math and logical thinking while women only can use emotion. Dont your intelligence feel insulted how can you stand for something so false in the first place? if males and females dont even fit these supposed models of the gender brain than how did this lady even get these results and how far did she have to reach out to make this believable. She is probably just a feminists who wants to make men look like horny dogs who aren't capable of emotional love. www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/.../...gre_b_6507658.html
Sure you got the point but not all is totally true. Maybe man don't notice when women are checking them out. I'm not saying women are turned on when they see a hot guy but they surely are looking at him at least for a few seconds. But if you are asking would they want anything else besides eye-candy, the answer is no.
doesn't necessarily matter who is straight and who isn't. Everyone is different, men aren't more visual as a whole and neither are females. Every individual brain is different regardless of gender unless of course, they are twins
Mostly correct. Unless there's more to a guy I really don't care how hot he is. However I do appreciate the eye candy when it's there. Even if it's off limits to me or taken or married or whatever, I can still appreciate the visuals in the vicinity.
However at the same time, if that hot guy expresses undesirable behaviors or character traits, he can instantly lose his appeal and become dead to me. That's how it is for most girls.
So basically women only appreciate men's physical appearance in the same way us straight guys acknowledge another guy's physical appearance? That means there is no attraction.
Women aren't attracted by a guy's looks? It is ADORABLE that you really believe that.
You could literally have the best personality in a two state radius and it won't matter at all if you're not attractive because NO WOMAN WILL TALK TO YOU
Have you ever heard of 'This gal is only worth a hookup'?
The girl is hot as hell, her personality sucks.
Girls don't like casual sex, they need to be attracted to how he is for physically attraction. The fact that women can be attracted by looks is because they do find him attractive and they 'guess' his personality. That's the difference betwen men's sexual behavior and women's. Men can be attracted sexually only by looks.
I'll tell you what.. I know a lot of women who are visual when it comes to the penis. They can see the slightest patch of dry skin or the small shade of redness, which can lead to questioning or the end of a potential sexual experience. This is why I use one of those penis health cremes every day. These are made to keep the skin clean, smooth, soft and irritation-free. My penis has never looked so good. Check these cremes out, fellas.
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(30-35)
+1 y
To be honest, I wish the opposite. I wish men weren't as visual as they are. It seems to me like any above average girl can actually get any guy they want if they know how to play their cards right. I wish men were more hard to get, less obtainable. I wish they demanded more things from women. And yes, I am aware that it's a weird thing to want.
I am exactly as you described and I've had reactions from women that range from bemusement, frustration, slight anger and lust. Some guys seem to be bothered by it. I even had a few guys asking me why I'm not a drooling lapdog.
To most guys, my behavior is completely foreign and they just don't understand why I'm not on my knees or running around after the nice looking women.
I am still visual, I just have complete control over my actions and hold women to a very high standard.
I think women are visual and you need to stop worrying about it. Yeah I wouldn't want to date a woman who thinks I'm physically unattractive. I prefer a woman who likes me inside and out.
Visual--of course we are!!! It's the first thing anyone connects with. If you have a "look" that's appealing, it's going to definitely make a difference. And ladies--if you're suppressing your use of eyes-to brain sense, you're missing out on huge possibilities!
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
34Opinion
Dear God.
Women find men hot.
unless your dad renutted in your mom and you where conceived a girl you wouldn't understand.
Women find attractive men attractive. But unlike men we won't touch a butteface or find every other average guy gorgeous. Because your programed to get every healthy girl pregnant and we are programmed to get pregnant by attractive men.
That's the thing, women don't find average guys attractive. Also I am starting to think that women only look at guys in the same way us straight guys look at other guys. In other words, some straight guys acknowledge another guys looks but don't feel any kind of attraction towards guys.
"We won't touch a butter face."
Lol what?
@TheSpartan i dnt see whats confusing about that
Um. No. You keep asking the same questions over and over again.
Women and men aren't the same. what your doing is thinking a womans sexuality should be like a mans and since it isn't you think something is wrong with women
If someone is attractive to you they will be. You aren't entitled to female attention. Your the minority of men who think women aren't attracted ro men becausr you haven't gotten to know a woman
You won't date a man whose worked hard to make his body and personally attractive, but was born with an ugly face?
Who are you talking to?
@TheSpartan yea. I wouldn't. Im not going to be with someone i find unattractive.
That's not what I asked, though. I asked about a man whose hot with a great personality, but doesn't have a good-looking face.
I'm only referring to physical attraction.
@TheSpartan you can't be hot with out a good looking face.. lol it doesn't work that way.
@TheSpartan @somebodysaycheese
It may seem crazy but I can think of a temporary work around to having an ugly face what about things where you go in fancy dress like a mascaraed ball type thing maybe with Venetian masks covering your face.
I don't know what most girls or other guys might thing of a situation like that but for something casual where for all I knew I was with a beautiful masked woman id be OK with not knowing that she had an ugly face if I thought she was hot with the mask. In my mind Iv fooled around with a beautiful girl and hopefully we enjoyed our selves a lot i'm happy and so is she. Its a bit like a more extreme unisex version of make up!
Id want to see the real her for something permanent so I knew what id be looking at ever day. Then an ugly face would turn me off but to me fake sounds OK for something casual or to role play in an actual relationship!
In my opinion, women are visual and always looking, they just don't get as pre occupied looking like men do. I'm tall and thin, my height makes women notice me, but it's my thinness and lack of big muscles that makes them quickly ignore me and focus on other, built men.
When it comes to working though women frequently remember me after coming back and usually ask me for help over other guys, that means something I guess.
I usually wear casual clothing I hate dressing up, usually jeans or shorts and a t shirt. Do women care how you dress or find certain clothing more attractive?
Yes, a lot of women care how you dress. I learned the hard way when I was in elementary school.
from your bio
"m half Japanese half Mexican, I like using my finger exercisers to strengthen my finger strength and dexterity. I am a animal lover. I am very compassionate and respectful, I have a deep voice but I am only 5 feet 4 inches, I am usually serious but I still smile and laugh. I only listen to classical music. I am a straight man (heterosexual). When it comes to dating for me, I have to be physically/visually attracted to the woman (face, body, clothing style) and I have to be emotionally attracted to the woman (she has to be compassionate/nice) for me to consider dating the woman."
try being 5-6" taller prolly even more, strengthen more than ur FUCKIN FINGERS and get well built and good looking, just LOL if u think they dont receive attention. As i said before, women are more visual than men, their standards for that are WAY higher though
I'll admit that I'm a little overweight but I'm working on burning some pounds. It's true though women seem to be attracted to tall guys, height is the equivalent of breasts for males. Do you even consider yourself attractive? T
Ignore the "T" it's a typo.
no i dont,
I feel sorry for you, maybe if you should try to have confidence in your looks.
yeah, i am still banging walls and trying to order KCN but i can't find any sources, so i'll just looksmax soon instead once my exams get over, i am starting, its all planned and everything
@jxpxtxr can confirm
tbh, i am an ethnic man myself like you (indian) and unless we are famous, a 9/10 ethnic guy=6/10 white guy and i am a 4/10 ethnic guy so a 1/10 white guy,
It's all planned but it seems like those plans are never actually gonna be put into action lmao
Of course we get turned on by muscular half naked men. Girls are drooling over Ryan Renyold are ryan gosling or whoever.
But they're just just images.
img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/aPyNBKR_700b.jpg
I think in reality we understand it's about more than looks. Other things matter too
Maybe because they are famous, I've seen some social experiments were a a guy acts as if he is a average guy when flirting. The women reject him, however once the guy pretends that he is famous with a fancy car, with paparazzi etc, those same women try to flirt with him. Sure enough he rejects them and let's them know of the social experiment.
Isn't that picture just a dramatization?
I think you should read my whole take to nudes what I'm saying.
*understand
It doesn't disappoint me. In fact I do think women are just as visual as men. If women can be visual with other women and notice if they're attractive or sexy or not, they can do the same thing with men, but don't because I think it's about ego: females would rather praise the way other women look before they do it to men because they want to seem like they're above being "shallow" - as they perceive it. In their minds, it seems to be weakness to show physical interest in men.
you are spouting pseudo science. Women, are just as visual as a men. This notion of women not being visual was started by a sexist feminist who wanted to make out men to be nothing but a bunch of horny dogs who are not capable of emotional love. this notion is quite idiotic and sickening and on top of all of that its false. there are many tests on this and the reactive time on females are just as strong as a males. the test that were taken before hand had actually included false variables such as wide age groups, pictures that some men/women will not find attractive etc.. In a more recent study women were provided erotic images that are seen as attractive in society. Before having time for emotional responses caused by a womens thought process the females brain lit up just as quick as a males would. There is no indication of a certain sex being more horny nor more visual. Its time to drop this false study and move on.
Good take.
Appearance matters to a woman to a degree, but they know it won't take her anywhere. Looks equal success in guys who are looking for casual sex, but to men looking to be involved in relationships it won't mean a thing because looks do not make a woman stay.
If a girl is attracted to you, and wants you for the long haul,, your looks though it may have opened you the first door, you won't make her wet... Unless, you tell her "I will commit to you", then she'll let you fuck her.
Guys on the other hand see a hot girl and he will want to have his way with her, either with one time sex, or date her (which also sex will be automatically taken in consideration).
It's true that women don't get as excited about just a pic of a guy as guys get about women... We don't care that much - unless there's a huge hormonal imbalance (teenager or ovulating)... But maybe not even then.
+ if a guy isn't attractive psychologically, the woman will not want anything else with him - physical or otherwise...
So, basically, yeah, it's true. Women aren't visually driven like men are.
Or is it that men are just not attractive to women. A lot of straight women ogle other women instead of men.
Nope. That's definitely not it. When straight women look at other women it's because they either want something they have or appreciate the beauty of something they have or want that body or hair... and appreciate it.
So women don't really find men pleasing to the eye?
You do realize that women just don't get caught as easily right? We have wider peripheral vision so we can see without focusing on one area. Not that everyone does it.
Also yes I find random guys attractive physically. Like very attractive.
I'm not sure we're *as* visual as men but I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one who finds men physically attractive even if I don't know them.
Did you read the whole take though?
Yup.
Good, it's just that a lot of people only read the title.
Haha loving those classic Abercrombie pics there. Seriously though, I think women ARE pretty visual, at least the women I know and of course myself. I can definitely appreciate a hot guy when he walks into the room, and I definitely will check him out even if it's not obvious that I am. Looks are pretty important to me, and if I'm attracted physically to a guy it's the first step in getting me romantically interested in him. Then comes personality and everything else.
Good take. I think it's nice if people just express themselves.
I don't know how women think either. It's difficult to read them. Can u check out my take please? It's about 1 girl and 2 guys. How does she rate each? www.girlsaskguys.com/.../a30669-do-women-have-dirtier-sex-with-guys-who-don-t-care-about-them-what
Thanks, please check my take out if you can?
Well, that's definitely a tough one.
Women's sexuality and brain is definitely a mystery.
Have you seen the study lead by a female researcher from Ohio?
She made women, both hetero and homosexual, watch 3 movies. The first movie was a heterosexual scene, the second one a lesbian scene, and the last one an animal scene. ALL the women reacted exactly the same way: they were all aroused by the scenes, including the animal one...
Not to mention there also was a scene where a man was walking half-naked on a beach and that didn't arouse any woman. Even weirder!
So in a nutshell, female sexuality doesn't make any sense. We are much more attracted to the general spirit emanating from a man than just the appearance. Of course, to me, appearance is super important but the main reason I dated my boyfriend was because... of his fragrance and voice!
So women don't find men pleasing to the eye/physically attractive?
@ADFSDF1996 Of course they do! I'm crazy attracted to my boyfriend. I believe guys are equally attractive as gals. But the difference is that they "might not" feel SEXUALLY attracted to guys in the first place, like guys can be when they see a woman wearing a bikini for instance. It will come later, mixed up with the personality of the guy and just his general way of being.
How can a woman find a man attractive if she isn't sexually attracted to him?
Are you saying women aren't visual? That's one of my fears, dating a woman that doesn't find me attractive till later on terrifies me.
This is why I think male modeling is pointless.
@ADFSDF1996 Don't worry, women do find men attractive, it just takes a different process for them than it does for guys! So it's difficult really to advise you to take care about your body and shave your face, because some women might hate it but some others might like it!! And you can see it's different for guys: i've never seen any guy being fond of a girl with a moustache.
Are women visual though? Do they like the way men's faces and bodies look, or do they just care about personality/emotional connection?
this lady clearly has no idea what she is talking about. Showing signs of arousal does not correlate with attractiveness. So no, women are not attracted to animals. also, if you showed a man a video of animals having sex he would also show signs of arousal. There was another test that took place, the supposed ''male and female brain'' thing isn't even real. Why? because the majority of us dont fit the supposed models of these categories. Most people, are in between and have variations. all they did was take a test with about 50 out of 7 billion people and assume that females in general are like this. gender studies are pure crap
@Bobbyhill1 Dude, I have a PhD in Gender Studies. I know what I'm talking about. The point here is to say that women aren't attracted to men the same way men are attracted to women. That's not very hard to understand.
Also, what you are saying is incorrect. Men do not show signs of arousal towards animal sex. The study shows "Any expectation that the animal sex would speak to something primitive within the men seemed to be mistaken; neither straights nor gays were stirred by the bonobos." The evidence is right here : https://w ww. nytimes. com/2009/01/25/magazine/25desire-t. html
Sounds like you're the one who has no idea what they're talking about.
the problem is gender studies isn't accurate outside of cultural issues. the majority of male or females dont even fit the supposed gender brain that they are supposed too. Just like a finger print a brain is unique to each person we are all in between and no, a phd won't make me believe in what you are saying. the fact that you studied in this field is even more of a surprise to me because anyone who even took these courses knows how inaccurate they are. Lets say I get 50 females and 50 males, I get certain results and come up with a bold claim knowing that this one group doesn't even make up 0000001% of the population. there is no logic involved in these studies. how are you going to say that men aren't attracted to females like females are attracted to males if every ones brain does not fit the gender model? there is another study by the way, that shows men being aroused by animal sex. When a study contradicts another that means that there are no facts involved
you still have no idea what you are talking about. This is why I laugh in the face of gender studies, and even more at the people who got a phd in it because they take it seriously
If the attraction comes later on for women then perhaps women don't really like men. Why would a woman date a man if she doesn't like how he looks? Is it only for his personality? I still think male modeling is pointless if it doesn't appeal to women.
@Bobbyhill1 Lol you're so funny. It's not cultural, it's scientific, twat. Obviously you're coming on here with no knowledge and you just want to discredit people who actually have some for a reason I ignore. Why do you disagree so much with me, do you have something to reproach yourself? ;) You absolutely have NO scientific evidence to back up what you are saying, contrary to me. Which shows you obviously don't know anything about science and how it's done.
Please find me this last study you're talking about. I looked for it and I haven't found it. Check out Meredith Chivers work. Her article was published in the NY Times and was read more than 20 million times, and approved by the most prominent scientists in that matter. You don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Bye.
how about this, i'll calm down a bit and we can have a normal conversation with no insults ok? I never said your claim wasn't used with scientific methods, what I did say was only the cultural aspect of gender studies holds weight. I dont need evidence to state that you are giving me studies that dont even consist of 000000001% of the population therefor, to say one study shows how male and females react visually in general is just illogical. The study would make sense if it consisted of about a billion people or maybe a few hundred millions. I know about science enough to know that evidence does not make something true rather there is a likeability and in this case this study doesn't even support likability due to the fact that not many people took place in the study. at most I would say about 100 males took place in this study, meaning there is still a few billion other men that may function entirely different than what the article claims.
thats like me making a article with 50 people. I can easily find 25 females more visual than men, and people will simply flock to it and believe it. science is not always right, some of the community is pretty dirty in the way they handle things in terms of psychology and gender studies. This is why I stick to concrete things such as physics, biology and anatomy. anyways here is a quote from the study ''doubt you’ve heard the phrase “Men are visual creatures” more often than you can count. But new research suggests that women may be just as visually driven when it comes to sex as men are, says Bergner. One study described in Bergner’s book found that women’s eyes linger on erotic imagery just as much as men’s do,'' you can search his name up, he has a entire book on these topics. besides that here is a fun fact, over 43% of porn accounts are in fact, from females.
oh and here are some womens own personal experience to what they think about this fallacious myth www.girlsaskguys.com/.../q1138644-women-are-not-as-visual-as-men-is-a-huge-myth-agree
brokendaughters.wordpress.com/.../ and finally, enough of the testimony here is the last link that completely debunks the whole female and male variations www.latimes.com/.../...e-brain-20151130-story.html
just to let you know the reason why I am angry is because I get insulted by these type of articles as should you. The same pseudo science that tells you how females are so different also claim men are better in math and logical thinking while women only can use emotion. Dont your intelligence feel insulted how can you stand for something so false in the first place? if males and females dont even fit these supposed models of the gender brain than how did this lady even get these results and how far did she have to reach out to make this believable. She is probably just a feminists who wants to make men look like horny dogs who aren't capable of emotional love. www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/.../...gre_b_6507658.html
Sure you got the point but not all is totally true.
Maybe man don't notice when women are checking them out. I'm not saying women are turned on when they see a hot guy but they surely are looking at him at least for a few seconds.
But if you are asking would they want anything else besides eye-candy, the answer is no.
So women don't find men physically attractive by looking at them?
They do but that's not enough to torn them on
*turn
she's lying, there are many women who get turned on by visualizing. Thats why 43% of all porn users are females. This is pseudo science
@Bobbyhill1 Funny that you know all of the world females. Besides, how many of them were straight and how many were lesbians?
doesn't necessarily matter who is straight and who isn't. Everyone is different, men aren't more visual as a whole and neither are females. Every individual brain is different regardless of gender unless of course, they are twins
Mostly correct. Unless there's more to a guy I really don't care how hot he is. However I do appreciate the eye candy when it's there. Even if it's off limits to me or taken or married or whatever, I can still appreciate the visuals in the vicinity.
However at the same time, if that hot guy expresses undesirable behaviors or character traits, he can instantly lose his appeal and become dead to me. That's how it is for most girls.
So basically women only appreciate men's physical appearance in the same way us straight guys acknowledge another guy's physical appearance? That means there is no attraction.
Women aren't attracted by a guy's looks? It is ADORABLE that you really believe that.
You could literally have the best personality in a two state radius and it won't matter at all if you're not attractive because NO WOMAN WILL TALK TO YOU
I hope what you say is true.
Have you ever heard of 'This gal is only worth a hookup'?
The girl is hot as hell, her personality sucks.
Girls don't like casual sex, they need to be attracted to how he is for physically attraction. The fact that women can be attracted by looks is because they do find him attractive and they 'guess' his personality.
That's the difference betwen men's sexual behavior and women's.
Men can be attracted sexually only by looks.
I'll tell you what.. I know a lot of women who are visual when it comes to the penis. They can see the slightest patch of dry skin or the small shade of redness, which can lead to questioning or the end of a potential sexual experience. This is why I use one of those penis health cremes every day. These are made to keep the skin clean, smooth, soft and irritation-free. My penis has never looked so good. Check these cremes out, fellas.
To be honest, I wish the opposite. I wish men weren't as visual as they are. It seems to me like any above average girl can actually get any guy they want if they know how to play their cards right. I wish men were more hard to get, less obtainable. I wish they demanded more things from women.
And yes, I am aware that it's a weird thing to want.
I am exactly as you described and I've had reactions from women that range from bemusement, frustration, slight anger and lust. Some guys seem to be bothered by it. I even had a few guys asking me why I'm not a drooling lapdog.
To most guys, my behavior is completely foreign and they just don't understand why I'm not on my knees or running around after the nice looking women.
I am still visual, I just have complete control over my actions and hold women to a very high standard.
Well, you're a vampire - a 100 years old-, so you don't count.
I think women are visual and you need to stop worrying about it. Yeah I wouldn't want to date a woman who thinks I'm physically unattractive. I prefer a woman who likes me inside and out.
Visual--of course we are!!! It's the first thing anyone connects with. If you have a "look" that's appealing, it's going to definitely make a difference. And ladies--if you're suppressing your use of eyes-to brain sense, you're missing out on huge possibilities!