this a really good insight and I agree with you completely you have outdone yourself by giving a evident response to any question a person of any gender may have on this particular subject I'm going to bookmark your article for a reference and suggest it to my friends and thanks for this Article
Actually, I more or less would rather save the men. Every woman who survives has a greater chance of producing more retarded humans into the world. I would have to be sneaky, though, so the retarded men don't catch me destroying their "valuable" sexual resources.
Plus, like you said, men are smarter and more interesting. Except for Dana Goldstein, who is an extraordinary woman.
Why? Just because you think so? You know that first comment I made on your blog post? I take it back. Although I do agree that lots of females are smart.
This is great, well thought analysis. While I do not wholly agree with all the opinions expressed here I can respect them. I can tell that you took quite a time to express them clearly. and eloquently.
Great take !! Except one mention about (alpha ) males I'll empathize on... I'm alpha 100% , but I've never had any problems holding on to a relationship whatsoever. There are reasons why I can be flexible here and there , but don't really want to say why. The hint would be something like ; I'm not threatened one way or another about my masculinity or do I have any female problems.
haha, a lot of feminists want to be selectively equal. I want equal everything. e. e. g oh what I have to pay, well this guy is just cheap. Don't wish for equality if you can't handle the responsibilities.
You can't teach women to want that, just like you can't teach them not to crave food. It's biology. And @Dtegesd123 the very design of female mind and body makes it so that she can't handle true equality as much as she doesn't want it.
If a man wants to bang everyone and he needs that desire to prolong and maintain the species in crisis, then he bangs to fill that function.
But if a man wants to attach to a woman in order to form a union in which he has less children, but will raise HIGH QUIALITY adults because he is raising them himself and giving his full attention and resources, he attaches emotionally and commits to one woman. Right now, there is enough women to go around for every man in the species and in a well run relationship, one woman is enough to fill his emotional and physical needs. He then fills the FUNCTION of monogamy.
A woman trying to be a man as feminists claim is possible, but like the guy fucking around, it's only functional if there is a shortage of men. Only functional BECAUSE there is no man to play his role around.
You're thinking from a single-mommy household mindset.
Are you that retarded that I ACTUALLY have to explain this to you? (-‸ლ) Holy... ಠ_ಠ
Submission is there to create intimacy and harmony. It requires love, dominance from the guy and trust that enables surrender. It is there to harmonize INTIMATE relationships. I won't be submitting to any idiot who comes along. A guy has to earn that from me just like he earns my trust.
It is also NOT the same as "respectful/polite/deferring/feminine behavior" which implies preserving harmony for protection of comfort/feelings of people around you. This is restraint out of empathy and NOT submission. Here, you don't get even that much. Because it's the internet, the place for free exchange of ideas I'm also gonna be a direct cunt with you.
"A guy has to earn that from me just like he earns my trust."
Well, pumpkin, YOU have to earn the respect of the guy too then. No more "respect me because i am a woman". In fact you're not WORTH anything. You're a stranger. Why should HE do anything EXTRA for you?
"Because it's the internet, the place for free exchange of ideas I'm also gonna be a direct cunt with you. "
It's ok, dearie, I don't think you need the internet to use your default settings :)
Petty insults an argument do not make. And so far this "internet moron" has debunked your childish demands and.. ahem..."logic". And all you were capable of replying with is hysterics and ad-hominems.
I suggest you refrain from replying unless you are capable of a civil conversation based on facts and logic. But that again from a person who says 'women don't want equality", I expect you to follow orders, perhaps? :)
No all we got straightened that you're utterly fucking moronic. I make a clear rational point about functions of the genders and why your retarded point about "following your urges" is idiotic, and instead of following my line of reasoning and responding on point like a normal person, you go:" Well you better impress me then, who would want you? And you don't want equality, go to the kitchen then..." THAT is how utterly fucking retarded you are, you moronic waste of bandwidth.
You're the one who claimed that women "do not desire equality" - so i showed you what that means. Now you complain. Which one is it?
Your whole "DISCLAIMER" is utter inconsistency. You brag about 'women being able to go on without men' then demand men act with respect towards you after you just belittled them. Furthermore you show your homophobic bigoted views of the world and write off everyone who doesn't agree with your 1950s views of gender and rights as "feminist dyke" or 'effeminate nice guy".
You are the last person to call others names. I suggest you think before you reply again because the more you do the sillier your comebacks become. So much so i am beginning to think i am being trolled by a poe.
Laughed at the comments in Part 1 on the clown makeup & that picture !! Listen in , ladies... Oompah Loompah's belong in Charlie & the Chocolate Factory , not real life !! How do they seriously believe they are attractive?
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(36-45)
+1 y
Wish it was more engaging as I got bored of reading after the first few paragraphs and I like reading and am interested in the subject.
I didn't understand this for a long time growing up. My mum said it to me and I vehemently disagreed. Then I found a guy who more or less fits what you described here. Now I get it. Great article. Wow. Just wow...
I am glad you didn't say nice guys are ''fake nice guys'' like other women do. You just mentioned that they ''kiss ass'', etc. Bravo. I do agree with what you posted.
Thank you so much. I agree with you. And yes I was too nice to my first girlfriend, but she is fucked up in the head anyway. A wonder it lasted a year with her.
We could fix that if we only called feminism out on its bullshit and thought young men and women the truth, instead of letting feminism shame them into becoming their fucked up version of male and female.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
38Opinion
this a really good insight and I agree with you completely you have outdone yourself by giving a evident response to any question a person of any gender may have on this particular subject I'm going to bookmark your article for a reference and suggest it to my friends and thanks for this Article
Very cool, i couldn't find all the words myself. When i read this i realized it was because there was just so much to say. Nice take.
Actually, I more or less would rather save the men. Every woman who survives has a greater chance of producing more retarded humans into the world. I would have to be sneaky, though, so the retarded men don't catch me destroying their "valuable" sexual resources.
Plus, like you said, men are smarter and more interesting. Except for Dana Goldstein, who is an extraordinary woman.
I should provide the caveat that I'm one of those feminists you don't like. Surprise.
Nah, not a surprise at all.
Women. Are. Not. Stupider. Than. Men.
As a collective. They. Are.
Oh, I see. So you are the maverick, misunderstood, lone intelligent female, floating amid the collective herd? Boo hoo.
I'm not a lone female. Lots of us are smart, I met plenty of women smarter than me.
And half of us are sure as hell smarter than you...
Why? Just because you think so? You know that first comment I made on your blog post? I take it back. Although I do agree that lots of females are smart.
This could have come from my own brain (and versions of it have). Excellent writing and very correct regarding history and evolution.
This is great, well thought analysis. While I do not wholly agree with all the opinions expressed here I can respect them. I can tell that you took quite a time to express them clearly. and eloquently.
Unfortunately, part one is impossible to post. =/
I'd be eager to hear what parts you disagree with, otherwise bringing up that you disagree was mostly a pointless gesture
Great take !! Except one mention about (alpha ) males I'll empathize on... I'm alpha 100% , but I've never had any problems holding on to a relationship whatsoever. There are reasons why I can be flexible here and there , but don't really want to say why. The hint would be something like ; I'm not threatened one way or another about my masculinity or do I have any female problems.
about that nice guy thing i'm suprised that some girl actually told what most girls so i agree on that point. I do agree.
That nice guy shit is what has been thaught to me by parents and it doesn't work for me and all those 'nice guys' who are whining and complaining.
That BDSM thing has opened my eyes because i've never experienced it that way.
Amazing 👌 such thought provoking ideas, and I mean no offence but from someone so young. Well done 😃
Thank you. =')
I actually am FOR equality and WANT to split the bill :)
The women i have met so far didn't.
Guess feminism needs to teach women to WANT to be equal, lol
haha, a lot of feminists want to be selectively equal. I want equal everything. e. e. g oh what I have to pay, well this guy is just cheap. Don't wish for equality if you can't handle the responsibilities.
You can't teach women to want that, just like you can't teach them not to crave food. It's biology.
And @Dtegesd123 the very design of female mind and body makes it so that she can't handle true equality as much as she doesn't want it.
if biology is just then, is it fair for a male to find multiple partners at one time. It is in male biology :)
It is also about FUNCTION of biology.
If a man wants to bang everyone and he needs that desire to prolong and maintain the species in crisis, then he bangs to fill that function.
But if a man wants to attach to a woman in order to form a union in which he has less children, but will raise HIGH QUIALITY adults because he is raising them himself and giving his full attention and resources, he attaches emotionally and commits to one woman. Right now, there is enough women to go around for every man in the species and in a well run relationship, one woman is enough to fill his emotional and physical needs. He then fills the FUNCTION of monogamy.
A woman trying to be a man as feminists claim is possible, but like the guy fucking around, it's only functional if there is a shortage of men. Only functional BECAUSE there is no man to play his role around.
You're thinking from a single-mommy household mindset.
" the very design of female mind and body makes it so that she can't handle true equality as much as she doesn't want it. "
Off to the kitchen with you then !
You're nothing to me. I would never listen.
"You're nothing to me. I would never listen. "
Hey you're the one who said "women don't desire equality" not me.
Also if you don't listen why would any man give you the time of day to begin with?
Are you that retarded that I ACTUALLY have to explain this to you? (-‸ლ)
Holy... ಠ_ಠ
Submission is there to create intimacy and harmony. It requires love, dominance from the guy and trust that enables surrender. It is there to harmonize INTIMATE relationships.
I won't be submitting to any idiot who comes along. A guy has to earn that from me just like he earns my trust.
It is also NOT the same as "respectful/polite/deferring/feminine behavior" which implies preserving harmony for protection of comfort/feelings of people around you. This is restraint out of empathy and NOT submission. Here, you don't get even that much. Because it's the internet, the place for free exchange of ideas I'm also gonna be a direct cunt with you.
"A guy has to earn that from me just like he earns my trust."
Well, pumpkin, YOU have to earn the respect of the guy too then. No more "respect me because i am a woman".
In fact you're not WORTH anything. You're a stranger. Why should HE do anything EXTRA for you?
"Because it's the internet, the place for free exchange of ideas I'm also gonna be a direct cunt with you. "
It's ok, dearie, I don't think you need the internet to use your default settings :)
Petty insults an argument do not make.
And so far this "internet moron" has debunked your childish demands and.. ahem..."logic".
And all you were capable of replying with is hysterics and ad-hominems.
I suggest you refrain from replying unless you are capable of a civil conversation based on facts and logic.
But that again from a person who says 'women don't want equality", I expect you to follow orders, perhaps? :)
Like I said... Internet moron.
Right, so you have no arguments.
Glad we got that straightened.
No all we got straightened that you're utterly fucking moronic.
I make a clear rational point about functions of the genders and why your retarded point about "following your urges" is idiotic, and instead of following my line of reasoning and responding on point like a normal person, you go:" Well you better impress me then, who would want you? And you don't want equality, go to the kitchen then..."
THAT is how utterly fucking retarded you are, you moronic waste of bandwidth.
You're the one who claimed that women "do not desire equality" - so i showed you what that means.
Now you complain.
Which one is it?
Your whole "DISCLAIMER" is utter inconsistency.
You brag about 'women being able to go on without men' then demand men act with respect towards you after you just belittled them. Furthermore you show your homophobic bigoted views of the world and write off everyone who doesn't agree with your 1950s views of gender and rights as "feminist dyke" or 'effeminate nice guy".
You are the last person to call others names. I suggest you think before you reply again because the more you do the sillier your comebacks become.
So much so i am beginning to think i am being trolled by a poe.
One of the women who gets it, but whose voice will be drowned out by the majority.
Also, you should update with a link to the first part, like @Frost_Byte said
www.girlsaskguys.com/.../a8369-cutting-trough-the-nice-guy-alpha-male-confidence-bullshit - here you go. ^^
So far it's the best take I saw about this subject in here.
Congrats.
I might disagree in some aspects, and I've experienced some things differently.
Good reading nonetheless.
Can you explain what you disagree with? (If you're up for discussing it I mean.)
50 Shades Of Grey Sold More Than Harry Potter? WHAT?
My reaction exactly. xD
Laughed at the comments in Part 1 on the clown makeup & that picture !! Listen in , ladies... Oompah Loompah's belong in Charlie & the Chocolate Factory , not real life !! How do they seriously believe they are attractive?
Wish it was more engaging as I got bored of reading after the first few paragraphs and I like reading and am interested in the subject.
Just some constructive criticism.
Alright, I'll keep it in mind.
Wasn't saying that to be nasty, sorry if it seemed bitchy.
No, of course not. ^^
I didn't understand this for a long time growing up. My mum said it to me and I vehemently disagreed. Then I found a guy who more or less fits what you described here. Now I get it. Great article. Wow. Just wow...
Thanks for adding to my knowledge. :)
That smile is an indication of the stupidly giving unconditionally nice guy. Lmao :D
I am glad you didn't say nice guys are ''fake nice guys'' like other women do. You just mentioned that they ''kiss ass'', etc. Bravo. I do agree with what you posted.
Thank you so much. I agree with you.
And yes I was too nice to my first girlfriend, but she is fucked up in the head anyway. A wonder it lasted a year with her.
Good take I think you hit the nail on the head. https://www.girlsaskguys.com/live-feed
And all this is why men are becoming players instead of getting into relationships. Men get the short end of the stick.
Well femininist I should say.
We could fix that if we only called feminism out on its bullshit and thought young men and women the truth, instead of letting feminism shame them into becoming their fucked up version of male and female.
I agree, feminists have led us guys to believe that being any more than equal to them is wrong.