Women claim men who attract to women based on their beauty is objectifying women. And then women base their attraction on men for a man's money?

[SpokenTruth]

Does anyone see the hypocrisy? And who do you think is doing the actual real objectification do you think it's men or women?

[MCheetah]

"Objectification" isn't a real thing; that's just called lust and no one is obligated to marry anyone before feeling sexual attraction towards them. And if anyone were to "objectify" the other gender, it'd be he one that literally reduces a man's usefulness down to his penis and sells them in sex shops, or the gender that reduces a man's usefulness down to being an Automated Teller Machine (ATM) as those are actual objects you're reducing a person into.

But still, "objectification" ain't a thing and I don't take people who claim it is, seriously. However, I will say that both genders use each other, all the time. Men use women for sex and women use men for money, emotional validation, and physical protection.

[KathrynTaylor]

A bit of both, done by immature people, spineless people and cynics.

[Anonymous]

Its really simple, The VAST majority of feminists (the ones that tout that sexual objectification bullshit) are hypocrites.

[Anonymous]

Wow, generalizing much?

[SpokenTruth]

Looks is based on the actual woman a psychical part of her being while money comes from a product of trees man made with ink. Who or which is doing the actual objectification would that be men or women?

[_piotr]

@SpokenTruth
Yes. That is true. Looks is integral part of human. Money is different entity. I came to this conclusion also.