Guys & girls - explain to me why dressing & acting cheaply (overly revealing, sleeping around, etc) as a woman is considered "acceptable" behavior?

[BlackBeauty90]

I don't do this. None of my friends do this. But keep in mind they're all educated, they're all successful women (lawyers, doctors, etc.). We all dress professionally (so dress pants & blouses, ankle to mid-calf skirts, etc.) & we all act properly (no bars, no clubs, etc.).

There's never been an issue attracting men's attention and by men I mean legitimate men not boys in adult bodies who think they're men but who have the maturity of a 10 year old.

And the thing is, is original feminism would be FAR more like us than modernday "feminists".

Feminism after all was AGAINST sexualization & objectification of women and yet the modern women - particularly in America/West - wanna act, be seen & treated as a sexualized object.

[MrOracle]

Since you don't know this already, it's probably going to sound like some conspiracy theory, except it's not at all difficult to confirm what I'm about to say - much of it from their own words.

I'm going to assume that you have heard of Gloria Steinem, and the NOW (National Organization of Women). This represented the leadership of Feminism from the late 1960s into the 2000s, and put in place all of the Gender Studies and public policy stuff we have now. Some of the women who were big in the NOW in the 70s and 80s left and created additional feminist organizations.

But all of these came out of the early 60s, when the 2nd-wave Feminists were taken over by the Red Stockings, a group of Marxists recruited and trained by Soviet agents. The Soviets recognized that they could not influence the world with money, since they didn't have much themselves, so they focused their efforts on SUBVERSION - getting people to think and act against what they were taught. In the 60s and 70s, this had to be kept quiet, because Marxism was still taken seriously as a threat, but by the 90s, Feminist leaders were very open - at least among "friendly" crowds - about their Marxist training and motivations. There are plenty of articles, speeches, and interviews in far-left-leaning media where they talk about it.

And one of the big goals of Marxism (which is only Marxism on paper and in propaganda) is to completely destroy western, freedom-and-basic-rights culture so that it can be replaced by "Marxism" (really, totalitarianism, controlled by a few of the wealthy elite). Marxism, after all, has always devolved into totalitarianism within weeks of coming to power.

The Marxists understand that you will never get free people to accept Marxism as long as a free society exists and is functional, so the goal is to destroy it down to the last brick, so that starving, frightened people will happily except Marxism. And one of the keys to destroying western society is to sew divisions between the people - to divide, so they can then conquer. Feminism was taken over with the specific goal of dividing men and women - to stop male-female relationships entirely where possible, and where it isn't, to lower the value of those relationships while preserving as much female power as possible.

THAT leads us directly to your observation: it's WHY modem Feminism encourages women to do those things and pushes society to accept it and defend it. It lowers the relationship value of the women, so men are less likely to commit to them, but retains most of women's power in the moment. It perfectly aligns with Feminist (Marxist, which really means ruling elite) goals.

In case you haven't read or heard anything that the World Economic Forum has been doing and talking about for the last decade (and they don't encourage you to be curious), they feel the world is vastly overpopulated and I want to reduce the global population to half-a-billion people, which is 1/16th of the current population. And they are fully prepared to use the same techniques that China uses (24/7 tracking, passport apps that can prevent you from even leaving your home) to control you. But that's really hard to do in a free society, which is why the elites crave that control so badly. They want just enough people to work for them, and don't care if the vast majority are effectively slaves - in fact, that's ideal for them.

[MrOracle]

As crazy as all this might sound, a bit of research will prove all of this true, with much of it in their own words (in dry, academic/corporate speak, of course - they don't WANT average people to be interested, but still need to release these documents publicly to comply with the law - for now...).

[bingbongbangbung]

Well considering that once the boomers die off, the world will become severely underpopulated, I doubt the WEF even needs to lift a finger; they can just wait until that happens, although they'll be in for a shock to learn that many normies are waking up to the woke authoritarian BS

[MrOracle]

I don't think you understand - they want to reduce the population of the planet to about 1/16th of the current population in less than 50 years. There is no natural way to accomplish that - though they are certainly doing everything they can to prevent non-elites from reproducing.

But they are also intentionally allowing the criminal class to go free to cause havoc, knowing that this will reduce the population in various ways. That's why so many crimes aren't being prosecuted when committed by active criminals, but when a law-abiding middle class person with no record does something wrong, they are prosecuted to the full extent of the law. And that's just one of many examples of how elites are pushing to destroy society.

But what event is responsible for the getting massive numbers of people killed? War. And have you noticed that we are closer than ever to a war, and that Biden has already recalled the inactive reserves? None of that is an accident...

[Grovermint]

It’s not just that extreme clothing is more revealing, it’s that baseline clothing, too , at least in Western society. Common wear for centuries was pretty tame from today's standards, discounting some particularly adventurous women who have indulged in plunging necklines, or the occasional bare shoulder, in part of elite society. Upper crust women wore corsets that narrowed their waists and accentuated their breasts, although how much was revealed was carefully controlled with frills and such.

Victorian era fashion was particularly prudish. It was considered daring to show bare shoulders and arms. No breasts on any amount of display, or even ankles. Swimming garments for both sexes modestly covered everything from your neck down.

From what I've noticed, the current trend started more or less because of Hollywood.

Today revealing clothing is common at all levels of society. Hollywood having some of the worst with everyone trying to put compete each other.

[whirled_up_girl]

I don't know either really but then again I've never dressed that way. I wear scrubs in the hospital while I'm at work and the rest of time I dress respectably. Most of my friends are the same, I notice it's a different story though with some of the younger women in town, particularly university students. I guess maybe they are trying to attract the male gaze and hoping to attract a partner.🤷‍♀️

[Anonymous]

Because people are free to do as they like as long as they don't break any laws or rules. Others people's sex life and wardrobe are none of your or my business as long as it doesn't affect us.

What is "acceptable" is highly subjective and depends on many things like how you got raised, cultural differences and many other things.

[modeunae]

Women in the West cannot be rebuked and if you rebuke them, you're a misogynist. What women don't understand is the more of your body you show, the less of your mind is seen. I'm not a feminist, nor do I support feminism in any way whatsoever, but from what I know, modern feminism has nothing to do with archaic feminism. Back then it was about being taught to read and write, too, but today-- all it has to do with is being "better" than men and putting us down.

• "You don't like women who dress like sluts? MYSOGYNIST!"
• "You don't like women who go to bars and sleep around? MYSOGYNIST!!"
• You don't like women who talk with [excessively] vulgar language? MYSOGYNIST!!!"

Now, I'll admit the last one is more for me than most men. Most men are okay with a swear here or there, but not me and too I'll mention that "not liking" these women doesn't mean men don't find them attractive. It means men don't take them seriously. The thing is, though, not to attack you but with women of your calibre, being highly educated and having high-paying jobs often gets to your heads, so although women like you are better than dick-hoppers [women that jump from dick, to dick... to dick, to dick, to dick], women like yourselves often take it too far, too.

Women who go to bars and clubs and things like that aren't women to wife, they're women for the night.

[TheorionMage]

To eschew the root empowerment of animal allure is like contemporary Science poo-pooing the fundamental validity of the 'empowerment' of gravity. It is hypocrisy to not consider the employment of promulgated 'desire' as the bedrock determinant of contemporary Society.
While modern firearms 'equalize' the dicodemy of physical musculature, nevertheless Shaolin JUVENILE Apprentices are routinely schooled in skills which empower them to put their tender fleshy appendages THROUGH boards and stone, to heal or take life.

'Allure' IS an implicit innate MARTIAL art...

"Thank Heaven, for little girls... for little girls get bigger every day.
Thank Heaven for little girls. They 'grow up' in the MOST DELIGHTFUL ways..."
-Maurice Chevalier

[Anpu23]

A couple of points.

People should dress how they want. Its certainly not your decision what someone else puts on their body.

I've certainly met many professional women who dress down and go out.

There were two branches of feminism even in the 20s the flapper movement was tied into the suffregettes. Sex positivity was seen as liberating, (even brought up in "The Second Sex the feminism classic). Im not a fan of feminism, but to rewrite it to suit a narrative is disingenuous.

Why does anybody dress the way they do? To project an image, to send social cues, to be seen, to blend in or stand out or just to be comfortable. Clothing has slowly gotten less ornate through the centuries (from about the 1600s or so on) not that there isn't a good argument for bringing back certain elements. I personally love 1700s mens fashion. But I wouldn't impose my fashion sense on others.

[TheSpaceGnome]

Revealing clothing is fine (if single), sleeping around or otherwise being a slut or whore is not, and revealing clothing in public when taken is not.

Sexualization and objectification aren't problems, everyone wants to be looked at lustfully, anyone saying otherwise is either spouting lies, or is asexual. And a man is not "illegitimate" for being sexually attracted to a woman.

Failure to love and be loyal are the actual problems.

Also feminism, clubs and bars are all for idiots, and 10 year old boys are not going to clubs or bars, or picking up slutty women, or otherwise fitting the description of the men you are referring to, so that comparison is a false equivalency.

[2244001]

I've seen a lot of young girls dressing like this and then complaining on socials that dudes are catcalling or wanting some. Like girl you are way to young to dress like that. For example, I had a neighbor ( who's now 18) started dressing like that at 14, pregnant at 16 and still dressing like this around her almost 2 year old daughter. It's like why are young girls like this? What are they getting out of it?

[2244001]

Where the " 😍" is it's supposed to say 18*

[Phoenix98]

It's not acceptable at least not to someone with standards.

And on the dressing revealing note I get wanting to look good and feel good about how you look from time to time and there's nothing wrong with that. But there's no real excuse for walking out of your house and looking like you belong in a strip club or a street corner that's not sexy that's trashy.

[bolverk]

Personally I do not find it acceptable women dressing & acting cheaply as "acceptable" behaviour, but then I'm not an "Influencer" and I'm from another time, and women NEVER dress for men as they are in a constant battle with other women, but I've no Idea why they dress and act like streetwalkers.

[Anemone978]

I don't think it is acceptable but that is life.. God gave everyone the choice to be good or bad so there are plenty of people with bad morals all over the world, but it is an easy way to distinguish who I want to be around and who I don't.

[inhua]

it's due to the masculinization of women to "do whatever they want" and feminization of weak men who are heavily influenced by the basic principle of "sex sells" thus these behaviors have become more acceptable by society

[AviatorTom]

Because sluts make it so... and paparazzi are ready and willing to take their pictures and sell them to the tabloids, which people pay to read.

[richardcory]

People are free to dress as they wish, however clothes do act as a form of communication, letting others know what about you you wish to be noticed.

[tzdc21]

Feminism. They have somehow convinced the world that it is acceptable. I for one do not find it acceptable at all.

[sheikalana]

t's not. It's really not. Maybe social media made you believe it's acceptable but big NO for me. Manners and elegance are still very much valued and appreciated.

[_SillyShoes_]

Because everyone can do whatever they want as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else...

[Aiko_E_Lara]

That's what you think. We can just say we're looking at your asses because we have eyes but as long as were not hurting you. But if you really get hurt because of that then you have no idea how much your suppressing people's attention span by wearing something revealing in front of anyone you have the power to shame someone by calling them out and make them look bad by screaming ''Harassment'' for looking at your pairs which can get them in trouble.

[BlackBeauty90]

But you are. That is WHY professional businesses DO NOT allow sluttish outfits in the office place. Because you are distracting, etc.

Not to mention many of the women sleep with whoever, god knows who the father of their 2 to 4 kids are, and so they are HURTING their children by not allowing them to be brought up properly.

[modeunae]

@Aiko_E_Lara There we go.

[_SillyShoes_]

*Exactly my point - do whatever you want as long as it's not hurting anyone.

If you're hurting yourself, your kids or anyone else, it's no longer fine...

But that remains at the discretion of moral-less people, and I, not anyone else, has control over other people. That's called life.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

"If you're hurting yourself, your kids or anyone else, it's no longer fine..." Which definitely has everything to do with dressing up inappropriately.

[_SillyShoes_]

@Aiko_E_Lara Not if you're a single person without kids...

[Aiko_E_Lara]

Your options include "yourself" in it and has nothing to do with your kids or partner/relationship. You as a single person still have yourself to be around with. It's not like it's ok to disrespect yourself just because you're single.

[_SillyShoes_]

@Aiko_E_Lara I think you're viewing the disrespect thing way too subjectively - on your own end.
And that's exactly what almost every other person on the planet does as well...

[Aiko_E_Lara]

I'm speaking with generality here. Yeah sure it is subjective. Just like feeling provoked if someone straight up insults you which is a feeling that's subjective except we have societal standards that considers that kind of behavior rude. You can insult yourself and you're not hurt, sure that's up to you. But in society's view, you're insecure. No normal person do that even if it's "subjective"

[Kathy101]

This. Exactly this. People don't get it nowadays though *sigh. The world is a messed up place

[WhiteBoyChill]

Simply because the media in America promotes it as female empowerment.

All the while you get to know these women personally, and they’re always depressed and broken people.

[OddBeMe]

Even tho I agree, it’s our opinion. Everyone has their own standards.

[jimmy2]

It's🤔 a man making it less and less to ware. I hope it does 🚫 t make rape more

[Anonymous]

I do not consider it acceptable, in fact I would avoid relating to a woman like that.

[Anonymous]

Liberal influences, pure and simple.