Well, that's kind of the reason why something such as 'conventional attractiveness' exists. The nature of it is that it is conventionally attractive, so most guys are attracted to
Wow, really? I found the brunette more appealing. I think guys find conventional beauty attractive, just because that's what we see idolized when we are growing up.
Ik I’m not a guy but I think both are super pretty. Maybe it has something to do with primal instincts. Maybe certain characteristics would aid in survival. Example: guys like boobs because they feed their offspring?
It might just be me, but I think guys would actually like the second one more, because A: her looks tell she has more personality than the first one and B: the first one looks faker in the pic than the second one.
Your update just answered the question. It's not that guys aren't less attracted to the second one than the first one, it's just that those girls are rarer.
I don't really see a difference between the two other than hair color really. And makeup.
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(18-24)
+1 y
Actually the girls u are '' using ''are both '' conventionally attractive'' , but with different coulour '' tones''. As to your question , for the good or for the bad mankind have beauty standards for both men and women , who are universal and in some case timeless. If one girl from Africa , one from Asia and one from Europe see a 6-packed guy they will all think that this guy is handsome.
Were not were attracted to a girl with a decent heart and personality the problem is you can't differentiate between the two either could be or neither could have those traits. 99% it's neither.
These are both bad options. The blond looks like a robot/machine. And the brunette looks like she's crazy. But the brunette is way more attractive than the blond.
I honestly think the 2nd girl was much prettier than that first girl. The first girl looked very plasticy and her makeup was caked. She also had a really bad dye job and her hair is probably very brittle. 2nd girl is a natural beauty!
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
129Opinion
Many people tend to gravitate to someone equal to themselves, and perhaps fantasise about photoshopped models.
Well, that's kind of the reason why something such as 'conventional attractiveness' exists. The nature of it is that it is conventionally attractive, so most guys are attracted to
Wow, really? I found the brunette more appealing. I think guys find conventional beauty attractive, just because that's what we see idolized when we are growing up.
Ik I’m not a guy but I think both are super pretty. Maybe it has something to do with primal instincts. Maybe certain characteristics would aid in survival. Example: guys like boobs because they feed their offspring?
It might just be me, but I think guys would actually like the second one more, because A: her looks tell she has more personality than the first one and B: the first one looks faker in the pic than the second one.
Your update just answered the question. It's not that guys aren't less attracted to the second one than the first one, it's just that those girls are rarer.
2nd girl is better stop generalizing what most guys want...
In my opinion both the women shown as examples here are equally attractive.
I don't really see a difference between the two other than hair color really. And makeup.
Actually the girls u are '' using ''are both '' conventionally attractive'' , but with different coulour '' tones''. As to your question , for the good or for the bad mankind have beauty standards for both men and women , who are universal and in some case timeless. If one girl from Africa , one from Asia and one from Europe see a 6-packed guy they will all think that this guy is handsome.
That's not true. I hate 6 packs.
xx
~ Mrs Manson
Your question answers itself. The reason it is defined as "conventional beauty" is exactly because most men/people find it most/more attractive.
I like the second one better. Guys like whatever is more exotic to them.
er they're both conventionally beautiful actually
Were not were attracted to a girl with a decent heart and personality the problem is you can't differentiate between the two either could be or neither could have those traits. 99% it's neither.
These are both bad options. The blond looks like a robot/machine. And the brunette looks like she's crazy. But the brunette is way more attractive than the blond.
The second pic has less makeup around the eyes. That's a killer for men.
Why are most women only attracted to men taller than them?
Hint: biology is the answer to both
People don't like it because it's conventionally attractive. It's considered conventionally attractive because people like it.
I don't see one unique thing about that second girl
I honestly think the 2nd girl was much prettier than that first girl. The first girl looked very plasticy and her makeup was caked. She also had a really bad dye job and her hair is probably very brittle. 2nd girl is a natural beauty!
well shit, I'm not attacked to either, where are the red haired Amazons?