Some felt it should go by who had the higher income. Others felt 50/50 was alright.
I personally wouldn't mind going 50/50 on bills with my future husband.


Doesn't necessarily need to be 50/50, and bank accounts don't need to be joined. We have separate accounts because he's an impulse spender and I'm an avid saver, and I run a business and so have to pay taxes straight out of my bank account. That means if we shared an account, the money he thought was available to spend might be going to taxes, etc. We function best when we have separate accounts. I budget, and we put money toward things together. We pay for cars and any personal debt separately. I make a bit less than him, so I pay a bit less, allocated toward what I use. Since I run a business out of my home, I pay for internet. Since I'm always cold and run the thermostat at 77, I pay for heat. Since he has the expensive iPhone, he pays for phone. That sort of thing. We come up with savings goals together and he tells me how much he wants to put toward it monthly (percent or amount) and then I transfer that for him. I might be saving for other things; he prefers to pay for vacations while I pay for "boring" things like furniture. So he might be socking his $500 extra a month toward a vacation, and I'm putting $500 a month toward furniture. But if I decide I want to go on a vacation, we definitely switch up and he'll start funding furniture so I can save for vacation, etc. It's all about cooperation and regular communication. You're a team. Works like a charm!
A few of the guys at my work are married. I asked them this question.
One has only one account in his marriage. All the money from both paychecks go in there and all the money for the bills comes out.
One has three accounts. Each spouse has a checking account and then they have an account they pay bills from. Their bills are split between them in accordance to which spouse makes more. They each pay the same number of bills, but because his wife's income is higher, the bills she pays are the more expensive ones. He said the percentage of their incomes spent on bills is the same, but the numerical value is different.
It's whichever way works for you, honestly.
Nice! Thanks so much for your opinion & thanks to the guys at your job as well! I agree with in whatever way works for you. But also every couple has their own way of living and that's perfectly fine.
That is by choice. Not whether or not if it's a yes or no. Whoever can be responsible for the bills should just do it if it's mutually agreed upon. But what matters is that both couples have to contribute to something when they want something. Bills are important. But not every married couple can do 50/50. It's however way they want to do it and is beneficial for the couple. But when there is overspending and financial problems, they issue stems with whether or not the couple knows what they are doing financially.
I don't think bills should be split. I think the could should both invest and help each other.
Example just pay the car and I will pay the house.
I will buy groceries and you can buy other home supplies.
I decorate the sitting room and you can decorate the room.
Or while one is paying bill the other is saving for the vacation...
I like your way of thinking, that's a good way to put it. Agreed 100% as well.
Mostly yes, but it depends. If one person wants an air conditioner instead of a water cooler and the electric bill is $500 per month, then they should pay $450 of that themselves.
Same goes for phone bills. If one doesn't care much for phones and has a $10 per month flip phone, they shouldn't be splitting the bill with the other person that has a $90 per month smart phone bill.
Also, each person should pay for their own car payment and insurance. I wouldn't want to pay for someone's $45,000 SUV when I saved up enough cash to buy my car outright and don't have payments.
As far as the money, I figure once the bills are payed, each person gets to keep the rest of their income as spending money for whatever they want, but things that would require monthly payments should be discussed by both partners first.
I love your opinion so much. Thanks for this! Some people don't see it that way but when you break it down like that, it makes a lot of sense.
It used to be they just deposited and used the same account. But really its about communication. I mean as long as you're together, its the same money, but really my general rule in theory is, split it in a way that no checks will bounce.
But ps, if you split every bill 50 50, thats just a lot of unnecessary work. Im thinking like, cable comes out of my paycheck and hiring housework comes out of yours (or something, i wanted to avoid saying groceries in case someone found that offensive, but im not married so i can't think of anything else)
I don't specifically mean 50/50 literally like if cable is $100. They each pay $50. I meant like ok you pay cable, gas & I pay for hot water and Internet. Mortgage could be split 50/50. But yeah. I'm just trying to get a gist of things lol.
Opinion
48Opinion
There is no right or wrong answer. It depends on the couple.
My wife and I have all our mutual bills - groceries, mortgage, insurance etc - direct debited off a credit card. At the end of every month, we both pay 50% of what is remaining on the credit card.
We pay our own car expenses, clothing etc.
We have an account that we both put a set amount of money into every week, that is used for things like holidays together, purchases for the house etc.
The rest of our money is to do with as we please. This is something we have developed over years, and it works perfectly. Our expenses are less than 50% of our income (we both earn almost the same too).
Love this. Thanks for sharing.
A marriage shouldn't be about who pays the bills. You commingle your money and the bills are paid out of that, regardless of who makes what. If you have to keep your money separate you should sit down and have a conversation about how you do things. There is no right percentage in a marriage. You are both in it together and how you pay things should not be an issue. A marriage is two people joining together in life, not keeping things separate. If you have to worry about who is paying what, you shouldn't get married.
It's not that deep LOL. But thanks for your opinion!
Sorry, it seemed like a serious subject to me. You're welcome.
If both are working, they should both contribute to a joint account to cover joint things like household expenses and vacations and entertainment and savings. The person earning more should contribute more. Both partners should also have separate accounts that they can spend freely. Maybe each gets half of whatever is left.
The guy who said that strikes me as the type who expects her to stay home, cook, clean and do laundry.
For me, it's a double income society anymore. If you want nice things and don't want debt up to your eyeballs, then both partners need to work. It isn't fair if I have to go to work every day and she doesn't, then I come home to pay for everything while she gets to claim ownership to half of it without paying for anything. I think any partner who sits back and allows the "breadwinner" to pay for everything is just being lazy, shallow and financially abusive because they are being a total financial flake. It doesn't have to be perfectly 50/50, but 95/5 won't work for me either. You want a life with me, you need to work for it and pay for it too! Fair is fair.
I don't see 50 50 rule
My parents do share money, but My father is the main provider. If he has money, he always pays. He even pays for his brothers, and their children. That's how family should be in my opinion. My mom isn't required to pay if my father has money. She does so out of kindness.
That's how my dad is. My parents have been married for 25 years.
Yeah, :)
I think the easiest way and my recommendation to married people is to have one main joint account that they both know about, contribute to and "work" with. They both should go over the bank statement and see what they all purchased and balance their checkbook. See if the bank made a mistake which does happen folks! I used to get this a few times"Well my husband always balanced the checkbook" when I was a teller. That way you both understand how things work and if the unthinkable does happen you are prepared.
I also believe having separate side accounts ts is good as well. That way you can purchase gifts, things that you've been saving up for to buy for yourself, or a " play" fund. But I don't believe in any secrets.
I put no because it really depends on the income and the relationship. If both parties are making similar pay I don't know why the hell it wouldn't be 50/50. For couples that have a large income disparity it can vary. Some people are only comfortable with 50/50, which is fine, but means you are limited to the budget of the lower income partner. Otherwise you're asking someone to live way beyond their means which isn't fair or kind to somebody you're supposedly care about. I think it's more common for couples with a large income disparity to split bills by percentage. That way the couple is living on total combined income and each person pays proportional to the total income. Both people are contributing an amount that is reasonable for their income.
i voted no because I think it depends on the couple. for a couple with joint accounts, house, kids and maybe different work schedules and different home chores yes.
a couple that has no shared responsibilities should be each one pays their own part.
but above all they should talk and come to their own agreement instead of using a fit for everyone bill.
I think a married couple should be sharing expenses, they should have a joint bank account. So technically yeah, they'd be sharing the bills, just like they're sharing everything else.
I believe that when you get married, you become once, therefore, you share your money.
You have to take into account whether both partners have jobs or not. If one does, and one doesn't then it's a given that all the responsibilities of bills would be on the one partner's shoulders. Now if they both are working, then of course it should be split. You're both living in the house, using water, electricity, eating the food, using the internet. Therefore you should both be contributing, unless otherwise discussed.
It's up to the couple, some want to spilt the bills and some don't. If one of you is a stay at home mum/dad then you can't really spilt the bills.
Agreed.
THe one guy was right... if you are splitting everything equally you have a roommate not a wife.
A family is a single unit, everyone should contribute a roughly equal amount but it can't be measured in dollars. As a family you share a budget and all the resources and responsibilities as a unit. Functionally, this means the money goes into one central location and everything gets paid for from there.
No, because oftentimes, one person (typically the man) is getting paid more in the workforce because they have more time and energy to do so, because the other person (typically the woman) is doing more of the unpaid labor around the house. Since the person in the workforce is getting paid more for their labor, it's fair that they pay more of the bills.
Also, in cases where the woman is pregnant, it's fair that the man pay more of the bills, since pregnancy can make working more difficult.
We each keep separate personal accounts as well as a household one. We each contribute equally to the household account that one is for bills and household emergencies, as for our personal accounts it keeps the money stress off of each of us. We can spend our money how we want, including spending it on each other without concerns as to if we can pay the bills. This is working for us.
I had a long post written and then I accidentally touched the "previous" button...
In short, because I am tired of writing this again, my answer is NEITHER.
LMFAO.
Sorry but that was funny lmao 😩
Legally, when you marry someone, your finances become intertwined in the first place. In many states, like Texas for example, the husband becomes the primary owner of ANY and ALL property purchased by either party while married, regardless of which of them is actually paying for it. Their debt can also become your debt. In some states, money owed can be garnished from your spouse, except for child support.
There is no yes or no here. a married couple should be able to work out how best to cover their bills between them.
What might be right for one couple may be all wrong for another. Declaring that the division of bills should be xxx/xxx shows an acute ignorance of how relationships work.
depends on if you have kids or who works etc. if the wife takes care of the kids and is a stay at home mom while the dad works obviously he pays the bills but say you guys don't have kids and both work, then yes u should split the bills.
Ok what if you have kids & both work?
whoever pitches in with the kids more should have to pay less bills, thats for you and your SO to hash out
I voted no, based on my current situation, I guess you could say we're splitting the bills, however all our money goes into a joint account. We don't believe in a his and hers account system, we share everything in our relationship, money is no different.
I think they should give an equal percentage, not necessarily 50/50, because if the salaries are very different, one would end up giving up too much. they should open an account for bills only, and each of them could transfer lets say 30% of their salaries
It should be dependent on how much each person makes. If they can both do 50/50 then great but some people can't afford a 50/50 split. If your partner makes like 2 or 3 times more than you than that really isn't fair. But a 30/70 or 40/60 split might work better or something might work better. And money for bills and what not should go into a joint account.
Someone else here was talking about contributing the same percentage of their incomes to the bills, yet because they had different salaries the amounts were different. She took care of the larger bills because she made the most money. That seems fair to me.
And thumbs down me eh? Lol ok... "Omg 50/50 or bust!" Yeah in a fairy tale land!
Uh no. If you're married all of both of your money goes into a mutual account and you decide, together, how the bills will be paid and which leisure items/activities you will spend on. Otherwise you just have a roommate.
Getting stingy or hiding money in your marriage is a bad idea. When you end up divorced, that person will take your money.
hi, i think realistically on a percentage of the income whether it be the man or woman who earns more... it may not be splitting bills but sharing the expenses if one earns twice as much as the other surely that is a fairer way leaving each person with a disposable income for themselves and to enjoy together xx
when your married you should get a joint account because it's no longer your money it's our money and doesn't matter who makes more because everything is joint
Thanks for your opinion!
Exactly this. There isn't him and me, there is us.
I paid all household bills, and she paid for groceries and her student loans. We so well, so there's plenty of extra funds for fun and vacations. Have four bank accounts, and we're joint on all of them. We're married, no need for hidden funds.
probably, but if im in a relationship with somebody and we're living together, and one of us is earning significantly more than the other, it would make sense to have that person pay more.
It's not about money, it's about making sure my partner is comfortable and not struggling (and vice versa)
I personally would like a main joint account that all of our money goes into, like three of them one for savings, one for planning and one for bills and food (PNC Bank has something similar) and separate accounts that we can put our "allowance" money into. That way we can still have freedom to save or spend money on what we want. Or buy each other special little gifts and not spoil thr surprise by seeing it in the history lol
I've thought maybe they should add same amount of money from their salaries to their common budget and then every time when they go somewhere, spend money from this budget. It is like splitting the money or whichever has the money at that time, he/she should pay.
well over centuries males are classified as the person who provides the necessities but nowadays times have become tough and there might be required to split expenses. I believe that the man should provide but if it is necessary and possible there should be assisted. There is more than likely going to be someone saying equality should be implemented but it doesn't exactly feel right expecting it
My wife and I pool our money into one account and then pay all of the bills from that account.
no. married couples should have only one account. both wages going there and the bills should be paid from that account.
You can tell you don't know how divorce works.
All of the liabilities/debts belong to him, and all the communal assets belong to her. That's not what the law SAYS, but that's how it's APPLIED.
Keeping assets separate not only reduces fights and the chance of overdrawing the account, it also *sometimes* means the man might not be completely broke after the divorce. If he has a good enough lawyer.
@Barrabus_the_Free
If you plan on a divorce happening, don't marry. Problem solved.
@AskNaz
Yeah, that'll work. You're just trolling the reader, right? You're not ACTUALLY that stupid, are you? You don't REALLY believe that every one of the millions of men that end up in divorces *every year* actually PLANNED to get divorced, do you? I know I didn't, and I don't know anyone that did.
I get a chuckle out of guys that say such incredibly ignorant crap as what you just did. "Yeah well I don't plan on getting divorced." Well, there ya go! That fixes everything.
SMH...
@Barrabus_the_Free
Yeah, let's do 50/50 honey. I don't want to commit 100% to you just in case shit doesn't work out in the future. Wow! That sounds like a healthy marriage, doesn't it?
Have you noticed all the successful marriages DON'T share that mindset?
The marriages that last are the ones that become one.
It seems you're only preparing for the worst, with that mindset, don't marry.
If you want a legitimate marriage, marry someone you can become one with and don't have to take precautions.
@AskNaz
I won't marry again, because I did things the way you advocate and I paid for it. And I know now that no matter what you do or don't do to prepare, if you're a man you WILL get fucked in the divorce unless you get extraordinarily lucky. She gets rewarded for pulling the plug, you get punished for being male. And that's just the way the System works.
Since the majority of marriages end in divorce, and even most of those that don't aren't happy, ignoring the reality of the topic is not only not smart, it's very dangerous. BUT, it's your choice. When you get punished for it, I hope you remember this conversation, and try to help other men who are thinking of making that mistake.
You sound like I used to. I just wish my lesson in the truth hadn't been so expensive. The lost time is the worst part. I can make the money back in a couple years, the stuff is just stuff, but I can't have those years back.
I don't know what went down in your marriage, but your experience doesn't necessarily mean marriage itself is a bad thing.
I'll take advice from my parents who have been happily and closely marriaged since my mom was 17.
Couple of my siblings also got married and rarely have I seen the solid bond from the marriage of my oldest sister and now she has 3 kids.
My other sister is also happily married.
So? Should I hold back, because other people divorce or should I look at the successful marriages of the ones around me and take direction through them?
I think I'll take the latter.
@bo494
Me too, which is part of why it went a lot easier on me than it goes for most men. The facts that she wore herself out with the games she was playing, and the guy she'd been fucking around with called my lawyer and offered to testify on my behalf, didn't hurt either. Even with all that, it was still an expensive lesson.
Naz, you're taking the idealistic approach. Just because something worked for someone else, especially people in previous generations, doesn't mean it's going to work for you, ESPECIALLY what people in past generations did. The world is different, the System is different, and its laws are different.
Your best bet is to look at all the ways things COULD go. Then what the chance is of X happening, statistically. Come up with and implement a plan. Repeat for Y, Z, A, B, etc.
Just because you don't *think* your wife will Fuck the town drug dealer doesn't that it won't happen, or that she won't suddenly get 'bored' and frivorce you.
You might think that a natural disaster is unlikely, but still prepare for it, right? You have a spare tire, floor jack, and tire iron in your car just in case you get a flat tire? Same thing.
Hope for the best, prepare for the worst.
Well I don't know if those examples are really similar to marriage.
Marriage shouldn't be some big gamble.
You make it sound like marriage is someone starting a business with very high risk. They could either become very successful or lose it all.
And marriage shouldn't really be taken in that approach in my opinion.
Sticking to this business analogy, I think someone should start a business by taking it slowly and careful. No rush.
They lay out their options and after careful consideration they choose which business they want to pursue. (Choosing the right partner)
Then they build it up, carefully.
Put in a safe amount of stakes initially and wait to see whether it'd produce profit.
(Build the relationship with the person, investing a safe amount of time and money to determine whether she's right)
Then once they see profit they can use it to continue building the business, until they've locked it in and officially open as a successful name.
(Get married)
SURE, they can still fail in the future, but by taking it slow and surely they've established a solid foundation and any setbacks (marriage problems) can solved with more wiggle room, thanks to the foundation, to prevent the business to topple (divorce).
If they chose the right business (person), took the right steps to open that business (build relationship properly and choose to marry wisely), and then built a strong foundation in case of any problems (solving any marriage issues). Then they could live their life to the end with a successful business (marriage).
Now someone rushing in and choosing a bad business to follow (wrong person) OR improperly building a relationship (and so on)
Would properly find it much easier to have their business crashing down without the proper steps and ability to maintain it.
we do our bills on percentage of totally income. since I made more I paid more but now that I cut back he pays more.
In my opinion, married couples shouldn't do a 50/50 lifestyle. They should rather put their money together - each by their monetary capabilities - for things they buy for them both.
They should set up an shared bank account for splitting bills fairly while still maintaining personal accounts
Agreed.
You set up a budget. Some money for shared goes together, some personal money each. No, costs shouldn't be exactly 50/50.
In my case anyway, I pay 100 soooooo
Since she would probably not agree to a weighted percentage of income based upon level of effort, I would opt for a central pool, each with a % of each income for their own personal account not requiring approval from the other for purchases.
In the United States, for the most part, when a couple marries, all assets and income of both partners becomes communal, with some notable exceptions. So really, both partners put 100% into the pot, and then the two of them decide how to spend it. In reality though, of course, individual people do still retain some control over some assets. What I think should happen is that both parties make a decision together. Not for me to decide how YOU split bills in your marriage.
50/50, you cover this bill I'll get the next, I'm not doing well financially can you cover most of it and I'll make up the rest or pay you back, etc
Im dutch so we go dutch 😎
My parents just pay what comes in they dont care who pays it. My dad brings in most money now as my mom is working for free now on her multiple entrepreneurships so maybe in the future she will bring in most money as she did in the past.
If you still think you need to split the bills then there is something wrong with your relationship. If you are meant to be one, then you should be able to communicate well enough to arrange your economics... I know 2 couples that did something similar. One marriage lasted one year and the other couple has serious sexual issues (not physical). Anyways. Just my opinion.
It's the most democratic, but I would do it like my parents do. my mom earns less than dad and it would be really "rude" to want her to pay 50/50. they split it the way they need and have no problems at all. That's what I would do too
For every bill? It will mean one thing... this is not a good relationship to start if...
I'd go with someone who will take responsibility for electricity bill and water, while I pay for gas, food and extra maintenance bills.
The person who makes more should pay more. The person who makes less should pay less.
Generally yes. My mum pays for majority of bills in my family though as she is the breadwinner. I think whoever gets the most income should pay more, but definitely split the bill.
yes to some extent. Sometimes wife or husbands make more money and work more hours so in this case the one making more money should pay more and the other one who makes less money and works less hours should still pay but help more around the ouse like cleaning or cooking.
Personally I think it should be based on how much they make.
For example if I made twice as much as my wife, I would want to pay 2/3 of each bill. If she made twice as much as me, then she'd pay 2/3.
I understand the merit with this, but my wife and I find it far easier to put all of our money in one common account. We both have autonomy to spend money as we please (within reason... we're not buying anything huge without discussing it at least).
We've been doing it since the start: a common account, both incomes come there and all expenses are paid through that account. All our accounts are common accounts.
To me everything in a marriage is 50/50. Both of you are in the marriage not just one. If you both work then you both pay bills. if only one works then they pay bills and the other works around the house (cleaning, cooking, taking care of kids, etc).
Yes i believe if you have same amount of money... otherwise who ever earns most.. or whatever but to be honest for me personally i share my money with my partner and they do with me.. so its both are money anyway.
our*
Why are married couples keeping separate money. In a marriage paying should come down to just "money we have" and "money we don't have"
I don't think it matters. A lot of married people have a joint bank account so they isn't really any splitting. All the money gets put together.
I thought close relationships were built on mutual trust but based on all these other opinions I appear to be mistaken :/
I dont know... but for me when I marry someone his money is my money and my money is his... i don't see it as like "yours" and "mine". so sometimes I will pay and other times he will pay..
This depends on the arrangement of finances. If both parties have similar income, 50/50 split is feasible. If not, then it maybe more difficult.
It all depends Here, dear. To be Square and fair.
If Both are Working, it is Good to Make a Budget to Fit Everyone under the Sun, hun. If only One party is On the Job, then One is the Only One. xx
Sharing the same bank account means that it is both your money because since your married nothing is just yours but both of yours so therefore you are paying for it together I guess!
I think it's more healthy when there's not a set percentage. If both are working, I think it's best if both are willing to contribute but neither is obsessive about paying themselves or making the other pay their fair amount.
My parents have been married for over 35 years and they have their own accounts where most of their money is and a joint account for bills between them.
I'd probably do the same thing to be honest.
If I'm not mistaken, the marriage vows include the following words:
"for rich or for poor".
Which means you either share each other's wealth or you share each other's poverty. That's part of being married.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions