The way men keep Weaponizing marriage against women is ridiculous.
Marriage is a social construct created by undesirable men. It is social conditioning!
Ladies, why do you even believe in marriage?
What the fuck? In the US, statistically speaking, you only have a at best a 60% chance of getting married nowadays. It used to be around 90% just 10 years ago. Money problems are really that bad.
It's up to you. Marriages are a bargain. They always have been. If you live alone, you will end up spending more per capita with a lower return. If you marry, it can come at great emotional cost if you are unsatisfied with your relationship. This is your dilemma.
We trying to fix the finance shit part of it in the US. Trump is a major indicator of a major societal problem that needs addressing. Not sure what other countries are going to do. It seems like though when we jump, the world shakes.
Yep marriage is a negative. If you study the societies with the weakest men they have been practicing monogamous marriage for the longest.
Opinion
17Opinion
You know, some say that getting married to a betamale from "Fresh & Fit" is like getting eaten alive by the writhing, fleshy cocks in a horrormaaxxx hentai. Just when you think you're safe in your comfy cocoon, they slither in, seeking their next hapless victim. And as you gaze upon their twisted forms, beckoning you with promises of warm, snuggly love, your sanity begins to crumble, turning into a dank swamp of never-ending disappointment. Their laughable expectations become insatiable tentacles of oppression, tearing at your every whim and fetish. You become a mere host for the constant growth of their cocks, an abyss that devours the very life out of you, forever shrouded in a thick mist of monstrous deception. Wouldn't it be better to keep those chthonic monstrosities at bay, to forge your destiny with only the untamed horned gods of chaos and mayhem? Because once they penetrate your deepest, darkest secrets, they can never truly let you go. Forever lost in a miasma of sexual terror and betrayal, your every cry of ecstasy will only serve to strengthen their putrid cocks. It's a living nightmare where your soul's pleasure can never match the insatiable hunger of their thirsty, voracious tentacles.
In other words, these weak ugly men are full of shit and they talk shit, and they will forever keep on talking shit because it gets them money and grows their horror cock's ego.
Marry if you want, nobody must get married. We seem to have a program within that sometimes makes us want to shag one person and keep shagging them for years... eventually you still can't get enough of the same old asshole after decades, and in this case you may want to get married just for the fuck of it. In this scenario both assholes are getting married by choice. Nobody is coerced. If any degree of coercion exists then avoid the whole thing.
Also, don't fuck stupid people. Stupids and frogwater drinking horror cocks should be kept incels with no mercy. I think it's self explanatory.
What I don't understand is how can people spend... thousands of hours talking about the same shit. All there is.. must be just to make income from cult followers. They don't even make fucking sense. Is it female nature? Or is it indoctrination? They're kind of the total opposites, but the same people talk about both? Are women followers by nature? Then doesn't her poor behavior reflect your own bullshit? If women only chase the chad, does that mean you're obese and ugly? If women are selfish by nature, then why the hell are you still talking about it, since you can't change nature?
I mean some conversations that fall under "red pull" are good, especially for those who are "blue pilled" and need serious education about how gender is not a social constructs and the two genders are different. But from what I've heard, even majority of the "red pill" people calls Fresh & Fit shit talkers. #BoobSlayer
Look at the two trailer trash. Of course bottom dwellers like this "weaponize" marriage.
Just as how bottom dwelling sluts, whores, "gold diggers" looking for money from decent guys but who contribute little value except sex and/or looks do same to men.
.
Decent women and men do not "weaponize" marriage. It is supposed to be an alliance of two people for the betterment of each other and to cause a solid foundation upon which to build a family, raise children and ultimately in own way leave a legacy.
But trailer trash, bottom dwellers, good for little like this - and as said gold diggers / sluts - they simply pollute the concept of marriage / allegiance & are foul to the core.
Whoa... You might have mixed up men and women in this question. Both marriages and divorces are usually initiated by women, and a state-sanctioned "marriage" is a Death Star-class weapon against men, given what they stand to lose if it ends in a divorce. Look no further than the infamous case of a certain Amber a lot of people have Heard about for an example of how the "marriage" and divorce procedure usually plays out. Captain Johnny Depp got lucky, with His wealth allowing Him to hire the best lawyers available and His enormous stockpile of evidence against His divorce rapist, but in the end, His former partners might have saved Him with their testimony countering His divorce rapist's lies. Thus, He might have been saved by some decent women in the end. A man with no such support would have to be crazy to agree to a state-sanctioned "marriage".
Marriage is meant to ensure that almost every dude gets exactly one woman so that most can be content and lots of people contribute to the next generation.
Still, this institution only formalizes a wish for security and long-term commitment that most women naturally have already.
Even if marriage goes out of fashion, guys can still offer long-term commitment as their secret weapon.
I expect that this allows 70% of men to find a woman for long term. Marriage could achieve about 90% if enforced by shaming of singles and similar old-fashioned methods.
The average dude will still be fine.
I agree it is better to never marry and have made that decision.
I don't understand what you mean by Weaponize Marriage against women. Do you mean that we have standards on which women we might marry and which we won't if they don't meet those standards? That is just exercising free will and discretion to buy or not buy.
It is of course a nonsense to say it is weaponizing marriage to have a concept of what a good wife looks like. Particularly when women themselves have a dozen foolscap sheets with closely written requirements.
If you think men are undesirable if they they have standards and it is social conditioning to only marry women that meet those standards then deal yourselves out of the gene pool Ladies.
You have it backwards. Women initiate most divorces and cheat more often. They use marriage as a means of acquiring resources. The law ensures that women gain half of the man's resources. It's quiet common for famous women to marry someone richer than divorce him so they can get more money essentially doing nothing.
Men could not possibly "weaponize" marriage in this day and age. You're playing the victim.
I’ve never heard of such a thing…. Men weaponizing marriage (at least in the US / free, non-oppressed countries). I could see that thought if it were arranged marriages or similar.
Are trolling or just plain retarded? Marriage in the modern day gives women every advantage over men to the point it's equivalent to her having a loaded gun to the man's head. The family courts have made it so that men are often completely ruined in a divorce even if they did nothing wrong! A woman can literally get married to a man, cheat on him, have another guys kid, then divorce him, say he was abusive without any evidence, and get rewarded with the marital home, half his assets, alimony, and child support.
Actually, it's women who weaponize marriage. They're called serial divorcees. They marry a man, later apply for a court divorce, then get paid. And then the cycle continues.
It's insecure men and women who don't believe in marriage. Because marriage is a contract, a commitment between two people. And that commitment is something a lot of people are not disciplined enough to uphold. So they look down upon it and want everyone to do the same.
If you really understand the value of marriage, then your relationship with your spouse will be long lasting and blissful. But again, people are becoming more and more unchained and subjects to their desire. So it's hard to hold up the commitment.
I don’t know in my country not everybody gets married you can be happily together indefinitely. Usually women push for marriage and guys who want to make them happy go for it. It’s a lot less common though than it was because of well you know divorce 40/40/20 the last 20 for lawyers court fees in general.
you mean men are weaponizing marriage against women for the sake of being divorced by said women and having half their stuff taken away from them? not exactly what i'd call "weaponizing".
Actually it is vice versa, 80% of women SPECIFICALLY in United States are not weaponizing marriage, but Have weaponized marriage with literally deadly results.
Are men weaponizing marriage against women? Kinda feels like it happens the other way around more often.
It's not just us. Both parties have been slacking when in comes to marriage. But you're right, it shouldn't be for everyone because these sacred vows are not taken seriously anymore nowadays.
Huh?
aren't women doing that...
Also no. Marriage isn't made for undesirables. How can they get married if theyre undesirable?
And marriage is meant to put a leash on men
What do you mean by this I'm not really sure what you mean by it
And that is exactly why men don't even like to get married. It's because women weaponize marriage against men.
So, does that mean your parents shouldn’t have married and had kids? 🤔
You are generalizing too much!
it's not men, but both do that
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions