- 943 opinions shared on Other topic.
+1 yPast genes are in your DNA makeup... some become recessive and possibly fade away for them to later appear in generations past your children. It's like both parents having brown eyes but one parent has parents that have green eyes. The fact that someone had green eyes means that there is a very slim chance of later generations in the family getting green eyes... think of it like winning the lottery; your chances of winning are slim, but the more you play, the better your odds are. The more children you have the higher the chance one of them is going to have green eyes. Guess Punnet isn't your friend?
Also green eyes is a recessive trait. Brown is dominant. That's why most people happen to have brown eyes. It's incredibly dominant and it's evermore so common. Just like hair colors that aren't brown or black. Blonde and red are both recessive and uncommon hair colors and the odds of them showing up in the child are much lower than the brown or black hair. Now if everyone in the family had green eyes for about 10 generations, you're almost guaranteed to have a child with green eyes, but there's still a chance of brown eyes because of the Origins of the Species.01 Reply- +1 y
Fuck all that bullshit genetics my ass
Most Helpful Opinions
+1 yYou have 2 copies of most genes, some genes are dominant, some are receive, you can buy 2 rabbits, both coloured, mate them and about one in 4 of the babies will be albinos, albinism is a receive trait. Both parents had one albino gene and one normal gene. Half the normal babies will have 2 normal genes, half one normal gene and one albino gene. If you mate all the normal rabbits with albinos the rabbits with 2 normal genes will have only normal offspring, the rabbits with one of each will 50% normal and 50% albino offspring.
05 Reply- +1 y
I dont care anymore its all bullshit
- +1 y
Selenia1021 why the fuck did you asked about genetics if you don't agree with it, you piece of shit
- +1 y
@chewdiepie whateve🤘
- +1 y
fucking piece of shit American teen
- +1 y
@chewdiepie thankyou cunt
543 opinions shared on Other topic. Just say bif forehead was a trait coded by genetics. Each gene could have two variables called alleles (The gene coding for the size of forhead) one for larger forehead one for small. If both parents had large foreheads but the child did not it would suggest large forheads was the dominant (always expressed when they are present) allele and that both parents were carriers, passing down a recessive trait in the formation of the gametes. :)
07 Reply- +1 y
Can You explain it in a different way?
- +1 y
Do you know the myth that crusts make your hair curl? Pretend white ice cream makes your forehead big. The government allows you two ice creams that you can have every day. They choose the two types and this never changes (the alleles selected randomly). If you are allowed one white ice cream regardless kid the couloir of the other ice cream you will be given a large forehead.
- +1 y
That's wrong there's no point in genetics lol
- +1 y
Like i care
2.7K opinions shared on Other topic. Because there's dominant and recessive traits. Brown is dominant over green. Plus there's cross over which can make a new version of a gene which is when the weird stuff happens.
03 Reply- +1 y
Wym by "weird stuff" happens?
- +1 y
Ok ok
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
16Opinion
It all depends on the exact genetics of both parents. If one parent has hybrid genes and the other one both recessive then the child has 1/4 of a chance to get a small forehead. I can't really explain it in words, I'd have to show you but there isn't really a way. All I can say is that it all depends on the parents genes and how they interact. Or which gene is dominant and which one is recessive.
17 Reply- +1 y
Genetics is bullshit.
- +1 y
Still bullshit. I updated my question look at it please
- +1 y
So whats the point of two people making a baby if one trait will be passed on doesn't make sense
- +1 y
It is bullshit
+1 yGenetic mutation, or it could be a recessive trait (meaning there was a one in four chance the kid gets a smaller forehead).
The eyes thing is basically the same principal. If brown eyes are a more dominant trait, you’re more likely to get brown eyes.09 Reply- +1 y
So how tf do other kids get light eyes? . Genes are complete trash in reality.
- +1 y
Well one gene is more recessive than another gene, and the one is more recessive than another one, etc.
I think green eyes is defeated by brown eyes which is defeated by blue eyes, but don’t quote me on that. The genes come from both of the parents. - +1 y
So whats the point of a fuckin dominant gene if it won't come out?
- +1 y
It’s called a punnet square. Get out a sheet of paper and draw a 2x2 grid. On the top, write a small b on top of one column and then a capital B on the one next to it. On the left, write a small b on the top row and a capital B on the bottom row.
- +1 y
Starting from the top left, write the letter that is above that column and next to that row. The two letters on top represent the genes that the mom has and the two on the left represent the genes that the dad has. A capital B means blue, which is dominant because it is capital, and a small b means brown, which is recessive, and this is shown by being lowercase.
- +1 y
After you’ve filled in each square, you’ll notice that it comes out in this order:
bb, Bb
Bb, BB.
You’ll notice that only one out of four squares has entirely recessive traits, meaning that there is a 1/4 chance for brown eyes, while the dominant blue wins over the other 3/4 squares. If both of your parents have blue eyes, but they have a dominant and recessive trait, then there’s a 1/4 chance that you get brown eyes. This applies to almost every other trait. - +1 y
So your tryna basically say both my parents had mostly recessive traits?
- +1 y
I don’t know what traits are more recessive or dominant, I’m just using a made up example
- +1 y
I get it recessive traits are trash
You are missing the whole point of "stupid" genetics. We can carry genes for all different eye colours, but some are more dominant than others. If both parents have one of the dominant colours, the higher the chances that the offspring have that colour eyes, but it is not a certainty.
09 Reply- +1 y
Its all bullshit
- +1 y
If it was all bullshit, you wouldn't exist, and when you become ill, there will be nothing to help you recover. Where do you think medicines come from, and surgical techniques. A lot of it is based on genetics. And genetics do influence your bodily characteristics. To say it is bullshit is like saying you are going to give up eating altogether because nutrition is bullshit. It isn't, it's an explanation of how and why things happen.
- +1 y
Its stupid
- +1 y
Genes is a lie
- +1 y
I just dont give a shit
- 1K opinions shared on Other topic.
+1 yGenetics is a bunch of bullshit? Well, hello, Mr Hovind!
23 Reply- +1 y
Often part of the appearance is controlled by more than one gene. The phenotype would then appear a bit random to the observer. Actually, phenotype and genotype don't usually correspond perfectly anyway, so …
- +1 y
Genetics is a bunch of trash
- +1 y
If I was you I'd call it garbage because then you could be technically correct, even if it is a false equivocation.
+1 yWell, even the way you parents or grand parents or later like 1000 years ago use to think you get what they thought about, for example if your parents are from China and they hate people from Russia, then you will see that you hate those people too and opposite. If there's two islands and you PUT two smart couples in it they will change their life faster than those stupid couples on the other island.
02 Reply- +1 y
Wtf you talkin bout lol
- +1 y
You can't understand what I'm talkin bout, you need more time babe 🐸☻
+1 ythis girl is seriously pissed about having a huge forehead 😂 , as everyone is saying about recessive and dominant genes, look up your family photo album, maybe parents both have the dominant gene of having a small forehead, but there are some genes that might get transferred to the next-generation without showing up in the current generation, in my case I'm taller than both my parents, yet in my family my 2 cousins and one uncle are the only ones taller than me, my other 4 uncles and 1 aunt qre shorter than me or have a similar height to that of my parents so clearly me , my 2 cousins and my uncle got the gene which was dormant in others while it is dominant in our bodies
03 Reply- +1 y
Stfu
- +1 y
what more could i expect more a teenager?🙃
- +1 y
Whateva🤘
science is a lie, it's fabricated nonsense believable enough to pass and make you think it's true
112 Reply- +1 y
Yup yup
Each parent could have different traits Yy or yy or YY there are different ways to write them out but more or less if each parent passes on the recessive gene to the kid then they will have the smaller forehead
08 Reply- +1 y
Its all bullshit fuck genetics
- +1 y
Whats your concern
- +1 y
Thats not your concern
- +1 y
Whateva🤘
Dats coz d child is adopted... coz some traits come from ur parents genes... n if dats absent den.
14 Reply- +1 y
I'm starting to think these two parents had other sexual partners before making the child
- +1 y
Damn
There's literally just too much proof to genetics. It makes sense. People can look exactly like their parents, grandparents, or great grandparents or even later. Eye color/hair color/skin color/height. Everything makes sense in the science of genetics, it's not bullshit, sillygoose :)
02 Reply- +1 y
My asss
Some genes are recessive, some tend to bs dominant, and some tend to be the real daddie's.
11 Reply- +1 y
Its bullshit
+1 yWell it all depends on dominant or recessibe traits. Try looking up if a big/medium forehead is dominant or recessive and then use logic to determain which of your parents gave you the size forehead you have.
01 Reply- +1 y
I clearly just said NONE of them
444 opinions shared on Other topic. Um, it's not astrology, genetics is incredibly important in terms of physical, behavioural traits as well as disease. Yes certain things can be random mutations and others are rare (one red head in a family of brunettes) but it's a powerful science.
02 Reply- +1 y
to answer your update upload.wikimedia.org/.../...wn_x_homoblue.svg.png\
brown is a dominant trait, so if the parent is homogenous brown eyed carrier, no matter what their child will have brown eyes. Again it's slightly more complex because there are around 10 genes controlling eye colour but this is the basis of genetics. - +1 y
If you ask me its all bullshit
+1 yGenetics is a lie born from communism
13 Reply- +1 y
Damn right
- +1 y
go do your homework kid, don't talk about stuff you don't have a slightest idea about
- +1 y
@chewdiepie Go suc a huge mandingo
2.1K opinions shared on Other topic. friends with benefits different forehead appear
11 Reply- +1 y
Exactly what I had in mind
2.1K opinions shared on Other topic. There are dominant traits, and recessive traits. Often, recessive traits are passed on.
22 Reply- +1 y
Its bullshit lies
+1 ySo that the child is never lost and the parents can tell which one is theirs when they place all the neighbourhood babies in the sandbox
07 Reply- +1 y
She asked why WOULDN'T the child have the same trait.
- +1 y
Yeah... I don't get ur point.
I answered her question... the child wouldn't come out with the same trait because mother nature doesn't want u to lose the child - +1 y
Makes no sense, you clearly don't get it.
- +1 y
@Nicole_Is_Bored She's clearly retarded dont u see lol
- +1 y
Eh, she's 12, what do you expect?
- +1 y
😂😂😂 u guys are both whores... what do u expect from a couple of idiots who use the word retard and think that this is a forum for u to act as headmistress? Get off my back u heavy ass hoes
- +1 y
Look at her nickname she should be the last one talking about "whore" this pathetic piece of trash. GAG needs to kick out these little kids.
Even though that trait is dominate. There is still a small chance that a less dominate trait can be passed down the gene pool
08 Reply- +1 y
Its all bullshit tbh
- +1 y
Its all nonsense & shit
- +1 y
So wats the point of dominant traits if mostly recessive traits are passed on?
- +1 y
Cus birth is a bunch of bullshit
- +1 y
Stfu
874 opinions shared on Other topic. He might not be the father lol
05 Reply- +1 y
I believe he is but I believe some other kinda sperm was there 😂 from a different guy
- +1 y
Babies never look like their fathers. If you knew he was a "cookoo in the nest you'd kill him. Why do we even use that expression? There are over 200 species of cookoo, only about twenty lay their eggs in other birds' nests, by not resembling their fathers babies are protected from infanticide.
- +1 y
@BigHairySack Are u being funny
- +1 y
Seriously, I was watching Q. I. and Stevan Fry said mist Coocoo's are not brood parasites.
+1 yGenetic mutation. Did they ever teach you about evolution in your school?
13 Reply- +1 y
Uh noo lol
- +1 y
Must have been a bad school...
- +1 y
Still dont give a fuc😂
You didn't learn about genes in school?
05 Reply- +1 y
Not really
- +1 y
Bunch of trash
- 397 opinions shared on Other topic.
+1 yMight skip generations.
01 Reply- +1 y
What do you mean
I don't think so...
02 Reply- +1 y
You dont think what?
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
Most Helpful Opinions