If both were in danger and you had the potential to save both (but no guarantee), who do you go to save first?

#WhatsTheScenario You’re the driver of an uber/ride share. Your next passengers are coincidentally your significant other/crush and some parent with a kid around age 3-5. He/She asks to sit in the front while the parent and kid take the backseat. On the way to the destination, someone runs you off the road and you crash through the rail, off the bridge and into a deep lake. You turn out fine but the car is filling with water. Your crush/SO is knocked out in the front seat and their seatbelt is jammed. The parent died on impact and the child is awake but freaking out since their seatbelt is jammed, their shoulder is dislocated, and their parent is dead. The car is sinking terribly fast. There is a chance that you could save both if the car hasn't sunk into the deep by then. Who are you saving first?
#FeelFreeToList #DeepDecisions
Updates
+1 y
I always let guys know early on that our future kid should come 1st especially if in danger. So if an SO didn't expect me to go save this (random) child first then i wouldn't be able to live with him anyways. I’d come back for him if i have a sharp rock or something to cut his seatbelt. Otherwise i’d call up to the bridge to see if help has arrived. My heart goes out to kids and always will. But it hurt that a boyfriend once told me that he’d save the kid CAUSE he’d make a better parent
If both were in danger and you had the potential to save both (but no guarantee), who do you go to save first?
Post Opinion