If a woman *seriously* hits me and thinks I won't hit her back then I'm going to hit her twice as hard as I normally would a guy.
1.7K opinions shared on Other topic. Then you are not a fucking adult and deserve the assault charge and two grand odd fine.
When someone weaker is hitting you, then you give them a few shots before taking them out. Not only does it make your defence stronger in court. But it proves to them that you were the strong and gave them ample opportunity to walk away.
Doesn't matter if it's woman, kid, dog or an American. You never go all out over a mere aggressive touch. That is just not civilised behaviour.
01 Reply
Most Helpful Opinions
- 899 opinions shared on Other topic.
+1 yIn theory I agree. Mess with the bull you get the horns right? None of this “but I’m a woman” crap. Don’t want to be hit, don’t hit people. Simple.
However unless you are actively defending yourself, self defense won’t be an accepted answer legally, it which case you could be in trouble legally/criminally. Also, I feel morally unless you are actively defending yourself there is no justification for violence.17 Reply- +1 y
Oh, please. If a 1 pound rat runs towards a woman - whether she's the biggest animal lover in town or not -- she will beg/order/demand that the nearest male kill it on the spot. But you're going to believe it's morally wrong to stomp on a 130-170 pound woman who is acting nuts? It's morally wrong to attack someone without provocation. That's the entire reason why it's also legally wrong to do that & it's legally allowed to defend yourself. For men what it really means is you need to drop her in 1 punch so nobody stupid on the jury can think you did too much.
- +1 y
I’m not saying that at all. I’m saying by all means men should physically defend themselves, but there is a difference between defense and retaliation.
“Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: but I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.”
Matthew 5:38-39 KJV
The above is not a call to pacifism. It’s simply saying don’t repay evil for evil. Retaliation would be evil. Self defense to stop an active and ongoing physical attack would NOT be evil and in fact I encourage it, regardless if it’s a woman. I also have 0 empathy or 0 sympathy for any woman who attacks a guy and gets throttled.
Then there’s the matter of the law. If a woman hits you, and doesn’t continue the attack it’s no longer self defense and the guy is gonna get held accountable almost always.
So that’s why I say what I’m saying. I’m not saying a woman who only hits once and doesn’t keep up the attack doesn’t deserve to get blasted. She does but at that point it’s the right thing to do to walk away, and that would be from a man or a woman. However anyone persisting in an attack should be immediately suppressed by any and all means necessary without regard for their safety. Whatever is expedient to end the attack should be done. - +1 y
No biggie. That’s true he did. Perhaps your right. As I always say, ass whippings teach lessons.
- +1 y
Today we say, don't hit first because we associate that with being wrong. But in the past if anybody acted crazy or talked crazy they got slapped in the face by random bystanders. Seems this worked better than today's system of claiming that if anyone acts crazy they need a therapist & pills. We have more nut jobs walking around and harming others than ever before. Yes, in a relationship we can talk instead of slap. I would just dump a woman who is continually a problem & refuses to fix it.
- +1 y
And maybe my 'dump' comment hints at a difference too. People probably felt responsible to keep others in line with social norms in the past. Now we have the option of saying, 'it's not my problem'. And as you say, there's legal consequences to making some things our problem. People/government have made a mess of society.
- +1 y
I fully agree with you. You got out of line, you got a slap. I’d prefer to return to this. We had a more orderly society when everyone participated and we had basically standard morals throughout society. Social norms if you will. I wish to see a return to this.
Agreed. Government has made a mess of things.
- 815 opinions shared on Other topic.
+1 yI think you should hit anyone back if they give you serious injury, irregardless of gender. You don't have to hit them twice as hard tho, coz I think the entitlement things is limited to the western women mindset. You cannot generalise that every woman feels that way.
12 Reply- +1 y
I think I can count the amount of non-western women I have met on a single hand, so when I talk about women I'm talking about women within my absolutely massive country that is almost as large as Europe.
- +1 y
Like I said, it's okay to hit back
4.9K opinions shared on Other topic. If someone hits you anywhere, you should hit back. End of story.
10 Reply
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
17Opinion
The issue is how can you tell 100% if she assumed you'd not hit her back? But how can you tell she won't hit you again or pull out a knife next? She showed willingness to attack and seriously harm you and you have every right to prevent her from doing any further harm. No matter the gender the goal shouldn't be to teach them some lesson but to make sure they can't do anything else to hurt you in that moment. If that requires you to hit them 10x as hard, break their arm etc. so be it. If you wanna get in a fight or hit someone and mean business you should make sure they can't get back at you. No matter if you react or start the physical confrontation.
11 ReplyMen who have been physically abused are often the ones to get arrested if they call the police. Remember that before you decide to fight back.
22 Reply- 1K opinions shared on Other topic.
+1 yI believe in equality. I’ll hit anyone back who hits me first. I’m definitely going to hit them hard enough that they regret hitting me. I’m talking about randos though. Every woman i ever dated hit me out of anger multiple times. I only ever hit one back. I’m lucky she realized she brought it on herself.
FYI, if you end up in prison, you WILL be somebody’s bitch. So you might want to rethink your position on the matter at hand. Ell oh ell!00 Reply
+1 yIt's funnier if you dodge and cause them to hurt themselves. Like by letting them break their hand or foot on a concrete wall.
Not that that's ever happened to me... On camera... Before LoL12 Reply3.7K opinions shared on Other topic. I do agree a man has the right to hit back especially since a lot of women think we're equal. So if you're gonna hit a mannprepare for one to hit back lol But I am fully against a man attacking a women and domestic violence.
But I don't think their has ever been a women unless she 5150 that has ever really thought she could hit me.
10 Reply871 opinions shared on Other topic. A real man has to hit back harder for the simple fact that he's not a woman. Women are physically weaker. If he wants to hit like a woman then he should put on some lipstick, a dress and become one of a fugly transgenders.
11 Reply- +1 y
The thing suckers don't get is that a woman will only physically attack dudes who don't defend themselves. I've even heard a woman who I know did that to guy X, talk about how she'd never do it to a guy who would smack that makeup off her face. No, I wouldn't stay in a relationship with a woman who got physical. She's damaged & it's not worth the risk that she gets a weapon.
+1 yBeing a woman does not give her the right to abuse you. If she hits you first, you are a victim and have the right to defend yourself. So yeah, strike back. I did it once in school.
10 ReplyFor me it depends on context. I typically wouldn’t hit a woman, but if it’s defending yourself from a stranger that attacked first then I’d fight for my life
10 Reply
+1 yAbsolutely but avoid the face. The law treats men and women differently so even though she was the perpetrator who assaulted you the law law will come after you espicially hard if you give her a taste of equality.
11 Reply
+1 yHit her back if she hits you but don't be sexist. If you're going to hit a male the way they hit you then do the same for women.
10 ReplyUnless the person, a guy or a girl, is an actual threat I just walk away. I am not going to seriously injure someone who is not a threat just because he or she is being stupid.
20 ReplyCall for backup...
10 ReplySelf defense is self defense. Do what you gotta do. But females are usually smaller and there fore require less power to knock out. So you may want to conserve your energy for the guy.
10 Reply2.8K opinions shared on Other topic. Context is key…
can you step away? Can you hold her down? Legally, she slaps you and you punch her, breaking her nose…. you may be charged.
00 Reply301 opinions shared on Other topic. Why twice as hard?
As hard I get, twice as hard, not so much.14 Reply3.8K opinions shared on Other topic. Bad idea - you will get in very serious legal trouble. Walk away.
07 Reply- +1 y
I don't care man, I reserved the right to get violent if somebody gets violent with me first. I don't care if you're the president or the most important person in the world, you throw hands with me I'm going to lay you out or die trying.
I'm not anybody's bitch and I would rather die on my feet than live on my knees.
3.2K opinions shared on Other topic. As if. Is this a fantasy of yours?
05 Reply- +1 y
@slaytyb
I’m sure it’s no one’s fantasy. There is a simple principal at work here. The fact that a woman would be on the receiving end of violence makes absolutely no difference. The principal is if you initiate physical violence and get your ass kicked as a result, you can no longer claim: “I’m weaker, I’m a child, I’m and old man, but I wear glasses, or I’m a woman.” It is unacceptable to initiate physical violence, especially with someone who you know will kick your ass and then try to hide behind some societal status of being weaker. That’s the bottom line. When a person goes down that road they have to expect retaliation and no excuse is acceptable. When you put your hands on someone there will be violence in return most of the time. If said person who is weaker got their ass kicked, too bad. They should have weighed out the possible outcomes better before they tired that.
You want to make him out to be a woman beater or desiring girl be and act as if his stance is unreasonable. What is actually unreasonable and illogical is you seem to want to give a sarcastic quip here. You mess with the bull, you get the horns. This is the law of the jungle. It’s that simple. People don’t get the right to initiate physical violence and then try to hide behind some societal protected status. It doesn’t work that way and if you think it does I suggest you re-examine your position for logic. If I pick a fight with someone that’s stronger then me, say Chuck Liddell, and take a swing at him, I don’t get claim after the fact: “Chuck’s a pro fighter, it’s unfair he kicked my ass, he should have showed restraint.” In such an instance I should have kept my hands to myself to start with and there wouldn’t have been an issue. - +1 y
@Exterminatore man I wish I could give that comment you just made MHO.
- +1 y
@jux
Thank you sir!
+1 yI do not approve, you should take it.
00 Reply
+1 yI approve.
10 Reply
How Receptive Are Women To Being Hit On?
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
Most Helpful Opinions