The "I trust you, I don't trust them" Theory

The

I just wrote a myTake about Why girls shouldn't blame their boyfriends for being jealous, and one of the main reasons was that, most of the time, guys trust their partners but not the other guys (that hit on their girls, or don't). Most girls who read that were like "why would they worry about what other guys would wanna do to their girls as long as they trust their girls to reject them?".

Here's why this is bullshit.

I come from a 'traditional' family. Whenever I was invited to some party or a guy friend's house, I needed to take permission from my parents. When it came to hanging out only with guys, normally, my mom wouldn't reject if I've known the guys for quite a while. But if I just met them, or if we hadn't known each other for a long time, my mom would say no. In these kinda situations, I used to keep telling her "don't you trust me?". And she always answered with "I trust you. But I don't trust them". She doesn't know them. Who knew what might happen? I don't even blame her for thinking that way since, okay, I might know them, she might not. A mother loves her daughter more than anything and cares about her more than anyhing that she doesn't wanna risk seeing if something bad might happen to her daughter or not. Now, I know your parents aren't that strict so, don't judge and don't comment.


They might put something in my drink without me noticing.
They might get drunk and if I'm the only girl there, well, use your imagination.
They are plenty of stuff that might happen in these kinda situations.

You say, who cares what some dude does to your girl as long as you trust her and know she'll reject him?

Well, guess what, it could be too late for the girl to reject him when he'd already made his move on her. Most answers here were "Who cares? He trusts her". Well, guess what, even if he did trust her, he'd still be bothered if some other guy approached her or made a move on her. Simply because they're in a relationship and simply because she's his. Now, don't misunderstand me, there's a difference between believing his lover is his "property" or simply his. This has nothing to do with being overprotective. And I repeat, there's nothing wrong with guys wanting thier girlfriends to be only theirs and touched only by them (by "touched", i dont mean touching her hand/shoulder/cheeks/etc- the normal stuff).

Some girls also said: "If there are men that are fantasising about me, it's MY call to tell them to fuck off if they approach, not my boyfriend's place to "protect me" by telling me who I should or shouldn't interact with based on his assessment of said men."

In relationships, there's something called "communication". IF you boyfriends tried to tell you "don't talk to him" or "don't be friends with that guy", then that's another story. This would mean your guy is being irrational. And so, this could simply (maybe it's not that simple - depends on the guy) be resolved by talking to your guy and eventually reaching an acord with him. If he's stubborn, then it's your choice to do whatever floats your boat.

In these situations, "jealousy" isn't the right term to use since guys get more pissed off than jealous.

If you truly love that person, it doesn't fucking matter that you know your gf/bf will reject them. You're still gonna be fucking pissed off as long as they are around that person... something called human nature. ~ @AryaP

The

Thanks for reading/understanding! - or not understanding - but at least I tried.

The "I trust you, I don't trust them" Theory
Post Opinion