
All you want
All they had
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age

I suppose I’d want him to offer that, give all he had but then I’d tell him to keep it, we share all we both have, or something else.
It’s sad to me- but it’s also genuine too.
At the same time this can be painted and biased. Some guys don’t try in life and learn to live off little and think the lady they’re with (in the case they don’t really care for her) think she’s only good enough to have what he gives her. What he’s got. Even if it’s a refrigerator of roaches. So it depends on the guy’s mentality. I don’t think it can be answered in a surface / face value level. With this meme, we root for Tom, but there’s guys out there who think some lady is easy and manipulative and he’ll just give her scraps he’s used to and not think she deserves better or want to give her better. If he mentioned that- you know, more context between them, then we could make a better decision.
Besides I’d want the man I love to be happy and able to get things he wanted too, and not to give me his and give his valuables up. He and I may not value his things the same way. Say he has some collection worth money and he gave it as a gift but she sold it? They don’t value it, or even if she wasn’t so rude she just shelved it and that was all?
I think for me the ideal situation in this society is that he can make himself happy first but his own fries and not share out of obligation (only if he wanted to or so), and he would be willing to learn about me and gift me things I desired as well- THOUGH it really wouldn’t be his responsibility at all. If we both made good money and had decent things, it’d be nice if we both got each other what each had wanted and not just giving them anything.
In the case of being slightly impoverished or in lack it ultimately ULTIMATELY depends on his intentions.
Even in the case with the guy who can afford much because he could easily blind her and it all mean nothing to him if he just gets her what she wants just to use her and then dump her. Like it’d be so horrible if he thought he could just buy girls… :[
So it’s really NOT about what any of them have. Guy or girl. Not even in real world context how much they make or so.
It will always, always be the intentions that they have and what they value. True lovers would respect what the other loves in material or ideals and value those because of it or simply value their partner’s fondness of those things and true lovers in any scenario would have the best intentions with WHAT EVEE they gift/give/ share with their partner.
Seeing the worth in their partner, and not trying to buy their affection of body. Major no no.
All I want because then it means they’re already in a place to be able to support themselves emotionally, physically, and financially. If it’s everything you have, it could honestly mean they don’t have much and I’m the burden for asking and taking.
Neither. Dealing with such absolute fools is never worth it.
Dealing with a fool giving all you want makes you a golddigger. But will end tragically for you when they also expect more value back, and you cannot provide.
Dealing with a fool giving all they had will make you a laughing stock. Mainly for having such low self esteem and self worth. You will both starve together, as love pays no bills, and have kids who will hate you for it even more.
Neither … they are both absolutes, with overtones of total surrender and or sacrifice. That doesn't really fit with my idea of what a healthy relationship is. A relationship or life in general may contain elements of both because of a trade off but in absolute terms its complete submission. nothing about that fits
Ah, diving into the deep end of love's pool, aren't we? Here's the thing: being with someone who gives you all they have is like having a partner who's all in - heart, soul, and Netflix password included. It's about them sharing their authentic self, the good, the bad, and even the ugly cries during rom-coms. On the other hand, someone giving you all you want sounds dreamy, but real talk, it can lead to a one-sided fairytale where you might end up playing the villain. True connection? It's about being real, sharing struggles, and growing together. So, I'd say, let's go for all they have - it's where the real magic happens! 🌟
Opinion
8Opinion
I think it should be for both to be satisfied. Someone who gives all he had will only benefit the woman or he may not satisfy her. A man who has more than enough can satisfy her and satisfy himself for satisfying her. But of course it always depends on how needy the girl is. If she is too needy that it gets to the point that a wealthy man got satisfy her isn't the right woman.
I am not after things
never would be... materialistic
Neither. I would rather be on my own in order to give myself and my loved ones all that I want and have.
I would not want my partner to struggle for me or hurt himself for me. I would take someone who could afford to give me what I want and need.
With someone who supported me earning what I wanted for myself.
All they had but I would never want to leave the person totally broke
All you want, I'm greedy, time is money, yum yum yum 🤤😋 (written for comedic effect) 🙃
And it's funny, as I'm a socialist. I'm not a fan of capitalism man, lol 😔😆 like *the man* or *man* lol 😂😆 ♂️ 🤑🤑🤑😂
I'm not greedy, I'd only want what I want from her.
You never actually get everything you want... It's a never ending loop, id take all they had every time
im not materialistic
At the end of the day it’s the same outcome
sometimes yes, but it's a give and take in most...
I think I'd rather keep what I had and be single.
I'm not materialistic
these both suck lol
You can also add your opinion below!