Religion & Spirituality

On the Foolishness of the Atheist Position

I will hereby debunk several Atheistic Creation myths.

On the Foolishness of the Atheist Position

the Maximum Universe.

As I've argued elsewhere, the Universe we live in is Maximized. It never lies, it never breaks any of its own internal laws (copernicus), it never breaks any law of logic or any conceivable self-consistent creator (Aquinas) and it never breaks any conceivable law of any conceivable nested reality it could possibly be a part of, therefore the Universe itself exibits the property of perfect righteousness. Moreover, all particles inside the Universe are maximized. For example, it is inconceivable that a "better" Proton could be created under the same laws and constants of this Universe or under the same age and size of this universe, and the lifespan of the Proton is inconceivably long, and the fact that Protons decay does not take away from the Laws of Physics, as the laws of physics actually cause the decay, and it doesn't take away from the True Creator, because not even an Almighty Being is even hypothetically capable of creating a past-eternal or future eternal space-time continuum, because such a thing logically cannot exist (Guthe et al). Moreover Free Moral Agency does not take away from the Universe, nor does it violate any law of Logic, so Free Moral Agency adds to the perfection of the Universe and adds to it's maximization.

The only thing that could conceivably create a Maximized Universe is an Almighty Being.

The False Science of the Accidental/Random Universe

Atheist physicists like to claim, for example, that reality could be an accident or random or chance. If the Universe happened by accident, it would not be expected to obey it's own laws. It would be expected to break its own laws roughly half the time. And if the Universe were an accident, it would not be expected to obey precisely known elegant mathematical equations nor any other form of logic. Moreover on average non of the Universes attributes would be maximized if it were a random accident. You would expect all of the Universe's attributes to be half-assed if it were in fact a random accident, and due to the fine structure constant being violated, such a random universe would not be capable of supporting any conceivable life form, much less biological life or intelligence.

The False Science of Nothing

I thought we put this to rest with Rene Descartes "From Nothing comes Nothing." the claim that all of the positive eneryg in the universe cancels negative energy in the universe and adds up to nothing is FALSE. there is only a miniscule, miniscule trace of negative energy in the real universe, NONE of it is known to be "primal". That is the Big Bang did not create the negative energy known to exist. the negative energy known ot exist is created in the binding energy of Neutrinos and a few other particle interactions. The claim is FRAUD. To knowingly lie to the scientific community is a FRAUD. Moreover, even if everything came from "zero" the equation itself is not "nothing". The equation is a logical, mathematical expression that would necessarily fulfill John 1:1 of the eternal Logos being the True Creator....but we know that was NOT the real manner of creation, because we KNOW there is not that much negative energy in the real Universe, so we know reality did not come from canceling positive energy with negative energy. And Nothing All All cannot create anything. Even if we allowed the postulate that "something" might come from nothing at all, which is ridiculous in itself, you would expect nothing at all to create a minimized reality. Turns out nothing at all is a minimized reality. So the only thing nothing can conceivably create is nothing at all, a minimized reality.

The False Science of Classical Chaos

If Classical Chaos were literally the First Cause, not to be confused with the "chaotic state" I ascribed to God a few days ago, but if Classical Chaos were the First Cause, then we would expect to live in a Chaotic Universe, ignoring the fact that no conceivable biological life form could ever exist in such a reality, and a Chaotic Universe would have no laws at all, except randomness again, and since randomness is predictable in spite of following no laws, we would not expect there to be elegant mathematical equations and elegant logic describing reality, and we would on average expect the Universe's attributes to be half-assed again, like classical randomness alone, and we would not expect any of the Universe's attributes to be maximized, such as any form of law or righteousness, or the ability to house Free Moral Agent beings. and most importantly we would not expect the Copernican Principle to exist if the Universe was created by true Chaos...but we have 8 or 9 Sigma proof that the Copernican Principle exists in the real material Universe, and every other layer of reality no matter how nested reality is as it has already been proven to be consistent with every known Multiverse theory too. We only need 5 Sigma proof to consider the Copernican Principle a "Scientific Law".

So anybody claiming the Universe could have come from accident, nothing, or chaos is not being scientific. They are a LIAR, and if they call themselves a Scientist, they are KNOWINGLY LYING TO YOU. And if that isn't a Crime then it should be, because they use these provably false arguments to try to overthrow your God-given RIGHT to worship the True Creator.

On the Foolishness of the Atheist Position
Post Opinion