Does Mitochondrial Eve hint towards Creation holding more plausibility than Evolutionary roots?

[Plitty-Tank]

This is a representation of what Eve looked like of most probability. This was based on traced back DNA.

Doctor Georgia Purdom was able to trace DNA back to the start of mankind and yield that we indeed were created and not evolved from lesser species into humans. Are you shocked?

Much research shows that we are created and that we all descended from a pair of parents. How glad are you that we hold this evidence and do you accept it? If this is indeed true, will you openly be glad or wish it wasn't so?

Please share the flaws in this researched findings if you feel it didn't meet authentic science on created humans!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_Eve

It maximally does

It greatly does

It does

It maximally doesn't

It greatly doesn't

It doesn't

[Deathraider]

You do know the wiki link you gave, if you look a bit further, it says “The name "Mitochondrial Eve" alludes to biblical Eve, which has led to repeated misrepresentations or misconceptions in journalistic accounts on the topic. Popular science presentations of the topic usually point out such possible misconceptions by emphasizing the fact that the position of mt-MRCA is neither fixed in time... nor does it refer to a "first woman", nor the only living female of her time, nor the first member of a "new species".”

Also the thing is that there were plenty of human females living at that time, along with plenty of human males. The Y chromosomal Adam didn’t live at the same period as well. These two concept just means that our mitochondria and Y chromosomes can be traced back to a person we all happen to be related to.

[meesegoMoo]

C'mon man! Why? I know that you know better. This is dumb. We mustn't resort to things like this. We need much stronger evidence before making that claim otherwise we might affect the opposite of our intent.

[Plitty-Tank]

Don't we need evidence of evolution too and not just adhere to it because we were told so?

[meesegoMoo]

We have much evidence for evolution. It's so far the best supported thing we have. It does have some holes, and those need to be studied further. Blindly holding to ANYTHING isn't science. Many do hold to it simply because of their distaste for religion.

[Meropatrick]

Eve had bloodshot eyes? What? was she and Adam snorting some cociane

[Plitty-Tank]

Great point. I suppose that's how sin affected her ageing and life.

[genericname85]

there's no mitochondial eve. the mitochondrium itself is the father of humanity.

[OtterMan68]

no, because she goes back millions of years

[strateguy632]

2nd.,