There is no consolidated force of men who are commited to the goal of male liberation and the empowerment of ordinary men. There is no male centric establishment of any kind advocating singularly on behalf of the needs, rights and interests of men -- heterosexual ones, at least. Need proof?
If there were, the Tiger Woods drama would certainly look a lot different. Men's rights activists would have seen this scandal immediately for what it is. Yet, we see another anti-male witch hunt lead by self-serving opportunists to present men as villains and women as victims and to amuse themselves destroying a man's life just because they can. Men's rights spokesmen would have engaged the mob and presented an alternative analysis that most men come up with on their own using common sense, only this time backed up by an institutional power in the form of a men's rights establishment.
Let me show you how this process works by giving you an example of how the feminist establishment responds when a woman finds herself in the court of public opinion for some wrongdoing. I will use the example of when a woman murders her husband for no justifiable reason. The feminist propaganda machine goes into overdrive. The dead man, unable to defend himself because he is dead, is portrayed as a two-timing abuser who put the murderess in fear of her life. She's given sympathetic treatment as a long-suffering wife who snapped after years of abuse. Her murderous conduct is deemed to be the totally uncharacteristic action of a desperate woman who had nowhere to turn. We are then asked to view a psychopathic killer as a victim, simply because she is a woman.
However, Tiger Woods, who didn't hurt anyone, and was himself a victim of violence, finds himself the victim of a massive media feeding frenzy where skank after dirty skank slithers out of the pondscum she normally lives in to claim her 15 minutes and pound of flesh. Every man hating lesbian and heterosexual woman alike jump on their moral high horse to sermonize to us about male cheating. Yet no one stands up and points out to them that women cheat just as often as men, and for the exact same reason as men -- to satisfy lust. Prefixing the word male before the word cheating is just another example of how women connect a given wrongdoing with being male and eventually force us to consider accepting that wrongdoing as an exclusively male trait. I digress. However, I'm outraged by this. If you're a man, you should be too.
However, like Tiger Woods, I am powerless to bring the full force of a men's rights establishment crashing down on those who treat men and men's lives as a sponge to soak up all of society's sins -- because there is no such thing. The reason for that is very simple. We, as men, and by men I mean normal, able-bodied, heterosexual men of at least average intelligence, have not come together to address the problems we face as men: i.e. the things that happen to us because we are men and the way we are treated because we are men. We haven't developed an ideology or philosophy that comes directly out of our experience, which would challenge the feminist assault on maleness and equip young men and boys with the language to deal with their critics. There are no men's studies departments in schools or universities. So boys are sent out into a male-hostile world, unarmed, and totally unprepared for the onslaught of hatred and exploitation they will face as they try to make their way. This results in males being raised only to respect women and to mistrust other men, rather than to compete at the highest levels in the scramble to acquire wealth and resources necessary to keep a people viable and strong.
Can someone with a brain please tell me how respecting women will make men better off? Will it put a roof over our heads? Will it put food on our tables? Will it educated us? Will it give us jobs? Will it pay our bills? Will it protect us from violence? No, it won't do a damn thing for us. It will simply just turn us into drooling, female-idolizing sex-beggars.
Men in general haven't challenged their traditional male role. That which is nothing more than a littany of burdens, responsibilities and obligations owed to others and sacrifices we are expected to make for others -- especially women. We are still bound by the same standards that society imposed on men over half a century ago. Meanwhile, women have been totally released from those that were imposed on them. This has made the relationship between the sexes a one-way transaction where men are expected to service women's needs with no reciprocal of obligation on women, prescribed by law or by custom, to service any male need.
We never hear the male side of any story. Why? Because articulate male voices of descent against feminist-driven mainstream orthodoxies are completely censored out of the media. Clearly, their fear is that if enough men came to understand just how unfair the deal that society gives them is, they would rightly rise up and rebel against it. We've seen it many times before. Any man who uses his position of authority to call for a saner or more balanced dialogue in gender issues is shouted down by viscious feminist attack dogs. On the rare platform available to us to air our side, we are stalked and harrassed by lunatics, as I have personally experienced.
So the only story ever told is how badly men treat women. A story approved and co-signed by a flock of manginas, sex-beggars, and queen worshipers -- all cowardly and desperate men who allow their character and manhood to be defined by women's values -- no matter what those values are. We have no means to communicate our ideas to boys and young men before these unethical influences have had a chance to work on their minds. And this is how we end up exactly where we are now -- with few men being able to purge themselves of the brainwashing that indoctrinates us that men are bad. There is no group of men delivering an uncompromisingly pro-male message, that which does not sacrifice any individual man or group of men, to appease those who harbor an anti-male agenda. This means, for the masses of men, that we are subject to limitless defamation; being used and abused by everybody on the moral ladder, from the highest office in the land right down to the trashiest prostitute. There are no consequences for slandering men, no outrage, no reprisal. Few men are courageous enough to face our critics and tell them about themselves without compromising or selling out. Thus, we are an easy target for every degenarate with an anti-man axe to grind. If you want to make some cheap political capital, then all you need to do is portray yourself as taking a zero tolerance stance on some social problem -- preferably one associated men, such as: crime or fatherlessness. If you want to present yourself as an outspoken critic of all that is wrong in society, then all you need to do is bleat endlessly on about how men are causing them. If you're a woman looking to deflect responsibility away from your own screw-ups, blame it on a man.
This is why this gender war started by women must be fought. We need to fight it from our own platforms. Too many have agendas that have nothing whatsoever to do with male rights or liberation. What we've had up until recently is domination by one side and total capitulation by the other in all matters to do with gender. Men have uncritically accepted the feminist analysis of gender relations, which is why we find ourselves ever more marginalized -- except when they're looking for someone to levy tax increases on or can not afford to go fight some war to protect the interest of a wealthy elite. We need to expand this gender war and fight feminism on every frontier. Don't let any illiterate buffon tell you that the gender war is a fiction just because it isn't being fought in the streets...yet. That is not where the gender war is fought at it's most fierce. It's fought behind closed doors, in the institutions of society. In the halls of government, in schools and on university campuses, in the family course, the workplace, the homeplace and in the media. It's fought by people who have almost 100 years head start on any men's rights opposition.
I, along with other men's rights groups I am a part of, have no interest in improving relations between the sexes. I have no interest in sorting through the masses of self-serving, hypocritical women, simply to find one "good" woman or a "good little wife" that I can lead. There is no such thing as a "good woman" and there never was. The only difference between today's generation of women and women of prior generations is in behavior, not character. In the past, female behavior was strictly regulated -- and that was what kept them in check. Today, no one holds women accountable for anything, which has brought the true lack of character in many women right out in the open. Getting back to the point, I no longer seek any "relationships", solely due to the fact that they are worthless in a society that flatly rejects the idea that women are obligated to cater to any male need or desire.
I am also totally undeterred by the fact that some women are starting to get offended or upset by the attacks we're mounting against them. The question is, are you men afraid to fight back against women? They did it to us while we watched. They started it, so we must keep it going. Never again must we allow ourselves to be cowered into silence for fear of being seen as unmanly while some deceitful, man-hating women open their filthy mouths to slander every man alive. The days when we just took the abuse in silence are over. The genie is out of the bottle -- and he's mighty pissed off.
If there were, the Tiger Woods drama would certainly look a lot different. Men's rights activists would have seen this scandal immediately for what it is. Yet, we see another anti-male witch hunt lead by self-serving opportunists to present men as villains and women as victims and to amuse themselves destroying a man's life just because they can. Men's rights spokesmen would have engaged the mob and presented an alternative analysis that most men come up with on their own using common sense, only this time backed up by an institutional power in the form of a men's rights establishment.
Let me show you how this process works by giving you an example of how the feminist establishment responds when a woman finds herself in the court of public opinion for some wrongdoing. I will use the example of when a woman murders her husband for no justifiable reason. The feminist propaganda machine goes into overdrive. The dead man, unable to defend himself because he is dead, is portrayed as a two-timing abuser who put the murderess in fear of her life. She's given sympathetic treatment as a long-suffering wife who snapped after years of abuse. Her murderous conduct is deemed to be the totally uncharacteristic action of a desperate woman who had nowhere to turn. We are then asked to view a psychopathic killer as a victim, simply because she is a woman.
However, Tiger Woods, who didn't hurt anyone, and was himself a victim of violence, finds himself the victim of a massive media feeding frenzy where skank after dirty skank slithers out of the pondscum she normally lives in to claim her 15 minutes and pound of flesh. Every man hating lesbian and heterosexual woman alike jump on their moral high horse to sermonize to us about male cheating. Yet no one stands up and points out to them that women cheat just as often as men, and for the exact same reason as men -- to satisfy lust. Prefixing the word male before the word cheating is just another example of how women connect a given wrongdoing with being male and eventually force us to consider accepting that wrongdoing as an exclusively male trait. I digress. However, I'm outraged by this. If you're a man, you should be too.
However, like Tiger Woods, I am powerless to bring the full force of a men's rights establishment crashing down on those who treat men and men's lives as a sponge to soak up all of society's sins -- because there is no such thing. The reason for that is very simple. We, as men, and by men I mean normal, able-bodied, heterosexual men of at least average intelligence, have not come together to address the problems we face as men: i.e. the things that happen to us because we are men and the way we are treated because we are men. We haven't developed an ideology or philosophy that comes directly out of our experience, which would challenge the feminist assault on maleness and equip young men and boys with the language to deal with their critics. There are no men's studies departments in schools or universities. So boys are sent out into a male-hostile world, unarmed, and totally unprepared for the onslaught of hatred and exploitation they will face as they try to make their way. This results in males being raised only to respect women and to mistrust other men, rather than to compete at the highest levels in the scramble to acquire wealth and resources necessary to keep a people viable and strong.
Can someone with a brain please tell me how respecting women will make men better off? Will it put a roof over our heads? Will it put food on our tables? Will it educated us? Will it give us jobs? Will it pay our bills? Will it protect us from violence? No, it won't do a damn thing for us. It will simply just turn us into drooling, female-idolizing sex-beggars.
Men in general haven't challenged their traditional male role. That which is nothing more than a littany of burdens, responsibilities and obligations owed to others and sacrifices we are expected to make for others -- especially women. We are still bound by the same standards that society imposed on men over half a century ago. Meanwhile, women have been totally released from those that were imposed on them. This has made the relationship between the sexes a one-way transaction where men are expected to service women's needs with no reciprocal of obligation on women, prescribed by law or by custom, to service any male need.
We never hear the male side of any story. Why? Because articulate male voices of descent against feminist-driven mainstream orthodoxies are completely censored out of the media. Clearly, their fear is that if enough men came to understand just how unfair the deal that society gives them is, they would rightly rise up and rebel against it. We've seen it many times before. Any man who uses his position of authority to call for a saner or more balanced dialogue in gender issues is shouted down by viscious feminist attack dogs. On the rare platform available to us to air our side, we are stalked and harrassed by lunatics, as I have personally experienced.
So the only story ever told is how badly men treat women. A story approved and co-signed by a flock of manginas, sex-beggars, and queen worshipers -- all cowardly and desperate men who allow their character and manhood to be defined by women's values -- no matter what those values are. We have no means to communicate our ideas to boys and young men before these unethical influences have had a chance to work on their minds. And this is how we end up exactly where we are now -- with few men being able to purge themselves of the brainwashing that indoctrinates us that men are bad. There is no group of men delivering an uncompromisingly pro-male message, that which does not sacrifice any individual man or group of men, to appease those who harbor an anti-male agenda. This means, for the masses of men, that we are subject to limitless defamation; being used and abused by everybody on the moral ladder, from the highest office in the land right down to the trashiest prostitute. There are no consequences for slandering men, no outrage, no reprisal. Few men are courageous enough to face our critics and tell them about themselves without compromising or selling out. Thus, we are an easy target for every degenarate with an anti-man axe to grind. If you want to make some cheap political capital, then all you need to do is portray yourself as taking a zero tolerance stance on some social problem -- preferably one associated men, such as: crime or fatherlessness. If you want to present yourself as an outspoken critic of all that is wrong in society, then all you need to do is bleat endlessly on about how men are causing them. If you're a woman looking to deflect responsibility away from your own screw-ups, blame it on a man.
This is why this gender war started by women must be fought. We need to fight it from our own platforms. Too many have agendas that have nothing whatsoever to do with male rights or liberation. What we've had up until recently is domination by one side and total capitulation by the other in all matters to do with gender. Men have uncritically accepted the feminist analysis of gender relations, which is why we find ourselves ever more marginalized -- except when they're looking for someone to levy tax increases on or can not afford to go fight some war to protect the interest of a wealthy elite. We need to expand this gender war and fight feminism on every frontier. Don't let any illiterate buffon tell you that the gender war is a fiction just because it isn't being fought in the streets...yet. That is not where the gender war is fought at it's most fierce. It's fought behind closed doors, in the institutions of society. In the halls of government, in schools and on university campuses, in the family course, the workplace, the homeplace and in the media. It's fought by people who have almost 100 years head start on any men's rights opposition.
I, along with other men's rights groups I am a part of, have no interest in improving relations between the sexes. I have no interest in sorting through the masses of self-serving, hypocritical women, simply to find one "good" woman or a "good little wife" that I can lead. There is no such thing as a "good woman" and there never was. The only difference between today's generation of women and women of prior generations is in behavior, not character. In the past, female behavior was strictly regulated -- and that was what kept them in check. Today, no one holds women accountable for anything, which has brought the true lack of character in many women right out in the open. Getting back to the point, I no longer seek any "relationships", solely due to the fact that they are worthless in a society that flatly rejects the idea that women are obligated to cater to any male need or desire.
I am also totally undeterred by the fact that some women are starting to get offended or upset by the attacks we're mounting against them. The question is, are you men afraid to fight back against women? They did it to us while we watched. They started it, so we must keep it going. Never again must we allow ourselves to be cowered into silence for fear of being seen as unmanly while some deceitful, man-hating women open their filthy mouths to slander every man alive. The days when we just took the abuse in silence are over. The genie is out of the bottle -- and he's mighty pissed off.
Most Helpful Opinions