The whole gorilla situation that went down recently got me thinking about this.
The Liberals actually sided with a gorilla over a poor black kid, It was shocking!
Not only that, These ultra progressive social justice warriors were bashing the hell out of the little boy and his black parents, I couldn't believe my eyes.
Their liberal rags even went so far as to say it all happened because black people were criminals and shit.And they gleefully made fun of the#BlackLivesMatter hashtag by changing it to #GorillaLivesMatter
And not so surprisingly, The black lives matter group called the shooting racist
In all fairness, This gorilla is from Africa and was half black(sorry, that ass is white).
If this had been a full honkey gorilla with evil white privilege, Then the zookeeper who popped him woulda been hailed as a hero.All this goes to prove that black lives matter is crazy as f**k, But so are the liberals.
Also, the liberals are flighty as hell. And their allegiance can change in the blink of an eye and all their love and support will go to the newest trendy 'victim' on the block.
They don't hold human life in very high regard either.
Here're some actual tweets and status updates from those psycho bitches...................
And if Harambe keeps trending, The Kardashian sisters and the Jenners will start dating gorillas....
So the liberal hierarchy of who matters most goes like this
Dogs
Cute bunnies
Rainbows
Gorillas
Puff the magic dragon
unicorns
Colored people
white women
dirt
fungus
Flesh -eating bacteria
..........And finally white men.
Don't trust em'
The Lefties Love You When It's Trendy And Convenient To Do So
God, I don't see the need for death having a part in the desired resolution at all.
Why can't people just say 'They should not have shot the gorilla', and stop at that? If they think they can do better, they should put forth funds and a team of scientists to create faster-acting sedatives for more situations like these.
There aren't really 'Lefties' or 'Righties' - they're vague terms that define extremes, anyways. There are just idiots who think they know better than everyone else, and would rather spread hate than spread a solution.
People are just using this as an excuse to jump on bandwagons and spread hate, I swear. Nobody really cares about the damned gorilla. As you can see, everyone just wants violence and hatred and death upon the family.
In my opinion, the value of the child's life and the gorilla's life are/were equal, because children and gorillas are more or less equally sentient, emotional, and intelligent. It was an outrageous situation, so it had an outrageous conclusion... So what? Things die all the time. The strong and lucky outlast the weak and unlucky. It's how the animal kingdom is.
"The Liberals actually sided with a gorilla over a poor black kid, It was shocking!" I'm fairly liberal and I believe that the Zoo was totally justified in shooting the Gorilla. Before you make blatant accusations you really should think
the simple fact is it's a tragic situation that was going to end badly one way or another. blame the parents for not tending to their child. blame the zoo for not shutting down an exhibit entirely while the fencing was still under construction... but in the end a gorilla had to die in order to avoid a much bigger problem
I'm not going to get into the political rhetoric. I'm a conscientious objector to the whole thing, both sides of the aisle. Here's my tax money, now shut the fuck up and leave me alone.
But the one issue I have with this and issues like it is that for some reason, animal life is less valued than human (just another species of animal btw) life. I disagree with that whole religious-based idea that this is the humans' world and all the other species are just living in it. I don't like human arrogance and this idea that we're different just because we have opposable thumbs and more highly-developed (for OUR purposes) brains. So the idea that we have zoos in the first place is kind of fucked up. I think we'd flip shit if gorillas held captive humans for other gorillas to look at.
Humans have this tendency to look at things with an extreme double standard. Some people go out in the woods and hunt down animals, many of which are supposed to be higher on the food chain if we weren't cheating with weapons. But if a cougar or a bear wanders into their yard, they'll kill it, saying it came to their territory and posed a threat, without even a hint of irony. If you want to just be dead honest and say you think you should look out for your own species over others, that's fine I guess, but in a situation like this recent one, you have to forget everything you think you know and acknowledge that this whole situation is avoided if this gorilla is in a jungle in Zaire like it's meant to be.
Then there's the situation of parenting. I think people look at things too much like "what if I was in this situation?" That's literally the worst way to look at it because you lose objectivity and let emotion get in the way of logic and facts. You want to say "oh, well, it could have happened to anyone", but guess what? That's true, but that doesn't change that it's negligent, so you can't just forgive it because you'd want to be forgiven. You have to be a fucking DUMBASS to let your kid get away long enough to hop a fence and fall 15 feet into a pit. Even if the gorilla wasn't there, you get a F- for parenting skills. CAN it happen? Yes. SHOULD it happen? Never. If you want to be a parent, you sign your life away to be responsible for that child, rain, snow, sleet, hail, or gorilla, no excuses, just get it done. And if you fuck up, that's all on you, and we all get to point and condemn you. Parenting is a 24/7 job, don't sign up if you want part time hours.
This whole situation has me baffled - It was not the parents fault, it was not the gorilla's fault, it was THE ZOO's fault for having shoddy safety measures which meant a 4 year old child could gain access to the gorilla enclosure. At first hearing, I went the reaction by keepers was over the top but in the analysis that came out that it would take 5 to 10 minutes for tranquiliser to take effect and the act of shooting the dart might get an angry reaction from the gorilla - In the footage of boy being dragged around, it is not impossible to imagine the boys head being hit against a wall or a fatal blow being accidentally administered by an animal with much superior strength. I am an animal lover but I agree correct decision was taken. As to your take I agree totally yes sometimes liberals and SJWs can take logic of the reservation. I agree with a lot of their views but sometimes I have to go "WTF" - I am no Donald Trump fan but I was watching CNN I think on Friday and while reporting on the remarks about the judge, they talked about another Donald Trump storm and it turns out he said "Look at my African American over there", (Honestly is this worthy of a news story) - If everyones' remarks were studied minutely, we would all be in a lot of trouble.
2
0 Reply
Anonymous
(25-29)
+1 y
Honestly, that whole situation is the parents fault... As much as people don't like to admit it, zoo's are a very dangerous place. No child should be left unattended. As for the silverback, people won't like to admit It, but it was "protecting" the child. Or at least what it considered protection. Other cases where children have been in a gorilla exhibit have usually turned out positive with the child not being harmed by the gorilla. The factor of the silverback was its aggressive protection and handling of the child probably made many assume the animal was endangering the child, but if you think about it that gorilla could have killed that child in seconds, but it didn't. I'm a libertarian and I feel that the situation was completely poorly handled. The zoo managers are at fault for a child being able to enter the animals exhibit, the parents are at fault for not noticing their child was gone, and the animal caretakers are at fault for poor reaction times and going to drastic measures. The reality is people just either need to watch their kids while at the zoo or keep the child at home watching national geographic.
I agree that this was a very interesting and admittedly hilarious fiasco because it really presented a dilemma for the Left. The fact that the child was Black conflicted with their conservationist tendencies to side with the gorilla. Simply put, if they side with the Black child, then they are not true conservationists and they concede that the use of firearms was a good thing. But on the other hand, if they side with the gorilla, then it means that they are racist and value the life of a dumb animal more than a Black child. What the Left SHOULD have done is keep their mouths silent, but ironically it was the #BlackLivesMatter crowd that opened their mouths too early (figures, because Black people do talk loud lol) and assumed that the child was White, drawing comparisons between the gorilla and the plight of African slaves. Essentially they dug their own grave for when the child ended up being Black.
I don't think a lot of the people bashing the mother knew what her race was. All they knew is that a human got an animal killed and that was enough to make them want to hold the mother accountable. The progressives almost always side with animals over humans. Part of the progressive mindset is that everything human's do is wrong or evil in some way, and that they are special little snowflakes that will come along and finally change the course of human history to the path it needs to be on.
The most vocal liberals are a bunch of spoiled young people trying to rebel against their mommies and daddies. Most of them will eventually convert to conservatives when they finish growing up, and start to make something they don't want taken away and redistributed in the name of equality. Then they will see their own children making ass's out of themselves thinking they know a better way to run society.
Lol, I hope you didn't just figure out your mytake title now lol, Jk. That's very true and obvious. They love when it benefits them and hate when someone disagrees with them. They are the most arrogant, bigoted, elitist, prejudice, hypocritical people that has ever been known to mankind and what's more, they actually act like it's normal and ok to be that way. There are exceptions of course.
Hey don't be mean to be because I'm left handed :P Anyways what happened was a shame. From what I heard, the mother wasn't watching her child and the child said he wanted to be with the gorila prior to falling in. If that's true, dead gorilla or not that mother needs to be held responsible. If you can't prevent your child fron falling into a gorilla enclosure, you shouldn't be having children. Seriously put them on a leash because I know they can dash in a heart beat and be gone
You realize there are many types of liberals, many different levels of liberalism and many different people that call themselves liberal right? From the insane to the intelligent. Just like there are many forms and types and degrees of Republicans. Or should all Republicans be judged as crazy as the craziest most insane republican to be found?
The fact is MOST liberals are not as insane as you try to make them all out to be. I know this and I'm republican. Quit stirring the pot just for an argument. Hopefully you are smarter then you present yourself.
I know liberal is supposed to mean being for equal rights and opportunities for everyone under the law. And fighting to give the poor dignity and help. And I know the word liberal has been hijacked and being used to justify some very messed up agendas.
I'm just saying this shit is out there right in the open for everybody to see, Yet people ask for proof and stats when you bring it up. The willfully blind are mind-boggling .
Let's just agree that there are plenty of idiots and misguided fucktards out there on both sides and under all banners. Isolating one particular group of fucktards is a waist of energy.
i don't think they should have shot the gorilla. i'm sure the gorilla had parental instinct, but i do agree that the left likes playing the victim card too much, and for the most part they are dicks. i mean come on? calling black people criminals? every race commits crime, so shut the f*ck up.
In all honesty it was the audience who was at fault. In the video, every time the gorilla looked at the fanatically screaming crowd he would try and drag the boy some place else. If the audience had been quiet the zookeepers could have grabbed the boy using the door that the gorilla was originally keeping the boy near. Not like screeching like a fucking moron would have saved the kid anyways.
Doesn't really matter. Gorilla specialists made the right call and the parents are getting charged with child endangerment. All things considered the situation was handled appropriately.
Another example of how quickly liberals will backstab you is Gavin Newsom, who is running for Governor of California, who basically gave a giant middle finger to the LGBT community in favor of gun control measures.
Life got so easy for a lot of people that all they have to do is sit around going soft, developing crazy ass ideas about things, and getting further away from reality.
I'll start caring about gorillas being shot every once a decade in zoos once we live in a worldwide utopia. Until then, this gorilla affair is just petty nonsense.
Most Helpful Opinions