New Study Shows Women Are Better Off Than Men And Men Face More Discrimination Than Women

[MementoMori_]

With all the loudmouth propaganda pumped through the liberal press day in and day out pushing the left's political narrative about how women are the victims of discrimination at the hands of a male dominated society, who would have known that the truth is is just the opposite?

But a new global study finds out that in reality it is MEN who face more discrimination than women.

To those who make their political living pushing false anti-male propaganda, read the truth and weep. You've been exposed!

New Global Study Shows Men Face More Discrimination Than Women

[Anonymous]

It’s impossible to measure who has it worse, men or women, basically anybody who thinks either men or women are oppressed is an idiot, both men and women face different challenges and privileges based on sex and it has to do with individual circumstances who has it worse, which is one of many reasons it’s impossible to measure, so ya both feminists and men’s rights activists are morons, once we as a collective society figure that out we can actually start fighting to make each of those challenges and privileges each sex faces blurred together until you can’t even notice the difference

[hammeronfire]

MHO right here i will be personally insulted if this guy doesn't get it

[ladsin]

It's been known for a while that this is the case in many European nations. It's just kept quiet because it's not socially acceptable.

[MementoMori_]

The Europeans are "politing" themselves into destruction. They are too "gentil" (French pronunciation) to call out the forces that are destroying their culture and way of life and it is eating them alive. Now the ignorant American left wants to force America to follow them down the same path to destruction.

[ladsin]

I don't really disagree.

[MementoMori_]

Like your moonshiners pic. ;)

[ladsin]

"Well a moonshiner's life is a damn good life 'Cause he ain't got no big city blues"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRlojcKZUsM
RIP Popcorn

[MementoMori_]

Been watching the show for years. Love it!

[ladsin]

Show? Popcorn Sutton has been dead for a while. Is the music video from a show?

[MementoMori_]

Yes, I know about Popcorn. There is a series on the Discovery Channel called "Moonshiners." It's a fake reality show, but I really enjoy it. They occasionally mix in some real history with the fake moonshiners on the show (which has included some footage of Popcorn). It's a lot of fun to watch.

[MementoMori_]

I think I have also seen some of those photos on the show. I don't think the music is the official theme song from the show. But it sounds familiar.

[ladsin]

Interesting... I may have to check it out.

[Anonymous]

Women are the dominant sex and that’s how nature intended it to be. Men however have systematically and successfully convinced women that they are the weaker sex. Women are winning back their power and men are mad. The end.

[MementoMori_]

They may be the dominant sex, but what you are saying is that they are also the stupider sex.

[Vegeta01]

Comparing Men to woMEN is like comparing God to humans. Women are nothing compared to us.

[Poormanscomedian]

Only because women know how to manipulate men. Women are not stronger,, but more tricky.

[englisc]

How do women dominate men/society?

[taleswapper]

which just goes to show you can create a "study" that will produce whatever numbers you want. It's all in how the study is designed.
This isn't a denigration on the Opinion, by the way; but on how we're teaching people to analyze data. There IS no metric for discrimination; so anyone who claims to have one is immediately suspect.

[thegirlfromthething]

How do more occupational deaths prove that men are discriminated against more than women?

[MementoMori_]

If women can claim that they are "forced into" jobs where they don't make enough money, men can claim they are forced into jobs that are more dangerous.

[thegirlfromthething]

Both can claim that, but it doesn’t make it true. How are men forced into dangerous jobs?

[MementoMori_]

Because not enough women can do them or want to do them.

[thegirlfromthething]

This sounds like more of a class issue, because it’s usually poor, uneducated men who have dangerous jobs.

[MementoMori_]

Maybe so, but nonetheless it's mostly men, not women. I think you are very smart, and you ask the right questions. I'm impressed by your thinking and although it may not seem so, I can tell by your comments that we probably agree on a lot of things.

[MeatPuppet]

Imagine actually believing private corporations have a left-wing ideological bias.

[Poormanscomedian]

They are liberal as you can get. Banks too. Used to be conservatives ran banks. There were no derivitves either. Now it is all Liberal debt based system , which they are going to pay for in the near future.

[MeatPuppet]

@Poormanscomedian Liberalism is right-wing.

[Benedek38]

"Imagine actually believing private corporations have a left-wing ideological bias."
China is a state capitalism, it's extremely authoritarian, lead by a left wing communist party... And there are still corporations. Of course, owner by puppets. Is it fair to saythat if chinese companies can have left wing bias - so can other ones?

[MementoMori_]

China is going capitalist and growing stronger, while America is going socialist and growing weaker. Of course President Trump is trying to reverse that trend against vicious opposition from both sides of that equation.

[Benedek38]

"China is going capitalist and growing stronger"
STATE capitalist. It's not free market capitalism, because the system is rigged by government influence. Did you know that by law the state owns 51% of every company's shares? Yeah, good luck being capitalist like that.

China is NOT capitalism, they just use a market economy in conjunction with authoritarian social politicies just like every socialist/communist party did back in the day.

"while America is going socialist and growing weaker."
The reason socialism would never work in America, or Europe is because Western society is BUILT on the basic idea of individualism. This makes socialism unacceptable. Asia is NOT an individualistic place. That is why China utilized state capitalism so well - the gears in the machine never speak, because they have no brain of their own,

[MementoMori_]

I don't dispute that. But there is no such thing as pure capitalism. American capitalism is one of the purest forms, but practically every industry is heavily regulated by the government, which amounts to the same thing as government ownership. In some ways China is more capitalist than America.

[Benedek38]

There IS such a thing as pure capitalism, it's just total anarchy, and ends badly. But I understand your point. Still, I think we all agree that however capitalist China is on paper, in the end the system is still rigged - you can't make it big without making the right kind of friends.

[MementoMori_]

Yes, of course I agree that China is not a good model for either government or economy. Still I cringe at the thought that sometimes their government seems to have a better understanding of the benefits of capitalism than ours. That's why they have been so successful building their economy over these last decades. While they have been moving in the direction of capitalism (at least in a relative sense compared to where they started) we have been going the other way with ever growing regulations and taxes that are handicapping our growth at the same time they have been liberating theirs.

[Benedek38]

That's true. Not just of the US, but the West in general. It's extremely frustrating as an engineer, seeing how everything is outsourced to China. It's less prevalent in the US, but in my country (Hungary), local businesses, both small and large, are being wrecked by cheap Chinese import.

And without wanting to sound condescending, running a successful economy is not rocket science. You just nees a bit of government intervention here and there, a lot of patience, and in this casey the protection of local businesses. But for some reason, the same thing that turned Germany into a superpower under a decade, the same thing that pulled China out of the dirt, the same thing that pulled the US out of the 1929 financial crisis - it just doesn't work apparently.

[MementoMori_]

Being partly of Hungarian ancestry, I am pleased to hear someone from your country with those beliefs. I also believe that a minimally regulated capitalist economy is the best system of economics known to man. It is the engine that creates more prosperity for more people than any other economic system. History is full of examples of the failure of socialism including some catastrophic failures that are taking place in various countries right at this moment. Yet in spite of the obvious bankruptcy of such a system, there are still so many of those who advocate for going down that path to ruin full speed ahead.

[Benedek38]

Yeah... Too bad Hungary has an "unorthodox" economic directive now. Sounds fun, doesn't it? It effectively means exploitinf EU funds and building stadiums, and slowly becoming Russia 2.0.

Hungary is in very big trouble right now. Anyway, I just hope Trump, despite all his quirks and debatable decisions, can sort-of cut as many ties with China as possible. We need working, self-sufficient industries in the West, because if Chinese mentality to culture takes over, we can bid adieu to our western values.

[MementoMori_]

I am a strong Trump supporter. However, I do not necessarily agree with your view about cheap Chinese goods. The idea of foreign governments subsidizing their industries so that they can sell goods at below market values in my country is not inimical to my belief in free market capitalism. In fact it is consistent with it. If some other country wants to take a loss and it results in an opportunity for my country to gain from their loss, that is not a bad thing for me or my country by itself. If Chinese people want to sell me something for less that it can be manufactured in my own country how is that bad for me?

I understand this is an extremely complex topic. For example, there are national security implications if buying goods that are critical to our own national security from China means that we lost our ability to produce them here.

But on the simplest level, I fail to see how getting something from China for $1 that we cannot produce here for less than $2 is a negative for us.

So I am not so sure I agree with that part of your assessment even though I do agree with much of the rest of it.

President Trump's views of our relationship with China are also complex. Not as simple as the seem. There is both and economic and a national security aspect to his views (as there should be). I believe his policies regarding China are brilliant and will for the first time give the entire world at least a fighting chance of putting China in check. Their economy has already taken a nosedive since he started the tariff war. They have been hurt much more than America. He knew it would be this way from the beginning. Now he has them softened up and they have already made some significant concessions.

[Benedek38]

"But on the simplest level, I fail to see how getting something from China for $1 that we cannot produce here for less than $2 is a negative for us."
It's very simple. China has an immense headstart due to low productiom costs and state organised industrial espionage. This is gradually leading to them dominating the market in every regard. And when that happens - when China will have a monopoly in literally every product to some extent -, then China will show it's true colors. I don't know what they want, but I know that a major superpower with a penchant for extreme authoritarianism is not exactly who I want to have monopoly over most of the market.

You say it is capitalism, but a one sides competition leads to monopolism, which leads back to authoritarianism.

[MementoMori_]

Right, but I don't just believe in capitalism. I believe in *free market* capitalism. That means the consumer should make the decisions about what they want to buy, not the government. If the government regulates what consumers can buy, that's not free market capitalism.

[Benedek38]

See, that's the source of our divide. I knew this was inevitable. Anyway. You can believe what you want, but just know that the average customer is NOT an economics

[Benedek38]

*economist

[MementoMori_]

Doesn't matter if the average consumer is an economist or not. It's supremely arrogant to assume that just because someone is an economist they have better judgement about what is good for any given consumer than that consumer has himself. Who is in a better position to know what is the right choice for a consumer than the consumer themself? Once you take away a consumers right to make their own decisions about what is best for them you take away the most basic building block of freedom.

[Benedek38]

"It's supremely arrogant to assume that just because someone is an economist they have better judgement about what is good for any given consumer than that consumer has himself."

It really isn't. Not anymore than assuming that if you place a chess grand master against a regular joe in a chess game, the grand master will beat the average joe 10/10 times.
The consumer might know its immediate interests, but the fact that there are entire schools of economics, regarding marketing, psychology, mathematics, statistics, etc, with the sole purpose of tricking customers makes me think you are putting WAY too much faith in the customer being able and willing to vote with their wallets. Let me put it like this - do you support legalising hard drugs? Because if people could vote with their wallets, they's spend it on cheat dollar store cocaine.

I seriously thought that I was talking with an educated person, but apparently when I mentioned the 1929 crisis, Hitler rebuilding Germany, and China, it completely went over your head that I was talking about the ever so loathed Keynesian economic model.

"Who is in a better position to know what is the right choice for a consumer than the consumer themself?"
The people who built the candy store of bad ideas and traps with the express purpose of tricking the customer. Just look at a supermarket - sugar sweetened drinks are causing the obesity epidemic in the US. Did the customers vote correctly with their wallets? Do you think they WANTED to die 40 years old from a heart attack?
The customer is DUMB. People are DUMB. That's the first thing you should keep in mind when it comes to economy.

"Once you take away a consumers right to make their own decisions"
No. Big companies with monopolies take away their rights. Personally, I would only INCENTIVISE buying certain products by placing higher taxes on others. You can call it unethical, but China is a danger to your precious capitalism.

[Aphrodite8789]

A bunch of lies. Smh, you MGTOW men will say anything to feel oppressed.

[MementoMori_]

What part is not true and what is your factual evidence to show it is not true?

[Aphrodite8789]

You have no factual evidence to show that anything you said is true. Males have never been told they couldn’t do something because they were a woman. Guys have not been hindered from going outside because they are a woman. So stop with the crap.

[MementoMori_]

No factual evidence? DUHHHHH! I posted an entire academic study. Where's YOUR study to back up what YOU are saying?

[Poormanscomedian]

What have you been told you could not do because you didn't have a penis?

[Aphrodite8789]

@Poormanscomedian you mean what haven’t I been told?

[Poormanscomedian]

Yea sure, sorry

[MementoMori_]

@Poormanscomedian You asked a simple, relevant and important question. She has no answer. She has no answer for ANYTHING, just anger and rage with no logical basis on which she bases it. Not worth wasting time talking to her since like most people on the left she cannot be persuaded by facts, reality or reason. Another way to describe that is hopeless.

[Poormanscomedian]

Ok that and she is 19 and knows nothing.

[MementoMori_]

That's a point. She's young. Maybe she will grow up and see that women have more opportunities in the United States of America today than they have and in any nation anywhere else on the planet in the entire history of mankind. Did I say MANkind? I meant PERSONkind!

PS: They can thank men for that.

[Aphrodite8789]

No both of you don’t know anything I had an answer y’all are probably the same guys that would tell me I can’t do certain things because I don’t have a dick @Poormanscomedian it’s shit like fucking whoever I want to while being safe males talk down about that stuff but do the same shit, with strength males tell me I can’t do that oh why? Cause I don’t have a dick. I think you are one of those same guys who would say the same shit so you don’t know wtf ya talking about.

[MementoMori_]

Seek therapy. You have mental issues.

[Aphrodite8789]

No you are just a vagina hater. Get off our tits.

[Grond21]

Given the metrics they listed, I am not surprised at all.

[MementoMori_]

What metrics could be more important or relevant than forced military service, harsher prison sentences or death on the job?

[Grond21]

Good question. I'm not sure that there are better ones. I just think the ones they chose make it extremely obvious. They also could have shown that women do better in school no, the system is geared towards women's way of learning, that more women enter and graduate college, and that in some cities women earn more than men.

[Anonymous]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhWZVtiGHQg

[Benedek38]

Nate Diaz everyone.

[MikeTheGreek79]

I agree women tend to get majority of the money tend to get the children and child support.

[11110000bbbb]

I agree, lots of women are too blind to see it.

[Stripes99]

Interesting but highly disturbing

[MementoMori_]

Interesting (and quite amusing) that women are engaged in a "resistance" movement in the United States against their own societal advantages.

[grega239]

how is that a surprise to any1?

[Vegeta01]

Just don't bother with it and go Mgtow man.

[Secretgardenblood]

Good take. .