In my opinion, the "royal way" is to share all the work more or less equally. This is particularly true if a couple has children. Both partners should be able to go out and have a job (and earn their own money) but they should also contribute at home. I also believe that it is beneficial for the children if they get taken care of by both parents. This is how it was for me as a child and it definitely helped me to form a close, loving relationship with both my mom and my dad.
Unfortunately, this ideal scenario is not always possible of course. It's difficult for both partners to find a 50%-job. Not all companies have family-friendly policies and even the public sector sometimes lacks these supporting structures.
So, if it's not possible to split it up right down the middle, I think the best idea is to discuss it as a couple and decide how to share things. If the husband doesn't mind staying home 100%, I don't see why not. Not all men are crazy about their job and their career; some even prefer doing house chores and spending time with the kids. Likewise, some women aren't good homemakers but they happen to be great managers or professors or doctors. It seems irrational to me to follow archaic and uncompromising gender rules if a more modern solution actually works better for both partners. I'm all for going down the road that feels best for my wife and myself. I really don't care about traditions and the like. If it feels right, it must be right.
Personally, I wouldn't mind working less than my wife. My only two conditions are that I want to work at least a bit outside the home (say 1-2 days a week) and I want to spend at least some time with our (future) children on an everyday basis (not just weekends). So, I'd say anything between me working in a 20%-job and me working in a 80%-job sounds goods. Once the children are a little older and they can better take care of each other, I would probably begin to work more.
Most Helpful Opinions
Depends on the relationships career or circumstances.
Maybe she makes more money and has children and instead of paying $30k+ a year for childcare she says he can stay home so they can keep what they would have been spending.
I see plenty of guys who run professional stock market careers that stay home because she wants her own career and not just stay home.
Maybe he got hurt and has disability. So many factors and non of which garnish opinions from people who are not in those positions.
If its what they want then so be it. This is not a discussion for being alpha or beta.
I'm a house wife. My husband and I move too much to really get settled in. It's difficult for me to find a good paying job. I'd be working more to pay a babysitter/daycare than actually helping out in anyway. For now it works better for us this way. He makes more than enough. My working would just be more money. Plus its good for our daughter and it will be good for our son thats on the way. With how often he's gone, my having a job would probably cause issues for us. We'd never have time together. The house wouldn't be taken care of like it is now. Our kids would barely be home. For some couples it's ideal. I think if one of y'all are going to stay home it should be whoever is most likely to make less. My husband is more successful. I'm proud of him and I'm happy with our life. One day I'll probably get a job once the kids are older, we're done moving, and he's out of the military. Right now it would be inconvenient.
My partner and I like the idea. I have no issue with a boyfriend wanting to be a househusband but obviously if I can't comfortably support our family on my wages, I'd expect him to also contribute by working. We can only have one person stay home if I can support everything well myself.
Fine as long as it’s practical for our overall situation. If I am earning enough to support both of us, etc. It just depends on what makes sense in the particular situation. I can’t really see it happening in my relationship but maybe if I get really lucky in my career, who knows.
As long as the couple has an understanding of their roles to play at home to run the household, gender has no role in this. As long as bills are paid, house is clean, children and pets are fed, I think it's okay.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
105Opinion
Would give my right arm to be one. I know it is a LOT of work, but when I leave in the morning and say good-bye to my girlfriend and our kids it is the hardest part of my day. (Luckily, she can work from home.)
to stay home and see the kids going through their days and learning new things... I admit it, I am a total mush.
What do I think of "househusbands?" Total abject envy.if it works for the family then more power to them especially if they have children having a parent who can be home is a great benefit
A friend of mine is one.
He would never admit this, but I think he finds it emasculating.
It's not something I could ever do.As long as he’s cooking, cleaning, taking care of the kids then I’m all for it.
They are whipped and too feminine and submissive. They is something so wrong about men staying at home and being the ‘wife’ it weirds me out just thinking about it. It’s a total screw up of dynamics. It’s only acceptable for guy do be doing all those chores exclusively if a is a single dad/lives alone or his misses is in some way unable physically. Theirs nothing wrong with helping out from time to time as a reward of sorts or on special occasions like Valentine’s Day, Christmas or their spouses birthday. Cooking is the exception if the guy is the better cook he should be making the meals.
It depends on why he's being a house man. It seems reasonable now that a woman can work and provide just as well as he could. So if for some reason there needs to be someone at home, I don't see why it has to be one or the other based on their genitals.
Now if we went back in time when there was such thing as a gender wage gap and women were overlooked for the majority of the jobs out there... it makes more sense to put him to work since it will be more fruitful.
But things are not like that anymore.True, people need to realise we're not following gender rules, but deep rooted psychological instincts. Men/Women with a masculine essence is goal and career-oriented. People with a feminine essence is caretaking and family-bonding. And each is attracted to the opposite.
Basically women that truly want to pursue a career has a masculine essence and would need to find a man with a feminine essence that would want to stay home. Going against your nature is only going to damage your relationship and make you miserable over time. If you're interested in this topic you can read books from David Deida instead of listening and quoting what unqualified people you might've heard in media.This is sexist here and double standard is in full effect. Unless the guy is in school or something, he's the fucking provider. Our house and some rental property are paid for. We have no bills, This allowed my wife to take off 3 years and go school and finish her degree. It allowed me to just work part time for a year after we moved once. It allowed me to take a year off for nursing school. The person who was off did most of the cleaning and grocery shopping. It still felt weird though having my wife being the breadwinner. I know I did it for her but it felt weird when it was my turn.
It all depends on the situation if the man can find a job or not and if he has to be on disability because some reason or if the woman has a really high-paying job and they have young children at home there is many different situations where it will be acceptable but if the man just does not want to walk at all then I would say no but like I was saying under certain circumstances I think it would be okay I myself could never do it it was just the way I was raised but I would never look down on anyone for doing otherwise
I know a couple of guys who are, mostly due to their insufficient command of the local language. One is married to a colleague of mine, who told me she actually likes it because he takes care of a lot of things she otherwise would have to.
In a nutshell, I wouldn't want to do it, but I don't see anything wrong with families where the wife works and the husband is a househusband.A functional relationship should share the work load. If you both have a dayjob, you split the chores. If only one of you works, the other does all the chores. Who does what doesn't really matter to me. I've been the primary earner. I've been a (roughly) equal earner. I've been a 'househusband' (I lost my job due to medical issues, and she had a very well paying governemnt job).
TBH all of them worked fine, but the 50/50 splitt was the biggest pain in the neck.Whatever flows your boat. Im not as paternalistic as to say that this is not fine/ideal if the patnership/people in the relationship feels completly fine with it. Most humans above a certain age knows themselves best. That doesn't mean they shouldn't be challenged and explore however.
It's definitely not a one-size-fits-all situation, but definitely, I would prefer to stay at home and cook, buy groceries, clean and do laundry and take care of the kids while he works full-time... I think it's a good balance balance for our dynamics.
I think the secret to be a housepartner, regardless of gender is that you have something really cool going on the side. Something that's not nearly as time consuming as a 9-5 job obviously, but substantial enough that no full time employed people would have time to do properly. It can be a hobby or a side-income. Fixing old cars, playing in a band, community involvement...
Without something like that, it never works.very little different from how I think of housewives. And not as positively as people who work for a living. Everyone, man and woman, as far back in my family as I know, has worked hard for a living. And way back in the 1800s women slaved away way harder in hard conditions at home so it could be argued that women worked just as hard as men back then despite the inequality.
Today, I just don't like the idea of people who stay at home. Okay, if your kids aren't old enough for preschool yet that's fine, or if there's a disability. But otherwise I view it negativelyNot the father you want. Unambitious and not a good role model for future guys. Men historically have always been the provider. We're physically stronger and we're better at managing stress. Women are far superior mothers. Roles nowadays are a complete mess and we can see the result on society. Everyone is unhappy and devorce is through the roof.
They are just doing what they feel is better for them. Let their wife work and them hold down the fort. This shouldn't be an issue and women choosing to do this shouldn't either.
I currently am one.
I like it and if I knew that my wife made a lot of money and we had a good amount of money in the bank, I would easily do this forever.It should be equal... That's just my opinion, to me if your at the house... Yes, making the house a home is a bit of work... but it's not contributing to the overall success, especially if the one at home has brought in financial and other baggage into the house... Then it's worthless... In everyway, both parties must contribute... But it also depends on the dynamic of the relationship.
I would be happy if my husband wanted to stay at home and raise the kids as long as he had a small part time on the side ex) wood work, metal work, something to make extra cash
Learn more
Most Helpful Opinions